Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
How do Western nations rank on economic freedom?
How do Western nations rank on economic freedom?
Jan 8, 2026 11:17 PM

The Fraser Institute released its annual “Economic Freedom of the World” report this morning. The free market think tank rates every nation based on its “degree of freedom in five broad areas”:

Area 1:Size of Government—As spending and taxation by government, and the size of government-controlled enterprises increase, government decision-making is substituted for individual choice and economic freedom is reduced.Area 2:Legal System and Property Rights—Protection of persons and their rightfully acquired property is a central element of both economic freedom and civil society. Indeed, it is the most important function of government.Area 3:Sound Money—Inflation erodes the value of rightfully earned wages and savings. Sound money is thus essential to protect property rights. When inflation is not only high but also volatile, it es difficult for individuals to plan for the future and thus use economic freedom effectively.Area 4:Freedom to Trade Internationally—Freedom to exchange—in its broadest sense, buying, selling, making contracts, and so on—is essential to economic freedom, which is reduced when freedom to exchange does not include businesses and individuals in other nations.Area 5:Regulation—Governments not only use a number of tools to limit the right to exchange internationally, they may also develop onerous regulations that limit the right to exchange, gain credit, hire or work for whom you wish, or freely operate your business.

This year, researchers also adjusted the ratings based on gender disparity: formal laws denying women economic rights on the basis of their sex. This year’s results drew on data from 2015.

Overall, global freedom plunged after holding steady for much of the previous decade.

The United States and Canada tied for eleventh place. Although the U.S. improved modestly from 16th place in last year’s report, it ranked second in 2000. Canada tied for fifth place last year.

The 10 most economically free nations were:

Hong KongSingaporeNew ZealandSwitzerlandIrelandThe United KingdomMauritiusGeorgiaAustraliaEstonia

The 10 least economically free nations include:

VenezuelaCentral African RepublicRepublic of CongoAlgeriaArgentinaLibyaSyriaMyanmarChadIran

The Fraser Institute does not rank some nations, including North Korea and Cuba, due to a lack of data.

According to the report, the most economically stifling nation in Europe is Ukraine, at 149, just one notch above Iran.

Other European nations’ rankings include: Lithuania (13), Denmark (15), Latvia and Finland (tied at 17), the Netherlands (19), Romania (20), Malta (21), Germany (23), Norway (25), Austria (26), Sweden (37), Albania (32), Portugal (34), Spain (36), Czech Republic (42), Belgium (43), Bulgaria (48), Poland (51), France (52), Slovakia (53), Hungary and Italy (tied at 54), Iceland (62), Macedonia (67), Croatia (72), Slovenia (73), Serbia (86), Bosnia and Herzegovina (99), Russia (100), and Greece (116).

In addition to the report, the institute’s website features an interactive map, displaying each nation’s ranking and overall score.

The steepest decrease in freedom between 2000 and 2015 came in Venezuela, Argentina, Bolivia, Iceland, and Greece. The largest gains came in Romania, Bulgaria, Rwanda, Albania, and Cyprus.

Why it matters

Aside from the wealth generated by free markets, economic freedom is intimately linked with religious and political liberty. In Freedom House’s ranking of political freedom – including freedom of the press – all 10 of the freest economies are rated “free” or “partly free” politically. Only two of the bottom 10 are (Argentina and Myanmar).

Religious liberty, as ranked by the Pew Research Center in 2015, yielded similar results. Only one of the freest economies, Singapore, imposed a “high” or “very high” level of government restrictions on religious liberty. Half of the most restrictive economies did.

As Friedrich Hayek wrote, “Totalitarianism is nothing but consistent collectivism.” Concentrating economic power in the hands of the state often precedes the eradication of religious freedom.

You can read the full report here.

Fraser Institute.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
‘Captialism’ according to the academy
For a quick overview of the current state of appreciation for economics and capitalism among various ‘academics,’ see the newly inaugurated e-journal Fast Capitalism. It might as well be subtitled: Marxism, Alive and Well. Most of the contributors to the first issue are in munications, or political science. Here’s a sampling: In “Beyond Beltway and Bible Belt: Re-imagining the Democratic Party and the American Left,” Ben Agger, who teaches sociology and humanities at the University of Texas at Arlington, writes,...
Nonprofits beware!
A friend forwarded a Website link for The Nonprofit Congress recently that was downright scary. It appears to be the epitome of good intentions fraught with unintended consequences. Or perhaps the consequences are not unintended. The Congress is an apparent call to advocacy (i.e., political pressuring) within the National Council of Nonprofit Associations. To the group’s credit, the “why” is a forthright statement of their view and values: The time e for nonprofits of all sizes and scope e together....
Stewardship and economics: two sides of the same coin
In yesterday’s Acton Commentary, I argued that the biblical foundation for the concepts of stewardship and economics should lead us to see them as united. In this sense I wrote, “Economics can be understood as the theoretical side of stewardship, and stewardship can be understood as the practical side of economics.” I also defined economics as “the thoughtful ordering of the material resources of a household or social unit toward the self-identified good end” and said that the discipline “helps...
The dignity of every human being
The February 11 issue of WORLD Magazine includes a culture feature, “Giving their names back.” Profiled in the article is Citizens for Community Values (CCV), a nonprofit in Memphis that does a victim assistance program called “A Way Out.” It’s a reclamation program of sorts, literally reclaiming women ensnarled in the sex trade industry, and giving them back their lives, reclamation evidenced by names. The very nature of the sex industry, be it topless dancing, stripping or prostitution, requires anonymity–no...
Concerns about consensus
George H. Taylor, the State Climatologist for Oregon, writes at TCS Daily, “A Consensus About Consensus.” The article is worth reading. It shows that scientific consensus is often overrated, both in terms of its existence and in terms of its relevance. With resepct to global warming, Taylor looks at some of the claims for scientific consensus, and states, “But even if there actually were a consensus on this issue, it may very well be wrong.” This simply means that the...
Jack Hafer at the Acton Lecture Series
Jack Hafer, the producer of the award-winning film, To End All Wars, will be speaking at the 2006 Acton Lecture Series on Wednesday, February 15. This luncheon (which does include a lunch) will be held in the David Cassard room of the Waters Building in downtown Grand Rapids from 12:00pm – 1:30. Mr. Hafer will discuss the challenges of making movies with profound moral messages in today’s Hollywood culture. He will also talk about plans for future projects that break...
Addicted to influence
A brief but timely editorial appears in this month’s issue of Christianity Today, “We Are What We Behold.” Here’s a taste: “…evangelicals have wrestled with our relationship to power. When in a position of influence (and in our better moments), we leverage power to better the lives of our neighbors. Cultural savvy enables us to successfully translate the gospel for a changing world. But it’s a double-edged sword—influence and savvy can also dull the gospel’s transcendence. We achieve a royal...
Bonhoeffer’s legacy
Earlier this month, we marked the 100th anniversary of Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s birth on February 4, in what is now Wroclaw, Poland. In a message before the International Bonhoeffer Conference on February 3, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams said, Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a man immersed in a specific cultural heritage, and untroubled by the fact; he was a person of profound and rigorous (and very traditional) personal spirituality; he was mitted to the ecumenical perspective from very early on in his...
Moral posturing on Africa
Over the weekend, the Daily Telegraph’s Charles Moore asked, “Why should the Left win the scramble for Africa?” : [T]he trouble with this subject – perhaps this is why the Left dominates it – is that it attracts posturing. Africa is, among other things, a photo-opportunity. As our own educational system makes it harder and harder to get British pupils to smile at all, so the attraction for politicians of being snapped with rows of black children with happy grins...
Western Europe’s political homogeneity
Western Europeans often talk about the homogeneity of American politics and how the parties hardly differ from one another. One reason why Europeans believe this is because they often pay attention to US politics only during a presidential campaign, so they do have some justification. But while their opinion is understandable not only does it fail to reflect the real difference between the left and the right in America; it obscures the homogeneity of Western European political life. What is...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved