Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Is the rise of ‘creative entrepreneurship’ killing the arts?
Is the rise of ‘creative entrepreneurship’ killing the arts?
Apr 2, 2025 9:02 PM

Capitalism is routinely ridiculed as an enemy of the “true artist,” with much of the finger-pointing bent toward profit and efficiency. Such forces, we are told, inevitably cause creators to drool only for money, care nothing for beauty, and cater exclusively mon consumer tastes.

Yet while free economies introduce a range of unique challenges for artists and consumers alike, economic empowerment has also led to plenty of artistic empowerment as well: putting more time, resources, and creative capacity in the hands of ordinary people.

Indeed, such empowerment has brought us so far that some now fear the “end of art as we know it.” In an age where everyone can be an “artist,” every business strives to be “creative,” and every product claims to be “artisanal,” is there anything left for the pursuit of true beauty and the cultivation of higher art?

In a fascinating essay in The Atlantic, William Deresiewicz offers plenty of cause for concern.Tracing our cultural conceptions of the artist over recent centuries, from “hard-working artisan” to “solitary genius” to “credentialed professional,” Deresiewicz worries that our current notion of “creative entrepreneurship” has e so widely applied that it leaves little room for art as a deeper, spiritual pursuit.

“A new paradigm is emerging, and has been since about the turn of the millennium,” he writes, “one that’s in the process of reshaping what artists are: how they work, train, trade, collaborate, think of themselves and are thought of — even what art is — just as the solitary-genius model did two centuries ago. The new paradigm may finally destroy the very notion of ‘art’ as such — that sacred spiritual substance — which the older one created.”

Before and beyond each of those conceptions is the market, of course, and whereas the artist as “artisan” was somewhat of a “feudal dependent” (pre-capitalism), “the paradigms of genius and professional were stages in the effort to adjust to it.”

In the former case [artist as genius], the object was to avoid the market and its sullying entanglements, or at least to appear to do so. Spirit stands opposed to flesh, to filthy lucre. Selling was selling out. Artists, like their churchly forebears, were meant to be unworldly…

Professionalism represents promise formation, midway between the sacred and the secular. A profession is not a vocation, in the older sense of a “calling,” but it also isn’t just a job; something of the priestly clings to it. Against the values of the market, the artist, like other professionals, maintained a countervailing set of standards and ideals—beauty, rigor, truth—inherited from the previous paradigm.

Today, however, we find ourselves entering yet another phase, one that is marked by the rise of the “creative entrepreneur” and the “self-employed.”According to Deresiewicz, our current situation represents “the final triumph of the market and its values, the removal of the last vestiges of protection and mediation.”

But is that such a bad thing?

The institutions that have undergirded the existing system are contracting or disintegrating. Professors are ing adjuncts. Employees are ing independent contractors (or unpaid interns). Everyone is in a budget squeeze: downsizing, outsourcing, merging, or collapsing. Now we’re all supposed to be our own boss, our own business: our own agent; our own label; our own marketing, production, and accounting departments. Entrepreneurialism is being sold to us as an opportunity. It is, by and large, a necessity. Everybody understands by now that nobody can count on a job.

Still, it alsoisan opportunity. The push of institutional disintegration has coincided with the pull of new technology. The emerging culture of creative entrepreneurship predates the Web—its roots go back to the 1960s—but the Web has brought it an unprecedented salience. The Internet enables you to promote, sell, and deliver directly to the user, and to do so in ways that allow you pete with corporations and institutions, which previously had a virtual monopoly on marketing and distribution. You can reach potential customers at a speed and on a scale that would have been unthinkable when pretty much the only means were word of mouth, the alternative press, and stapling handbills to telephone poles.

Deresiewicz identifies some real risks in our present situation — the replacement of depth with breadth, the degradation of beauty, a preference for “safe” art, a catering to the petty demands of popular patronage, a sweeping “democratization of taste.”

But given the range of new benefits and opportunities, many of which Deresiewicz duly acknowledges, there is also plenty to celebrate. For while the popular perception of “creative entrepreneurship” may indeed lack any meaningful spiritual significance through a modern materialistic lens, the trend of all work ing seen as “artisanal” ports rather well with the Christian view of all work as sacred.

Deresiewicz explains how the artist was once seen “like a holy man; inspired, like a prophet; in touch with the unseen, his consciousness bulging into the future.” This may sound like a lofty vision, but it is not so different from our basic calling as Christians in the broader economy.

As workers, creators, craftspeople, and collaborators, we are not just laborers in a materialistic, profit-driven system.We are creators and collaborators, servants called to connect our minds with our spirits and our hearts with our hands. We may not be “solitary geniuses,” but we are called to be prophets in the workplaceand everywhere else, asking God for wisdom and truth as we serve our neighbors and cultivate beauty around us — no matter how mundane our activities and efforts may seem.

This is speaking of something far different than the high art of the Renaissance and the Romantic Era. But in democratizing our vision of are, empowering everyday creators, and attributing to the “professional” that which was previously confined to the “artist,” we have actually moved our minds closer to a proper theology of work.

The question, then, is how do we embrace that shift in imagination without losing the distinct goods of high art and the variations that exist before and beyond the marketplace?

Those risks are real, and we should heed Deresiewicz’s concerns about the evaporation of certain standards or conceptions of art, just as we should affirm that such art brings something distinct and valuable to civilization. In an increasingly utilitarian world, cramped in its capacity for mystery and wonder, such art is uniquely enriching — forming and fostering our imaginations in truth and beauty and goodness.

But as we acknowledge those risks, we can do so in a way that retains a wider imagination about the past and the present, as well as a bolder optimism for the future. We can bring an appreciation for high art as well as bottom-up economic and creative empowerment, the convergence of which is sure to bring value to both civilization and the soul.

Image: Prawny, CC0

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Acton Line podcast: What is woke capitalism? Daniel J. Mahoney on ‘The Idol of Our Age’
From Gillette to Pepsi, panies are starting to market their products by advocating for social justice issues, signaling to consumers that they are “woke.” Is ‘woke capitalism’ a trend that’s truly new in the market? Is there a place for businesses ment on social issues? Acton’s president and co-founder, Rev. Robert Sirico, explains. Afterwards, Daniel J. Mahoney, professor of political science at Assumption College speaks about his newest book, “The Idol of our Age: How the Religion of Humanity Subverts...
Latin America falls behind—again
Economic globalization has brought many economic benefits to the planet, but it’s also true that the benefits have been uneven. One continent which has lagged behind much of the rest of the world is Latin America. As a recent Wall Street Journal article entitled “Latin America Hangs On to Its Economic Gloom” pointed out: This year, once again, Latin America is shaping up as an economic disappointment. Brazil’s economy likely shrank slightly in the year’s first half, and Mexico’s didn’t...
Virtue and the Lake Wobegon effect
During the mid-1990s I spent a tour of duty as a Marine recruiter in southwestern Washington State. One of my primary tasks was to give talks at local high schools, but because many of the guidance counselors were not exactly pro-military, I was expected to give generic “motivational” speeches. I soon discovered my idea of what constituted a motivational speech was not widely shared. “Your parents and teachers have not been straight-forward with you,” I told the students in my...
Ignoring the invisible
I have been thinking a lot about all of the invisible things around us, important foundational things that we take for granted. Because they don’t immediately manifest themselves to our attention we can forget about them if we are not careful. There are different layers of “invisible” things or institutions or concepts that make life go on and that undergird our economic, political, and social life. One of the characteristics of these invisible things is that we don’t necessarily need...
Michael Novak and the ‘crisis of capitalism’
Jordan Ballor recently brought to my attention this remarkable passage from Michael Novak’s The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism, “Our moral and cultural traditions have not kept pace with our economic possibilities. We try to match new demands with a spiritual life not designed for them.” What we think of as ‘democratic capitalism,’ and the economic and political theories which under-gird it, arose out of a tradition of moral and theological reflection on the institutions, ethics, and law of early modern...
Be fruitful, multiply, and grow the economy
In one of the most memorable mid-1990s episodes of The Simpsons, the curmudgeonly misanthrope Charles Montgomery Burns achieves a lifelong dream: Since the beginning of time, man has yearned to destroy the sun. I shall do the next best thing: block it out. While Mr. Burns had no use for our nearest star, the other residents Springfield were dismayed by the citywide sun-block. They understood, as Steve Martin once said, that “A day without sunshine is like, you know, night.”...
The reason America’s poor are richer than most Europeans
The U.S. has diverged from the OECD approach to economic and energy issues that critics called this weekend’s G7 Summit the “G6-plus-one.” However, a new study shows America’s less regulated, less regimented economy has generated such abundance that the poorest 20 percent of Americans are more prosperous than the average European. “If the U.S. ‘poor’ were a nation, it would be one of the world’s richest,” writes Jim Agresti of Just Facts in a new article for the Acton Institute’s...
Drucker on the ‘master organization’ and the totalitarian conceit
This is the fourth in a series of essayson Peter Drucker’s early works. It was sometimes said of fascists that they “made the trains run on time.” In The End of Economic Man, Peter Drucker saw that fascists “proved” their fitness through effective organization. Technical details substituted for real social ends. But the real power of fascist organization has to do with its ambition prehensiveness. In effect, the fascist state holds up the political party and insists that all be...
Abba Moses on the Christian vocation
Today in the Orthodox Church memorate St. Moses the Ethiopian, also simply known as St. Moses the Black. His life and teachings have enriched the Christian spiritual tradition for more than 1,600 years, and he has something to teach us about the concept of vocation. Abba Moses was one of the desert fathers, the first Christian monks who lived in the wilderness of ancient Egypt and dedicated their lives to the pursuit of virtue and holiness. According to tradition, he...
Explainer: What does it mean to prorogue Parliament?
Prime Minister Boris Johnson has set up a collision with Parliament over the likelihood of a no-deal Brexit, as he announced that he intends to prorogue Parliament next month. Here are the facts you need to know. What does it mean to “prorogue” Parliament? To prorogue Parliament resets the session, as Members of Parliament take an extended recess. All pending legislation is wiped clean, except for measures MPs voted to carry over. The traditionalQueen’s Speechthen rings in a new session...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved