Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Israel Really Wants A King (Part II)
Israel Really Wants A King (Part II)
Jan 16, 2026 7:10 PM

Picking up where we left offlast time(in verse 9 of I Samuel 8), the prophet Samuel’s sons have given God’s system of judges a black eye with their corrupt behavior. Not wishing to be upstaged in the “Let’s Disappoint God” department, the people of Israel decide they want to up-the-sin-ante by rejecting God’s order and demanding a monarchy.

It’s now time for Samuel to share with the people what is in store for them should they refuse to course-correct.

In verse 9, at the behest of God himself, Samuel offers a “solemn” warning to his people. I note this at the start because I am of the opinion that it is always a worthwhile endeavor to give someone headed off of a cliff a fair warning. Even if you know they won’t listen, it’s always worth a shot. God knew the people had turned their hearts from Him, and He knew they would reject the council of His appointed mediator, but He told that mediator to warn them anyway.

Samuel’s task was to walk rightly with his God and obediently speak truth to his countrymen. The rest was in Yahweh’s hands.

Verses 10-18are pilation of “the ways of the king” – the king’s “Best/Worst Of” list, if you will. The intent is to talk some sense into the twelve tribes of Israel. Many of these things on that list are simply the average, “normal” tasks that a king would perform as the leader of a nation.

Wherever power resides, so do responsibilities and duties. The collection of taxes in order to pay for protection (i.e. the es to mind. But there is no doubt about God’s (via Samuel’s) intent here: He wants the people to know how thoroughly a king will dominate their lives, livelihoods, and day-to-day activities.

Corruption and the potential to sin are within all of us, but increased power over others accelerates the chances for injustice, abuse, and gross mismanagement/misallocation of resources. There was corruption among the judges, but God is warning the people how much worse it can (and will) get.

So what are these warnings, exactly? Let’s take a brief look at a few of them.

Verse 11 – “He will take your sons and appoint them to his chariots and to be his horsemen and to run before his chariots.

Chariot-runners were nothing more than a status symbol. The king is going to take children from their homes, make them run ahead of his chariots (which would be moving fairly quickly) for long stretches, and all so that his prestige would increase among other kings and military leaders. Sounds like a summer job or two that I had in high school.

Verses 12 and 13 – “And he will appoint for manders of thousands manders of fifties, and some to plow his ground and to reap his harvest, and to make his implements of war and the equipment of his chariots. He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers.

Instead of a volunteer army, recruited from among the individual tribes, the king – out of necessity – will begin conscripting those he wishes to serve. He will need young men for his army, and he will need young women to feed his army (as well as his court). This won’t be suggested, but demanded.

Verses 14 and 15 – “He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive orchards and give them to his servants. He will take the tenth of your grain and of your vineyards and give it to his officers and to his servants.

The phrase “best of your fields” is unequivocally alluding to the above-and-beyond annexation of the people’s goods and services their king will be guilty of. Leaders, and especially those overseeing monarchies and oligarchies, don’t tend to be thrifty people. They’re going to “get theirs” and since they are busy being in charge, they won’t have any time to actually produce anything themselves.

They live at the expense of others. So do those lucky enough to be in the king’s “inner circle.”

During munists’ rule in Russia from 1917 to 1991, the people worked jobs their leaders told them to work, accepted the shortages in food and basic goods they were forced to accept, and meanwhile the top-brass of the USSR lived like, well, kings. This isn’t about entrepreneurial people making a good living and having nice things. This is about an elitist, ruling class that lives solely off of the fruits of other folks’ labors.

Verses 17 and 18 – “He will take the tenth of your flocks, and you shall be his slaves. And in that day you will cry out because of your king, whom you have chosen for yourselves, but the LORD will not answer you in that day.”

Every aspect of one’s life has now been covered in Samuel’s list of warnings. Ultimately he flat-out states that the people will be “slaves.” And when that day arrives the people will wail and moan and wonder how they gave their liberty willingly away. But God will not answer at that time because He has answered now.

Christians and students of the Old Testament know how this tale ends. Israel tells Samuel and Yahweh to stuff their warnings in a sack. Saul es king, does a horrendous job, David takes over, falls into major sin, and the rest of Israel’s schizophrenic history is one bad king following a good king (following a bad king).

It’s a mess. We’re a mess.

The one true es, dies, rises from the grave, ascends into heaven and promises that He will be back to establish the only monarchy and kingdom that ever had a chance of working properly.

But that is e, and for now we are interested in what happened then and what we ought to be doing now. It’s clear that a nation gets the leaders it deserves. The fantasy of a toil-free existence, of an end to sin, suffering, and poverty in this life, is a pipe dream (and a dangerous one at that). The idea that just the bination of ideology and leadership will fix humanity is a lie. It has plagued mankind since Babel, and it e to a final, wicked culmination in the one-world government of the antichrist (Babylon).

There is no substitute for personal responsibility, the exercise of civic duty (at munity/church level), and an ever-increasing reliance upon God.Governments aren’t bad things. Romans 13 is clear about our duty to respect those in power. But “we the people” in the United States of America are the government.

We have the ability to choose whether we will head in the direction of top-down collectivism or a representative prised of individual families, munities, cities, and states.

If you’re looking to Scripture for a theocratic blueprint that will detail how Christ wants us to run our nation, you won’t find it. But to fail to glean wisdom from such glaring examples of the inherent flaws to centralized power would be a foolish mistake.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Makers, Takers, and Representation without Taxation
The American minister Jonathan Mayhew (October 8, 1720 – July 9, 1766) is credited with coining the phrase “No taxation without representation.”My review of Nicholas Eberstadt’s A Nation of Takers: America’s Entitlement Epidemic appears in the current issue of The City(currently available in print). Eberstadt makes some important points about the sustainability of our society given current trends in our national polity. The most salient feature, contends Eberstadt, is that “the United States is at the verge of a symbolic...
Departing in Peace: Economics and Liturgical Living
In the most recent issue of Theosis (1.6), Fr. Thomas Loya, a Byzantine Catholic priest, iconographer, and columnist, has an interesting contribution on the ing feast of the Presentation of Christ at the Temple (also known as Candlemas or the “Meeting of the Lord”). For many, February 2nd is simply the most bizarre and meaningless American holiday: Groundhog Day. However, for more traditional Christians, this is a major Christian feast day: memoration of the forty day presentation of Christ at...
Rev. Robert Sirico Participates in Debate on Government’s Role in Helping Poor
On Monday, January 28, the Rev. Robert Sirico participated in a debate, hosted by the Aquinas Institute for Catholic Thought, on the role of government in helping the poor. Fr. Sirico debated Michael Sean Winters, a writer with the National Catholic Reporter, on the campus of the University of Colorado in Boulder. The priest said during the debate that with the “overarching ethical orientation” a capitalist economy needs, it can provide for the needs of the poor. No solution, he...
Business Entrepreneur Focuses on Catholic Education
Frank Hanna III, CEO of Hanna Capital, LLC, has made Catholic education a special focus. In an interview with the National Catholic Register, Hanna spoke of the challenges, changes and reasons to champion religious education: The more I looked into the issues of society, the more I became convinced that a lot of our societal failings happen much sooner; so much of the foundation of our failure was happening in our educational system. And that’s what actually got me thinking...
Canons and Guns: An Eastern Orthodox Response to a HuffPo Writer
Several of my friends on Facebook pages posted a link to David Dunn’s Huffington Post essay on gun control (An Eastern Orthodox Case for Banning Assault Weapons). As Dylan Pahman posted earlier today, Dunn, an Eastern Orthodox Christian, is to mended for bringing the tradition of the Orthodox Church into conversation with contemporary issues such as gun control. As a technical matter, to say nothing for the credibility of his argument, it would be helpful if he understood the weapons...
Bums, Anarchy, and Homicidal Fictions
“I’ll just walk the earth.” It may not be very pious (although there is a very memorable apocryphal quote from Ezekiel 25:17), but Pulp Fiction is perhaps my favorite movie. There’s a scene where Vincent (John Travolta) and Jules (Samuel L. Jackson), two hit men, are in a diner discussing their future. Jules contends that he and Vincent have just experienced a miracle, and he plans to change his life accordingly. After finishing their current job, Jules says, “I’ll just...
Crisis and Constitution: Hitler’s Rise to Power
In March 1933, through various political maneuvers, Adolf Hitler successfully suppressed Communist, Socialist, and Catholic opposition to a proposed “Enabling Act,” which allowed him to introduce legislation without first going through parliament, thus by-passing constitutional review. The act would give the German executive branch unprecedented power. “Hitler’s rise to power is a sobering story of how a crisis and calls for quick solutions can tempt citizens and leaders to subvert the rule of law and ignore a country’s constitutional safeguards,”...
Obama’s Most Fowl Double Standard
In the 1880s America’s most flighty fad was fowl-bedecked fashion. “Trendy bonnets were piled high with feathers, birds, fruit, flowers, furs, even mice and small reptiles,” writes Jennifer Price, “Birds were by far the most popular accessory: Women sported egret plumes, owl heads, sparrow wings, and whole hummingbirds; a single hat could feature all that, plus four or five warblers.” The result was the killing of millions of birds, including many exotic and rare species. Reporting on the winter hat...
Subsidiarity ‘From Above’ and ‘From Below’
I have wrapped up a brief series on the principle of subsidiarity over at the blog of the journal Political Theology with a post today, “Subsidiarity ‘From Below.'” You can check out the previous post, “Subsidiarity ‘From Above,'” as well as my introductory primer on the topic as well. For those who might be interested in reading some more, you can also download some related papers: “State, Church, and the Reformational Roots of Subsidiarity” and “A Society of Mutual Aid:...
Dunn, Oikonomia, and Assault Weapons: Misappropriating a Principle?
Update (1/31/2013): David Dunn Responds to my post, Fr. Gregory’s post, and others: here. Original post: David J. Dunn yesterday wrote an interesting piece arguing for a ban on assault weapons from an Orthodox Christian perspective (here). First of all, I am happy to see any timely Orthodox engagement with contemporary social issues and applaud the effort. Furthermore, I respect his humility, as his bio statement reads: “his views reflect the diversity of Orthodox opinion on this issue, not any...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved