Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
How global leaders used COVID-19 to restrict religious liberty
How global leaders used COVID-19 to restrict religious liberty
Jan 29, 2026 8:33 AM

From violating burial rites to blame-shifting toward religious minorities to anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, the pandemic has served as a precursor to all sorts of anti-religious mischief. A new report from the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedoms shows how religious freedoms have been curtailed across the world.

Read More…

COVID-19 has posed unique challenges to religious liberty across the United States, spurring politicians to impose public health measures that restricted in-person worship services. Globally, the situation has often been much worse, with many governments using the pandemic as an excuse for targeted persecution through a mix of misinformation and coercive action.

In the latest annual International Religious Freedom Report, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) details these developments, along with other evolving threats to religious liberty around the world.

“In many cases these [public health] plied with international human rights standards protecting freedom of religion or belief, but in some cases they did not,” the report concludes. “USCIRF’s monitoring revealed that in some countries, already marginalized religious minorities faced official and/or societal stigmatization, harassment, and discrimination for allegedly causing or spreading the virus.”

From violating burial rites to blame-shifting toward religious minorities to anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, the pandemic has served as a precursor to all sorts of anti-religious mischief.

Forced cremation in Sri Lanka

In Sri Lanka, authorities insisted on the cremation of those who died from COVID-19, including Muslims for whom the practice is religiously prohibited…Vietnam arrested members of the Ha Mon religious group on charges of “sabotaging implementation of solidarity practices.” In Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, government authorities indicated Shi’a munities were responsible for the spread of coronavirus and subjected some neighborhoods and localities to stricter lockdown measures. On a positive note, however, in several countries, as part of efforts to reduce prison populations for health reasons, nonviolent offenders, including prisoners of conscience, were furloughed or sent to house arrest.

Religious intolerance in India

The pandemic also fostered a wave of misinformation targeting religious minorities…In India, for example, Muslims were accused of spreading COVID-19, leading to a reported increase in attacks on members of munity. In April, the United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Ahmed Shaheed, issued a statement warning that the pandemic has precipitated a “flare-up in existing religious intolerance in many countries.” For example, USCIRF received reports of numerous anti-Hindu incidents in Bangladesh that occurred with impunity, particularly during COVID-19 lockdowns.

Rise of antisemitism in Germany

…A rise in antisemitism also coincided with the outbreak of COVID-19, particularly in Europe. In Germany, protests against public health measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19 involved the invocation of Holocaust imagery and antisemitic conspiracy theories about mandatory vaccination. Social media users in France used antisemitic tropes to criticize Jewish former health minister Agnes Buzyn, and a Polish Holocaust revisionist claimed that COVID-19 was being used to introduce “Jewish” values into “Western Christian culture.”

India, Russia, Syria and Vietnam e ‘Countries of Particular Concern’

Beyond the COVID-19 crisis, longer-term challenges continued, as well. The report assesses a broad range of violations to “the broad right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion or belief, including the right to nonbelief, protected under international human rights law.”

The report highlights growing turmoil in four specific countries — India, Russia, Syria, and Vietnam — and mends adding them to USCIRF’s “Countries of Particular Concern” (CPCs) designation, along with pre-designated countries such as Burma, China, Eritrea, Iran, Nigeria, North Korea, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan. It also mends keeping Cuba and Nicaragua on its second-tier “Special Watch List” (SWL), while adding 10 additional countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Azerbaijan, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Turkey, and Uzbekistan.

With an overview of each country in question, the report provides extensive details about evolutions in political/legal dynamics and rises in violence and persecution, as well as mends next steps for U.S. policymakers.

Overall trends include attacks on houses of worship (in China, France, Pakistan, Vietnam, and Ethiopa), political unrest leading to religious liberty violations (in Yemen and across Eastern Europe), and the enforcement of blasphemy laws (in Sri Lanka, Morocco, and Poland). The report also points to a rise in anti-Semitic incidents across Europe, whether among neo-Nazis in Norway, far-right nationalists in Spain and Ukraine, or far-left conspiracy peddlers in Great Britain and Germany. Meanwhile, school textbooks in Islamic countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia continue to promote anti-Semitic ideas to rising generations.

China further restricts religious freedoms

Perhaps most notably, while China has long been on the report’s list of CPCs, its violations continue to multiply. “In 2020, religious freedom conditions in China deteriorated,” the report concludes. “The government intensified its ‘sinicization of religion’ policy, particularly targeting religions perceived to have foreign connections, such as Christianity, Islam, and Tibetan Buddhism.” Religious minorities across the country are aggressively tracked and monitored, leading to now routine reports of forced labor, torture and rape, and genocidal sterilization.

Unfortunately, China’s oppressive behavior doesn’t stop at its borders, and continues to spread as the country grows in international influence. As the report explains:

China’s coercive policies at home have negative transnational implications for religious freedom. In some cases, such policies amount to the active aiding and abetting of religious freedom violations in other countries. Uyghur, Kazakh, and other Turkic Muslims in foreign countries reported in 2020 that Chinese authorities harassed them through messaging apps and phone calls, and by targeting their relatives back home, to silence and suppress their speech and activities overseas. Chinese authorities also rescinded their passports to lure them back to China where they faced persecution, such as internment.

In addition, Chinese authorities continued to carry out a policy of forced repatriation of North Korean refugees in China who faced severe persecution upon their return to North Korea, in many cases due to their exposure and connection to Christianity and to South Korean Christian missionaries who play a crucial role in assisting them to escape North Korea.

Lastly, the Chinese government and its allies continued to weaken and subvert the international human rights system and norms within the United Nations (UN) by arguing that economic progress should precede respect for individual rights, including the right to religious freedom.

Taken together, the global threats to religious liberty are significant in size and prising far more than a string of one-off abuses. The human costs of each situation are tragic, and yet such violations sow seeds of disorder and destruction that spread across the social and economic order.

Samuel Gregg has outlined how religious liberty is intricately linked to economic and political liberty. Likewise, researchers such as Brian Grim, Greg Clark, and Robert Edward Snyder have demonstrated a strong correlation between such liberty and economic growth.

“In understanding and securing religious freedom, we open the door to the full panoply of human rights and to the limits of the state,” wrote Daniel Mark in Acton’s One and Indivisible, a collection of essays on the relationship between religious and economic liberty. “… In building and preserving the institutions of freedom in our time, we would do well to promote the centrality of religious freedom not only for its own sake but also because it undergirds all of our rights.”

When the state stifles religious liberty, it spreads from the persecuted and their families to the fruits and frame of society as a whole — and back and forth again. In our efforts to further a free and virtuous society, both at home and around the globe, such a report reminds us that the fight for our “first freedom” is central to all else.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Is the gig economy really reshaping our work?
We continue to hear doomsday prophecies about the future of work, with much of the fear focused on the recent growth of the so-called “gig economy”—a swirling sphere of temporary, flexible, and increasingly independent work. Epitomized by services like Uber and Airbnb, and scattered across a wider variety of independent and web-based work, the expansion of the gig economy has caused many to ponder whether its rise might mean the end of traditional long-term employment and a gloomy future of...
The Solow model and ideas
Note: This is post #84 in a weekly video series on basic economics. According to previous videos in this series, the Solow model seems to predict that we’ll always end up in a steady state with no economic growth. But, the Solow model still has one variable unaccounted for: ideas. Ideas do one thing really well, says Alex Tabarrok of Marginal Revolution University, they give us more bang for our buck. This means we get more output for the same...
The overdue good news Juneteenth
Although bad news travels fast, good news often takes the scenic route. That appears to have been especially true during the Civil War. Although Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation became official on the first day of January 1863, word didn’t arrive in Texas until June 19, 1865. On that day Union soldiers, led by Major General Gordon Granger, landed in Galveston with news that the war had ended and that those who were once enslaved were now free. One of Granger’s first...
Introducing The Good Society
Frequent visitors to this blog know that the Acton Institute is rooted in a mission to promote a free and virtuous society characterized by individual liberty and sustained by religious principles. Over the years, our visitors and supporters have begged for an easy way to share this mission and Acton’s core teachings. Last week, our email subscribers got the first look at our newest short film series meeting that need: the inaugural six episodes of The Good Society. The Good...
Berkeley’s ‘mass extinction’ scare just more Malthusian mythology
Too often, environmentalists seem to see humans as a cancer mutilating the earth’s natural splendor, but the idea that fewer people is the solution to the earth’s woes ignores the incredible creative capacity inherent in the human mind. On June 12th, the Berkeley City Council unanimously voted to declare a state of “climate emergency.” The resolution, introduced by Council Member Cheryl Davila, calls for California governments to “initiate a just local, state, national, and global climate emergency mobilization to restore...
The shrinking of the administrative state
In just the last year, the regulatory apparatus of the federal government has endured a range of healthy threats and corrections. Approximately1,579 regulatory actions have been withdrawn or delayed, according to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, and that wave is set to continue. “Agencies plan to finalize three deregulatory actions for every new regulatory action” this fiscal year, a recent report noted. “We’re here today for one single reason,” said President Trump said last December, holding a pair...
Incredibles 2: Making superheroes great again
I saw Incredibles 2 over the Father’s Day weekend, and just like its predecessor, there’s a lot to ponder beneath the surface of this animated film. In the real world we’ve had to wait 14 years, but the sequel picks up basically where the original left off. As the Rev. Jerry Zandstra wrote of the original, “litigiousness and mediocrity are some of the biggest obstacles in our culture. The propensity to settle every dispute by legal action undermines values, such...
Video: Rev. Ben Johnson on First Things blaming democracy and capitalism for abortion
Rev. Ben Johnson, editor of the Acton Institute Religion & Liberty Transatlantic project, appears on the Stephen Herreid Show on YouTube to talk about his critique of First Things editor Matt Schmitz’s essay which blamed democracy and capitalism for Ireland’s repeal by referendum of its 8th Amendment, which “recognizes the equal right to life of the pregnant woman and the unborn.” Latest news here. Read Johnson’s Acton June 8 blog post: ‘Satanic’ capitalism brought abortion to Ireland: ‘First Things’ editor...
A Samson Option for Ireland’s Catholic hospitals?
National funding of health care has produced a fresh crisis in Europe. Not merely the never-ending “winter crisis” in the NHS each year, but a crisis of conscience for Catholic health care providers. The Republic of Ireland voted overwhelmingly to repeal the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution, recognizing the unborn child’s inalienable right to life. With alarming speed, abortion has gone from illegal to mandatory. According to the (UK) Catholic Herald: Ireland’s Taoiseach [Prime Minister] has said that hospitals with...
Supreme Court smacks down liberal double standard on free speech
Last week the Supreme Court struck down a Minnesota law that banned voters from going to the polls while wearing T-shirts, buttons and similar items containing politically charged messages. On the surface the issue may seem to be a trivial matter—at best a minor win for self-expression. But the court ruling was major victory against the double standards of the political left. As I wrote back in March, the case ofMinnesota Voters Alliance v. Manskyconcerned a Minnesota statute that broadly...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved