Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
How to beat the ‘social recession’ of COVID-19
How to beat the ‘social recession’ of COVID-19
Feb 28, 2026 7:50 AM

Before the COVID-19 crisis began, America was already facing a severe loneliness epidemic – marked by decades-long increases in suicide and chronic loneliness and declines in marriage munity attachment. Now, amid flurries of sweeping lockdowns, the struggle has e harder still, pushing any remnants of munity deeper into the confines of social media.

We are facing a “social recession,” argues the Manhattan Institute’s Michael Hendrix, driven by a mix of stress over public health, economic anxiety, and the isolating effects of physical distancing. “Disasters often have a way of munities together,” he writes. “But not this pandemic. The twisted logic of contagion means that es through suffering alone. The places with the strongest social ties and greatest connectivity are the most vulnerable to the spread of Covid-19.”

Drawing from a new survey from the Centers for Disease Control, he summarizes the scene as follows:

More than 40 percent of [survey] respondents reported some form of adverse mental or behavioral health this June, with symptoms of depression and anxiety up three and four times their 2019 levels, respectively. A quarter of young adults (ages 18 to 24) said they had considered suicide in the past 30 days, and a similar share say they are turning to drink and drugs to cope with the emotional toll of the pandemic.

The CDC’s shocking findings are echoed elsewhere. Since the coronavirus pandemic began, more than one third of Americans have reported suffering from severe anxiety. Fifty-five percent of those who have experienced financial hardship during the pandemic report the same. Today, just 14 percent of American adults say they’re very happy, down from nearly one third in 2018. And half of Americans say they feel isolated. No wonder that so many Americans also say the coronavirus pandemic is harming their mental health. Texts to a federal mental health hotline jumped by 1,000 percent in April year-on-year. Suspected drug overdoses rose by 18 percent in March, 29 percent in April, and 42 percent in May. And Covid-19 is still wreaking havoc on our lives and livelihoods. America is facing a public health crisis, an economic crisis, and a mental health crisis all in one.

In response, policymakers have proved predictably inept, relying on a tired mix of so-called stimulus and monetarist tweaks to curb the economic pain, all while demonizing those who attempt to gather in public – even those who adhered to the politicians’ protocols. As has e particularly evident in the debates over school closures, even those who acknowledge the problem are not willing to take any risks to address it. Even when public health officials and the American Academy of Pediatrics were keen to bring the issue to the forefront, all it took was a few chirps from public-sector unions for all social side effects to e secondary line-item concerns.

Rather than acknowledging the full range of health risks at play – physical, mental, emotional, spiritual, and otherwise – our political class has opted for overemphasis on an excessively narrow set of concerns. Paired with the hum-drum petence we e to expect from our governing officials, the cultural conversation has e misaligned on multiple fronts.

“Unfortunately,” Hendrix observes, “most our public leaders know far better how to pull a fiscal lever than to replenish social capital – or even to coordinate contact tracing, mass testing, selective quarantines, vaccine prizes, or other such signs of effective leadership during a pandemic.”

Those frustrations loom large. Yet outside of lifting restrictions or implementing effective testing regimes, policy will have plenty of limits when es to curbing loneliness. In turn, we would do well to direct our attention elsewhere. Hendrix points to the example of Hurricane Katrina, after which many survivors experienced severe emotional stress (known as “Katrina brain”), reminding us how “the city’s munity helped many cope and recover.” According to New York University historian Jacob Remes, who studied the aftermath in New Orleans, “Dense social networks munities save people. That’s what munities resilient, and it’s what then munities recover.”

What we need, it would appear, is renewed intentionality and innovation in actual, munity – not reactive resistance to the fruits of freedom, but faithful stewardship of each new blessing and opportunity as it arises. The idols of modernity have long tempted us toward isolation and individualism, but when es to this, the pandemic may serve as a wake-up call, helping us prioritize human connection where it’s currently lacking – and see and appreciate it where it already exists.

This can occur even amid our current season of social distancing, as we have already seen across a number of spheres. Churches are innovating new ways of bringing people together municating the Gospel, challenging traditional constraints and demonstrating the value of embodied munity. The increasing acceptance of virtual schooling is leading to widespread migration to homeschooling, neighborhood co-ops, and private institutions – all of which is sure to inspire new paradigms munity and connection outside of our stagnant, postwar bureaucracies. In the workplace, many are now making do with “virtual happy hours,” but more importantly, they are starting to realize that social connection is, indeed, a large part of economic life and always has been. In neighborhoods like my own, less interaction in public spaces has led each of us to deepen connections with our neighbors – creating “isolation cells” in small platoons as a way of coping with loneliness elsewhere.

As Hendrix explains, before and beyond any policy solutions, we need an attentiveness to human munity needs. Our hearts must place loving our neighbors over and above the temptation of narrow isolation and self-protection:

The charge to every American during this pandemic of Covid-19 should be to ask “What particular role is munity asking me to play?” It could be to serve, to give, to care, or to cure. Of course, the elites of munities and our country have a unique role to play in bat the virus and restoring our civic health. But each of us also has a civic responsibility to seek the best for our neighbors without expecting anything in return.

Much of this is due to our current season, yes. But with continued investment, the revival of America’s civic fabric may be closer than it’s been in recent decades. “In the meantime,” Hendrix concludes, “we must all do our part to sustain what binds us together: our families, faith, friends, and work, and every other such institution. These are the binding threads of America’s social fabric, and we are the weavers. And, however weakened and frayed, they are what will carry us through this crisis together.”

We are called to a higher freedom than the isolationism of our age, one that fully and actively embodies the space between individual and state, but not only as a means to a political end or public-health objective. It is up to us, then, to be the moral witnesses of such freedom, investing in our neighbors munities and tackling the challenge of loneliness where it begins.

Verhulst. CC BY-ND 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Does bundling benefit social welfare?
Note: This is post #53 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Bundling refers to when two or more goods are sold together as a package. Cable TV is a prime example of bundling. What if there was no bundling and you had to pay for Cable TV by channel rather than purchasing channels in bundles? Would you end up paying more or less? In this video by Marginal Revolution University, economist Alex Tabarrok explains the benefits of bundling....
The ‘nudge’ that separated families
Richard Thaler, the co-author of Nudge, has won the Nobel Prize for his contributions to behavioral economics. While he decides how best to spend his $1.1 million in prize money, less prosperous families are paying the price for government policies advancing economic paternalism. Thaler suggested in a 2012 New York Times op-ed that the United States follow Europe’s lead in raising the price of gasoline in order to preserve the environment. Hiking the gas tax would be a more efficient...
More victims of the $15 minimum wage
The deleterious side effects of the $15-per-hour minimum wage have continued to manifest across the country, affecting cities from Seattle to Minneapolis and states from California to New York. To illustrate the damage, the Employment Policies Instituteis maintaining a catalog of suffering businesses across the country, highlighting stories of raised consumer prices, increased unemployment, reduced working hours, and outright business closures. I’ve pointed to several of those stories in the past, and in four new videos, EPI offers fresh glimpses...
Marketers ‘nudge’ us, but should government?
On Monday the University of Chicago’s Richard Thaler won a Nobel Prize for his work in behavioral economics. “Thaler’s work raises important questions about the state’s influence over human action,” says Victor V. Claar in this week’s Acton Commentary. In some years two or three economists share the prize for their collective contributions to a specific line of inquiry, but this year the 72-year-old Thaler was the sole recipient for his accumulated plishments in behavioral economics. Put simply, behavioral economics...
Economic man is a myth, but ‘nudging’ is a distraction
The University of Chicago’s Richard Thaler recently won the Nobel Prize for his contributions in behavioral economics, much of which centers on challenging rational choice theory. “Renowned for his use of data to observe and predict how people behave in the real world,” writes Derek Thompson, “Thaler’s career has been a lifelong war on Homo economicus, that mythical species of purely rational hominids who dwell exclusively in the models of classical economic theory.” Victor Claar has helpfully summarized Thaler’s work...
Samuel Gregg: Ideas, intellectuals and the free economy
In another round of conservative debate on the virtues — or vices — of the market economy, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg published a new piece at Public Discourse in which he takes on the critiques of writer Matthew McManus. MacManus’ criticisms were written in reply to an earlier piece in which Gregg addresses the growing criticisms of a free economy by editors and writers at First Things magazine. In Gregg’s article, Capitalism, Conservatives, and the Intellectuals: A Reply to...
3 Reasons income tax cuts (almost) always benefit the wealthy
Death and taxes may be the only certainties in life, but there is a close third: e tax cuts mostly benefit e workers. As Congress discusses tax reform, the debate about who will benefit from tax cuts is back in the news. And many people are concerned with how the changes will favor high e earners. Even President Trump has promised that the reforms won’t give wealthy Americans a massive tax cut. The reality is that there is almost no...
Christian education is not safe
“Each generation needs to re-own the rationale for Christian education,” says philosopher James K.A. Smith, “to ask ourselves ‘Why did we do this?’ and ‘Should we keep doing this?’” In answering such questions, Smith notes, “it might be helpful to point out what Christian education is not”: First, Christian education is not meant to be merely “safe” education. The impetus for Christian schooling is not a protectionist concern, driven by fear, to sequester children from the big, bad world. Christian...
Sin taxes: The ‘nudge’ that benefits terrorism
Richard Thaler won the Nobel Prize for describe how even small economic incentives can affect behavior. One of those nudges, high “sin taxes,” has helped finance terrorism and organized crime. Sin taxes played some role in his winning the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences this week. The Nobel Committee that awarded Thaler’s prize in economics noted, “The insights of behavioral economics can also be used to inform more traditional policy interventions, for example the taxation of ‘sinful goods,’” adding...
Radio Free Acton: Ben DeGrow on school choice; Econ Quiz on tax reform; Upstream on Ray Bradbury
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, Caroline Roberts talks with Ben DeGrow, Director of Education Policy at The Mackinac Center for Public Policy, about school choice, previewing his panel presentation at Acton’s ingEducation & Freedom conference. Then, Caroline Roberts hosts another Econ Quiz with guest Dave Hebert, Professor of Economics at Aquinas college on the topic of the week: tax reform. Finally, on the Upstream segment, Bruce Edward Walker talks with Jonathan R. Eller, Chancellors Professor of English at...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved