Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
How to Develop a Christian Mind in Business School (Part III)
How to Develop a Christian Mind in Business School (Part III)
Jan 5, 2026 6:26 AM

Note: This is the third in a series on developing a Christian mind in business school. You can find the intro and links to all previous posts here.

When people ask me what business school was like, I’m tempted to say, “A lot like a medieval university.” Unfortunately, parison makes people think b-school is dark, musty, and full of monks—which is not quite what I mean.

In medieval universities, the three subjects that were considered the first three stages of learning were the trivium: grammar, logic, and rhetoric. Our use of those terms, however, fails to convey the broader meaning they had in earlier centuries. In her excellent book on the trivium (Latin for “the three-fold way”), Sister Miriam Joseph explains:

Grammar is concerned with the thing as-it-is-symbolized,

Logic is concerned with the thing as-it-is-known, and

Rhetoric is concerned with the thing municated.

These three language arts, adds Sister Joseph, can be defined as they relate to reality and to each other. Similarly, while the arts learned in business school are very different from the classical trivium, every course can similarly be classified in a “three-fold way”:

Thing as-it-is-symbolized: Quantification (Accounting, Quantitative Analysis, Finance) – Most of what is being administered in business administration can be quantified, that is reduced to numbers (money, inventory, personnel, etc.). Classes in this area teach the student to better understand the relationship between the symbols (numbers) in order to improve decision-making.

Thing as-it-is-known: Orientation (Organizational Behavior, Operations Management, Economics, Information Technology, Business Law, Global/International focus (management/finance/marketing/etc.) – If you don’t know the difference between a supply chain and an S-corporation, these are the classes that fill in the gaps. About a third of the MBA program prised of courses like these that are intended to orient the student to the business and economic environment. Although there is a lot of overlap and interdependence with the other two areas, these courses primarily serve as introductions to various “things as-they-are-known” in the realm of business.

Thing municated: Rhetoric (Business Communication, Marketing, Business Ethics, Strategy) – These are often considered the “soft” classes, not because they are easier than finance or accounting (though they certainly are that) but because they tend to focus on the non-quantitative aspects of business. These are also the courses were you learn to persuade others—investors, customers, suppliers, managers—to agree with your analysis, adopt your opinion, or follow your mendation. Just as rhetoric is the master art of the classical trivium, for it presupposes and makes use of the other two, rhetoric is the master art of the business trivium. These classes are the true heart of business school since almost everything you learn in the program is focused on you eventually using your knowledge to persuade others.

While I believe this classification of business arts—quantification, orientation, rhetoric—provides a useful framework of understanding business school, I think it is essential to the task of developing a Christian mind in business school.

When we speak of a particular type of “mind”, as in the “scientific mind”, “secular mind” “Christian mind”, etc., we are referring to a set of notions, beliefs, attitudes, and mental orientations collectively accepted by a particular group. Therefore, when I speak in this series about developing a Christian mind in b-school I’m referring primarily to learning how to think Christianly about things as they are symbolized, things as they are known, and things as they municated. That is, how to think Christianly about the three business arts taught in business school: quantification, orientation, and rhetoric.

There mon misperception that being a Christian businessperson means merely being a person in business who behaves morally (i.e., like a Christian should). Oftentimes this is reduced to being nice, honest, friendly, etc. (because supposedly Jesus wants us to always be nice, honest, and friendly!). Christians should certainly behave in an ethically responsible manner, but that in itself does not distinguish us from non-believers, who can share our ethical norms. Indeed, there are many non-Christians in business who could put us believers to shame when es to exemplifying moral behavior. Behaving morally is important but it is not at all the same as thinking Christianly about business.

So what does it mean to thinking Christianly about business? In our next post we’ll take a closer look at that question and what it means to develop a Christian view on the business arts.

See Also:Part I,Part II, Part IV

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Bloomberg and Sanders are both wrong about money in politics
Super Tuesday – the single day in the U.S. presidential primaries with the most delegates at stake – e and gone, and so have quite a few presidential candidates. Former South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) both dropped out before Tuesday and endorsed former Vice President Joe Biden. After lackluster performances on Tuesday, both former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and his debate nemesis, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, have dropped out, as well. The...
Acton Line podcast: The biggest problems of national conservatism
In recent years, a rift has opened within American conservatism, a series of divisions animated in part by the 2016 presidential election and also by a right concern with an increasingly progressive culture. Among these divisions is a growing split between self-professing liberal and illiberal conservatives as some on the right scramble to give explanation for a culture which has e hostile to civil society and traditional institutions, most notably the family. One movement which has grown out of this...
3 books to help you think and talk about politics without practicing politics
When people talk about politics, they are usually discussing passions and interests, often with a whole lot of passion and interest. This is why prohibitions exist in polite society against talking about politics. Political discussions about issues, parties, or candidates are often performative recitations of opinion: yesterday’s knowledge, right or wrong, applied to today’s situation. These debates can be engaging, enraging, or enjoyable. It is this sort of politics that, as Henry Adams observed, “as a practice, whatever its professions,...
For Roger Scruton, philosophy and culture were inseparable
It’s almost two months since the death of perhaps the twentieth century’s most important conservative philosopher, Sir Roger Scruton, but discussion of the significance of his work and life continues to occupy a great deal of space in journals, opinion pieces and on the airwaves. Like many others, I have found myself looking again at many of Scruton’s great books, such as his classic “The Meaning of Conservatism” (1980), the very reflective “England: An Elegy” (2000) and the aesthetic arguments...
Why businesses should use the servant leadership model
I recently flew from Grand Rapids to Los Angeles on Delta. With the exception of some extra frisky TSA agents here in Michigan, the experience was largely positive. My flights were on time, the crew was helpful, and the planes were clean and well equipped. Even for those of us sitting in the back, the seating fortable. Bonus—I had a whole row to myself on the trip home! All of this got me thinking about a news article that blipped...
Hubris old and new
Adam MacLeod, a law professor at Faulkner University in Alabama, wrote a couple of years ago in the New Boston Post of “chronological snobbery,” the idea that “moral knowledge progresses inevitably, such that later generations are morally and intellectually superior to earlier generations, and that the older the source the more morally suspect that source is.” We don’t have to look too hard to see how widespread this attitude is now. No other age has had the hubris of ours....
A look inside a pro-life, free-market healthcare system
Proponents of massive government programs like Medicare for All often present their schemes as though there were no alternative to state intervention. Thankfully, a life-affirming, healthcare practice shows that the free market has a superior answer about how to care for vulnerable women and their babies. Chris Gast of Right to Life of Michigan drew my attention to the story of Mark Blocher, a Christian bioethicist who believes medical practices should reflect their faith, something often difficult even in our...
Acton Commentary: Liberty for AOC but not for thee
During a congressional hearing late last week, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez likened Christians who refuse to perform medical procedures that violate their religious beliefs to Klansmen, segregationists, and slaveholders. But in this week’s Acton Commentary, Rev. Gregory Jensen writes that it is the congresswoman who shares the Jim Crow tactics of using the government to deny other people their inalienable rights. In a video clip that went viral, AOC, a democratic socialist, said that Christians lack the right to live according to...
As it turns out, Lake Erie does not have ‘rights’
Last week, a federal district court judge in Ohio declared that the city of Toledo’s move to establish a Lake Erie Bill of Rights, or LEBOR, was invalid. Judge Jack Zouhary put it this way: Frustrated by the status quo, LEBOR supporters knocked on doors, engaged their fellow citizens, and used the democratic process to pursue a well-intentioned goal: the protection of Lake Erie. As written, however, LEBOR fails to achieve that goal. This is not a close call. LEBOR...
Clayton Christensen: ‘If you take away religion, you can’t hire enough police’
The Founding Fathers understood, in the words of John Adams, that “we have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion.” An Ivy League professor recently heard the same conclusion repeated by a Chinese Marxist. “I had no idea how critical religion is to the functioning of democracy,” the economist told Clayton Christensen. Christensen, who died last month at the age of 67, taught business administration at Harvard Business School and served...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved