Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Interview: Adriana Gini, neuroradiologist and bioethicist
Interview: Adriana Gini, neuroradiologist and bioethicist
Jul 11, 2025 10:41 PM

The market place is plicated and intricate in terms of decision making processes and human relationships. We have to start thinking in terms of multiple layers, multiple dimensions and an astonishing level plexity when making sense of human beings and their moral behavior.

Read More…

Is moral enhancement of the entrepreneur possible? That’s the question Michael Severance, operations manager for Istituto Acton (the Acton Institute’s Rome office) recently posed to Dr. Adriana Gini, a neuroradiologist at San Camillo-Forlanini Medical Centre in Rome and an expert bioethicist at the Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum. Dr. Gini recently led Istituto Acton’s monthly Campus Martius seminar “Moral Enhancement: Back to the Future” and offers some further insight on her topic. An audio recording of her seminar is available on the Istituto Acton home page.

Michael Severance: Dr. Gini, thank you for taking time to explain your views on the fascinating subject of moral enhancement. Most of us have heard of various forms of “physical” enhancement, as with genetic splicing for disease prevention, pre-selection of human embryos to produce “savior siblings” and mixing chemical cocktails to improve the physical endurance of our organs…In what way are the two types of enhancement – physical and moral – related, if at all? Or is this just a play on words?

Adriana Gini: The association between the word “moral” to the type of life we live, the decisions we make, our efforts and struggles to improve society and ourselves is perfectly natural. In fact, morality depends on our acts and our acts are the expression of what we are as human beings. Our behavior, as moral agents, is plex and, no doubt, involves our physicality. Nonetheless, a pure physical/neuronal explanation of morality -with no reference to a prehensive knowledge of the human person- is rather hazardous. As such, the term “moral enhancement” does not have an immediate, direct connection to some forms of genetic, pharmacological or biotechnological enhancement, unlike the ones targeted at cognitive enhancement.

MS: From an Acton perspective, it is interesting to know if there is some type of petition” or “economic” factor driving neurological science in the direction of improving the human moral condition. What is at the bottom of all this? For example, is the real inspiration to improve human action found in creating petitive edge in intelligence within the marketplace? Some might find it hard to believe that secular science is really interested in fostering moral excellence for its own sake in its laboratories. Much less so in its lab rats and guinea pigs!

AG: According to some authors, as with Julian Savulescu, director of the Oxford Centre for Practical Ethics and head of the Oxford Centre for Neuroethics, contemporary research aimed at enhancing human cognition will result in an economic improvement (cf. Chap. 1.4 of Enhancing Human Capacities edited by Dr. Savulescu). In other words, better people make for better jobs, and in the end, better, more productive societies – in an economic sense. However, Savulescu’s claim is that such enhancement might also lead to a greater world of evil action. For example, we can use drugs or other biotechnological means to improve our mental abilities, but sometimes also to our detriment: smarter terrorists mean fiercer terrorist attacks with the mental enhancement to fabricate more powerful, more intelligent weapons of mass destruction. Therefore, in Savulescu’s opinion, any means to morally enhance the human species in terms of cognitive enhancement should only progress alongside research on moral enhancement. No one really knows, however, how to improve the human species morally by biotechnological means alone, since morality is not purely “biological”…, although there are certainly biological correlations to human moral behavior.

MS: In your area of neurological research, we must readdress the age old mind-body problem. Thomas Aquinas often referred to the “intermingling” of the material and immaterial in the case of human moral action. Surely there is some truth to the point that the physical makeup of our bodies influences the decisions taken by our minds and acts of the will. Maybe you can give us some practical examples of hormones that may affect the brain and, in the end, human choice.

AG: I agree, and St. Thomas Aquinas had the most unified “neurological vision of the brain” in the Middle Ages. Regarding the hormones that affect the brain, oxytocin is one of them: it is produced by the hypothalamus and stored in the posterior pituitary, a midline structure at the base of our brain. Its role in human labor and lactation is well known. More recently, it has been shown that oxytocin may affect our behavior. In particular, it seems to increase trust, generosity, empathy and reduces fear.

MS: On a related note, I recently saw a video that links genetic predispositions to virtues and vices of human sexuality. For example, scientists claim to have discovered a “monogamy gene” for those who tend toward mitment and a “cheating gene” for those who tend toward the opposite moral sphere. Yet studies seemed inconclusive and present many exceptions. At any rate, scientists make it sound as if our physical predisposition manifests itself in behavioral mechanisms. Are we really that animalistic?

AG: First of all, we are humans, with vices and virtues. Genes have a role, and they play it too! However, no single gene will ever explain the plexity” of our ethical behavior, whether this has to do with the type and quality of our relationships with others or with other aspects of our moral lives. The influence genes have on a few pathological conditions has been studied – such as dangerous aggressiveness and related profound immoral behavior. But the role of such genes and their familiarity is only partly understood.

MS: If I could peek into a genetics laboratory today, I am sure I would find scientists hard at work searching for a new “entrepreneur gene”, or at least one linked to the virtue of “prudential risk tasking”, the lack of which leads to the vices “rash decision making” and eventually “material excess” and “greed”. I imagine some corrupt men on Wall Street are looking for a way to scientifically explain some of their follies, and even profit from it. A discovery, might mean creating more intelligent and morally enhanced CEOs, better entrepreneurs in general, and, perhaps, a panacea to prevent future economic disasters based on immoral actions. Is their any such gene linked to this form moral enhancement?

AG: You are on to something. The search for a “morality” gene or genes is already taking place. It will continue in labs and outside of labs. In fact, functional MRI studies of the brain have been used to investigate moral judgment since 2001 (cf. research conducted by Harvard University’s Dr. Joshua Green and Dr. Marc Hauser). Such studies are aimed at understanding a possible universal basis of moral cognition and behavior. Something similar, for language, was proposed by MIT’s Dr. Noam Chomsky [a philosopher who laid out a breakthrough cognitivist approach to linguistics, introducing a new paradigm for human language and the mind].

MS: Fascinating. Can you explain more?

AG: Proponents of this theory claim that if a person’s moral behavior can be analyzed via functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, while taking on specific moral tasks, we can probably conclude that we have found a way to look at the “biology” of moral judgment. A direct correlation could also be made between the results of the imaging studies and the person’s genetic make up: in this case, we could assume that ethical science and genetic moral enhancement are possible….Some scientists have actually advocated the use of oxytocin to produce greater empathy in men and create a more balanced sense of risk and judgment in them.. Nonetheless, a business man, who takes many risks and makes many daily big decisions, is more than is his own genes or hormones, while obviously in need of them! One sure thing is the more we study human behavior, the more realize just plex action and moral decision making can be, as is in fact the business world. The market place is plicated and intricate in terms of decision making processes and human relationships. We have to start thinking in terms of multiple layers, multiple dimensions and an astonishing level plexity when making sense of human beings and their moral behavior. A “planned science of moral behavior”, much akin to a “planned economy”, would not necessarily work if aiming at producing better entrepreneurs.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Will socialism or corruption sink Europe’s most Catholic state?
The island nation of Malta has long enjoyed a reputation as perhaps the most Catholic nation in the world. However, some analysts believe socialism is gaining adherents, with Labour Party member George Vella about to e president this Friday – and its popularity is due in large part to widespread corruption. Mark R. Royce examines both issues in a new essay for Religion & Liberty Transatlantic. He begins by defining the term socialism, a helpful definition that notes the faith-based...
President Trump visits Grand Rapids, promises to turn it into Detroit
Last Thursday, at a campaign rally in Grand Rapids, MI (home, inter alia, to the Acton Institute), President Trump promised the crowd, “By the way, we’re bringing a lot of those panies back. Remember I told you. ing back. They’re pouring back in.” Now, it is important to put this in context. Trump had just praised Michigan workers — and no doubt people likely came from all over Michigan, even out of state, to hear the president speak. That said,...
The U.S. money supplies
Note: This is post #117 in a weekly video series on basic economics. What exactly is money? That may seem like a really simple question, but it’s actually kind plicated, notes economist Alex Tabarrok. We often think of money as currency (i.e., paper bills and coins), but “money” is anything that is a widely accepted means of payment. Given that there’s no set definition for what makes modity money, there are a few measurements for the U.S. money supplies. In...
How the minimum wage affected workers during (and after) the Great Recession
The law of demand is one of the most fundamental concepts of economics. This law states that, if all other factors remain equal, the higher the price of a good, the less people will demand that good. Most of the time this is too obvious to mention. Yet people seem to think we can suspend the law of demand when es to wages. They seem to believe, for example, that increasing the price of labor for low-skilled workers will have...
Study finds crony capitalists believe markets in America are already too free
Do business leaders embrace cronyism because they receive favoritism from the government or do those who seek favoritism from the government do so because they’ve already embraced cronyism? Whether it’s a matter of causation or correlation, there is definitely a connection, as a new study from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University finds. The new working paper discusses a national survey of business leaders that sought to determine how government favoritism toward particular firms (i.e., cronyism) correlates with attitudes...
The biggest beneficiaries of the success sequence
Good choices benefit everyone but, as in all of life, not all groups gain equally. The success sequence is no different. The sequence says that the vast majority of people can avoid living in poverty if they make a few deliberate life choices: finish high school, work full time, wait until age 21 to get married, and do not have children outside wedlock. Religion can provide unparalleled motivation for at least two of these goals.A new study has found that99.1...
All homeschoolers may have to register with the government
The Department of Education has proposed new guidelines that all homeschool parents must register with the government. Officials say the registry, es as a booming number ofchildren are being educated at home,would be used for government officials to check upon students and assure the pupils are receivingthe government’s definition of aquality education. The UK government unveiled the proposal as another controversial policy percolated through the British school system: pulsory classes about homosexual, bisexual, and transgender relationships beginning in primary school.That...
Grace in our life together: Community beyond markets, states, and ‘social capital’
When discussing the role of economics in our life and world I am always careful to make a distinction: life is economic but economics is not all of life.I’ve suggested this broader understanding of personal and social interests has mon among major free-market theorists since Adam Smith. Economics itself is the product of the sustained reflection of Christians on nature, the scriptures, and their own experience in crafting the institutions, ethics, and law which birthed the tradition of ordered liberty....
AOC and the New Eugenics
Here is a piece I wrote for the Stream on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and ments on climate change and whether “it is still ok to have children.” When an American politician asks if it is still okay to have children, this is something to notice. Are you familiar with the progressive movement and their attraction to eugenics? Then you know the score. It’s a short step from “wondering” if it’s okay for people to have children to making laws that forbid...
Kevin D. Williamson responds to ‘Ben Shapiro and the alt-right smear’
In my Friday post titled, “Ben Shapiro and the alt-right smear” I wrote: Thus, National Review – once a bulwark of American conservatism – advocates that gay marriage is a family value – according to Jonah Goldberg – and that statues of former Confederate leadership must be torn down by patriotism – according to Kevin Williamson. Williamson objected, saying this is what he actually wrote in his August 2017 piece “Let It Be” in National Review: The current attack on...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved