Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
How ‘Downton Abbey’ Shows Income Inequality Doesn’t Matter
How ‘Downton Abbey’ Shows Income Inequality Doesn’t Matter
Apr 2, 2025 8:40 AM

After what seemed to be an interminably long wait, Downton Abbey, a British period drama on PBS, recently returned to America. Many of us who have been hooked on the show for four seasons tune in each Sunday night to watch the new twists in the saga of the Earl and Countess of Grantham, their household, and their servants.

But as with most pop culture artifacts, this series about Victorian England is having a subversive effect on the views of modern Americans. Who would have guessed when the show premiered in the U.S. in 2011 that it would undermine liberal arguments about the significance of e inequality?

Many of those concerned about e inequality, though, don’t quite grasp that fact yet. Indeed, some even think the show proves their point. For example, Brett Arends, a columnist for MarketWatch, recently wrote an article titled, “Inequality worse now than on ‘Downton Abbey’” in which he notes,

A research paper to be presented this week at the National Bureau of Economic Research, a leading think tank, will confirm that the U.S. today has e as unequal as the England of the Earl of Grantham, Lady Mary, Daisy the kitchen maid and Carson the butler a hundred years ago.

The richest take home a higher share of national e in America today than did the aristocrats and superrich of 1920s England. The poor today take home a smaller share than the butlers, chauffeurs and other working folk did back then.

Peter Lindert, economics professor at the University of California in Davis, and one of the world’s leading experts in measuring e inequality, will be presenting research at the NBER this week, and he shared his thoughts with me by email. “Britain’s Downton Abbey economy of the 1920s,” Lindert says, was slightly “less unequal than…the U.S. today” (emphasis added).

Based on this information, Arends makes the spurious claim that, “Half of our country are just like Daisy the kitchen maid or Thomas the scheming footman a hundred years ago. They basically have nothing.”

Is that true? Do half of American have “basically nothing?” And are half of Americans as unfortunate as Daisy and Thomas?

No, it’s not true. But Arends’ pletely incorrect either.

In 2013, the median annual salary for a man was $35,228 and $22,063 for a woman. Both Thomas and Daisy, who have rather plum jobs for low-skilled workers, actually earn more than the median U.S. worker. Thomas, as a second footman, would have earned an annual salary $37,379.37 (in 2014 dollars). Daisy, as an undercook, would have earned $22,150 a year. (They also received other benefits—such as free room and board—but that would have been offset by having to work 14-16 hour days for 6-7 days a week, so we’ll exclude those from our calculations.)

Daisy and Thomas would be even better off if they decided to get married (we’ll ignore the reason that is unlikely). bined salaries would be, in 2014 dollars, $59,529. Not too shabby for a couple of servants.

Yet Arends concludes they—both the servants and half of America— “basically have nothing.” That’s unlikely to be true for Thomas and Daisy (why couldn’t they save since their living expenses are so low?) and definitely not true for Americans. The median net worth of an American family in 2013 was $81,400. (For young single people like Thomas and Daisy it’s only about $14,1600, but that’s because their American equivalents are usually still in school or moving up on the economic ladder.)

Let’s concede that e inequality in America is roughly the same as it was in Victorian-era England. Let’s also concede that Downtown servants earned wages equal to the median for Americans today. If e inequality is the most important factor, then it shouldn’t matter much whether the average low-skilled worker was flipping burgers in a kitchen at a McDonalds in Dallas or making foie gras in the kitchen at Downtown Abbey. Yet how many modern fast food workers would be willing to trade places with Daisy? Not many, I suspect. Even Daisy wouldn’t make that trade-off.

The reason is because the inequality that matters is consumption inequality. When es to living standards, consumption is significantly more important than e. As The Economist explains,

e inequality is the monly cited measure, primarily because the data on it is the prehensive. However, for the purpose of measuring how inequality affects munity it is also probably the least interesting yardstick of the three.

Consumption inequality, though harder to measure, provides a better proxy of social welfare. This is because people’s living standards depend on the amount of goods and services they consume, rather than the number of dollars in their wage packet.

Even though Daisy makes as much e as a modern day worker, both the quality and quantity of goods and services she can purchase in Victorian England is much less that what we have today. The e inequality may be the same between the two periods, but on the inequality that matters—consumption—Victorian Daisy is much worse off than Modern American Daisy.

Also, fans of Downton know that Daisy isn’t the least bit concerned about e inequality. If Lord Grantham’s e were to fall to the point where his e equaled a kitchen maid, e inequality would be reduced. And yet both Grantham and Daisy would be much worse off; the Grantham’s would be broke and Daisy would be out of a job. (Even uneducated Daisy understood economics better than the average Ivy League trained Occupy Wall Street protestor.)

Arends wrote a second article titled “10 ways ‘Downton Abbey’ servants had it better than you” and says “Daisy has it better than us in so many other ways.” Number one on his list is that Daisy has a job for life: “She works for one of the richest men in England and she knows she’ll be there as long as she wants or needs to be.” That is true, and as she pointed out in the most recent episode, she appreciates that fact. But she also wants options. Sure, she could work in a kitchen the rest of her life but what if she doesn’t want to?

That’s why Daisy is getting tutored in math and history and other topics. She wants to get an education so, in economic terms, she can increase her productivity and increase her ability to move up the social mobility scale. What Daisy cares about is not e inequality but intragenerational social mobility—the ability to a change one’s social position during a person’s lifetime. Daisy wants the opportunity to move up the economic ladder and have some sort of choice in the works she does.

Daisy understands that what truly matters is not the disparity between her pay and the e of the folks living upstairs, but the opportunities she has to improve her own human flourishing. She may be an uneducated kitchen maid, but Daisy is teaching modern Americans that, despite the claims of equality-obsessed economic liberals, e inequality isn’t all that important.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
“A lot of people are hungry for this…”
A Boston-area Church of Christ is using environmental stewardship to boost membership. The United Church of Christ, to which the Newbury congregation belongs, has called upon its members to e more deeply engaged in stewardship initiatives. Gary Gardner, a senior researcher at the Worldwatch Institute, an environmental research organization in Washington, wrote in 2002 that the union of environmentalists and religious institutions is "a bination that until recently remained virtually unexplored. . . . Each looks at the world from...
Federalism and the EPA
There’s a lingering issue that continues to bother me about the so-called “global warming” Supreme Court case from 2007, Massachusetts v. EPA (05-1120), and that is a nagging concern about federalism and environmental standards. As it stands currently, individual states are often prevented from enacting tougher legislation or regulation regarding some forms of pollution than the federal EPA standards. In order for a state EPA to partner with the federal EPA, be “authorized,” and thus receive funds, “a state must...
Why Not Learn Some Economics First?
According to a report from the Zenit News Service, Cardinal Renato Martino, president of the Pontifical Council of Justice and Peace, recently insisted that the “logic” of the market be changed. He said that the logic “was till (sic) now that of maximum gain, and therefore the most investments possible directed toward obtaining maximum benefit. And this, according to the social doctrine of the Church, is immoral.” This is because, according to the Cardinal, the market “should be able to...
Baby Stepping Toward the Nanny State
Is Senator Obama a closet socialist waiting for inauguration day, at which time he and a Democratic Congress will immediately pursue a massive increase in the size and power of government in our lives, panied by massive tax increases and massive redistribution of wealth? Or is he really a moderate pragmatist, a canny politician who when he was getting started in politics used his radical contacts from his ultra-leftwing Hyde munity, but now is in a position to use more...
Election Preaching
The election day sermon was an important institution in colonial New England. It was one delivered by Samuel Danforth in 1670 that furnished the venerable Puritan concept of America as an “errand into the wilderness.” (For more, see Nathan Hatch, The Democratization of American Christianity.) One need not share the Massachusetts colony’s view of church-state relations (one of the chief tasks of government was the suppression of heresy) to recognize that the election day sermon served a useful purpose. The...
Busted
The lyrics to “Busted,” written by Harlan Howard, and made famous as performed by Johnny Cash: My bills are all due and the babies need shoes, But I’m Busted Cotton’s gone down to a quarter a pound And I’m Busted I got a cow that’s gone dry And a hen that won’t lay A big stack of bills Getting bigger each day The county’s gonna haul my belongings away, But I’m Busted So I called on my brother to ask...
Careful what you wish for….
Via Drudge, Australia is joining none other than China in censoring the internet. Here’s a surprising endorsement/justification the writer uses to bottom line the article: The Australian Christian Lobby, however, has ed the proposals. Managing director Jim Wallace said the measures were needed. "The need to prevent access to illegal hard-core material and child pornography must be placed above the industry’s desire for unfettered access," Mr Wallace said. I’m not endorsing porn. But earth to Mr. Wallace: Scan up a...
Doctoral Work on Religion and Philanthropy
I received this notice via H-Net last week: THE LAKE INSTITUTE ON FAITH & GIVING THE CENTER ON PHILANTHROPY INDIANA UNIVERSITY DOCTORAL DISSERTATION FELLOWSHIP The Lake Institute on Faith and Giving at the Center on Philanthropy, Indiana University will offer a one year doctoral dissertation fellowship of $22,000 for the academic year 2009-2010. This doctoral dissertation fellowship will be given to a scholar whose primary research focus is in the area of religion and philanthropy or faith and giving. The...
Birth of Freedom Shorts Series: How did Plato and Aristotle justify slavery?
In this week’s Birth of Freedom short video Sam Gregg, author of On Ordered Liberty, discusses the views that two influential ancient philosophers held regarding human equality and the practice of slavery. If you haven’t seen the other 7 video shorts, you can check out the rest of the series, learn about premieres in your area, and discover more background information at . ...
Birth of Freedom Shorts Series: Is it appropriate to consider the religious views of political candidates?
Acton Media’s latest Birth of Freedom short video is a timely message in the face of tomorrow’s election. In this video, William B. Allen, Professor of Political Science at Michigan State University, discusses how faith, “the pelling part of one’s existence”, ought to fit in when evaluating a political candidate. Check out more Birth of Freedom shorts, learn about premieres in your area, and discover more background information at . ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved