Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
How to Be a Better Guesstimater
How to Be a Better Guesstimater
Mar 30, 2026 2:11 AM

Is the murder rate in the U.S. increasing or decreasing? What percentage of teen girls will give birth this year? What percentage of Americans are Christian or Muslim? What percentage are immigrants?

If you guess wrong, you’re not alone. A new global survey, building on work in the UK last year for the Royal Statistical Society, finds that most people in the countries surveyed were wildly wrong. For instance, Americans guess wrong on each of the following questions:

• What Percentage of Girls Age 15-19 Give Birth Each Year? (Avg. guess: 24 percent; Actual: 3 percent)

• What Percentage of People Are Muslim? (Avg. guess: 15 percent; Actual: 1 percent)

• What Percentage of People Are Christian? (Avg.guess: 56 percent; Actual: 78 percent)

• What Percentage of People Are Immigrants? (Avg.guess: 32 percent; Actual: 13 percent)

• What Percentage of People Voted in the Last Major Election? (Avg.guess: 57 percent; Actual: 67 percent)

• What Percentage of People Are Unemployed and Looking For Work? (Avg.guess: 32 percent; Actual: 6 percent)

While these examples may seem relatively trivial, they highlight that when es to numbers that shape policy and politics, many Americans are extremely confused. Ideally, before making a decision about how to vote or stressing about the latest health threat, we’d research the numbers to develop an informed decision. But the number of issues we face each day often prevents us from doing more than making a “best guess.”

Fortunately, there are ways we can hone our skills at guessing and estimation — guesstimation — that will help us minimize our innumeracy. Here are a few tips for making better guesses about numbers related to politics, policy, and demographics:

Choose (and know) your reference points — For policy purposes, one essential reference point is the population of the U.S., which is currently 316 million. But for purposes of guesstimation, 315 is close enough and easier to use in mental calculations.

That’s a big number, so you’ll also want to have a few other ways to gauge large numbers of people. For example, it may be helpful to know that California has 38 million people (round up to 40), Texas has 26 million (round down to 25), or New York City has 8 million.

Keep in mind these numbers are only useful if they make sense to you. If you’ve never been to New York City you may not be able to grasp just how big the city is or how crowded it can be. Choose references, such as your city or state, that will help you in your guesstimation.

Translate into both percentages and fractions — A lot of guesstimation problems occur when we use percentages without translating them into their equivalent fraction.

From elementary school math you learned that 20 percent is “1 out of 5”, 25 percent is “1 out of 4”, 33 percent is “1 out of 3”, etc. These types of fractions are particularly useful when thinking about populations, and can prevent us from making some obvious mistakes.

For instance, a Gallup poll found that U.S. adults, on average, estimate that 25 percent of Americans are gay or lesbian, and young adults estimated about 30 percent (the real answer is about 2 percent). Do these people really think that 1 out of 4 people in the U.S. (about 79 million people (315 / 4 = 78.7)) or even on 1 out of every 4 people they know are homosexual? Probably not. They just didn’t think about how the percentage translates into monsensical terms.

Think outside your circles —The esteemed movie critic Pauline Kael famously said, after the 1972 Presidential election, “I live in a rather special world. I only know one person who voted for Nixon. Where [Nixon voters] are I don’t know. They’re outside my ken.” Prior to that election, Kael probably would have done a poor job of guesstimating how many people would vote for Nixon. We tend to parisons based on the groups we know e in contact with, which can cause us to over/under-estimate the size of those groups.

For instance, if you work in a crisis pregnancy center, it may seem reasonable to assume 1 out of 4 young teen girls are getting pregnants. Similarly, if you live in an urban area, such as Chicago, you are likely to encounter more immigrants and overestimate their size relative to the general population. Always consider how your own experience may bias your guess.

Ask, “Is that a big number? — During the height of the recent ebola panic, a clever meme spread around the Internet that noted, “More Americans have been dumped by Taylor Swift than have died from ebola.” You don’t even need to know how many men Ms. Swift has dated (about a dozen) to understand parison. The meme works because it provides a guesstimation-style response to the question “Is the number of people who have died from ebola in America a large number?”

Of course, what is considered a large number is relative, so we need to make the parisons. If one American out of 315 million has died from ebola, that is not a big number. But we might also want pare it to a similar circumstance, such as the flu virus. Flu-associated deaths range from a low of about 3,000 to a high of about 49,000 people. While there may be sensible reasons to by concerned about the spread of ebola, we are currently much more likely to die from the flu.

Consider the precision of the question — Finally, we need to take into account the question or claim under consideration. For instance, President Obama recently said that, “It is estimated that 1 in 5 women on college campuses has been sexually assaulted during their time there — 1 in 5.” What is surprising is that if that statistic is true, then Obama — and ever other sensible adult — should be warning women pletely avoid college campuses, just as they would advise against walking down a dark, unfamiliar alley in a crime-ridden part of a city.

But the two questions we have to ask upon hearing that claim are “It it true?” and “How do they define sexual assault?” The answer to the first part is clearly “no.” The second part if a bit trickier. In the source Obama quotes, “sexual assault” includes both “rubbing up against you in a sexual way, even if it is over your clothes while you were drunk and unable to consent” and violent sexual penetration. If you’re a young woman, you may want to know how much of each category is included in such a statistic before deciding whether to apply for college.

***

While guesstimation shouldn’t take the place of ing informed about actual facts, it can be a helpful way for us to process the deluge of stats and figures that wash over us on a daily basis. And since we’re already going to make such guesses anyway, we might as well develop a process to do it more effectively.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
HHS Mandate Round-up
The Obamacare HHS provision went into effect yesterday. Here is a round-up of posts with reaction to that. The Day After the HHS Mandate Kicked In Kathryn Jean Lopez, National Review Online Kolesar is a part owner of this family business established in 1961. The family is Catholic and considers the HHS contraception, sterilization, and abortion-inducing-drug “Preventative Services” mandate — which the White House has introduced as part of its health-care law — a clash with conscience. “We only ask...
The Tortured Logic of the Obamacare Law
The Affordable Care Act, monly known as “Obamacare”, is a strange law from the perspective of economic theories of insurance markets. Still, one can see where its designers were starting from. The individual mandate may be onerous from a liberty standpoint, but it makes sense if you understand that insurance markets are vulnerable to a phenomenon known as the “death spiral.” The idea behind the death spiral is based on the recognition that insurance is a risk management scheme. panies,...
Samuel Gregg: The Profoundly anti-Keynesian Political Economy of Wilhelm Röpke
Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg is featured on the July 29 episode of Liberty Law Talk. The conversation, which focuses on the too-often forgotten free-market economics of Wilhelm Röpke, can be downloaded online at the Library of Law and Liberty website. Gregg has written extensively on Röpke in the past and the conversation meets expectations as enlightening and thought-provoking. Be sure to check it out. ...
Movie Review: ‘Safety Not Guaranteed’
From the producers of Little Miss es this charming mix edy, suspense, drama, and—possibly—science fiction. Safety Not Guaranteed is the story of melancholy Darius (Aubrey Plaza), an intern at a Seattle magazine, who goes on assignment with reporter Jeff (Jake M. Johnson) and fellow intern Arnau (Karan Soni) to investigate the author of a peculiar classified ad that reads: *WANTED* Someone to go back in time with me. This is not a joke. You’ll get paid after we get back....
Two Steps Forward for GR Public…. One Step Back for MI?
In yesterday’s Grand Rapids Press (and appearing at on Monday), Monica Scott reports on the tenure reform bill signed by Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder last year and set to take effect in the 2013-2014 school year: Last year, Gov. Rick Snyder signed a tenure reform bill pletely overhauled teacher performance evaluations, tying teachers’ grades to student achievement. But teachers and union leaders locally and across the state have said they think it’s unfair to be held accountable for the performance...
Acton Commentary: Challenging Liberals on Economic Immobility
In today’s Acton Commentary (published August 1) Samuel Gregg writes that “one shouldn’t forget just how central the endless pursuit of ever-greater economic equality is to the modern Left’s very identity. In fact, without it, the modern Left would have little to its agenda other than the promotion of lifestyle libertarianism and other socially destructive ends.”The full text of his essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weekly Acton News & Commentary and other publicationshere. Challenging Liberals on Economic Immobility bySamuel...
What Board Games Can and Cannot Teach Us About Economics
One of the most basic forms of entertainment that friends and families share together is playing board games, such as Monopoly or Risk. While we may not realize is how much these games are teach us about economic ideas such as trade or scarcity. I must confess I’m a bit of a board game snob. I don’t really care mon games like Monopoly as I prefer so-called “designer” games such as the Settlers of Catan or Power Grid. In an...
The Prospects of More QE for Economic Stimulus: A Lesson from History
In today’s Wall Street Journal, Jon Hilsenrath and Kristina Peterson report, “The Federal Reserve is heading toward launching a new round of stimulus to buck up the weak economy, but stopped short of doing so right away.” The predicted means of stimulating the economy is another round of the unconventional policy of quantitative easing (QE), i.e. when a central bank purchases financial assets from the private sector with newly created money in effort to spark economic growth. Thus, the quantity...
The High Cost of Conscience
The Obama administration’s controversial contraception-abortifacient mandate goes into effect yesterday, creating a difficult choice for pro-life business owners. If employers don’t change their plans, they will be hit with fines of up to $100 per employee per day. But if they stop providing health coverage, employers with more than 50 employees could be hit with an alternative fine of $2,000 per employee per year. As the Heritage Foundation has noted, for panies, the level of these fines would mean going...
Why Robert Sirico Moved to the Right—and Jane Fonda Didn’t
RealClearReligion’s Nicholas G. Hahn III recently talked to Acton President Fr. Robert Sirico about Obama, Marx, and Jane Fonda: RCR: Why didn’t Jane Fonda and others in your generation follow you to the Right? Robert Sirico: There are a lot of them that are not Leftist anymore. I know a lot of people in my generation who were at those things and are much more conservative today — not quite philosophically, but certainly wouldn’t identify with the Left. Now, why...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved