Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Justice needs a face
Justice needs a face
Jan 9, 2026 8:30 PM

In the wake of George Floyd’s tragic death and the subsequent swell of protests, we are surrounded by resounding cries for justice—both in this particular case and across the issues of over-policing, over-criminalization, and systemic racism.

Set within our polarized political climate, such conversations quickly devolve into narrow ideological debates over particular policy prescriptions. But as valid and valuable as many of those discussions may be, we should also remember that seeking justice ought to be personal, beginning with a proper love of our neighbors and proceeded by right relationships from bottom to top and back again.

In a short film from The Bible Project, we get a broad overview of what that starting point looks like from a Christian perspective, and how a corresponding approach to justice can shift our attitudes, affections, and actions across our relationships and systems.

“Humans are set apart from all other creatures as the image of God—God’s representatives who rule the world by his definition of good and evil,” the narrators explain. “This identity is the bedrock of the Bible’s view of justice; all humans are equal before God and have the right to be treated with dignity and fairness no matter who you are.”

Of course, as we see in the biblical story, humans have long struggled to uphold this view, working instead to protect our own power, privilege, and position while dehumanizing and delegitimizing those who don’t align with our plans for self-preservation. “We see this happening on a personal level,” the narrators explain, “but also in families and then munities and in whole civilizations that create injustice, especially toward the vulnerable.”

Thankfully, God calls his people to something different: a new way of living focused on “right relationship” and “treating others as the image of God with the God-given dignity they deserve.” Culminating in the life and resurrection of Jesus, we have an invitation to participate in a very particular path of restorative justice that stretches beyond lofty thoughts, opinions, and philosophies.

“The earliest followers of Jesus experienced this righteousness from God not just as a new status, but as a power that changed their lives pelled them to act in surprising new ways,” the narrators explain. “If God declared someone righteous when they didn’t deserve it, the only reasonable response is to go and seek righteousness and justice for others. This is a radical way of life. It’s not always convenient or easy.”

Set within plicated mix of policy battles and cultural debates, we have plenty more to consider. As we wade into the waters of creative service and solution-making, we also consider the bigger picture of human freedom and flourishing. But even here, whereas most of our modern policy debates tend to depersonalize that conversation in terms of individual versus state, we remember that all of this begins with persons positioned in the broader human family.

As Anthony Bradley explains, such attempts at justice-seeking and policymaking would greatly benefit from a healthy dose of personalism focused around a foundational question: “What moral and economic and political and social and psychological and spiritual contexts are best suited for men and women who are made in God’s image to thrive and be the people that God has created them to be?”

In a 2014 lecture, “Lost in Policy? The Person Beyond Public and Social Utility,” Bradley unpacks all of this at length, explaining why we ought to approach policy “from the person up” if we hope to find real and lasting reconciliation.

More often, he argues, “We love ideas, but have very little interest in loving actual people,” which distracts and distorts our efforts in any number of ways:

Instead of embracing ideologies as a way to think about human flourishing, what if we actually built our theories about politics and economics from the person up? What if we began with the attributes of the human person and thought about the sorts of economic and political and social structures derived from the attributes of the human person that allow persons to flourish? That we’re not concerned about winning the culture war, and we’re not really burdened by having a political ideology, but we want people to be what God has created people to be and to do.

As Bradley goes on to remind us, such an approach has led to credible cultural witness and productive, disruptive transformation in times of great distress and division, from Martin Luther King Jr.’s fight for civil rights to Pope John Paul II’s opposition to the Soviet Union.

This begins with our own relationships, flowing outward through our munities, institutions, and beyond. “Every encounter with a human person is an opportunity for liberation,” Bradley explains. “It’s an opportunity, in union with the other, to explore together what it means to be truly human as God designed … Christian personalism shows the world that because our neighbors are people—not because they are simply ‘like us’—they are worthy of love and connection and relationship.”

In Acton’s film series For the Life of the World: Letters to the Exiles, we see these same connections through the lens of justice as hospitality. In Evan Koons’ concluding note on the Economy of Order, we are reminded of the importance of Christian personalism in our approach to justice.

“How are we to operate with so much hurt, so much dysfunction in the world? What hope is there for justice?” Koons asks. “Here’s the key: Justice needs a face.”

He continues:

Yes, God created the world to have order, and yes, in a broken world we need curators of that order: governing bodies to cultivate the conditions for the various spheres of society to flourish in the ways that they know best …

But seeking justice must always be personal, and this means investment. It means vulnerability. It means hospitality, not just to the members of the household of faith, but to the stranger … This isn’t to say we shouldn’t be involved in government. We absolutely should, if for no other reason than as the body of Christ we keep the memory of this truth: Justice requires love, because you won’t have justice unless you remember the image of God in each person. Unless you remember each person’s dignity as a glorious, creative, capable gift to the world. Unless you are willing to give yourself away to keep that memory alive. But we must do more than just remember the dignity of all, and especially the stranger. We must e that stranger, make a space for him in our lives, to make a place at our tables for that gift in whom God Himself delights …

Seeking order, seeking justice, isn’t a matter of designing the right programs or delivery systems. Let us remember that seeking order means acting in accord with a true vision of our brothers and sisters. Let us remember the words of a famous theologian: “Seeing with the eyes of Christ, I can give to others much more than their outward necessities; I can give them the look of love which they crave.”

This invites many questions: How do we view and treat our neighbors, whatever their race, age, creed, ideology, or political tribe? How are we interacting, collaborating, and relating in everyday life? Are we approaching and treating others as people, as co-creators made in the image of a holy God? And if so, are our corresponding efforts at forming our associations and institutions tailored to reflect and protect that basic reality?

As Ryan Anderson puts it, “Law and culture reinforce each other, either for or against human dignity and human flourishing.” As we continue fighting against systemic oppression and dysfunction, and as we continue to explore the ways in which we can better honor the dignity of all persons, let us remember that along with the fight to change the system at the top, God has given us wisdom, relational capacity, and, above all, love and grace to begin repairing the fragments of society and pursuing reconciliation at the level of the person.

Shaull. CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Samuel Gregg on India’s Civil Society
Current events in India have left the country wrestling with an important question: What is civil society and what does it consist of? These are not easy questions to answer as definitions of civil society can greatly vary. According to a story on the Wall Street Journal’s India Real Time section, “…political demonstrators have demanded greater civil society involvement in the governing country…” While many throughout India are trying to define a civil society and who represents it, the Journal...
The Complex Tax Code
Today at Capital Commentary I discuss the size and scope of the tax code in the US relative to its basic purposes. In “Back Door Social Engineering,” I argue, “When governments run huge deficits in part because of plexity of its tax system and the ability of people and institutions to engage in large-scale (and legal) tax avoidance, there is something deeply wrong with the system.” The basic purpose of taxes is to raise money for the government, not to...
Civil Society, Entrepreneurship, and the Common Good
Acton University has been full of thought provoking lectures and stimulating discussion. It is easy to see why the attendees wish the conference was much longer. There are many interesting lectures, one just wishes he or she could attend all of them. Yesterday Dr. John Bolt, of Calvin Theological Seminary, taught a course titled “Centralization and Civil Society.” Bolt’s course paid special attention to Alexis de Tocqueville and his contributions to defining a civil society. As one can imagine, by...
Budget Morality
My Acton Commentary for this week tries to explain the differences between Christian proponents and opponents of Republican budget proposals: A Circle of Exchange is Better Than a Circle of Protection Strife over the budget in Washington continues, with religious leaders and organizations weighing in on both sides. The positions of Christian participants in this battle are as intractable as the batants and for the same reason: A fundamental difference of outlook concerning the role of government and the effect...
Samuel Gregg: Hell, Heaven, and Progressive Catholics
Recently, progressive Catholics met in Detroit and issued calls for a married clergy and the ordination of women priests. In a very timely article Samuel Gregg, research director at the Acton Institute, addresses the progressive Catholics who “sit rather loosely with Catholic teaching on questions like life and marriage” and how they are continuing “to press what is often a hyper-politicized understanding of the gospel.” Gregg’s article appearing in Crisis Magazine. The roots of the progressive Catholic’s problems may lie...
Follow Acton University on Twitter from the PowerBlog
We now have a live stream of the #ActonU hashtag on Twitter running on the right side of our blog. This tab will keep you updated on the folks who are using this tag in their Twitter posts. Feel free to join in and be featured on the blog! You might even find someone to meet up with between sessions. For those of you who aren’t at Acton University you can use the feed to find out what you’re missing....
Purchase Acton University 2011 Lectures Online
Continuing the tradition from 2010, Acton University 2011 lectures will be available for purchase online from our secure order page. New lectures will be posted as they conclude throughout the week, so check back often. The downloads are in MP3 format and can be transferred to any device that plays audio files such as an iPod or smartphone. Here are some useful Acton University links: Acton University 2011 Digital DownloadsActon University 2010 Digital DownloadsOfficial Acton University site ...
Rev. Sirico: Who Really Was John Galt, Anyway?
On the Patheos website, Rev. Robert A. Sirico examines the current debate over the legacy of Ayn Rand in conservative circles, and the attempt by liberal/progressives to tarnish prominent figures like Rep. Paul Ryan with “hyperbolic and personal critiques of the woman and her thought.” But what if there is much to Rand that defies the caricature? Rev. Sirico writes: There is in Rand an undeniable and passionate quest, a hunger for truth, for the ideal, for morality, for a...
Global Problems, Global Solutions
There’s a saying that when goods cross borders, armies don’t (it’s the correlative to the observation attributed to Bastiat: “If goods cannot cross borders, armies will.”). The point is that trade tends to bring people together who might otherwise have cause to be hostile. One of the themes at Acton University, which begins in just a few hours, is globalization and various Christian responses. That’s sure to be the case again this year, as we have just about 70 countries...
Is the Green Movement Problematic for Christians?
The green movement has had a dramatic, long lasting impact on public policy, individuals, and even religion. But many people of faith have criticized supporters of the green movement, equating its strong followers with those who practice a pagan religion in support of Mother Nature. As Christians we are called to be environmental stewards and to care for God’s creation. However, putting aside the perceptual paganism of a too dedicated support of the green movement, one must ask, is the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved