Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
How global leaders used COVID-19 to restrict religious liberty
How global leaders used COVID-19 to restrict religious liberty
Jan 28, 2026 12:56 AM

From violating burial rites to blame-shifting toward religious minorities to anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, the pandemic has served as a precursor to all sorts of anti-religious mischief. A new report from the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedoms shows how religious freedoms have been curtailed across the world.

Read More…

COVID-19 has posed unique challenges to religious liberty across the United States, spurring politicians to impose public health measures that restricted in-person worship services. Globally, the situation has often been much worse, with many governments using the pandemic as an excuse for targeted persecution through a mix of misinformation and coercive action.

In the latest annual International Religious Freedom Report, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) details these developments, along with other evolving threats to religious liberty around the world.

“In many cases these [public health] plied with international human rights standards protecting freedom of religion or belief, but in some cases they did not,” the report concludes. “USCIRF’s monitoring revealed that in some countries, already marginalized religious minorities faced official and/or societal stigmatization, harassment, and discrimination for allegedly causing or spreading the virus.”

From violating burial rites to blame-shifting toward religious minorities to anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, the pandemic has served as a precursor to all sorts of anti-religious mischief.

Forced cremation in Sri Lanka

In Sri Lanka, authorities insisted on the cremation of those who died from COVID-19, including Muslims for whom the practice is religiously prohibited…Vietnam arrested members of the Ha Mon religious group on charges of “sabotaging implementation of solidarity practices.” In Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, government authorities indicated Shi’a munities were responsible for the spread of coronavirus and subjected some neighborhoods and localities to stricter lockdown measures. On a positive note, however, in several countries, as part of efforts to reduce prison populations for health reasons, nonviolent offenders, including prisoners of conscience, were furloughed or sent to house arrest.

Religious intolerance in India

The pandemic also fostered a wave of misinformation targeting religious minorities…In India, for example, Muslims were accused of spreading COVID-19, leading to a reported increase in attacks on members of munity. In April, the United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Ahmed Shaheed, issued a statement warning that the pandemic has precipitated a “flare-up in existing religious intolerance in many countries.” For example, USCIRF received reports of numerous anti-Hindu incidents in Bangladesh that occurred with impunity, particularly during COVID-19 lockdowns.

Rise of antisemitism in Germany

…A rise in antisemitism also coincided with the outbreak of COVID-19, particularly in Europe. In Germany, protests against public health measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19 involved the invocation of Holocaust imagery and antisemitic conspiracy theories about mandatory vaccination. Social media users in France used antisemitic tropes to criticize Jewish former health minister Agnes Buzyn, and a Polish Holocaust revisionist claimed that COVID-19 was being used to introduce “Jewish” values into “Western Christian culture.”

India, Russia, Syria and Vietnam e ‘Countries of Particular Concern’

Beyond the COVID-19 crisis, longer-term challenges continued, as well. The report assesses a broad range of violations to “the broad right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion or belief, including the right to nonbelief, protected under international human rights law.”

The report highlights growing turmoil in four specific countries — India, Russia, Syria, and Vietnam — and mends adding them to USCIRF’s “Countries of Particular Concern” (CPCs) designation, along with pre-designated countries such as Burma, China, Eritrea, Iran, Nigeria, North Korea, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan. It also mends keeping Cuba and Nicaragua on its second-tier “Special Watch List” (SWL), while adding 10 additional countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Azerbaijan, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Turkey, and Uzbekistan.

With an overview of each country in question, the report provides extensive details about evolutions in political/legal dynamics and rises in violence and persecution, as well as mends next steps for U.S. policymakers.

Overall trends include attacks on houses of worship (in China, France, Pakistan, Vietnam, and Ethiopa), political unrest leading to religious liberty violations (in Yemen and across Eastern Europe), and the enforcement of blasphemy laws (in Sri Lanka, Morocco, and Poland). The report also points to a rise in anti-Semitic incidents across Europe, whether among neo-Nazis in Norway, far-right nationalists in Spain and Ukraine, or far-left conspiracy peddlers in Great Britain and Germany. Meanwhile, school textbooks in Islamic countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia continue to promote anti-Semitic ideas to rising generations.

China further restricts religious freedoms

Perhaps most notably, while China has long been on the report’s list of CPCs, its violations continue to multiply. “In 2020, religious freedom conditions in China deteriorated,” the report concludes. “The government intensified its ‘sinicization of religion’ policy, particularly targeting religions perceived to have foreign connections, such as Christianity, Islam, and Tibetan Buddhism.” Religious minorities across the country are aggressively tracked and monitored, leading to now routine reports of forced labor, torture and rape, and genocidal sterilization.

Unfortunately, China’s oppressive behavior doesn’t stop at its borders, and continues to spread as the country grows in international influence. As the report explains:

China’s coercive policies at home have negative transnational implications for religious freedom. In some cases, such policies amount to the active aiding and abetting of religious freedom violations in other countries. Uyghur, Kazakh, and other Turkic Muslims in foreign countries reported in 2020 that Chinese authorities harassed them through messaging apps and phone calls, and by targeting their relatives back home, to silence and suppress their speech and activities overseas. Chinese authorities also rescinded their passports to lure them back to China where they faced persecution, such as internment.

In addition, Chinese authorities continued to carry out a policy of forced repatriation of North Korean refugees in China who faced severe persecution upon their return to North Korea, in many cases due to their exposure and connection to Christianity and to South Korean Christian missionaries who play a crucial role in assisting them to escape North Korea.

Lastly, the Chinese government and its allies continued to weaken and subvert the international human rights system and norms within the United Nations (UN) by arguing that economic progress should precede respect for individual rights, including the right to religious freedom.

Taken together, the global threats to religious liberty are significant in size and prising far more than a string of one-off abuses. The human costs of each situation are tragic, and yet such violations sow seeds of disorder and destruction that spread across the social and economic order.

Samuel Gregg has outlined how religious liberty is intricately linked to economic and political liberty. Likewise, researchers such as Brian Grim, Greg Clark, and Robert Edward Snyder have demonstrated a strong correlation between such liberty and economic growth.

“In understanding and securing religious freedom, we open the door to the full panoply of human rights and to the limits of the state,” wrote Daniel Mark in Acton’s One and Indivisible, a collection of essays on the relationship between religious and economic liberty. “… In building and preserving the institutions of freedom in our time, we would do well to promote the centrality of religious freedom not only for its own sake but also because it undergirds all of our rights.”

When the state stifles religious liberty, it spreads from the persecuted and their families to the fruits and frame of society as a whole — and back and forth again. In our efforts to further a free and virtuous society, both at home and around the globe, such a report reminds us that the fight for our “first freedom” is central to all else.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
5 facts about Easter in America
Throughout the world Easter is celebrated as the greatest eventof the Christian faith. But as with most things associated with Christianity, we Americans tend to put our peculiar stamp on the holiday. Here are five facts you should know about Easter in America: 1. Easter Sunday church services are among the most well-attended all year. There’s even two terms to describe these additional congregants: CEOs — Christians who are “Christmas and Easter Only” — and Chreasters. These are Americans who...
The EU: Global Judicial Despotism and the International Criminal Court
“Americans’ instinctively refuse to recognize as legitimate any international organization, law or treaty that claims any authority over Americans above the U.S. Constitution,” says Todd Huizinga in this week’s Acton Commentary, “particularly if that organization, law or treaty contradicts the Constitution or violates Americans’ constitutional rights.” In the American system, it is because sovereignty rests in the people that the U.S. government does not have a right to transfer sovereignty to any other organization, government or group of governments. But...
Rev. Sirico: When politicians want your money
In the Detroit News, Rev. Robert A. Sirico, co-founder and president of the Acton Institute, offers mentary on the two-year battle with the city of Grand Rapids over the institute’s exempt status under state property tax law (see the March 15 Acton news release, “Acton Institute Prevails in Property Tax Dispute with City of Grand Rapids” for background). In his opinion piece, Rev. Sirico writes: We were assured earlier from then-City Attorney Catherine Mish that it all wasn’t political, but...
Rev. Sirico to appear on America’s News HQ on Easter Sunday
On Sunday, March 27, Acton’s President and Co-founder, Rev. Robert Sirico will join Shannon Bream and Leland Vittert on Fox News’ America’s News HQ. He will offer an Easter reflection ment on any significant breaking news. You can catch him between 1 and 2PM Eastern. America’s News HQ on Fox News Channel reports the latest national and world news. It reports expert insight on health, politics and military matters. ...
Audio: Samuel Gregg on Terrorism, Economics, and Poverty
Acton Institute Director of Research Samuel Gregg was a guest on Thursday’s edition of Kresta in the Afternoon on the Ave Maria Radio Network; his conversation with host Al Kresta touched on Europe’s current struggles with Islamic terrorism, with a focus on this week’s attacks in Brussels, Belgium, and then shifted to a preview of Sam’s ing Acton Lecture Series address on Pope Francis, Poverty, and the Economy. If you’d like to attend that lecture here at the Acton Building...
When the American Colonists Experimented with Socialism
Do you remember the story about colonial Americans experimenting with socialism? Probably not. It’s a tale that rarely finds its way into the textbooks of high school and college students. Indeed, I had been out of school nearly 20 years when I first heard about it. If your not familiar with this part of American history, this short video by Larry Schweikart will fill you in on explains what happened when the early settlers who arrived at Plymouth and Jamestown...
Not a nanoparticle of science in this shareholder resolution
Sometimes clearer heads prevail, but at considerable costs to individual stock portfolios and corporations who have to mount a defense against uninformed, nuisance shareholder resolutions. Last week the Securities and Exchange Commission slowed the progressive roll of religious activist group As You Sow by denying an AYS proxy resolution seeking a detailed nanoparticle risk assessment by Mondelēz International Foodservice. Mondelēz successfully convinced the SEC that its use of food whitener titanium dioxide (TiO2) in its Dentyne Ice chewing gum does...
Work Is Not About You: How Theology Can Save Us from Trade Protectionism
It’s e rather predictable to hear progressives promote protectionist rhetoric on trade and globalization. What’s surprising is when it spills from the lips of the leading Republican candidate. Donald Trump has made opposition to free trade a hallmark of his campaign, a holethat petitors have been slow to exploit. Inthemost recent CNN debate, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and John Kasich eachechoed their own agreement in varying degrees, voicing slight critiques ontariffs but mostlyaffirmingTrump’s ambiguous platitudesabout trade that is“free but fair.”...
What Would Lord Acton Think of Superman?
“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” is the most famous quote by the English Catholic historian Sir John Dalberg-Acton. It also appears to be the overriding theme of the teaser-trailer for the new movie Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice. The quote is even stated directly in the trailer in a voiceover (by actress Holly Hunter). Is it applicable in this context? Would Lord Acton agree that absolute power has corrupted Superman? I think he would. That...
The FAQs: Religious Liberty and the Little Sisters of the Poor
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments todayin a casefrom religious nonprofit groups challenging thefederal government’s contraceptive/abortifacient mandate. Here is what you should knowabout that case. What is this case, and what’s it about? The case the Supreme Court will hear, Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. bines seven challenges to the Health and Human Services’ (HHS) contraceptive/abortifacient mandate. To fulfill the requirements of the Affordable Healthcare Act (aka ObamaCare) the federal government passed a regulation...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved