Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY
/
Jesus and Class Warfare
Jesus and Class Warfare
Jan 20, 2025 4:00 PM

Plenty of Marxists have turned to the New Testament and the origins of Christianity. Memorable examples include the works of F.D. Maurice and Zhu Weizhi’s Jesus the Proletarian. After criticizing how so many translations of the New Testament soften Jesus’ teachings regarding material possessions, greed, and wealth, Orthodox theologian David Bentley Hart has gone so far to ask, “Are Christians supposed to be Communists?” In the Huffington Post, Dan Arel has even claimed that “Jesus was clearly a Marxist, not by name, but by ideology.” With a title like Jesus: A Life in Class Conflict, one might assume that this volume, produced by Bible scholars James Crossley and Robert J. Myles, is another disposable piece of popular nonfiction, wedging Jesus into the authors’ political mold. Thankfully, this is not that kind of book.

Was Jesus a proto-Marxist? Some say yes. Others are convinced he did not fit into any neat category, ancient or modern. What’s certain is that of the making of many “historical” biographies there is no end.

Jesus: A Life in Class Conflict

By James Crossley and Robert J. Myles

(Zero Books, 2023)

Knowing they will be accused of turning Jesus into a proto-Marxist or forerunner of socialism, Crossley and Myles are quick to say that is not their goal. Their concern is methodological and pragmatic. The purpose of the book is not to read a socialist Jesus into the early Jesus tradition, preserved in the Gospels and the letters of Paul, but rather to examine the social, material, and class conditions that shaped the life of Jesus and his earliest followers. Put another way, what Crossley and Myles have produced is a Marxist reading of the Gospels, not a Marxist gospel.

For too long, claim Crossley and Myles, Bible scholars of various mitments and confessional creeds have crafted a Jesus in their image—or at least their idealized image. Little wonder that readers can find all sorts of Jesuses to fit their preferences, whether it be a Jesus for evangelical Americans, a Jesus for the nonreligious, or a Jesus for third wave feminists. The authors’ solution to this methodological doom spiral? An approach that emphasizes historical materialism when studying the historical Jesus and the birth of Christianity.

Crossley and Myles begin their history by arguing that Jesus was most likely the eldest son of Mary and Joseph and born in the unremarkable town of Nazareth (not Bethlehem), and at some point in adulthood he felt called by God. From peasant artisan to apocalyptic preacher and millenarian hopeful, Jesus garnered a humble following based on his ability to cast out demons and perform healing miracles. His parabolic message was full of not-so-subtle warnings, criticisms, and invitations to men and women across the Judean political, religious, and class spectrum. As this message garnered followers, he inevitably brought attention to and endangered himself, so much so that he ended up on a Roman cross. Much of the portrait painted by Crossley and Myles will be all too familiar to any with a passing knowledge of the quest for the historical Jesus. Where these authors shine, however, is in illustrating the socio-economic world of Jesus and his first followers.

The authors have produced is a Marxist reading of the Gospels, not a Marxist gospel.

Unlike the peaceful and prosperous image painted by Howard Clark Kee, Crossley and Myles argue that the Galilee at the time of Jesus was dangerous, dislocated, and distressed. Given that Jesus was a craftsman, the authors assert that the rebuilding of Sepphoris and the building of Tiberias would have dramatically displaced people like Jesus. The ancient historian Josephus provides evidence for this economic unrest with numerous references to banditry as well as various tax revolts. With remarkable ease, Crossley and Myles situate readers in the economically desperate, brutally violent, and apocalyptically expectant time and place that produced Jesus and his movement. The hopes, the stakes, and the vulnerability of that movement are made tangible and real.

What follows is a rather standard telling of the life of the historical Jesus, at least standard for anyone with a passing familiarity with the works of N.T. Wright, Bart D. Ehrman, and Paula Fredriksen, all of whom present Jesus as a millennial prophet, with Wright standing out as the sole believing Christian of the trio. Crossley and Myles’ overall profile of Jesus may not be that original, but their insights into the Jesus movement are pelling and the best elements of this book. Pointing to Jesus’ inner circle of fishermen and the agricultural basis of so many of Jesus’ parables, the authors emphasize the connections between Jesus’ followers and the Galilean peasantry. Furthermore, the often referenced “crowds” throughout the Gospels in Greco-Roman literature were understood to reference the lower classes. But while most scholarship has focused on Jesus’ ability to heal the sick, cast out demons, and forgive sinners, more important for Crossley and Myles is the disciples’ ability to partake in and utilize this same divine power. Not only will Jesus sit on a throne—so will his closest followers as they join him in judging their pagan overlords (Matt. 19:27–28) and even angels (1 Cor. 6:1­–3). All this suggests to Crossley and Myles that the Jesus movement had a far more diversified regime of latent power than other historians have credited.

But in its “mission to the rich,” Jesus and his followers could be equally prophetic and pragmatic. While Jesus’ dining with “sinners and tax collectors” is well known in the Christian tradition, Crossley and Myles argue that these “sinners” included the rich and economic exploiters (or Law breakers) and therefore were able to offer space and means for Jesus and his followers to dine. This reading is consistent with that found in other ancient Jewish literature—for example, 1 Enoch 102:9, “Now I tell you, sinners, you have satiated yourselves with food and drink, robbing and sin, impoverishing people and gaining property.” Of course, given the stories of those reluctant to give up their wealth, such as the rich young man in Matthew 19:16–30, it is more than likely that the Jesus movement’s success in these elite circles was limited. In addition, as suggested by E.P. Sanders, if Jesus had won over more of the economic elite, it is unlikely he would have been executed in the manner he was. Even so, the point stands that Jesus’ kingdom message appealed to a broad spectrum and summoned people from across the ancient world’s harsh class divide.

Jesus operated in a style more akin to the prophets of destruction like Jeremiah.

They also believe that Jesus’ advocation of nonviolence was primarily pragmatic, given the Roman occupation and history of horrific retaliation against any who challenged Roman rule. But rather than being what we conceive of as a nonviolent resister, a Martin Luther King Jr. or a Mahatma Gandhi, Jesus operated in a style more akin to the prophets of destruction like Jeremiah. He may have instructed his followers to “turn the other cheek,” but such advice was designed to help grow and foster the movement, not to be a set of ethics. In the messianic age e, divine violence would be dealt out on behalf of Jesus’ followers. Caesar’s violence would be replaced by the God of Israel’s violence, a human empire swapped out for a divine empire—but an empire nonetheless.

But God’s empire did e, and the messianic age never arrived. Jesus’ kingdom movement should have ended with his crucifixion at the hands of the Romans, yet Crossley and Myles do think that the postmortem visions of Jesus were genuine—or at least that they contain a sincere though problematic historical memory from his closest disciples. These visionary experiences, coupled with their messianic expectations, helped launch the Christian faith. Once again, grounding their reading in class analysis, Crossley and Myles take stock of the Jesus movement’s transformation from one originally grounded in rural subjects of the Roman Empire to one centered on the urban elites of that empire. One is reminded of Marx’s often quoted line that “all great world-historic facts and personages appear… the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce.”

Crossley and Myles’ style is approachable and academic-jargon free, yet it still gets bogged down in Marxist shibboleths such as “organizer,” mittee,” and “politburo.” Another strange translation choice is “Dictatorship of Peasantry” for “the Kingdom of God.” While such terminology might tickle the sort of reader Zero Books primarily appeals to, it’s distracting at best and cringe-worthy at worst. There are also some curiosities. Early on, Crossley and Myles push back against efforts by Christian apologists to present the historical Jesus as “countercultural” to his Jewish world, and they bristle at the term “subversive.” The reason for this is twofold: to avoid “great man of history” tropes and because of the anti-Semitism such efforts have engendered, fostering images of the “Satanic” Pharisees and Christ killers. Nevertheless, Crossley and Myles highlight instances where the Jesus movement does, in fact, challenge the dominate cultural patterns of the ancient Mediterranean world. Jesus, they argue, was offering an alternative way to live. If that’s the case, why is this not countercultural and subversive? Because it challenges more than just traditional Jewish life in Judea? The distinction made by Crossley and Myles doesn’t quite offer a difference when put under scrutiny.

Even so, there is an old-fashioned quality to Jesus: A Life in Class Conflict that many readers will appreciate. Despite being written from a perspective that questions many of the traditions of the Christian faith, it is respectful in its approach, reasonable in most of its assessments, and simply enjoyable to read. Given its accessibility to the non-scholar and price point, Crossley and Myles’ work might make an panion to N.T. Wright’s The Challenge of Jesus, John Dominic Crossan’s Jesus: A Revolutionary Biography, or Paula Fredriksen’s Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews, so long as you approach each with eyes wide open to the authors’ presuppositions. And we all have them.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY
The Digital Economy in Christian Perspective
In 2021 the pany of the massively popular social networking site Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms. Mark Zuckerberg, its creator and chairman, plans for pany to develop a “metaverse,” a virtual reality (“VR”) world in which all kinds of social and economic business can be conducted by users via VR avatars and digital transactions. Not to be outdone, rapper Snoop Dogg has developed his own “Snoopverse,” and other celebrities are getting in on the VR real estate...
In the Liberal Tradition: Francisco de Vitoria
Francisco de Vitoria probably isn’t a name that rolls off the lips or even vaguely registers in the minds of most, but he is worth knowing. This highly influential 16th-century Spanish Dominican priest is known as no less than the “father of international law.” What does a late Renaissance Catholic priest have to do with the “liberal tradition”? When you’re also the founder of the “School of Salamanca,” more than you think. Born in Burgos, Spain, in 1483, Vitoria...
Confronting the State with the Person
This cleverly titled book begins with a discussion of the so-called Great Reset associated with Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum held in Davos, Switzerland, at which the global elite of business, government, finance, and nongovernmental organizations speculate on major challenges to the global order and their solutions. Somewhat boringly, the best and brightest parrot the usual bromides about equity, justice, the rich paying “their fair share,” sustainability, and climate change with such frequency that one might be...
Our Smartphones, Our Humanity
By now it’s fairly well known just how much harm digital technology and the internet can do to individuals munities. They’re addictive distractions that isolate people from one another, and they have e the powerful propaganda tools, supplying a constant stream of misleading narratives, periodic outrages, and blatantly false information—all while claiming the mantel of truth and objectivity. Already adults suffer from their excessive consumption of shallow social media, mindless entertainment, and abundant pornography, but today’s children stand to...
Reason and Revelation in the Singularity
Harris Bor’s Staying Human: A Jewish Theology for the Age of Artificial Intelligence is an ambitious book. Its message can be put simply: Jewish religious tradition has the resources to respond to a world in which technology controls human beings. Bor is responding to the promise and threat of a future in which artificial intelligence renders human choice and individuality obsolete, a future Bor refers to as “the singularity,” following techno-futurist Ray Kurzweil. Bor is convinced that the singularity...
The Cult of Celebrity in the Church of Christ
In a profile for The Guardian from 2012, Kim Kardashian was perplexed. “When I hear people say [what are you famous for], I want to say, ‘what are you talking about?’… I have a hit TV show. We’ve shot more episodes than I Love Lucy!” In the wake of multiple scandals that have rocked the evangelical world, from Mars Hill to Hillsong, the role of the celebrity pastor e in for intense scrutiny. Why be faithful when you can...
Plato’s "Republic" and Our Own
The expectations of justice reside deeply within us. Figures in both the Hebraic and Hellenic worlds placed the demand for a just society at the center of their work. Those demands have echoed through the ages and into our streets. At the earliest of ages plain about things we deem unfair and dog our parents over broken promises. Of all the virtues, justice seems most ingrained. And yet it is the one most likely to create havoc and wreak...
The Existential Threat of Anti-Christian Nationalism
In the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic—well beyond the initial two weeks to flatten the curve, but in August of 2020—the New York Times reported, in an article entitled “Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be,” on scientists’ worries about the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. The means by which public health workers and government officials (not to mention journalists) were assessing the spread of the virus was, some feared, too sensitive. People were testing positive...
Methods Out of Madness
In his famous poem “The Second Coming,” W.B. Yeats warns about what happens when a society, or in our case a church, descends into anarchy and lawlessness: Turning and turning in the widening gyre The falcon cannot hear the falconer; Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of innocence is drowned; The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate...
Jacques Ellul and the Idols of Transhumanism
Transhumanism is a vision of the future of humanity in which applied technologies are supposed to enhance and upgrade human existence. According to the transhumanist story, evolution has brought us very far indeed—to the moon and back, so far. Yet as an intelligent species, humanity is still very primitive and thus stands in need of upgrading. Given the rise of new technologies, transhumanists argue that we can—nay, e our current evolutionary limitations in terms of physiology, emotion, cognition, and...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved