Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Israel Really Wants A King (Part II)
Israel Really Wants A King (Part II)
Jan 5, 2026 6:43 AM

Picking up where we left offlast time(in verse 9 of I Samuel 8), the prophet Samuel’s sons have given God’s system of judges a black eye with their corrupt behavior. Not wishing to be upstaged in the “Let’s Disappoint God” department, the people of Israel decide they want to up-the-sin-ante by rejecting God’s order and demanding a monarchy.

It’s now time for Samuel to share with the people what is in store for them should they refuse to course-correct.

In verse 9, at the behest of God himself, Samuel offers a “solemn” warning to his people. I note this at the start because I am of the opinion that it is always a worthwhile endeavor to give someone headed off of a cliff a fair warning. Even if you know they won’t listen, it’s always worth a shot. God knew the people had turned their hearts from Him, and He knew they would reject the council of His appointed mediator, but He told that mediator to warn them anyway.

Samuel’s task was to walk rightly with his God and obediently speak truth to his countrymen. The rest was in Yahweh’s hands.

Verses 10-18are pilation of “the ways of the king” – the king’s “Best/Worst Of” list, if you will. The intent is to talk some sense into the twelve tribes of Israel. Many of these things on that list are simply the average, “normal” tasks that a king would perform as the leader of a nation.

Wherever power resides, so do responsibilities and duties. The collection of taxes in order to pay for protection (i.e. the es to mind. But there is no doubt about God’s (via Samuel’s) intent here: He wants the people to know how thoroughly a king will dominate their lives, livelihoods, and day-to-day activities.

Corruption and the potential to sin are within all of us, but increased power over others accelerates the chances for injustice, abuse, and gross mismanagement/misallocation of resources. There was corruption among the judges, but God is warning the people how much worse it can (and will) get.

So what are these warnings, exactly? Let’s take a brief look at a few of them.

Verse 11 – “He will take your sons and appoint them to his chariots and to be his horsemen and to run before his chariots.

Chariot-runners were nothing more than a status symbol. The king is going to take children from their homes, make them run ahead of his chariots (which would be moving fairly quickly) for long stretches, and all so that his prestige would increase among other kings and military leaders. Sounds like a summer job or two that I had in high school.

Verses 12 and 13 – “And he will appoint for manders of thousands manders of fifties, and some to plow his ground and to reap his harvest, and to make his implements of war and the equipment of his chariots. He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers.

Instead of a volunteer army, recruited from among the individual tribes, the king – out of necessity – will begin conscripting those he wishes to serve. He will need young men for his army, and he will need young women to feed his army (as well as his court). This won’t be suggested, but demanded.

Verses 14 and 15 – “He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive orchards and give them to his servants. He will take the tenth of your grain and of your vineyards and give it to his officers and to his servants.

The phrase “best of your fields” is unequivocally alluding to the above-and-beyond annexation of the people’s goods and services their king will be guilty of. Leaders, and especially those overseeing monarchies and oligarchies, don’t tend to be thrifty people. They’re going to “get theirs” and since they are busy being in charge, they won’t have any time to actually produce anything themselves.

They live at the expense of others. So do those lucky enough to be in the king’s “inner circle.”

During munists’ rule in Russia from 1917 to 1991, the people worked jobs their leaders told them to work, accepted the shortages in food and basic goods they were forced to accept, and meanwhile the top-brass of the USSR lived like, well, kings. This isn’t about entrepreneurial people making a good living and having nice things. This is about an elitist, ruling class that lives solely off of the fruits of other folks’ labors.

Verses 17 and 18 – “He will take the tenth of your flocks, and you shall be his slaves. And in that day you will cry out because of your king, whom you have chosen for yourselves, but the LORD will not answer you in that day.”

Every aspect of one’s life has now been covered in Samuel’s list of warnings. Ultimately he flat-out states that the people will be “slaves.” And when that day arrives the people will wail and moan and wonder how they gave their liberty willingly away. But God will not answer at that time because He has answered now.

Christians and students of the Old Testament know how this tale ends. Israel tells Samuel and Yahweh to stuff their warnings in a sack. Saul es king, does a horrendous job, David takes over, falls into major sin, and the rest of Israel’s schizophrenic history is one bad king following a good king (following a bad king).

It’s a mess. We’re a mess.

The one true es, dies, rises from the grave, ascends into heaven and promises that He will be back to establish the only monarchy and kingdom that ever had a chance of working properly.

But that is e, and for now we are interested in what happened then and what we ought to be doing now. It’s clear that a nation gets the leaders it deserves. The fantasy of a toil-free existence, of an end to sin, suffering, and poverty in this life, is a pipe dream (and a dangerous one at that). The idea that just the bination of ideology and leadership will fix humanity is a lie. It has plagued mankind since Babel, and it e to a final, wicked culmination in the one-world government of the antichrist (Babylon).

There is no substitute for personal responsibility, the exercise of civic duty (at munity/church level), and an ever-increasing reliance upon God.Governments aren’t bad things. Romans 13 is clear about our duty to respect those in power. But “we the people” in the United States of America are the government.

We have the ability to choose whether we will head in the direction of top-down collectivism or a representative prised of individual families, munities, cities, and states.

If you’re looking to Scripture for a theocratic blueprint that will detail how Christ wants us to run our nation, you won’t find it. But to fail to glean wisdom from such glaring examples of the inherent flaws to centralized power would be a foolish mistake.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Bloomberg and Sanders are both wrong about money in politics
Super Tuesday – the single day in the U.S. presidential primaries with the most delegates at stake – e and gone, and so have quite a few presidential candidates. Former South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) both dropped out before Tuesday and endorsed former Vice President Joe Biden. After lackluster performances on Tuesday, both former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and his debate nemesis, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, have dropped out, as well. The...
Acton Commentary: Liberty for AOC but not for thee
During a congressional hearing late last week, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez likened Christians who refuse to perform medical procedures that violate their religious beliefs to Klansmen, segregationists, and slaveholders. But in this week’s Acton Commentary, Rev. Gregory Jensen writes that it is the congresswoman who shares the Jim Crow tactics of using the government to deny other people their inalienable rights. In a video clip that went viral, AOC, a democratic socialist, said that Christians lack the right to live according to...
Acton Line podcast: The biggest problems of national conservatism
In recent years, a rift has opened within American conservatism, a series of divisions animated in part by the 2016 presidential election and also by a right concern with an increasingly progressive culture. Among these divisions is a growing split between self-professing liberal and illiberal conservatives as some on the right scramble to give explanation for a culture which has e hostile to civil society and traditional institutions, most notably the family. One movement which has grown out of this...
For Roger Scruton, philosophy and culture were inseparable
It’s almost two months since the death of perhaps the twentieth century’s most important conservative philosopher, Sir Roger Scruton, but discussion of the significance of his work and life continues to occupy a great deal of space in journals, opinion pieces and on the airwaves. Like many others, I have found myself looking again at many of Scruton’s great books, such as his classic “The Meaning of Conservatism” (1980), the very reflective “England: An Elegy” (2000) and the aesthetic arguments...
A look inside a pro-life, free-market healthcare system
Proponents of massive government programs like Medicare for All often present their schemes as though there were no alternative to state intervention. Thankfully, a life-affirming, healthcare practice shows that the free market has a superior answer about how to care for vulnerable women and their babies. Chris Gast of Right to Life of Michigan drew my attention to the story of Mark Blocher, a Christian bioethicist who believes medical practices should reflect their faith, something often difficult even in our...
3 books to help you think and talk about politics without practicing politics
When people talk about politics, they are usually discussing passions and interests, often with a whole lot of passion and interest. This is why prohibitions exist in polite society against talking about politics. Political discussions about issues, parties, or candidates are often performative recitations of opinion: yesterday’s knowledge, right or wrong, applied to today’s situation. These debates can be engaging, enraging, or enjoyable. It is this sort of politics that, as Henry Adams observed, “as a practice, whatever its professions,...
Hubris old and new
Adam MacLeod, a law professor at Faulkner University in Alabama, wrote a couple of years ago in the New Boston Post of “chronological snobbery,” the idea that “moral knowledge progresses inevitably, such that later generations are morally and intellectually superior to earlier generations, and that the older the source the more morally suspect that source is.” We don’t have to look too hard to see how widespread this attitude is now. No other age has had the hubris of ours....
Why businesses should use the servant leadership model
I recently flew from Grand Rapids to Los Angeles on Delta. With the exception of some extra frisky TSA agents here in Michigan, the experience was largely positive. My flights were on time, the crew was helpful, and the planes were clean and well equipped. Even for those of us sitting in the back, the seating fortable. Bonus—I had a whole row to myself on the trip home! All of this got me thinking about a news article that blipped...
As it turns out, Lake Erie does not have ‘rights’
Last week, a federal district court judge in Ohio declared that the city of Toledo’s move to establish a Lake Erie Bill of Rights, or LEBOR, was invalid. Judge Jack Zouhary put it this way: Frustrated by the status quo, LEBOR supporters knocked on doors, engaged their fellow citizens, and used the democratic process to pursue a well-intentioned goal: the protection of Lake Erie. As written, however, LEBOR fails to achieve that goal. This is not a close call. LEBOR...
Clayton Christensen: ‘If you take away religion, you can’t hire enough police’
The Founding Fathers understood, in the words of John Adams, that “we have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion.” An Ivy League professor recently heard the same conclusion repeated by a Chinese Marxist. “I had no idea how critical religion is to the functioning of democracy,” the economist told Clayton Christensen. Christensen, who died last month at the age of 67, taught business administration at Harvard Business School and served...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved