Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
How to beat the ‘social recession’ of COVID-19
How to beat the ‘social recession’ of COVID-19
Mar 14, 2026 1:35 PM

Before the COVID-19 crisis began, America was already facing a severe loneliness epidemic – marked by decades-long increases in suicide and chronic loneliness and declines in marriage munity attachment. Now, amid flurries of sweeping lockdowns, the struggle has e harder still, pushing any remnants of munity deeper into the confines of social media.

We are facing a “social recession,” argues the Manhattan Institute’s Michael Hendrix, driven by a mix of stress over public health, economic anxiety, and the isolating effects of physical distancing. “Disasters often have a way of munities together,” he writes. “But not this pandemic. The twisted logic of contagion means that es through suffering alone. The places with the strongest social ties and greatest connectivity are the most vulnerable to the spread of Covid-19.”

Drawing from a new survey from the Centers for Disease Control, he summarizes the scene as follows:

More than 40 percent of [survey] respondents reported some form of adverse mental or behavioral health this June, with symptoms of depression and anxiety up three and four times their 2019 levels, respectively. A quarter of young adults (ages 18 to 24) said they had considered suicide in the past 30 days, and a similar share say they are turning to drink and drugs to cope with the emotional toll of the pandemic.

The CDC’s shocking findings are echoed elsewhere. Since the coronavirus pandemic began, more than one third of Americans have reported suffering from severe anxiety. Fifty-five percent of those who have experienced financial hardship during the pandemic report the same. Today, just 14 percent of American adults say they’re very happy, down from nearly one third in 2018. And half of Americans say they feel isolated. No wonder that so many Americans also say the coronavirus pandemic is harming their mental health. Texts to a federal mental health hotline jumped by 1,000 percent in April year-on-year. Suspected drug overdoses rose by 18 percent in March, 29 percent in April, and 42 percent in May. And Covid-19 is still wreaking havoc on our lives and livelihoods. America is facing a public health crisis, an economic crisis, and a mental health crisis all in one.

In response, policymakers have proved predictably inept, relying on a tired mix of so-called stimulus and monetarist tweaks to curb the economic pain, all while demonizing those who attempt to gather in public – even those who adhered to the politicians’ protocols. As has e particularly evident in the debates over school closures, even those who acknowledge the problem are not willing to take any risks to address it. Even when public health officials and the American Academy of Pediatrics were keen to bring the issue to the forefront, all it took was a few chirps from public-sector unions for all social side effects to e secondary line-item concerns.

Rather than acknowledging the full range of health risks at play – physical, mental, emotional, spiritual, and otherwise – our political class has opted for overemphasis on an excessively narrow set of concerns. Paired with the hum-drum petence we e to expect from our governing officials, the cultural conversation has e misaligned on multiple fronts.

“Unfortunately,” Hendrix observes, “most our public leaders know far better how to pull a fiscal lever than to replenish social capital – or even to coordinate contact tracing, mass testing, selective quarantines, vaccine prizes, or other such signs of effective leadership during a pandemic.”

Those frustrations loom large. Yet outside of lifting restrictions or implementing effective testing regimes, policy will have plenty of limits when es to curbing loneliness. In turn, we would do well to direct our attention elsewhere. Hendrix points to the example of Hurricane Katrina, after which many survivors experienced severe emotional stress (known as “Katrina brain”), reminding us how “the city’s munity helped many cope and recover.” According to New York University historian Jacob Remes, who studied the aftermath in New Orleans, “Dense social networks munities save people. That’s what munities resilient, and it’s what then munities recover.”

What we need, it would appear, is renewed intentionality and innovation in actual, munity – not reactive resistance to the fruits of freedom, but faithful stewardship of each new blessing and opportunity as it arises. The idols of modernity have long tempted us toward isolation and individualism, but when es to this, the pandemic may serve as a wake-up call, helping us prioritize human connection where it’s currently lacking – and see and appreciate it where it already exists.

This can occur even amid our current season of social distancing, as we have already seen across a number of spheres. Churches are innovating new ways of bringing people together municating the Gospel, challenging traditional constraints and demonstrating the value of embodied munity. The increasing acceptance of virtual schooling is leading to widespread migration to homeschooling, neighborhood co-ops, and private institutions – all of which is sure to inspire new paradigms munity and connection outside of our stagnant, postwar bureaucracies. In the workplace, many are now making do with “virtual happy hours,” but more importantly, they are starting to realize that social connection is, indeed, a large part of economic life and always has been. In neighborhoods like my own, less interaction in public spaces has led each of us to deepen connections with our neighbors – creating “isolation cells” in small platoons as a way of coping with loneliness elsewhere.

As Hendrix explains, before and beyond any policy solutions, we need an attentiveness to human munity needs. Our hearts must place loving our neighbors over and above the temptation of narrow isolation and self-protection:

The charge to every American during this pandemic of Covid-19 should be to ask “What particular role is munity asking me to play?” It could be to serve, to give, to care, or to cure. Of course, the elites of munities and our country have a unique role to play in bat the virus and restoring our civic health. But each of us also has a civic responsibility to seek the best for our neighbors without expecting anything in return.

Much of this is due to our current season, yes. But with continued investment, the revival of America’s civic fabric may be closer than it’s been in recent decades. “In the meantime,” Hendrix concludes, “we must all do our part to sustain what binds us together: our families, faith, friends, and work, and every other such institution. These are the binding threads of America’s social fabric, and we are the weavers. And, however weakened and frayed, they are what will carry us through this crisis together.”

We are called to a higher freedom than the isolationism of our age, one that fully and actively embodies the space between individual and state, but not only as a means to a political end or public-health objective. It is up to us, then, to be the moral witnesses of such freedom, investing in our neighbors munities and tackling the challenge of loneliness where it begins.

Verhulst. CC BY-ND 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
How a Protestant pastor defended Brazil’s Catholics
It was in Brazil’s 2010 elections that the majority of the voters first learned about Silas Malafaia. It was also the election in which the left-wing president Lula da Silva reached the height of his political power. Lula was one of the most successful left-wing populist leaders of Latin America in the first two decades of the 21st century. He had all the pragmatism of a Tammany Hall boss. He could be applauded by a crowd of Communists one day...
Radio Free Acton: Was Jesus a socialist? The importance of poetry
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, Dan Hugger, Research Associate at Acton, speaks with Larry Reed, President of the Foundation for Economic Education, about the question that seems to be cropping up everywhere nowadays: Was Jesus a socialist? Then, Bruce Edward Walker talks to James Matthew Wilson about his new volume of poetry and on why poetry is important today. Check out these additional resources on this week’s podcast topics: Read “Jesus would have voted socialist, says Germany’s Left”...
The economics of choosing the right career
Note: This is post #97 in a weekly video series on basic economics. Warning for young people: having a college degree no longer guarantees you’ll be able to find a good job, much less have a promising career. Four-year college graduates with entry-level jobs actually earned more in 2000 than they’re earning today. Choosing a good career requires planning beyond getting a college education, says Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution University. In this video he explains why you’ll want to...
Review: Bradley Birzer’s Russell Kirk biography invites us to reconsider conservatism
This is the fifth in a series celebrating the work of Russell Kirk in honor of his 100th birthday this October. Read more from the serieshere. During the twentieth century, one man in particular took it upon himself to make a project of defining and perhaps re-invigorating an American conservatism which the prominent cultural critic Lionel Trilling dismissed as “a series of irritable mental gestures.” I remember picking up a copy of Russell Kirk’s The Conservative Mindmany years ago. As...
The Spanish tradition of freedom in the 16th and 17th centuries
The following article is written by Angel Fernández Álvarez and translated by Joshua Gregor. Juan de Mariana This October 31, I will give a conference entitled The Spanish School of the XVI and XVII Centuries at Harvard University, in order to explain in detail the “institutional framework” and the principles of growth upheld by the late Spanish scholastics. In the conference, organized by the Harvard Real Colegio Complutense, I will explain the importance of Christian humanism, which spread especially from...
The reason young people embrace socialism revealed
Why do young people throughout the West have an increasingly positive view of socialism? The answer has been ferreted out between the lines of a survey recently conducted for the Charles Koch Institute. Young people’s infatuation with socialism remains one of the most lamented (or celebrated) facts of the cultural landscape – but both sides agree, it is an undeniable fact. Americans under the age of 30 hold a more favorable view of socialism than capitalism, according to a Gallup...
Alexis de Tocqueville, socialism, and the American Way
Tocqueville determined that the one defining factor in the United States was equality of condition, says John Wilsey in this week’s Acton Commentary. Tocqueville noticed that Americans apparently had the singular ability to prevent equality of conditions from yielding democratic despotism. Through voluntary associations, vigorous local government, a pursuit of self-interest rightly understood, and laws that were based on an accepted moral structure taught in disestablished church bodies, Americans were able to strike that critical balance between private interests and...
What determines the value of your money?
The value of money is determined by how much (or how little) of it is in circulation. But who makes that decision, and how does their choice affect the economy at large? Doug Levinson looks at the role of the U.S. Federal Reserve efforts to affect inflation and deflation affects the value of our money. ...
The best ways (empirically speaking) to alleviate global poverty
Virtually all poverty es from economic growth and migration—not redistribution or philanthropy. That’s how economist Bryan Caplan summarizes a fascinating new working paper by Lant Pritchett of the Harvard Kennedy School and Center for Global Development. To make it easier to get the gist of the argument (without having to read all 32 pages), I’ve taken the liberty of “interviewing” the paper. All questions are my own and all answers (with the exception of the parts in brackets) are exact...
The political manipulation of religion
The fact that something is political does not mean that it is not religious, says Paul Marshall. Instead of describing something as political, not religious, we might should describe it as the political manipulation of religion, or the insincere use of religion: This stress that events are not religion but politics can lead to misunderstanding the nature of both religion and politics. It can be akin to saying that a table is not round but red. But tables can be...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved