Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Is Having Children Too Expensive? (Wrong Question!)
Is Having Children Too Expensive? (Wrong Question!)
Mar 18, 2025 8:00 PM

The cost of raising kids in the United States has reportedly gone up, averaging $245,340 per child according to a recent report by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which factors in costs for housing, food, clothing, healthcare, education, toys, and more.

From the Associated Press:

A child born in 2013 will cost a e American family an average of $245,340 until he or she reaches the age of 18, with families living in the Northeast taking on a greater burden, according to a report out Monday. And that doesn’t include college — or expenses if a child lives at home after age 17.

In response to these estimates, much of the reporting has aimed to paint an even grimmer picture for prospective parents, emphasizing other factors such as the likely trajectory of declining wages and rising costs in areas like healthcare and education.

Taken together, it’s enough to make your average spoiled youngster run in the opposite direction. And indeed, many actively are.As Jonathan Last details extensively in his book, What to Expect When No One’s Expecting: America’s Coming Demographic Disaster, birthrates in the Western world are in a free fall, with more and more adults opting for fewer and fewer kids, if any at all, and making such decisions later and later in life.

For those of us who shudder at the prospect of a world with fewer children, and who increasingly encounter negative attitudes about child-bearing and -rearing amongst our peers, many of whom are in their child-bearing “primes,” one wonders how we might respond with pelling financial case for having children amid such supposedly grim prospects.

But while it may be tempting to respond by nit-picking over the inflated consumeristic expectations of modern American parents, or by elevating innovative “life hacks” on how to coupon-cut your way to retaining that expensive Starbucks habit, we’d do well to recognize that at the heart of the West’s demographic crisis is the question plete with its narrowconsumeristic disposition toward cost and convenience as the primary metrics for human hope and destiny.

For Christians in particular, no matter what the dollar numbers of the day, the choice to have children is one driven by something deeper, wider, and higher than ourselves. Financial wisdom and frugality are important, but God didn’t tell Hannah, Manoah, or Mary to plug their ears, shut up their hearts, and budget their way to babies.At what point do we waive our “right to choose,” and let God choose for us?

This is where we ought to begin, with financial analysis and every other thought process funneled and interpreted accordingly.With that as my proposed foundation, I offer the following reflections to prospective parents: whether you tremble at the USDA’s price tag or dismiss its validity altogether.

1. Having and raising kids involves lots of pain and sacrifice, and that’s a good thing. Parenting involves hard work and immense dedication, economic and otherwise, and there’s no getting around it. Want to serve, sacrifice, and contribute to something awesome in real, tangible, transformative, and transcendent ways? Pray earnestly and selflessly about whether you’re called to marry and have kids, and if you hear “yes” from on high, find the right spouse, bear children, and prepare your spirit, soul, body, and pocketbook for a life of liberating constraints.

2. Children are a net gain. That’snot to downplay or ignore the element of extreme sacrifice. When you wake up drowsily at 3 a.m. to help your screaming child for the 7th night in a row, the last thing on your mind is some sophisticated cost-benefit analysis about how “this all pays off in the long run.” But surely there are both immediate and long-term gains for all parties involved. People are producers, innovators, lovers, and taxpayers, and we were created to be in family and relationship munity. From a parent’s perspective, whatever you may think about the (likely) potential for dips in “happiness,” fort,” “economic stability,” yearly vacations to Paris, or any other superficial pseudo-pleasures of the Entitled Age, where there is hard and meaningful work, there is fulfillment, joy, purpose, and all-around human flourishing. As most parents eventually understand, the reward of parenting is a mysterious, paradoxical, perplexing, and beautiful thing that will never be trumped by some petty financial estimate by the USDA.

3. Sticker shock is sticker shock. But speaking of petty quantification, the numbers and estimates in these studies are surely inflated by over-the-top Western privilege and priority, even when taken through a wholly materialistic lens. Yet even still: How much does that actually matter? Even if you, as a parent, were modest and frugal to the extreme, sticker shock is still sticker shock. My wife quit her job to raise our three kids, and plans to be home full-time for some time. What should we do as a start? Multiply her lost salary times 18 or so, and factor in how many raises she might’ve earned in the years in between? See #1 above.The economic price is high no matter how you calculate it. Embrace the risk and sacrifice and find the reward.

4. What would God have you do? Going back to my initial point, and first and foremost above all else: With our newfound choice in all things family- and sex-related, our decision-making process must be rooted in obedience to God, which includes a heightened sense of obligation to spouse munity, and a far healthier view of sacrifice, happiness, and meaning than we as a culture currently possess. Russia tries to give away fancy prize packages to counter its population decline, and such measures continue to fail because they ignore a fundamental ingredient of a society with flourishing families: submission to priorities more powerful pelling than free refrigerators and materialistic gimmicks.

Again, financial considerations are important, and they ought to remain an active part of our discernment and decision-making process. Likewise, God does not call everyone to have kids, nor to have them as soon or as young as possible. Even for those who embrace the calling,many face severe and painful hurdles in finding a good spouse or bearing children itself.

But when I ask young, married, prosperous millennials why they’re not having kids, more often than not, they point to illusions fort, their own personal plans and designs for the future (“wise” though they may be), and inflated notions of economic impossibility.

We are not in the demographic or cultural position of Russia, but the rising generation of young people in the U.S. is increasingly questioning or distorting the value and purpose of child-bearing and child-rearing. We’d do well to locate the proper source of whole-life flourishing, and do so nice and quick.

As Jonathan Last concludes at the end of his book:

There are many perfectly good reasons to have a baby. (Curiosity, vanity, and naiveté e to mind.) But at the end of the day, there’s only one good reason to go through the trouble a second time: Because you believe, in some sense, that God wants you to.

Do we actually believe that?

Are we even asking the question?

[product sku=”1103″]

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The (just) price of salt (and cancer drugs)
A recent episode of the very fine podcast EconTalk reminded me of one of the more remarkable episodes during my time here at the Acton Institute involving our internship program. The EconTalk episode is about the price of cancer drugs, and the various factors that go into the often astronomical prices of the latest cancer-fighting drugs. These can run up to an in excess of $300,000 per year. A question implicit in the discussion is whether such high costs are...
Church and politics: Necessary definitions and distinctions
A few weeks ago The Gospel Coalition ran a review of Jonathan Leeman’s book, Why Nations Rage: Rethinking Faith and Politics in a Divided Age. A snip: Leeman’s analysis is guided by a few central convictions. One is represented in Psalm 2 and the title itself. He explains, “History’s greatest political rivalry, it would seem, is between the nations of the earth and the Messiah.” Another guiding insight is that all of life is religious, including politics. This is true...
Justice Scalia explains why the ‘living Constitution’ is a threat to America
A majority of Americans—55 percent—now say the U.S. Supreme Court should base its rulings on what the Constitution “means in current times,” while only 41 percent say rulings should be based on what it “meant as originally written,” according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center. Not surprisingly, the divide is mostly along partisan lines. According to Pew, nearly eight-in-ten Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents (78 percent) now say rulings should be based on the Constitution’s meaning in current...
Socialism is dead (Part 2): What’s wrong with the market-based evolution of socialism?
I spent my previous postexplaining that orthodox socialism is effectively dead and what remains is really different variations on societies that effectively accept the market as the standard frame. Here, I would like to explain, in part, why the Bernie Sanders approach to market-based socialism (after the death of socialism) is not the right way forward. As I stated in the previous post, this Americanized “socialism” is definitely of the half-hearted variety. Strong socialism would mean government ownership of the...
Dalio’s animated adventure in common grace-infused wisdom
Ray Dalio is a fascinating character. Founder of the“world’s richest and strangest hedge fund,”he’s been dubbed the “Steve Jobs of investing” and “Wall Street’s oddest duck.” He’s currently #26 on Forbes list ofrichest people in Americaand Time magazine once included him on their list of the world’s 100 most influential people. In 2011, Dalio outlined his personal philosophy on life and business in a self-published 123-page PDF called “Principles.” (It was re-released as a book in 2017 and e the#1Amazon...
What can economics teach us about moral ecology?
In exploring the various connections between morality, theology, and economics, we routinely long for philosophers and theologians who understand economics, just as we crave economists who understand the bigger picture of self-interest and human destiny. That sort cross-disciplinary dialogue and mutual understanding can be beneficial, but for economist Peter Boettke, it can also serve as a distraction. In an article for Faith and Economics, Boettke argues that economics as a scienceoffers plenty of tools for “moral assessment,” and that economists...
The miracle apple: Co-creative lessons from the fall of the Red Delicious
In the Age of Information, much of our work now takes place in the realm of the “intangible”—creating and trading products and services that can feel somewhat obscure or abstract. Even still, in our technological, data-driven world, we should remember that we are cooperating withnatureandco-creating with our Creator. From the social-media giants to the sawmills, from the blockchain banks to the barbershops, we are using our God-given intellect and creativity to transform a mix of matter and information into something...
Liberalism needs natural law
The great British political thinker Edmund Burke regarded what some call “liberalism” today as prehensible, unworkable and unjust in the absence of mitment to natural law.A similar argument can be made in our own time, says Acton research director Samuel Gregg: Without natural law foundations, for instance, how can we determine what is and isn’t a right other than appeals to raw power or utility, neither of which can provide a principled case for rights? Or, on what other basis...
How geography affects economic growth
Note: This is post #78 in a weekly video series on basic economics. You could fit most of the U.S., China, India, and a lot of Europe, into Africa. But if pare Africa to Europe, Europe has two to three times the length of coastline that Africa. Why does this matter? As this video by Marginal Revolution University explains, geography can have profound effects on a nation’s economic growth. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d...
Bernie Sanders is not a socialist. Socialism is dead.
I recently gave a presentation to students about foreign aid in the developing world. I tried to explain that many ing to the conclusion that what is really necessary is to establish conditions suitable for a market-based society. In other words, there must be a transparent administration of justice, the predictable rule of law, private property rights, ease in doing business, a real lack of arbitrariness, etc. Both as I prepared and as I spoke, however, I realized that some...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved