Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Jonathan Haidt: Why Good People are Divided by Politics (and Religion)
Jonathan Haidt: Why Good People are Divided by Politics (and Religion)
Apr 2, 2025 8:44 AM

Two weeks ago I attended a lecture at Grand Valley State University (GVSU) by Jonathan Haidt, author, among many other books and articles, of the book The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. Haidt is a social psychologist whose research focuses on the emotive and anthropological bases of morality. His talk at GVSU for their Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies and Business Ethics Center, focused mostly on the question of the roots of our political divides in the United States and how to move our public discourse in a more civil direction.

He began by noting that in academia he encountered very little conservative political and moral writings. Why not educate people in both? he asked. Good question. His talk at GVSU was, at least, one preliminary contribution. While it did not systematically get into the specifics of liberal and conservative perspectives, it aimed to help people understand the moral and psychological bases of both.

Next, he framed his presentation by offering some good news and some bad news.

The Good News:

Extreme poverty is disappearing. Really. Haidt began with what has been called the “hockey stick of economic history.” Basically, while economic growth has been mostly stagnant for the majority of human history, since 1800 we have seen a remarkably new trend in sustained economic growth. This skews graphs of economic growth through human history to look like a hockey stick on its side, hence the term “hockey stick of economic history.” Things have been especially good since 1950 since countries like China and India have e more economically liberalized. Literally over a billion people were raised out of extreme poverty in the last fifty years. And according to Haidt, “when poverty plummits, people get rights.” The good of this good news is not limited to the material.Democracy is triumphant. This might seem like romanticism, but he gave the impression that he was referring to the close of the Cold War. Whether or not ostensibly democratic countries are actually so would be another question, but nearly everyone today at least wants to look democratic.Genocide is nearly gone. Haidt acknowledged that there have been isolated (if terrible) cases, such as that in Rwanda, but the scale of this evil has been much smaller and less frequent.Rape and homicide are down in the U.S.No more threat of nuclear apocalypse. Millennials like me might laugh at the idea of drills in school where children were taught to take cover under their desks, but this was serious for Baby Boomers. A nuclear attack miles away could have sent dangerous rubble crashing down upon the heads of unprepared schoolchildren. No such fears are the norm today.

He concluded his good news by saying, “We should be dancing in the streets!” But, then, there is the bad news….

The Bad News:

Happiness is relative. That is, people evaluate their own situation not based upon where they pared to bygone ages pared to others in the present and to their former selves in the near past. 1 billion people lifted out of poverty? That’s great, but I really wish I could afford that new iPhone….Our political parties in Congress have e increasingly polarized. This is a major change since 1980 especially. Going back even further to the 1960s, Haidt pointed out that at that time there were several conservative Democrats, liberal Republicans, and a significant base of centrists in both parties. Today, judging by votes along party lines, Congress is more polarized than it was in the years directly following the Civil War.At the same time, citizens are more polarized. Whereas religious affiliation used to be the most decisive topic in our country, this has been far surpassed by political affiliation today.Trust in our government is down. This has been bad since the 1960s and 1970s, due in part at that time to the unpopularity of the Vietnam war and the Watergate scandal, among other factors. On average distrust for government is actually one thing that people of both parties have mon, though Republicans (and not just the Tea Party) fluctuate more depending on whether or not their party controls Congress or the White House.

So what happened? Before directly answering that question, Haidt outlined some of his own research and presuppositions:

He is an intuitionist, which he defined as agreeing with David Hume contra Plato et al. that “reason is and ought to be the slave of the passions.” He quoted Benjamin Franklin as saying that human beings use their reason to justify just about any emotion or conviction. In his experience, he claimed that his research supports this perspective.He identified six topics that can be found in all human morality across cultures and history:Compassion vs. harm. In human beings, unlike most other animals, both males and females are geared toward nurturing and many moral concerns take care feelings passion as their foundation.Fairness and justice. Haidt emphasized that this is not simply a matter of equality but proportionality. It is bining of fairness passion, prevalent in on the Left, that tends to foster an emphasis on equality. On the Right, fairness is taken more strictly as proportionality and tempered by other factors as well passion.Liberty vs. oppression. On the Left, this looks like Occupy Wall Street. On the Right, this is a widespread concern for limited government.Loyalty vs, betrayal. Respect for the flag of the United States would be an expression of this.Authority vs. subversion. Respect for elders, teachers, religious figures, and so on fall into this category.Sanctity vs. degradation. Those who value sacred spaces and even topics (such as chastity, for example) exemplify this topic.

Interestingly, Haidt claims that while the Left highly values #1 first of all, then #2 and #3 secondarily, the Right seems to more consistently incorporate all six foundations. The Left tends to reject the importance of loyalty, authority, and sanctity, though he did later note some near exceptions. Topics such as same-sex marriage and environmentalism have a sort of sacred quality to the Left, according to Haidt, though he cautioned that even so this is not the same or as strong as how that foundation is built upon more broadly by the Right.

In summary, he noted that large scale cooperation is actually quite rare in nature, but we (and bees) are an exception. The way we do it (lacking a hive mind) tends to be as follows:

We circle around sacred objects and principles, creating “a moral electromagnet.” That is, when two groups of people with differing sacred objects and e into contact the result tends to be a Manichean polarization. All on the outside are regarded as heretics, traitors, and apostates. Morality both binds and blinds.

So, again, what happened in the United States? Why are we so polarized today. Unfortunately, Haidt ran out of time when he came to this part of the discussion, but he did manage to get the following points across:

After 1965, our political parties have undergone a process of realignment and purification. In Eisenhower’s time, for example, most Republicans were centrists. Since the 1980s, Republicans have moved “far Right,” especially in the House of Representatives.Generational and cultural changes. The Greatest generation was united by WWII. Baby Boomers have done okay, but not as well. However, today things are very bad in this regard. One possible explanation he gave was that since under Newt Gingrich our representatives have not been required to live in Washington, DC. The result has been that they do not have to send their children to the same schools and otherwise interact with one another as neighbors and, indeed, as friends. He called this “the death of friendship in DC.”Changes in Congress.Changes in American media.

Unfortunately, that was where he had to stop. He had about four more items and barely touched on even the last two above (which is why I have no more notes). I would really have loved to hear how he could tie all these things together as a cause of polarization. I found myself wondering if these were simply more symptoms of polarization — their explanatory power was left unclear.

As for what we can do now, on an individual level he gave the following advice for ing Thanksgiving dinners: The worst conversation strategy when speaking with someone who holds a different political (or religious) view is the point-by-point rebuttal. A better approach is to mon ground — get the other person to say “yes” before suggesting any alternative perspective. Haidt himself did a good job of modeling what he was advocating: staying neutral while pointing to areas mon ground.

Lastly, he tried to address whether there is any hope for Washington, DC. First of all, he emphasized that DC is “in its own world.” Currently, they have no feedback mechanism for policy decisions other than what makes them money. The way we run elections favors extremists. Campaign finance reform will be difficult with the current Supreme Court. In short, the next 5-10 years do not look very good.

Rather than ing despondent over that, however, he mended that citizens take matters into their own hands. Depolarization begins at Thanksgiving dinner, not the voting booth.

For more on this and other subjects, check out Jonathan Haidt’s webpage here.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The limits of fiscal policy
Note: This is post #126 in a weekly video series on basic economics. The best case for fiscal policy happens during a recession caused by an aggregate demand shock, says economist Alex Tabarrok. Even so, it’s hard to get it right because the U.S. economy is massive plex. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Tabarrok highlights the three factors for an ideal stimulus—Timely, Targeted, and Temporary—and notes that all of these characteristics present some problems for enacting fiscal policy....
The Laffer Curve vindicated…in Canada
On September 14, 1974, economist Arthur Laffer and three friends had the most productive cocktail discussion in U.S. history. On that day, Laffer famously sketched his U-shaped theory of taxation on a cocktail napkin. It came at the height of the Keynesian ascendancy, just three years after President Richard Nixon proclaimed, “I am now a Keynesian in economics” and as his successor proposed a tax increase. Laffer argued that higher tax rates produce higher tax revenues, but only up to...
Alejandro Chafuen in Forbes: Change afoot in Uruguay’s elections?
Alejandro Chafuen, Acton’s Managing Director, International, has lectured during two visits to Uruguay this year, and today in Forbes he presents an examination of various candidates and policies in the lead-up to the country’s presidential elections this October. Uruguay, the most secular country in Latin America, also ranks highly in such categories as rule of law, confidence in government, low perceptions of corruption and crime, and so forth. Political culture and society in Uruguay are also marked by strong currents...
Reason, Faith, and the Struggle for Western Civilization is . . . . AVAILABLE!
After a long gestation, I’m happy to report that my book, Reason, Faith, and the Struggle for Western Civilization, published by Regnery Gateway, has just been released and is available for purchase at Amazon. Over the past two weeks, it’s been listed as #1 New Release on Amazon in 5 categories – History of Civilization and Culture; Science and Religion; Ancient Early Civilization History; Church and State; and History of Christianity. The book has already been reviewed in The Stream...
Daily Caller reviews Samuel Gregg’s new book
Samuel Gregg, director of research at the Acton Institute, released a new book titled, Reason, Faith, and the Struggle for Western Civilization. In his book, Gregg discusses the dangers that an unbalanced relationship between faith and reason imposes on a society. The Daily Caller, a widely read news and opinion outlet, reviewed Gregg’s new book in an article titled, “New Book Emphasizes the Importance of Faith and Reason for Western Civilization.” The article provides a brief synopsis of the book...
Acton Line podcast: Hong Kong’s freedom coming to an end? SCOTUS takes on regulatory state
Update (Aug. 6): Writing at The National Interest, Gordon C. Chang says “it’s now a revolution.” In an especially tone-deaf press conference Monday, Lam, standing next to eight grim-faced ministers, made no further concessions, either symbolic or substantive, as she struck all the wrong notes if she was trying to calm the situation in her embattled city. Her stern and sometimes ominous words—Lam warned the territory was on the “path of no return”—seemed aimed at an audience of one: Communist...
Nisbet and Dalrymple on community, authority, function and tattoos
In his must-read book, The Quest for Community, Robert Nisbet discusses the relationship munity and authority. Communities provide human connection and sense of belonging, but they e with limitations. They make demands up us to do certain things, to hold fast to certain beliefs. You can’t simply do whatever you want and still remain part of munity.
 Community without authority is not munity. This is of course one of the tensions of contemporary life. We all munity, but we don’t...
State Department releases latest report on international religious freedom
A wide range of U.S. government agencies and offices use the reports for such efforts as shaping policy and conducting diplomacy. The Secretary of State also uses the reports to help determine which countries have engaged in or tolerated “particularly severe violations” of religious freedom in order to designate “countries of particular concern.” Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Ambassador at Large for International Religious Freedom Sam Brownback discussed the report at a special briefing. “This mission is not just...
Common grace, community, and culture
Earlier this year I had the honor of moderating a panel discussion, “Common Grace, Community, and Culture,” at the Kuyper Conference at Calvin College and Seminary. The discussion featured J. Daryl Charles, with whom I have the pleasure of coediting the Common Grace volumes in the Kuyper series, Vincent Bacote of Wheaton College, and Jessica Joustra of Redeemer University College and TU Kampen. It was a wide-ranging and substantive discussion. The video is now available and mend it to you:...
2019 G20 Summit: Tariffs and forbearance
As world leaders from a select group of the largest national economies meet in Osaka at the end of this week, they face increasing volatility and uncertainty around some of the basic principles and institutions that bring together their various peoples in the global marketplace. The World Trade Organization may undergo serious reform in the face of hints from President Trump that the United States might withdraw amid broader dissatisfactions. The ongoing tariff battles between China and the United States...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved