Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
In celebrating American liberty, let’s not forget the role of religion
In celebrating American liberty, let’s not forget the role of religion
Jan 13, 2026 12:58 PM

Religion is critical to a free society because it provides the moral and ethical structure to guide people to act as they ought in a state where the government allows them to act as they want.

Read More…

On July 4, 1776, the Continental Congress officially endorsed the Declaration of Independence. Parades, public readings, and bonfires ensued. These spontaneous celebrations developed into the Independence Day traditions that Americans still enjoy today.

The United States has retained many of these festivities in the years since, yet it is worth considering how much of the framers’ actual philosophy has been preserved as well.

The United States was founded on the idea of liberty. As Thomas Jefferson famously declared in the Declaration of Independence, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

The proximate cause of the American Revolution was to protect these rights among the colonists from infringement by Great Britain. But the ultimate goal was to create a society that protected these natural rights and liberties universally.

The founders understood, however, that liberty by itself cannot guarantee human flourishing. They recognized that religion is also necessary to realize the good life. One decade after the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson wrote the following in Notes on the State of Virginia:

God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the Gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.

Jefferson correctly saw that the liberties of a nation cannot be secure when religion is removed as the basis for those freedoms.

Writing in the early 19th century, the French political philosopher Alexis de Tocqueville mented on the important relationship between religion and liberty. In Democracy in America, Tocqueville wrote that “American liberty was born in the bosom of religion and is still sustained in its arms.”

But what is it about religious belief that is so important for sustaining liberty and achieving a good life? Tocqueville again offers an answer:

America is still the place in the world where the Christian religion has most retained true power over souls; and nothing shows better how useful and natural religion is to man, since the country where today it exercises the most dominion is at the same time the most enlightened and most free. . . . At the same time that the law allows the American people to do everything, religion prevents them from conceiving of everything and forbids them to dare everything.

Thus, religion is critical to a free society because it provides the moral and ethical structure to guide people to act as they ought in a state where the government allows them to act as they want.

There are certain behaviors and ways of life, knowable through human reason, which are morally correct and necessary for full human flourishing. The most basic of these – such as the prohibition on homicide – are enshrined in civil law and are generally accepted. Others – such as the importance of family, munity life, and charity – are not fully recognized by the state, but are still critical to human flourishing.

In a free society that emphasizes personal liberty, it is not the government’s role to encourage or mandate these virtues. That is the proper role of true religion. Religion educates citizens and orders their lives towards the objective goods of civic and private life, away from the reach of the state. It’s not just that the state is incapable of providing this structure from a practical standpoint. To do so would require the state to unjustly impinge upon the freedom of its citizens. In conjunction with liberty, religion is necessary to secure these facets of the good life.

The decline in religious values in previous decades has contributed to many of the problems in the modern world. As church attendance has declined since the 1950s, American society has grown more lonely, more atomized, and more materialistic. Citizens are still free to do what they want, but religion no longer guides them to do as they ought: to prioritize family, to participate in munity, and to live virtuously.

Contrary to the vision of the founders, America has retained the liberty inherent to a free society, but is no longer sustained in the arms of religion, and that is a problem.

Which begs the question: How can the United States restore the symbiotic relationship between religion and liberty imagined by Tocqueville and the founders? One easy way is for citizens to return to church pews. Research indicates that greater civic engagement and personal fulfillment will follow from that decision. If people do not adopt this course, then alternative solutions will be necessary to restore a higher degree of virtue to American life (e.g., investment in munities and family-oriented public policy).

The widespread adoption of a pass will make the United States truly free. A return to liberty and faith will allow America to celebrate future Independence Days in the spirit originally imagined by the founders.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Christmas and the Cross
Two of Eric Shansberg’s recent PowerBlog posts got me thinking of some other things I had run across in the last couple weeks during the run-up to Christmas Day. The first item, “Santa and the ultimate Fairy Tale,” quotes Tony Woodlief to the effect that “fairy tales and Santa Claus do prepare us to embrace the ultimate Fairy Tale.” Schansberg’s (and Woodlief’s) take on this question is pelling and worth considering, even though I’m not quite convinced of the value...
Why We Give — Liberal and Conservative
Nicholas Kristof’s Dec. 21 New York Times column was, he says, “a transparent attempt this holiday season to shame liberals into being more charitable.” He quotes Arthur Brooks’ “Who Really Cares” book which shows that conservatives give more to charity than liberals. The upshot is that Democrats, who speak passionately about the hungry and homeless, personally fork over less money to charity than Republicans — the ones who try to cut health insurance for children. “When I started doing research...
Conservative/Libertarian Books for the Acton Reader
It is the new year and the time of reflection is upon us. In 2008, we witnessed a revolutionary left-liberal presidential victory and the onset of substantial economic challenges. Under the circumstances, I thought now might be a good time to propose a list of outstanding books for the intellectually curious friend or fellow traveler. I would not dare attempt to put these in order based on excellence. Just consider it a series of number ones. 1. Lancelot by Walker...
Acton Commentary: A Second Opinion on Employer Responsibility for Heath Care
Health care reform is likely to move back into the public eye as a new Congress and a new Obama administration prepare to start work this month. In this week’s Acton Commentary, Dr. Don Condit argues for a move away from employer funded health care benefits to a portable system. “Corporate human resources departments should not be viewed as the main source of support for Americans’ health care,” he writes. “The iniquitous government subsidy for employer-based health care could be...
One Good Thing about Term Limits
I’m ambivalent about the value of term limits, but one thing that can certainly be counted in their favor is that they (at some point at least), force lawmakers to go out and try to make a living in the economic environment which they helped to shape. In Michigan, nearly half of the 110-member House of Representatives will consist of new members. Of the 46 new members, 44 ing from seats that were open because of term limits. And now...
Ignorance, Humility, and Economics
I like Robert Samuelson’s recent column about the difficulty (impossibility?) of accurately analyzing economic reality, let alone predicting its future. Over the past several months a few people, mistaking me for someone who knows a great deal about economics, have asked what I think about the financial crisis, the stock market, the recession, etc. My response is usually something along the lines of the following: Anyone who pretends to know and pletely the causes of the economic meltdown and/or how...
Farewell, Father Neuhaus
First Things has announced that Father Richard John Neuhaus died this morning. I am hardly qualified to write a eulogy, having never met the man. No doubt others, including one or two Acton colleagues who knew him better, will perform this service admirably. But I pelled to offer a few words, as I have long admired Fr. Neuhaus and his vital work, in particular the journal he edited for many years, First Things (FT). In the mid-1990s, I was a...
Wilken on Islam
One of the most thought-provoking articles I’ve read lately is Robert Louis Wilken’s “Christianity Face to Face with Islam,” in the January 2009 issue of First Things. It’s accessible online only to subscribers, but you can find the publication at academic and high-quality municipal libraries and it will be freely available online in a month or two. Wilken makes so many interesting and informed observations that I don’t know where to start. Among the points to ponder: “In the long...
Movie Review: Valkyrie
The year is 1943 and Valkyrie, the second release under the revamped United Artists brand, opens with German officer Claus von Stauffenberg (Tom Cruise) on assignment in Africa. He had been sent there because his opposition to Hitler and the Nazi regime had e dangerously explicit and bellicose. His promotion to lieutenant-colonel of the general staff and transfer from the European lines to Africa is intended to give him some protection from pro-Nazi officers who might make trouble for him....
Book Review: My Grandfather’s Son
Perhaps the most striking theme of Associate Justice Clarence Thomas’s autobiography My Grandfather’s Son is just how many obstacles Thomas had to e to reach the high judicial position he currently holds. Thomas was born into poverty, abandoned by his father, and was raised in the segregated South all before achieving the American Dream. At the same time, it was Thomas’s poverty-stricken circumstances that would help propel him to a world of greater opportunity. Because of his mother’s poverty, when...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved