Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
How the Church can respond to the Coronavirus pandemic
How the Church can respond to the Coronavirus pandemic
Jan 13, 2026 8:47 AM

If you had you asked someone on New Year’s Day of 2020 what they envisioned the year ahead might look like, few would’ve imagined that the first few months would be spent canceling trips, events, and academic semesters. Families and college students hadn’t planned to spend their spring break in quarantine. Most businesses didn’t enter the year in fear of stomach-turning Dow Jones plummets and sobering market uncertainty. Regardless of projections, governments across the world are taking extensive measures to limit the spread of COVID-19.

History is no stranger to epidemics and pandemics. But it’s times like this, when looming uncertainty es the global lingua franca, that Christians have the opportunity to showcase the best of humanity. Yuval Levin, writing for the New York Times, urges Americans, particularly those of us who have strong institutional allegiances, to take an honest assessment of ourselves and ask, “Given my role here, how should I behave?” This is the question that those who take their institutional roles seriously are now asking themselves. For Christians, the answer is given very clearly in Matthew 22: Love God and love your neighbors.

In the second century, the Antonine Plague wreaked havoc and death across the Roman world. Paganism, which was the ruling religion of the time, did not possess a theology of care passion for the sick, which led many of the diseased to be abandoned to their fate. However, Christians who pelled by passion central to mandment to “love our neighbor as ourselves” took a different approach. Professor John Horgan notes that during the plague “Christians often stayed to provide assistance while pagans fled.”

These early believers regularly risked their lives by taking the sick in and providing the dead with proper burials. Instead of allowing fear to drive them to turn their backs on suffering men, women, and children, they courageously went into the most perilous areas to fort, care, and the Gospel. Over the centuries, the moral courage and institutional strength of the Church has been one of its greatest assets.

Is the Church of the twenty-first century prepared to handle tragedy and disaster with similar grace? Are our moral muscles conditioned to passion and care during times of crisis, or have we allowed them to atrophy, content to allow others to be our brother’s keeper? Lawrence Gostin, a professor of global health law, recently wrote that during this outbreak, “The government will need to provide food, medicine and support for the lonely, fearful or depressed.” Without a doubt, the government has a crucial role to play during such a crisis, and we should pray for wisdom on behalf of our elected officials. But the question remains: How much of the burden to provide food and support for the lonely, fearful, and depressed should the Church help shoulder?

As advocates of limited government, one of the best ways we can promote confidence in civil society’s ability to respond to tragedy is by responding to tragedy ourselves. The Christian example of charity evident in the weeks and months following Hurricane Harvey is a modern-day example of how the Church is at her best when she is carrying the burdens of others.

As this virus spreads, those with weak immune systems are most vulnerable and need to mon sense measures to avoid infection. However, there are untold numbers who have weakened emotional immune systems and are working overtime to cope with the stress tied to uncertainty and fear. Below are several ways that we can respond to this crisis, showing love passion to those who are loaded down with anxiety and fear:

Get creative about munity

Few things are more isolating than dealing with sickness, whether physical or mental, by yourself. Longstanding relationships are often forced e to terms with the new dynamics that the limitations of the sickness demand. The sick often feel discouraged to engage with the outside world, sometimes out of fear of rejection.

As government and private entities look for ways to slow down the spread of this virus, events are canceled, travel restricted, employees asked to work from home, and many people are undergoing mandatory and voluntary quarantines.

Regardless of the cause, when social interaction is discouraged, or forbidden, it can foster feelings of loneliness and isolation. Without question, these measures are taken to protect individuals, especially those with weaker immune systems, but that doesn’t make the feelings of alienation any less painful. Now is the time to think creatively about how we can foster a sense munity, utilizing the digital platforms available to nearly all Americans.

Encourage the fearful

Scripture tells us that we have not been given a spirit of fear. Unfortunately, we see panic set in for the masses quickly, with near non-stop coverage of disasters and outbreaks stoking the tinder of fear that many are already battling.

Because fear of the unknown can have a paralyzing effect, we have to be intentional bating it. Uncertainty of what might be lurking around the corner has crippled many. Yet even when tragedy and suffering rear their ugly heads, I Thessalonians 4 reminds us that we don’t grieve as those who have no hope. Instead we can fort in the truth that no matter what struggles we face in this life, God’s sovereignty is a sure anchor. Look for ways to encourage those struggling with debilitating fear. Invite them to view today’s concerns through the lens of eternity.

Stand alongside of the suffering

In the parable of the sheep and goats, Jesus suggests that one indication of a person’s salvation is how they take care of the sick. History has shown that the early Christians took their mandate to minister to the sick seriously. If Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever (which He is), then this directive is no less relevant in our present time.

Instead of succumbing to feelings of frustration over the multitude of people whom we can’t help, we can turn our attention forting and standing alongside those within our sphere of influence. It’s true that we can’t help everyone. But for those of us who are able-bodied, we can begin by reaching out to those most proximate to us.

There are many basic, tangible ways we can meet the needs of the sick that stand to make a considerable difference in their lives and can also serve as a character-forming experience for us.

The integrity of our institutions is tested during times of tragedy. It’s usually in such crucibles that our character is revealed. We have an opportunity to exercise our institutional muscles by putting them to good use during this period of uncertainty and fear. Let’s roll up our sleeves and get to work.

domain.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Beyond Bolsonaro: A freedom surge in Brazil
Those who argue that the recent victory of President Jair Bolsonaro in the 2018 Brazilian presidential elections represent an authoritarian shift are highly mistaken. On the contrary, liberalism has never been as strong and vibrant in Brazil as it is in the present moment. While some “intellectuals” and most of the media — in Brazil and internationally — keep characterizing Bolsonaro’s victory as a sign of increasing intolerance and alt-right politics (because of a few unfortunate declarations during his campaign)...
Why the national debt is an intergenerational injustice
Note:This article is part of the ‘Principles Project,’ a list of principles, axioms, and beliefs that undergirda Christian view of economics, liberty, and virtue. Clickhereto read the introduction and other posts in this series. The Principle: #21A – National debt is almost always an unjust form of an intergenerational wealth transfer. The Definitions: National Debt — The federal or national debt is the net accumulation of the federal government’s annual budget deficits; the total amount of money that the U.S....
Fiscal policy: The best case scenario
Note: This is post #125 in a weekly video series on basic economics. When and why does the government might engage in expansionary fiscal policy? When does the government increase spending, or decrease taxes, bat a recession? In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Tyler Cowen examines some of the government’s options, from doing nothing to taking steps to increase thevelocity of moneyand thereby increase aggregate demand. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching...
Trump’s tariffs could lead to a Bible shortage
At his campaign rally last night President Trump vowed that he’d make “America wealthy again.” But the taxes he’s imposed on Americans in the form of tariffs are making America poorer—both materially and spiritually. When Trump imposed tariffs on China last year I mentioned that in 2019 the tax would cost households to suffer losses equivalent to $2,357 per household (or $915 per person). Since then we’ve found that the tax increase may have other harmful effects, including causing a...
The board gaming boom: Reviving face-to-face play in a digital age
The rise of board games is making headlines (just check out some of the stories here, here, here, here, and here). Despite massive disruption by online- and mobile-based gaming, many consumers seem to still enjoy the face-to-face interaction and experience of tabletop games. As the market responds, and as technology and globalization continue to open the playing field to petitors and genres, what might we learn about the prospects munity in an otherwise digital age? There are many theories about...
Philip K. Dick, Lord Acton, and the nineteenth century that never ended
The American science fiction author Philip K. Dick was a strange guy. In addition to being a prolific author of many science fiction classics like The Man in the High Castle, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, and Minority Report (All these and many more adapted for film and television) he was also a prolific diarist. Many of these diary entries were edited and published as The Exegesis of Philip K. Dick in 2011. A recurring theme in these diary...
Acton Line podcast: Why Marxism is still alive; The legacy of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
On this episode of Acton Line, Romanian author and public intellectual, Mihail Neamtu, joins the show to talk about what he calls the “ghost” of Marxism. What defines Marxism and what remnants of the ideology are we seeing today? After that, Daniel J. Mahoney, writer and professor of politics at Assumption College, speaks with Acton’s Director of Communications, John Couretas, about the legacy of the 20th century Russian writer, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. Solzhenitsyn’s writings are said to have contributed greatly in...
Business is bad. Can it also be good?
There are many reasons to critique business these days. From crony capitalist practices to surveillance capitalism and data collection, from abuse of the environment for short term profits to siding with the fashionable for short term praise at the expense of religious freedom and long term cultural health. Business and corporations deserve much of the condemnation they receive. As Adam Smith wrote in The Wealth of Nations People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion,...
New York’s rent regulations: people over profit?
Last week, the New York State Legislature arranged a series of regulations designed to protect tenants and control rents. This action was quickly repeated by the California Assembly, which passed a rent-cap bill, both following in the footsteps of Oregon’s statewide rent control law enacted this past February. Landlords in New York City were quick to argue that the new legislation would cost local construction jobs and prevent owners from making needed repairs, leading to buildings in disrepair. Nevertheless, these...
What’s missing from the UK prime minister’s race? A British view
The 313 Conservative MPs held the second round of voting to elect the new leader of the Conservative Party and prime minister of the United Kingdom. Each of the six remaining candidates – Boris Johnson, Jeremy Hunt, Michael Gove, Dominic Raab, Sajid Javid, and Rory Stewart – had to receive at least 33 votes to advance to the next round. The results, which were announced around 6 p.m. London time, were as follows: Johnson: 126;Hunt: 46;Gove: 41;Stewart: 37;Javid: 33; andRaab:...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved