Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
How Many Taylor Swifts Does It Take to Pay the Interest on the National Debt?
How Many Taylor Swifts Does It Take to Pay the Interest on the National Debt?
Jan 31, 2026 2:18 AM

Margaret Thatcher famously said the problem with socialist governments is that, “They always run out of other people’s money.” Unfortunately, that’s true for almost all governments. Even more unfortunate, though, is that some people refuse to believe that government can ever run out of other people’s money.

Some people claim, for instance, that the government can continue to borrow and spend (and should do more of both since interest rates are currently low) since the national debt is not a problem. Take, for example, Matthew Yglesias, who writes about economics for Vox. He famously said (and repeats far too often) that, “the U.S. government can never run out of dollars. Unlike you, or pany you work for, or the town you live in, the federal government prints dollars.”

Unpacking the economic ignorance embedded in that claim would take all day. So let’s set aside the question of how the government will be able to pay off the debt in the future and focus instead on the part of the debt the government pays right now: interest.

How does government pay that interest? The answer, of course, is with “other people’s money” (i.e., taxes). Interest on the debt is paid out of the tax dollars that are taken from the American people. That is money es out of our pockets today to pay for money we borrowed in the past. And it’s a lot of money.

True, if we measure it as a percentage of the total federal budget, the amount paid in interest doesn’t seem like a lot—only about 7 percent. But what this overlooks is that the percentage can be made to appear even lower by simply increasing spending in other areas. If you spend more on any other category of the federal budget then the category of interest payments will be smaller, at least as a relative proportion of the overall budget.Looking at interest payments only as a percentage of the budget doesn’t tell us much about what is required to actually paythose payments.

A better number for our purposes is the total amount we have to pay in interest expense each fiscal year. In 2015 that total came to $402,435,356,075.49.

Having trouble puttingthat number into perspective? The Heritage Foundation can help us out. They ask “What if Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers decided he wanted to help out and pay off some of the debt?”

Maybe you’re not a sports fan, or maybe that number is still too big. The human brain wasn’t designed prehend a numbers that large, so let’s break it down into a smaller (though still difficult to process) number: $1,102,562,619.38. That’s the interest that accrues every single day.

How long would it take Taylor Swift to pay just a single day’s worth of interest on the debt?

To pay all the interest for the entire year, we’d need about 1,095 more Taylor Swifts who do nothing but give concerts every day and give their entire proceeds to the government. While in many ways that would be awesome (who wouldn’t want a world with more Taylor Swifts?), that’s not a viable option. To paraphrase Thatcher, when es to paying the interest on the national debt, the government will eventually run out of Taylor Swift’s money.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Sportsmen think global warming is a threat?
In the in-box, this interesting survey from Nate at Field & Stream: A new survey conducted by the National Wildlife Federation (the results of which are being hosted exclusively on ) shows that: 76 percent of sportsmen believe global warming is occurring71 percent believe it’s a serious threat to fish and wildlife78 percent believe the U.S. should reduce its emissions of greenhouse gases like CO2 even though: 73 percent consider themselves conservative to moderate on political issues50 percent consider themselves...
Acton on the radio
Yesterday afternoon, Andrew Yuengert joined host Al Kresta on Kresta in the Afternoon on the Ave Maria Radio Network to discuss immigration reform and President Bush’s most recent proposal to secure the USA’s southern border. Yuengert is an Associate Professor of Economics at Pepperdine University and the author of Inhabiting the Land, an economic analysis of migration and part of Acton’s Christian Social Thought Series of monographs. To listen to the interview, click here (6.5 mb mp3 file). Inhabiting the...
The mandate of the state
In his fragmentary and plete Ethics, Dietrich Bonhoeffer examines the reality of the will of God, which he e to us from Scripture in the form of four mandates: work, marriage, government, and church. Here’s a great summary of Bonhoeffer’s view of the mandate of the government or state, from his essay, “Christ, Reality, and Good,” pages 72-73: The divine mandate of government already presupposes the mandates of work and marriage. In the world that it rules, government finds already...
Hello, pot? This is the kettle…
David Klinghoffer, a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute, writes at NRO this week about the use of biblical texts in support of immigration liberalization by liberals, “Borders & the Bible: It’s not the gospel according to Hillary.” I find this essay problematic on a number of levels. Klinghoffer first reprimands Hillary Clinton, among others, for quoting the Bible: “While the Left typically resists applying Biblical insights to modern political problems, liberals have seemed to make an exception for the...
Immigration reform, French-style
“As we look at how the immigration debate is unfolding, there are reasons to be concerned about the rule of law,” Jennifer Roback Morse writes. “The mass demonstrations of the past weeks reveal a much more sinister development: the arrival of French-style street politics in America.” Read mentary here. ...
The myth of aid
John Stossel has made an excellent and noteworthy journalistic career by going where the evidence takes him. He possesses an intellectual honesty and curiosity that is refreshing, especially pared to the banal talking head syndrome which dominates most main stream media. As co-anchor of ABC’s 20/20, Stossel has negotiated a deal which allows him to do special reports on whatever interesting and controversial topics he chooses. His latest was a special aimed at debunking popularly accepted myths, tied to the...
Tax those greedy Christians
Over at the Alabama Policy Institute, Gary Palmer takes on University of Alabama law professor Susan Pace Hamill and her assertion that Christians have an obligation to pay higher taxes. In “No Biblical Mandate for Higher Taxes,” Palmer examines her “theocratic tax inquisition.” In one article directed at Christians in Alabama, Professor Hamill contends that to be truly pro-life you must also support paying higher taxes to give the government more money to provide more government programs for the poor....
Jaroslav Pelikan 1923-2006
Jaroslav Pelikan, the great historian of the Christian Tradition, died May 13 at his home in Hamden, Conn. He was 82 years old and had been battling lung cancer. Pelikan wrote more than 30 books and over a dozen reference works covering the entire history of Christianity. Perhaps his best known work is the five-volume “The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine.” In 2003, he published “Credo: Historical and Theological Guide to Creeds and Confessions of Faith...
Geldof trades up
The May 16 Independent is guest-edited by the ubiquitous Bono and sports the RED brand–another Bono project where a share of the profits from the mag will be donated to fighting AIDS and poverty in Africa. panies with RED brands include Converse, American Express, Armani, and GAP.) See the issue for yourself (where you will find a critique of subsidies, as well as Nelson Mandela giving props to RED as well as an interview edian Eddie Izzard–two men who much...
Scan this book! Break the law!
As a brief follow-up to my post last week about the state of scholarly publishing, I want to highlight this recent article in The New York Times, “Scan This Book!” by Kevin Kelly, who is on the staff at Wired magazine. He conjures up the same image as Janet H. Murray, of “the great library at Alexandria,” and laments that “for 2,000 years, the universal library, together with other perennial longings like invisibility cloaks, antigravity shoes and paperless offices, has...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved