Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Jordan Peterson on the universal basic income
Jordan Peterson on the universal basic income
Mar 17, 2025 4:48 AM

As we enter a new age of automation and artificial intelligence, fears about job loss and human obsolescence are troubling the cultural imagination. Prosperity abounds, but innovators like Elon Musk and Bill Gates continue to predict a future where humans steadily diminish in their contributions, ing ever more dependent on external sources of provision.

As a result, many have hitched their hopes to a universal basic e – a form of widespread welfare in which regular cash transfers are guaranteed by the government, regardless of a citizen’s status or situation.

It’s a proposal that’s been advocated by a diverse mix of leaders, from progressives like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Nancy Pelosi, to tech entrepreneurs like Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey, to free-market thinkers like Milton Friedman and Charles Murray. More recently, it was a central plank of Andrew Yang’s failed presidential bid, and it continues to be a defining feature of his campaign for mayor of New York City. Set amid the dystopian disruptions of COVID-19, the appetite for a UBI has only increased, teased by the now steady drip of stimulus checks.

In most of the proposals, the numbers simply don’t add up, creating an insurmountable national debt. But even in the more sober-minded attempts from libertarians like Friedman and Murray – which prioritize administrative and budgetary efficiency through a drastic dismantling of the welfare state – the fundamental thinking is still woefully inadequate, exhibiting little care or concern for the long-term social and spiritual side effects of mechanical redistribution.

The idea has longstanding roots, stretching back to early advocates like Thomas More and Thomas Paine. But in our current context, it represents a very particular form of surrender. Indeed, while humanity remains anxious about the prospect of our future robotic replacements, we also seem to be strangely at peace with just keeping our bellies full until the transition is plete.

In an interview on Dr. Oz, psychologist Jordan Peterson challenges these attitudes, arguing that “mere economic rectification” is insufficient to address the challenges that lie ahead. At its core, a UBI promotes a materialistic view of human work and human needs. In turn, it’s bound to set us on the wrong path when es to human destiny.

“The guaranteed basic e idea is predicated on the idea that man lives by bread alone,” Peterson explains. “Well, that isn’t how it works, and I’ve certainly seen that in my clinical practice.”

Peterson proceeds to explain how money can often enable pound existing problems. “I’ve had clients, especially addicts, [where] if you gave them money, they would die,” he says, recalling a particular example from his clinical practice. “As long as [my client] was flat broke, he wasn’t dead.”

It’s an extreme example, but it points to an important insight: “People need purpose more than money.” Each individual’s situation is highly unique plex. In the case of Peterson’s client, family, poverty, and psychology all play intersecting roles. But this only furthers the case that our solutions ought not to be overly simplistic.

The more our economic policy ignores the capacity plexity of the human person, the more we risk a systemic abdication of human creativity and contribution:

It isn’t the provision of material well-being with ease that allows people to live properly, even though a certain amount of material wealth is a necessary precondition. It’s purpose. That is a much more difficult problem to solve.

We need something to grapple with. We need meaning to justify our lives. And some of that is to be found in the struggle against privation and malevolence. The mere offering of material sustenance to people isn’t going to solve the problem …

[Fyodor] Dostoevsky knew this 150 years ago. He said if you gave people everything they wanted, so all they had to do was eat cakes and busy themselves with the continuation of the species, the first thing they’d do is smash it all to Hell so that something interesting could happen. That’s our fatal flaw and salvation … that wanting to contend rather than sit back and have everything taken care of.

The referenced es from Dostoevsky’s novel Notes from the Underground, in which the Russian author reflects on the mystery of human agency.

“Men still are men and not the keys of a piano, which the laws of nature threaten to control pletely that soon one will be able to desire nothing but by the calendar,” Dostoevsky wrote. “And that is not all: even if man really were nothing but a piano-key, even if this were proved to him by natural science and mathematics, even then he would not e reasonable, but would purposely do something perverse out of simple ingratitude, simply to gain his point.”

When es to the UBI, we’d do well to recognize this reality. We are not “keys of a piano,” cogs in some grand economic machine. Predictably, the corresponding efforts to run humanity “by the calendar” have thus e up short.

In Ontario, Canada, a pilot program of a UBI was abruptly canceled after leaders concluded it was “a disincentive to get people back on track” and was not helping people e “independent contributors to the economy.” Likewise, in a UBI experiment in the Netherlands, progressive economist Ive Marx concluded that the it would increase poverty by 3%, emphasizing that it was “massively inefficient if one cares about the least well-off in society.”

Peterson is right that we all long for meaning and purpose, and much of that meaning is found in work itself, by God’s very design. In working on behalf of our neighbors, our hearts and hands are ordered in a way that both affirms our inherent dignity and cultivates civilization. If we neglect or forget about these connections, our tinkering will be tragically confined at the surface level.

As Peter Cove argues in his own critique of conservative support for the UBI, “Our future depends on a robust future for work, because work does so much more than provide for our basic needs. Work draws us into the public square and instills in us a sense of personal responsibility. It allows people to feel the pride and self-respect e with supporting their spouses and children.”

We should pursue generosity and seek efficiency wherever we can, and that includes our efforts to provide some sort of public safety net for the needy. But in designing systems for the future, we should stay focused on what actually helps humans thrive over the long term.

Peterson refers to our humanity’s inner drive for freedom and purpose as our “fatal flaw and salvation.” At the Acton Institute, we might put it differently: “The human person, created in the image of God, is individually unique, rational, the subject of moral agency, and a co-creator. Accordingly, he possesses intrinsic value and dignity, implying certain rights and duties both for himself and other persons.”

We see the future not through a lens of chaos – seeking to secure and protect ourselves from the inevitability of robot overlords. Cash transfers will not protect us from such a fate.

Instead, through the lens of God’s creative design, we see humans as protagonists in a bigger, more mysterious economic story. Far from embracing human obsolescence, we can look for opportunities to better empower human wisdom and creative service – to love our neighbors through new ideas, new relationships, and the economic abundance that’s bound to follow.

The future is bright, and human contribution is a key part of the story.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Our American Children And Poverty
Robert Putnam says our children are in a state of crisis. Those who live in poverty or near-poverty seemed to be doomed to stay there. Those born into families with money will likely go on to enjoy the lives that money affords. His book, Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis, follows a number of individuals, tracking a list of factors, including the ability to move up or down the economic spectrum. One pivotal factor is marriage: Highly correlated is...
Are Our Rights Gifts From the Government?
In his recent announcement that he was running for president, Sen. Ted Cruz’s said “our rights e from man, e from God Almighty.” That raised some eyebrows in our secular culture. For example, Meredith Shiner, a Yahoo reporter, tweeted:”Bizarre to talk about how rights are God-made and not man-made in your speech announcing a POTUS bid? When Constitution was man-made?” The idea that the “unalienable Rights” mentioned in the Declaration of Independence e from God is considered obvious to many...
When a Church Embraces the Power of Entrepreneurship
When we hear about church “outreach ministries,” we often think of food pantries, homeless shelters, munity events. But while these can be powerful channels for service, many churches are beginning to look for new ways to empower individuals more holistically. For some, this means abandoning traditional charity altogether, focusing their ministry more directly around recognizing the gifts and strengths of others. For others, like Evangel Ministries in Detroit, it involves a mix of many things, but with a particular emphasis...
Free-Market Federalism
“States and municipalities craft laws that reflect local cultures, and this proximity to the people has market consequences,” says James Bruce in this week’s Acton Commentary. “Let’s call it free-market federalism, the encouragement of local markets by permitting states and municipalities to frame, as much as possible, the laws by which munities engage merce.” In a spirited defense of decentralization, Abraham Kuyper argues that a central government can only supplement local governments and families. Put another way, the central government...
Review: Hope for the Workplace, Christ in You
Bill Dalgetty’s Hope for the Workplace, Christ in You is rich with stories of people in business who are struggling to integrate their faith and work lives. Weaving biblical parables with dozens of real life stories gleaned from his experience as president of Christians in Commerce International, Dalgetty points—usually explicitly and sometimes in a more nuanced way—to universal truths of human conscience. Dalgetty, a career attorney and executive for Mobil Corporation, is sensitive to corporate America’s overly PC culture. He...
Entrepreneurial Stewardship: Employees Share Millions After Company Sold
J.C. Huizenga Photo from Mlive Employees of the Huizenga Automation Group got a great surprise earlier this week. According to Mlive, after selling pany, owner J.C. Huizenga gave away $5.75 million in bonuses to his employees at two panies that were part of the Automation Group. Huizenga acknowledged that his success was due to the work of his employees so he wanted to share his profits with them: “We all worked together at J.R. Automation and Dane Systems” and panies...
Why Cheap Food Makes Us Richer
While it may not seem like it when you’re standing at the checkout line at the grocery store, food is cheaper now that it was half a century ago. “We are purchasing more food for less money, and we are purchasing our food for less of our e,” says Annette Clauson, an agricultural economist. “This is a good thing, because we have e to purchase other things.” A recent report published by the U.S. Department of Agriculture shows how the...
What Does Human Dignity Look Like?
It monplace in Christian circles, whether Orthodox, Roman Catholic, or Protestant, to appeal in public discourse to the inviolable good of human dignity. Today at Ethika Politika, I seek to answer the question, “What does human dignity look like in real life?” It is fine to talk about it in the abstract, but what does it look like on the job or as a parent? I write, Real, flesh-and-blood human persons do not evoke our respect as naturally as an...
5 Principles for Spiritual Discernment in the Economic Order
If there’s one area of the faith-work conversation that’s lacking in exploration and introspection, it’s the role of spiritual discernment in the day-to-day decisions of economiclife. It’s one thing to orientone’s heart and mind around thebig picture of vocation and stewardship — no small feat, to be sure — but if economics is about the intersection of knowledge and human action, what does it mean to serve a God whose thoughts are higher than our thoughts?Before and beyondourquestions about ethics...
Radio Free Acton: Burt & Anita Folsom on Uncle Sam’s Subsidy Problem
On this week’s edition of Radio Free Acton,Burt and Anita Folsom discuss their latest book, Uncle Sam Can’t Count.Weexamine whether the government has a good track record in subsidizing industry and innovation, and look at some of the unforeseen consequences of subsidies in society. You can listen via the audio player below, and then be sure to check out the video of Burt’s Acton Lecture Series address as well. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved