Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
ICCR’s Rules for Radical Nuns
ICCR’s Rules for Radical Nuns
Apr 26, 2025 12:42 AM

What is it with nuns crusading against corporate lobbying? This fad of recent years has grabbed headlines as orders such as the Sisters of Mercy and the Benedictine Sisters of Virginia gravitated toward political actions as members of shareholder activist group the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility. Seems there’s nothing alternately cuter pelling than a nun “speaking truth” to corporate power as the ICCR nuns do each year in their campaign against lobbying and donations to nonprofit organizations such as the American Legislative Exchange Council.

How any of this has anything to do with Christian praxis or, more specifically, Roman Catholicism is beyond this prehension. But the press covers these pointless resolutions which I presume is part of the nuns’ name and shame plan. Somehow, we’re supposed to connect the nonexistent dots between the nuns’ religious authority and proxy resolutions that would require corporations increase transparency of their lobbying efforts. This is merely a smokescreen for panies to abandon ALEC and quit advocating in their own – and their shareholders’ and clients’ – best interests.

For example, The Charlotte Observer reported last week:

The sisters of two Catholic religious orders that own Duke Energy stock want the nation’s biggest electric utility to open up about its lobbying of federal and state officials.

Investors will vote Thursday, at Duke’s annual meeting, on a shareholder proposal to disclose more about its lobbying and membership in industry-friendly advocacy groups.

Duke may have billions of dollars at stake when energy and environmental rules are crafted. pany has spent more than $33 million in federal lobbying in the past six years, records show.

Duke says it already files required lobbying reports. At the urging of institutional investors, pany beefed up its oversight of political contributions and lobbying last year.

The nuns say that’s not enough.

Before proceeding, your writer ecstatically reports the nuns’ resolution garnered only 29 percent support at Duke Energy’s annual shareholder meeting last week. But readers may rest assured the nuns will return next year with more of the same nonsense.

Nonsense? Indeed, the ICCR-endorsed resolutions are nonsense on both religious and secular grounds. There exists no genuine religious reason to defund ALEC or publicly divulge lobbying efforts, despite public records and The Charlotte Observer already disclosing Duke spent $2.5 million on federal lobbying and $800,000 on state lobbying in 2015.

Additionally, Duke lists its Political Action Committee, trade association dues and 527 (tax-exempt political organization) contributions on its website albeit without breaking down the amounts given to the unnamed recipients, which is what really sticks in the ICCR and nuns’ craw.

Nope, it’s not remotely religious in nature but only political. ICCR and its kindly sisterhood affiliates demand more transparency because it makes it easier to name donation recipients in attempts to shame Duke from funding them, and the leftist agenda of ICCR squarely is opposed to ALEC or any group that dares express skepticism regarding climate change and efforts to mitigate it. Your writer recalls no Biblical or doctrinal edict to shut down opposing voices on politicized science, but only a portion of the game plan laid out in Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, particularly those that proclaim “the threat is more terrifying than the thing itself” and “pick the target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it.”

In their actions and resolutions, ICCR and the Sisters of Mercy and Benedictine Sisters act contrary to the best interests of fellow shareholders, Duke Energy and its clientele, by siding exclusively with the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan – a radical plan currently stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court due to the pliance costs inflicted upon panies – and extremist environmentalists Bill McKibben and Naomi Klein.

Thank goodness for the shared wisdom of the 71 percent of Duke Energy shareholders who voted against the nuns’ resolution.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Italy’s Tax Man Takes Aim at the Vatican
Kishore Jayabalan, the Acton Institute’s Rome office director, was interviewed by the Zenit news agency in an article titled, “Is Taxing the Church a Real Solution for Italy?” In the article, Jayabalan discusses the history of the Italian state and its imposition of property taxes on the Roman Catholic Church’s land holdings, residences and non-profit businesses. Sometimes in the past, particularly under Napoleonic rule and before the Lateran Pacts, the institution of property tax was often a subject of state...
Is Work a Curse?
Is work a curse, a result of mankind’s fall from grace? Not according to the Book of Genesis. As Hugh Whelchel, Executive Director of the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, explains, what Adam was called to do in the garden is what we are still called to do in our work today: Humanity was created by God to cultivate and keep God’s creation, which included developing it and protecting it. You see, we were created to be stewards of...
Lord Acton and the Power of the Historian
Looking through my back stacks of periodicals the other day I ran across a review in Books & Culture by David Bebbington, “Macaulay in the Dock,” of a recent biography of Thomas Babington Macaulay. The essay takes its point of departure in Lord Acton’s characterization of Macaulay as “one of the greatest of all writers and masters, although I think him utterly base, contemptible and odious.” As Bebbington writes, “Acton, a towering intellectual of the later 19th century, was at...
Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Threat to Freedom
Over at the Liberty Law Blog, there is an excellent post titled “Ronald Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Dialogue of Liberty” by Alan Snyder. Snyder delves into the influence Chambers had on Reagan and how their worldviews differed as well. Many conservatives and scholars felt Chambers’ prediction that the West was on the losing side of history in the battle against Marxism collapsed after the fall of the Iron Curtain and the Soviet Union. For many, the ideas of Chambers...
Obamacare’s Religious Rubes
The White House has a plan to mobilize prayer vigils in front of the Supreme Court in defense of Obamacare. It was reported that the administration met with leaders at non-profit organizations and religious officials who support the new health care law. The court takes up the constitutional test of the health care mandate in a couple of weeks. The mandate has now been challenged in 26 states. Cue the same stale big government religious prophets who confuse statism and...
Constitutional Cases and the Four Cardinal Virtues
Should virtue be a consideration in judicial decisionmaking? Indiana Law Professor R. George Wright makes an intriguing argument for why the four cardinal virtues could be useful in interpreting constitutional cases: Judges typically decide constitutional cases by referring to one or more legal precedents, rules, tests, principles, doctrines, or policies. This Article mends supplementing this standard approach with fully legitimate and appropriate attention to what many cultures have long recognized as the four basic cardinal virtues of practical wisdom or...
Integral Human Development
The Journal of Markets & Morality is planning a theme issue for the Spring of 2013: “Integral Human Development,” i.e. the synthesis of human freedom and responsibility necessary for the material and spiritual enrichment of human life. According to Pope Benedict XVI, Integral human development presupposes the responsible freedom of the individual and of peoples: no structure can guarantee this development over and above human responsibility. (Caritas in Veritate 17) There is a delicate balance between the material and the...
How to Steal a Bike in New York City
Edmund Burke didn’t really say it, but it still rings true: All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. In a test of this maxim, filmmaker Casey Neistat tries to steal his own bike in several locations around New York City and finds that most people do nothing about it—even when it’s done right in front of a police station. I recently spent a couple of days conducting a bike theft experiment, which...
Let’s Change Hearts and Minds (and Laws, Too)
Few clichés are so widespread within the evangelical subculture, says Matthew Lee Anderson, as the notion that our witness must be one of “changing hearts and minds.” In careful hands, the idea is at best ambiguous. At worst it reinforces the sort of interior-oriented individualism that allows for and perpetuates a blissful naivete about how institutions and structures shape our dispositions and thoughts. In less than careful hands, the phrase drives a wedge between law and culture by attempting to...
How to Love Liberty More Than a Libertarian Economist
I have a deep and abiding love for liberty—which is why I find myself so often in disagreement with libertarians. Libertarians love liberty too, of course, but they tend to love liberty a bit differently. I love liberty in an earthy, elemental way. I love liberty because I need it—like I need air and food—for human flourishing. In contrast, the libertarians I’ve encountered tend to love liberty primarily as an abstraction. Indeed, the most ideologically consistent libertarians I know seem...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved