Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
How to Develop a Christian Mind in Business School (Part III)
How to Develop a Christian Mind in Business School (Part III)
Jan 21, 2026 2:03 AM

Note: This is the third in a series on developing a Christian mind in business school. You can find the intro and links to all previous posts here.

When people ask me what business school was like, I’m tempted to say, “A lot like a medieval university.” Unfortunately, parison makes people think b-school is dark, musty, and full of monks—which is not quite what I mean.

In medieval universities, the three subjects that were considered the first three stages of learning were the trivium: grammar, logic, and rhetoric. Our use of those terms, however, fails to convey the broader meaning they had in earlier centuries. In her excellent book on the trivium (Latin for “the three-fold way”), Sister Miriam Joseph explains:

Grammar is concerned with the thing as-it-is-symbolized,

Logic is concerned with the thing as-it-is-known, and

Rhetoric is concerned with the thing municated.

These three language arts, adds Sister Joseph, can be defined as they relate to reality and to each other. Similarly, while the arts learned in business school are very different from the classical trivium, every course can similarly be classified in a “three-fold way”:

Thing as-it-is-symbolized: Quantification (Accounting, Quantitative Analysis, Finance) – Most of what is being administered in business administration can be quantified, that is reduced to numbers (money, inventory, personnel, etc.). Classes in this area teach the student to better understand the relationship between the symbols (numbers) in order to improve decision-making.

Thing as-it-is-known: Orientation (Organizational Behavior, Operations Management, Economics, Information Technology, Business Law, Global/International focus (management/finance/marketing/etc.) – If you don’t know the difference between a supply chain and an S-corporation, these are the classes that fill in the gaps. About a third of the MBA program prised of courses like these that are intended to orient the student to the business and economic environment. Although there is a lot of overlap and interdependence with the other two areas, these courses primarily serve as introductions to various “things as-they-are-known” in the realm of business.

Thing municated: Rhetoric (Business Communication, Marketing, Business Ethics, Strategy) – These are often considered the “soft” classes, not because they are easier than finance or accounting (though they certainly are that) but because they tend to focus on the non-quantitative aspects of business. These are also the courses were you learn to persuade others—investors, customers, suppliers, managers—to agree with your analysis, adopt your opinion, or follow your mendation. Just as rhetoric is the master art of the classical trivium, for it presupposes and makes use of the other two, rhetoric is the master art of the business trivium. These classes are the true heart of business school since almost everything you learn in the program is focused on you eventually using your knowledge to persuade others.

While I believe this classification of business arts—quantification, orientation, rhetoric—provides a useful framework of understanding business school, I think it is essential to the task of developing a Christian mind in business school.

When we speak of a particular type of “mind”, as in the “scientific mind”, “secular mind” “Christian mind”, etc., we are referring to a set of notions, beliefs, attitudes, and mental orientations collectively accepted by a particular group. Therefore, when I speak in this series about developing a Christian mind in b-school I’m referring primarily to learning how to think Christianly about things as they are symbolized, things as they are known, and things as they municated. That is, how to think Christianly about the three business arts taught in business school: quantification, orientation, and rhetoric.

There mon misperception that being a Christian businessperson means merely being a person in business who behaves morally (i.e., like a Christian should). Oftentimes this is reduced to being nice, honest, friendly, etc. (because supposedly Jesus wants us to always be nice, honest, and friendly!). Christians should certainly behave in an ethically responsible manner, but that in itself does not distinguish us from non-believers, who can share our ethical norms. Indeed, there are many non-Christians in business who could put us believers to shame when es to exemplifying moral behavior. Behaving morally is important but it is not at all the same as thinking Christianly about business.

So what does it mean to thinking Christianly about business? In our next post we’ll take a closer look at that question and what it means to develop a Christian view on the business arts.

See Also:Part I,Part II, Part IV

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Chicago Event: How Ideology Destroys Biblical Ecumenism
For those PowerBlog readers in the Chicago area, I’ll be in town next Tuesday for a luncheon where I’ll be discussing the topic, “How Ideology Destroys Biblical Ecumenism.” The event is sponsored by the Chicago-based ministry ACT 3 and will be held at St. Paul United Church of Christ, 118 S. First Street, Bloomingdale, IL. The event will begin at 11:45am (Tuesday, November 9) and you can register for the luncheon at the ACT 3 website. The point of departure...
More on Putting Politics in its Place
Last week Jordan Ballor and I offered short addresses to the crowd that gathered for Acton on Tap in Grand Rapids. This is an essay that closely mirrors ments from the event. It’s a sermon of sorts, and a personal testimonial too. — — — — — — Remarks on the “Limit of Politics” for Acton on Tap: I love elections. Elections produce drama, conflict, and intrigue. It produces statements like this by the former Louisiana governor and federal convict...
Audio: Sirico on Subsidiarity, Free Enterprise & the 2010 Elections
Acton President Rev. Robert A. Sirico took to the airwaves this morning in Chicago on WVON’s Launching Chicago with Lenny McAllister to discuss today’s elections across the country from a Christian perspective. You can listen to the interview using the audio player below, and don’t forget to follow Rev. Sirico on Twitter right here. And don’t forget to vote! [audio: ...
Audio: Sirico Discusses Election 2010
Tuesday was a momentous day in American politics, Acton President Rev. Robert A. Sirico was called upon mentate on the results of the mid-term elections yesterday a couple of times: Guest host Sheila Liaugminas invited Father Sirico ment on the e of the election and the impact of the Catholic vote on the results for The Drew Mariani Show on Relevant Radio. Listen via the audio player below: [audio: Sirico also mentary on the Ave Maria Radio Network, joining host...
Video: Sirico on Christian Anthropology (and some thoughts on Election 2010)
Another election e and gone, and once again the balance of power has significantly shifted in Washington, D.C. and statehouses across America. Tuesday’s results are, I suppose, a win for fans of limited government, in that a Republican House of Representatives will make it more difficult for President Obama and his Democrat colleagues in the Congress to enact more of what has been a very statist agenda. But even with the prospect of divided government on the horizon, we who...
‘A’ for Austerity: The New Scarlet Letter
I introduced this week’s Acton Commentary yesterday with some thoughts about “The Audacity of Austerity.” In today’s “‘A’ for Austerity: The New Scarlet Letter,” I take to task the attitude embodied by Paul Krugman’s vilification of proponents of austerity measures. Most recently Krugman called such advocates “debt moralizers,” implicitly drawing the connection between austerity measures and “puritanical” virtues like thrift. In this Krugman follows in the spirit of Nathaniel Hawthorne, who indeed has much to answer for in forming the...
What Difference Does This Election Make for Religious Hiring Rights?
Stanley Carlson-Thies, president of the Institutional Religious Freedom Alliance, writes in the Nov. 4 IRFA Newsletter: The races haven’t all even been decided yet, and, given the big changes, it will take considerable time for new directions to be settled, so it is far too soon to try to guess how the November 2nd voting will affect national policy. Just a few quick thoughts: Two notable changes in Congress to the benefit of institutional religious freedom: Dan Coats, who served...
Video: More Highlights from the Acton Institute’s 20th Anniversary Celebration
On October 21st at Acton’s 20th Anniversary Dinner, Richard M. DeVos – Co-Founder of Amway Corporation with his friend Jay Van Andel – was presented with the 2010 Faith and Freedom Award. Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, cited DeVos for his “decades-long exemplary leadership in business, his dedication to the promotion of liberty, his courage in maintaining and defending the free and virtuous society, and his conviction that the roots of liberty and the...
A Tale of Two Europes
A new article from Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg published today in Acton News & Commentary. Sign up for the free, weekly email newsletter here. +++++++++ A Tale of Two Europes By Samuel Gregg The word “crisis” is usually employed to indicate that a person or even an entire culture has reached a turning-point which demands decisions: choices that either propel those in crisis towards renewed growth or condemn them to remorseless decline. These dynamics of crisis are especially pertinent...
Speaking of a Principled Basis for Limited Government
My recent posts on politics and austerity and this week’s Acton Commentary refer to a principled basis for limited government. I speak of “the limits of government rooted in a rich and variegated civil society.” Here’s a good statement of that basis from Lord Acton: There are many things government can’t do – many good purposes it must renounce. It must leave them to the enterprise of others. It cannot feed the people. It cannot enrich the people. It cannot...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved