Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Humanity 2.0: The human progress accelerator that ‘should’
Humanity 2.0: The human progress accelerator that ‘should’
Dec 19, 2025 10:06 AM

Matthew Sanders and Fr. Ezra Sullivan, O.P. facilitate moral discussion with entrepreneurs and academics.

Matthew Harvey Sanders, a former seminarian turned successful technology munications entrepreneur, has sought to fuse deep theological and moral convictions with his natural talent and contagious pioneering spirit. His brain child: Humanity 2.0, a self-described “human progress accelerator” showcased last May 9 at a forum held inside Vatican walls.

According to Sanders’s web site, Humanity 2.0 is built on Thomas Aquinas’s precepts for human salvation, namely, that we ought to believe, desire and mit to what our Christian mands us to do. The project’s specific mission is to “identify impediments to human progress and work collaboratively across [multiple] sectors to remove them by sourcing and scaling bold and innovative solutions.”

Sanders began his ambitious project over one year ago, but last Friday’s meeting was its international launch. Humanity 2.0 attracted the creativity and moral conscience of business executives, entrepreneurs and academics in order to give them space to pitch solutions to global social health, economic, and moral concerns. Listening and critiquing them were religious leaders, public sector officials, journalists and think tank representatives.

No doubt Sanders worked hardto realize a coup of business, academic, ecclesial and public sector leadership all under one Vatican roof. It was a feat not easily achieved while at the same time balancing harmonious agreement and vigorous disagreement from among the over 150 creative and concerned minds. Nevertheless, Sanders remained positive and expressed his confidence that human beings can unite under the umbrella of effective care and solidarity when left free to do what they “should” and “can” creatively achieve.

“If history has taught us anything, it’s that humans rarely rise to the occasion unless they’re inspired by what ‘should be’ and this is why Humanity 2.0 mitted to articulating mon vision”, Sanders said. “The crux of our strategy is to focus on what we ‘can’ do together, not what we ‘can’t’.”

The entire morning of the forum was dedicated to the “Humanity 2.0 Lab”, a vision for research centers to be set up in cities with mercial, cultural and moral influence, including Rome where the pope is considered to have the greatest ‘soft power’. The Humanity 2.0 Lab would gather and share data on scientific, economic and health-related issues in order to coalesce the brightest minds to cooperate on providing optimal solutions to shared human crises.

The CEO of the Humanity 2.0 Lab, Morad Fareed, presented his plan for centers focusing on maternal health impact. Fareed is the founder Square Roots, “a pany” that focuses on improving pregnancy health “by connecting the dots of existing care models to human needs.” He also co-founded Delos, a global wellness enterprise guided by the mission to serve as the world’s leading catalyst for enhanced health and well-being in the environments where we live, work, sleep and play.

His maternal health labs would work to amalgamate and analyze data and then offer tool-kits of preventative medicine and self-care for carrying babies to full term. Fareed said that optimizing pregnancy is critical to ensuring human flourishing and that if we don’t act, we are limiting the potential of the next generation.

The forum’s afternoon mainly focused on the moral vision and ethical debate surrounding human flourishing and decision making in business. Fr. Ezra Sullivan, OP, a Dominican theologian at the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas, evaluated the various levels of human happiness, while clearly stating that without some basic level of health and well-being, as defined by Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, flourishing is simply not possible.

Sullivan also demonstrated how there may arise confusing and conflicting “metrics of happiness”, as when European Nordic countries are said to be the “most happy” but also have the “highest suicide rates,” a correlation many do not naturally expect. Hence, even while material needs are being met by a supposedly well-organized societies, they are not the only measure of human fulfillment. Most fundamentally, said Sullivan, the needs of our intellectual and spiritual dimensions must also be cared for and respected by the munity.

After Sullivan’s speech, a School of Business Ethics supported by the Pontifical Lateran University as well as professors from Harvard and Wharton business schools was proposed by Fr. Philip Larrey. Larry is the Lateran’s professor of logic, author of Connected World, and chairman of Humanity 2.0.

Larrey said while we live in a corporate world guided by good governance, tightly enforced pliance and superior codes of conduct, we too often breach solid moral infrastructure in place at successful businesses. The problem is not just that the human species is fallen to original sin and thus prone to evil.

“Most business persons I meet are actually very impressive moral persons” yet need better judgement and moral mentoring to sort through dilemmas brought on by the plex transactions” they must discern in market exchange economies, Larrey said.

Larrey said his vision for a School of Business in Rome would provide diplomas and certificates via intensive seminars with executives and entrepreneurs to “raise their level of critical thinking” without producing cookie cutter or Vatican imprimatur solutions to business ethics and by ing much more international case studies in collaboration with the world’s best business schools.

The closing session was dedicated to emerging technology for mon good. Sanders reminded the audience that Humanity “2.0” implies that the human species has moved beyond its primitive “1.0” version, when human society used to be made of rival and ultimately disconnected munities.

“Today’s “2.0” humanity,” Sanders said, is made of munities, essentially “one tribe which should be able to municate and collaborate with the aid of modern technologies and act in coordinated, creative solidarity” for the achievement of goods necessary for human flourishing.

This is exactly what Pope Francis has called for, as noted in an excellent Crux article on the event, when he urged faithful last November 2018 to strive for “free and far-sighted entrepreneurship… and a solidarity approach” for achieving just solutions to humanity’s greatest present-day and future challenges.

(Photo and featured image credit: Humanity 2.0 logo used with permission from Matthew Harvey Sanders. Top photo courtesy of Michael Severance).

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Religious Leaders Bash the Global Market
Why do so many clergy and religious activists reflexively attack the free market? Kishore Jayabalan takes a look at recent anti-business campaigns. “The very concepts of business and profit motive are often reason enough for religious leaders to condemn an activity as immoral and unethical, and criticisms of multinational corporations are just the same condemnations on a larger scale,” he writes. However, large multinational corporations are one of the most able and efficient means of improving the economies of developing...
Cracking Down on Church Contributions
A week or so ago I passed along a story about the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of New York’s interpretation of recent legislation to make it illegal for those filing for bankruptcy to tithe, except under very specific circumstances (here’s a good follow-up story). Well, yesterday Religion Clause (which is, by the way, an excellent blog well worthy of bookmarking), noted that while the aforementioned case had received a great deal of attention, “an equally important...
Larger Hands, Smaller Feet
I believe the New munity of Bishops has nailed this one (emphasis added): In response, both individual and collective acts of selflessness are needed — of self-sacrifice for the greater good, of self denial in the midst of convenient choices, of choosing simpler lifestyles in the midst of a consumer society. This does not mean abandoning the scientific and technological advances which have given us such great benefits. It means using them wisely, and in a thoughtful manner which reflects...
The Political Economy of Fantasy Sports
Although it is played by about 15 million Americans and amounting to a $1.5 billion a year industry, and even though it is a growing business and worth talking about, this post is not about the real-world economics of fantasy sports. Instead, this post is about the typical structures of fantasy leagues, particularly football (the most popular), and what these leagues can tell us about the participants’ most basic economic assumptions or impulses. I will argue that the default model...
An Acute Western Problem: “Hardness of Hearing”
Earlier this week Pope Benedict XVI told his fellow Germans, and other modern Western societies, that they are shutting their ears to the Christian message when they insist that science and technology alone bat AIDS and other social ills. His description of the problem is one that will stand out for me for the foreseeable future. He refers to this acute spiritual malady as a “hardness of hearing.” What a great description of modern life that expression provides. We are...
Prohibition, Blue Laws, and the Primum Usus Legis
A paper recently published at the National Bureau of Economic Research calls into question some conventional economic wisdom about the effects of certain kinds of legislation. In “The Church vs the Mall: What Happens When Religion Faces Increased Secular Competition?”, Jonathan Gruber and Daniel M. Hungerman find that when so-called “blue laws” are repealed in any given state, “religious attendance falls, and that church donations and spending fall as well.” But in addition, “repealing blue laws leads to an increase...
In Defense of Compassionate Conservatism
In his column, which also appears over at Human Events Online, Acton senior fellow Marvin Olasky mentions the work of the Acton Institute’s Samaritan Award in defense of passionate conservatism”: Those who passionate conservatism is dead e to Samaritan Award programs in Richmond or Fairfield, California; Memphis, Nashville or Knoxville, Tennessee; Camden, N.J., or Chester, Penn.; Columbus, Ohio, or Hastings, Neb. or Marquette, Mich. Why go there? Because those are the towns and cities that are home to this year’s...
Introduction to Protestantism and Natural Law
Many of you have read the series that Stephen Grabill wrote about Protestantism and Natural Law. For those of you who have not read it, but are interested, Stephen wrote an eight part series on the PowerBlog. The following exerpt from the first post points to Stephen’s aim of shifting the debate … … away from the badly caricatured doctrine of sola scriptura toward a fuller understanding of the biblical theology underlying natural law. As Protestants rediscover the biblical basis...
Pascal and Climate Change
In today’s Times of London, taking a cue from Blaise Pascal (at least he thinks), Gerard Baker argues, “Unless the sceptics are really, really certain that we’re all going to be OK, we must act now.” He sums it up this way: “If we believe in global warming and do something about it and it turns out we’re right, then we’re, climatologically speaking, redeemed — if not for ever, at least until some other threat to our es along. If...
Moral Business
Profit is a valid motivation for business and, generally speaking, pany that pursues profits within the bounds of law and morality will be fulfilling its purpose admirably. But profit is an instrumental good rather than a final good, and so there are sometimes extraordinary circumstances that place additional moral obligations on business. For an edifying story about pany that responded well to such circumstances, see ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved