Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Hope for America Lies in a Grateful Heart
Hope for America Lies in a Grateful Heart
Dec 14, 2025 6:38 AM

What can conservatism contribute to our nation right now? Not only tried and true ideas but also deep gratitude for a rich cultural inheritance.

Read More…

“Gratitude is not only the greatest of virtues, but the parent of all the others.”

—Cicero, Pro Plancio, 54 B.C.

Whenever I act out of anger or fear, I make mistakes—sometimes serious mistakes. Whenever I embrace gratitude as a guiding principle, I find joy and reward. Maybe the same can be said not just for individuals but for groups and political movements, too. The only thing produced by anger and fear in the present is more fuel for anger and fear in the future.

Countless historians, politicians, and political philosophers have attempted to define the central meaning of conservatism. But the one consistent and ponent of those attempts at es down to one word: gratitude. “To my mind, conservatism is gratitude. Conservatives tend to begin from gratitude for what is good and what works in our society and then strive to build on it,” wrote Yuval Levin. And whenever conservatives e distracted by fear and anger, they lose sight of their inherent strength.

Gratitude differentiates liberalism from conservatism. At the root of conservative identity lies a gratitude for the blessings and legacy of the past. Prior to formulating any policy position or political message, the conservative must first recognize a deep gratitude for the fruits of the past. Those fruits are what present conservatives seek to nourish. Consequently, the vision of conservatives must focus on what is valuable from the past and what can be done to extend the successes of the past into the future.

Contrary to the message of modern liberalism, conservatism does not seek to discredit or reject the past; nor does it see within the past only oppression or injustice. What fundamentally characterizes conservatism is gratitude for the freedoms bestowed by and the richness of Western civilization. For the prosperity of a free market economy. For the stability and humanity of family munity.

This gratitude means neither a passive acceptance of the status quo nor an embrace of everything from the past. To the contrary, a true gratitude carries a present responsibility to improve upon the past, as Yuval Levin notes, and to continue paving the road to a free and prosperous future for people who may have been excluded in the past. It recognizes the mistakes and inadequacies of the past while treasuring its triumphs.

The importance of gratitude to the conservative message can be gleaned from the writings of many political theorists. Edmund Burke, for instance, focused his conservatism on an appreciation of and gratitude for the social values and institutions of the past. However, the true meaning of gratitude must be experienced. That is how I learned gratitude, from the experience of my parents. They lived lives of gratitude, which they so often tried to teach me, but I was a reluctant student. I knew thankfulness, but I did not know gratitude. I appreciated individual benefits, like a birthday gift or a raise at work or some award. But my thankfulness was always just a response for some particular benefit. Consequently, my thankfulness was always contingent—I had to get the gift or reward before being thankful. On the other hand, my parents’ gratitude formed a consistent bedrock in their lives, regardless of day-to-day events. “Gratitude, in most men, is only a strong and secret hope of greater favors,” wrote La Rochefoucauld.

I thought it was naive to be grateful for a day even before you knew what that day would bring. But my mother told me that was the whole point of gratitude. If your gratitude depended on what happened to you that day, then your gratitude didn’t mean much.

When their children became teenagers, my parents put up a St. Anthony statue in their room. Most other parents, preparing for the worst at that age, increased the insurance coverage on their cars or started to more closely monitor their children’s activities or set up parental counseling sessions. But my parents put up a statute to the patron saint of recovering lost things. It was their way of being reminded of all the things they had not lost but had in fact been given throughout their children’s lives.

Gratitude was also a steadying force in our family’s life. When a large petitor located a new plant just miles away from my father’s business, he didn’t panic or try to sell out. He did one thing: he tried to show gratitude to every customer who came into the office. Three years later, the pany shut down its plant.

My parents taught me that a life of gratitude differed from the habit of saying “thank you” for individual benefits. Gratitude paves the way for virtues we often think of as unattainable: virtues like courage and service and faith. Gratitude opens our eyes to the blessings of the past, even when present difficulties exert a blinding effect to those blessings. Gratitude allows us to be thankful even during times of adversity.

Gratitude defined my parents’ lives, but through their example I can also see all the ways in which gratitude defines conservatism—or should. Unfortunately, anger often characterizes our polarized political environment. Anger toward the Washington swamp and the biased media, although justified, can cloud the basic message of conservatism—that human flourishing demands liberty. Indeed, gratitude may be the only stabilizing force in our present world of conflict. Only gratitude can unite a diverse society, and only gratitude can provide a clear barometer to the future. Without gratitude, there can be no antidote to anger and resentment and conflict. Without gratitude for the rich inheritance received from our forebears, there’s nothing to build upon. In short, without gratitude, there’s no hope for a peaceful, unified future.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The new urban Christians
“Should I not be concerned about that great city?” asks God of the prophet Jonah about Nineveh, which “has more than a hundred and twenty thousand people who cannot tell their right hand from their left, and many cattle as well.” God is rebuking the recalcitrant prophet, who only carried out his assigned proclamation in Nineveh after a rather harrowing adventure on the high seas. After Jonah delivered his message, “Forty more days and Nineveh will be overturned,” the Bible...
Follies of the Wise
Here’s a link to the introduction to Frederick Crews’ new book, Follies of the Wise, which includes the following statement: Having made a large intellectual misstep in younger days, I am aware that rationality isn’t an endowment but an achievement that e undone at any moment. And that is just why it is prudent, in my opinion, to distrust sacrosanct authorities, whether academic or psychiatric or ecclesiastic, and to put one’s faith instead in objective procedures that can place a...
There are more environmentalist misanthropes than you think
On April 3, I reported the story of Texas scientist Eric Pianka, who allegedly argued in a speech that the only hope for the planet was for a mutated Ebola virus to exterminate 90% of the human population. Forrest Mims, who attended the speech, broke the story. Over the next few weeks, there was a media firestorm over the incident, and Mims was accused of misrepresenting Pianka’s speech. As a result, I received several emails telling me that I should...
Evangelicals and cable TV
A story over the weekend in Washington Post gives a good overview of the mixed motives behind evangelical campaigning for and against a la carte pricing of cable channels, despite the poorly chosen title, “Evangelicals vs. Christian Cable” (as if Christian broadcasters aren’t largely evangelicals of some sort or another). Just a sign that in the MSM evangelical is ing a term with primarily political rather than theological content. On the one side, lobbyists who want to be able to...
A different view of immigration
I haven’t been uncritical of American bishops’ statements concerning immigration. But I wouldn’t go *quite* as far as Pastor Ralph Ovadal of Pilgrims Covenant Church, for whom the terms ‘antichrist,’ ‘Romanist,’ and ‘Reconquista’ fairly roll off the tongue. Rick Garnett has an appropriately tongue-in-cheek treatment at Mirror of Justice. ...
History and empire
John Wilson, editor of Books & Culture, writes up a summary of the proceedings of The Historical Society’s conference, “Globalization, Empire, and Imperialism in Historical Perspective.” “We urgently need an antidote to the journalistic clichés and the even more deplorable pseudo-scholarly discourse surrounding the interlocked themes of globalization, empire, and imperialism. We need the distance—the perspective—that good historical thinking affords. There was plenty of that on display in Chapel Hill, along with some muddle,” reports Wilson. For more on how...
Guilt free ecology
TerraPass is a way to assuage a guilty conscience caused by your car’s CO2 emissions. In the interest of trying to be balanced on the whole CO2 debate, here’s a link to their climate change blog with plenty of GW posts. To each his own. But it sounds like a way for mon folk to buy into what Iain Murray calls “the new aristocracy:” Al Gore justifies his enjoyment of a carbon-intensive lifestyle in a speech in the UK: He...
Inconvenient expertise
During this year’s hurricane season, global warming will likely e a topic of discussion at dinner tables across the United States (and likely in other countries as well). Al Gore recently released his documentary on climate change. “An Inconvenient Truth” asserts that global warming is indeed a real occurrence, and that it is being caused by CO2 being pumped into the atmosphere by factories, vehicles, etc. Gore also asserts that the majority of the munity” agree that global warming is...
The ties that bind: cabled Christianity
Pro-family and church groups are battling over a proposed policy that would allow viewers to select their cable TV plans on an “a la carte” basis. But why are they asking the federal government to referee this fight? In this week’s Acton Commentary, I examine at the most munications policy: Turning off the TV. Read the mentary here. Related Items: Daniel Pulliam, “Preachers and pornographers unite,” GetReligion, June 12, 2006. Jordan J. Ballor, “Evangelicals and Cable TV,” Acton Institute PowerBlog,...
Penitence in the penitentiary
Joe Knippenberg, who blogs at No Left Turns, provides a thoughtful and engaging analysis of the particulars of the recent Iowa court decision finding against InnerChange Freedom Initiative, an outreach of Prison Fellowship Ministries. In “Penitents in the Penitentiary?,” at The American Enterprise Online, Knippenberg writes, “Despite my general support for the faith-based initiative, and for religious efforts to put the penitence back in penitentiaries, I’m inclined for the most part to agree with Judge Pratt. In this particular case,...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved