Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Katie Steinle and the Morality of Sanctuary Cities
Katie Steinle and the Morality of Sanctuary Cities
Apr 3, 2025 10:20 PM

The moral obligation of society regarding illegal immigrants remains at the center of the political debate on immigration. Numerous questions surround the proper “status” for illegal immigrants, how the state should respond, and the responsibility of American citizens over various humanitarian concerns. Article I, Section 8 of the bined with numerous Supreme Court rulings, has established that the federal government has “plenary power” over immigration and is solely entitled to make laws in accordance with this authority. These laws establish the framework for ordered and legal immigration which most would agree is highly beneficial to society as well as being a foundational part of American history. However, when cities and municipalities disregard the rule of law on immigration, humanitarian issues e clouded and morality is challenged.

According to the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), there are over 200 “sanctuary cities” in the United States. These are cities or municipalities that have laws or policies that pliance with federal immigration authorities. Local authorities are required by federal law to inform Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) when they apprehend someone and find that they are an illegal immigrant. Places that have given themselves a sanctuary designation do not inform ICE or turn over an immigrant upon discovering illegal status.

Recently, the issue of sanctuary cities made headlines after the shooting death of 32-year-old Katie Steinle. She was killed by a Mexican immigrant named Francisco Sanchez, who had previously been deported to Mexico five times mitting various felonies, and was currently under the custody of San Francisco police. ICE apprehended him in March but due to an outstanding drug warrant, he was turned over to San Francisco along with an immigration detainer so ICE could regain custody if San Francisco decided to release him. San Francisco dropped their drug charges against Sanchez and released him without notifying ICE due to their policy as a sanctuary city. As a result, a seven-time felon that had illegally crossed the border at least five times was released into the general public.

Sanctuary city policies caused the release of more than 8,000 criminal offenders sought by ICE over just an eight-month period according to CIS. Nearly 1,900 of those released were subsequently arrested for another crime within the same eight-month period.

Not only has the open defiance of federal pletely unchallenged, it has received tacit endorsement from the government. In response to a question of whether new laws to penalize local officials for breaking federal law were needed, ICE Director Sarah Saldana recently said, “Any effort at federal legislation now to mandate state and local law pliance… will be a highly counterproductive step… in our overall efforts to promote public safety.”

Political expediency in the name of public safety e to be the overriding concern of the current administration in the face of a chaotic immigration scene and rampant dereliction of enforcement. Nevertheless, it is remarkable that in any sphere, the federal government actively discourages the enforcement of its laws.

Not all illegal immigrants are felons and many of them are very productive members of society, but as a country, the United States must decide whether it will be governed by the rule of law or whether each city will decide for itself which federal laws it will enforce. There is a strong presumption of states’ rights in the Constitution to determine what is in the best interests of its citizens, but immigration is one exception as it has repeatedly been ruled that immigration is solely within the purview of Congress. Legally and practically it follows that the federal government has a legitimate interest in knowing who crosses its borders.

There are valid moral arguments on both sides of the immigration issue regarding a pathway to citizenship, work permits, and border security; but there should be no debate, moral or otherwise, that an individual city should be the sole arbiter over which federal laws it enforces when es to immigration or that illegal immigrants that are multiple felons should go free because pliance with a city directive.

The federal government condoning and supporting sanctuary cities sends a bad moral message to the country. Not only is it promoting deliberate defiance of federal law, it sets a moral precedent for those entering the country illegally that breaking the law will not necessarily subject one to any penalty or consequence. This message has trickled down from the highest levels and is seen by the recurrence of multiple deportations for the same people and in the recidivism rates for criminal illegal immigrants.

Immigration is a good thing but it must be panied by the rule of law. Open borders and cities that actively thwart federal immigration law lead to chaos and send the wrong message to current and prospective legal immigrants. Breaking the law should never be incentivized, neither for those crossing the border illegally nor for those business owners who seek to hire illegal workers. Comprehensive reform is needed and the rule of law should be central to any proposed plan. Allowing cities to continue to flout federal law will only lead to more lawlessness and more victims like Katie Steinle. An orderly immigration system within the rule of law contributes to culture and society by diversity and increased opportunity while providing a moral framework to advance virtues and humanitarian interests.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Ladies: Give Us Your Most Productive Years, We’ll Hold Your Eggs For You
This story has so many things wrong with it, I hardly know where to start. Apple and Facebook have both announced that will now offer egg-freezing – for non-medical purposes – for their employees (which runs at least $10,000, plus a $500 to $800 annual storage fee.) For panies, it means two things. One, there is a demand from their employees for such an offer. Second, panies themselves see some benefit to this. What it sounds like is this: “It’s...
Socialists Love Everything About $20 Minimum Wages (Except Paying Such Wages Themselves)
There’s something almost charming about people in American who champion socialism. Yes, their economic views are naive and destructive. And yes most people (though especially the poor) would be much worse off if their vision for “progress” was actually implemented. But it’s hard to be too concerned when they are, at heart, really just capitalists who like to play political dress up. Consider one of their favorite causes, a $20 minimum wage. In their most recent party platform, the Freedom...
Rev. Sirico on the Vatican Synod
In today’s Wall Street Journal, Rev. Robert A. Sirico clears away the media hype surrounding the Vatican Synod on the Family and offers an analysis of its early work. He observes that nothing about the synod “challenges the dogma of the church related to the indissolubility of sacramental marriage, the use of artificial contraception, cohabitation and homosexual acts. What it did was soften the tone of these teachings.” But things got interesting. An early report led critics to say that...
Why Not Just Hand Over the Sermons?
After hearing the news that the city of Houston had ordered several pastors to submit their sermons for legal review, many people had the same reaction as Brian Lee: “My response? So what? Sermons are public proclamation, aren’t they?” Sermons are indeed proclamations intended for the public, and most pastors would be eager for anyone — including public officials — to hear them. So what is the reason for the current objection? Mollie Hemingway explains that the true “governing authorities”...
Reflections on the Passing of Leonard P. Liggio
LiggioAlmost 20 years ago I was invited to speak at the celebratory banquet for the Atlas Economic Research Foundation (now Atlas Network) and the Institute for Humane Studies, then celebrating their 15th and 35th anniversaries respectively. I was an alumnus of both and six years into the launch of the Acton Institute (founded in 1990). Both organizations considered me “successful enough” to reflect at the banquet on how each had influenced my life. It was an undeserved honor, of course,...
Is Money Just a Necessary Evil?
If money didn’t exist, would God have ordained that we invent it? Theologian Wayne Grudem says he would since money is simply a tool for our use that makes voluntary exchanges possible: Money makes voluntary exchanges more fair, less wasteful, and far more extensive. We need money in the world in order for us to be good stewards of the earth and to glorify God through using it wisely. If money were evil in itself, then God would not have...
Freedom, Security, and the iPhone
Writing on September 22 in the Wall Street Journal, Devlin Barret and Danny Yadron reported, Last week, Apple announced that its new operating system for phones would prevent law enforcement from retrieving data stored on a locked phone, such as photos, videos and contacts. A day later, Google reiterated that the next version of its Android mobile-operating system this fall would make it similarly difficult for police or Google to extract such data from suspects’ phones. It’s not just a...
Movies That Define America
Don’t you love lists? Intercollegiate Press does too, and they’ve put together “12 Movies That Defined America.” Feel free to argue, debate, add on, cross off as you wish. Here are just a couple of Intercollegiate Press’ choices: The Birth of a Nation – 1915, silent. The first blockbuster, D. W. Griffith’s Birth of a Nation was both celebrated as a great artistic achievement and denounced as racist for its vicious depiction of African Americans and homage to the KKK....
Why Are So Many Americans Still on Food Stamps?
When the economy takes a downturn and unemployment rises, more people rely on the social safety net and programs like the recently renamed food stamp program called SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program). As the economy improves and employment increases, people need to rely less on government provided support. At least that’s what used to happen. But something has changed. From 1969 until 2003, SNAP has been very responsive to changes in the unemployment rate. But from 2003 to 2007, the...
Why American slavery wasn’t capitalist
In his new book, The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism, Edward E. Baptist “offers a radical new interpretation of American history,” through which slavery laid the foundation for and “drove the evolution and modernization of the United States.” In a review of the book for the Wall Street Journal, Fergus M. Bordewich concurs with this central point, noting that “Mississippi…does not have to look like Manchester, England, or Lowell, Mass., to make it...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved