Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Hope for America Lies in a Grateful Heart
Hope for America Lies in a Grateful Heart
Jan 14, 2026 6:56 AM

What can conservatism contribute to our nation right now? Not only tried and true ideas but also deep gratitude for a rich cultural inheritance.

Read More…

“Gratitude is not only the greatest of virtues, but the parent of all the others.”

—Cicero, Pro Plancio, 54 B.C.

Whenever I act out of anger or fear, I make mistakes—sometimes serious mistakes. Whenever I embrace gratitude as a guiding principle, I find joy and reward. Maybe the same can be said not just for individuals but for groups and political movements, too. The only thing produced by anger and fear in the present is more fuel for anger and fear in the future.

Countless historians, politicians, and political philosophers have attempted to define the central meaning of conservatism. But the one consistent and ponent of those attempts at es down to one word: gratitude. “To my mind, conservatism is gratitude. Conservatives tend to begin from gratitude for what is good and what works in our society and then strive to build on it,” wrote Yuval Levin. And whenever conservatives e distracted by fear and anger, they lose sight of their inherent strength.

Gratitude differentiates liberalism from conservatism. At the root of conservative identity lies a gratitude for the blessings and legacy of the past. Prior to formulating any policy position or political message, the conservative must first recognize a deep gratitude for the fruits of the past. Those fruits are what present conservatives seek to nourish. Consequently, the vision of conservatives must focus on what is valuable from the past and what can be done to extend the successes of the past into the future.

Contrary to the message of modern liberalism, conservatism does not seek to discredit or reject the past; nor does it see within the past only oppression or injustice. What fundamentally characterizes conservatism is gratitude for the freedoms bestowed by and the richness of Western civilization. For the prosperity of a free market economy. For the stability and humanity of family munity.

This gratitude means neither a passive acceptance of the status quo nor an embrace of everything from the past. To the contrary, a true gratitude carries a present responsibility to improve upon the past, as Yuval Levin notes, and to continue paving the road to a free and prosperous future for people who may have been excluded in the past. It recognizes the mistakes and inadequacies of the past while treasuring its triumphs.

The importance of gratitude to the conservative message can be gleaned from the writings of many political theorists. Edmund Burke, for instance, focused his conservatism on an appreciation of and gratitude for the social values and institutions of the past. However, the true meaning of gratitude must be experienced. That is how I learned gratitude, from the experience of my parents. They lived lives of gratitude, which they so often tried to teach me, but I was a reluctant student. I knew thankfulness, but I did not know gratitude. I appreciated individual benefits, like a birthday gift or a raise at work or some award. But my thankfulness was always just a response for some particular benefit. Consequently, my thankfulness was always contingent—I had to get the gift or reward before being thankful. On the other hand, my parents’ gratitude formed a consistent bedrock in their lives, regardless of day-to-day events. “Gratitude, in most men, is only a strong and secret hope of greater favors,” wrote La Rochefoucauld.

I thought it was naive to be grateful for a day even before you knew what that day would bring. But my mother told me that was the whole point of gratitude. If your gratitude depended on what happened to you that day, then your gratitude didn’t mean much.

When their children became teenagers, my parents put up a St. Anthony statue in their room. Most other parents, preparing for the worst at that age, increased the insurance coverage on their cars or started to more closely monitor their children’s activities or set up parental counseling sessions. But my parents put up a statute to the patron saint of recovering lost things. It was their way of being reminded of all the things they had not lost but had in fact been given throughout their children’s lives.

Gratitude was also a steadying force in our family’s life. When a large petitor located a new plant just miles away from my father’s business, he didn’t panic or try to sell out. He did one thing: he tried to show gratitude to every customer who came into the office. Three years later, the pany shut down its plant.

My parents taught me that a life of gratitude differed from the habit of saying “thank you” for individual benefits. Gratitude paves the way for virtues we often think of as unattainable: virtues like courage and service and faith. Gratitude opens our eyes to the blessings of the past, even when present difficulties exert a blinding effect to those blessings. Gratitude allows us to be thankful even during times of adversity.

Gratitude defined my parents’ lives, but through their example I can also see all the ways in which gratitude defines conservatism—or should. Unfortunately, anger often characterizes our polarized political environment. Anger toward the Washington swamp and the biased media, although justified, can cloud the basic message of conservatism—that human flourishing demands liberty. Indeed, gratitude may be the only stabilizing force in our present world of conflict. Only gratitude can unite a diverse society, and only gratitude can provide a clear barometer to the future. Without gratitude, there can be no antidote to anger and resentment and conflict. Without gratitude for the rich inheritance received from our forebears, there’s nothing to build upon. In short, without gratitude, there’s no hope for a peaceful, unified future.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Samuel Gregg: Charles de Gaulle could have prevented the Brexit debate
The integration of Europe in the postwar era continues to roil politics continent-wide, most notably taking center stage in this week’s UK general election. Yet Acton Institute Director of Research Samuel Gregg writes that Charles de Gaulle could have spared Europe this future. Gregg traces the history of European supranationalism from Immanuel Kant to Jacques Maritain’s Christian Democratic ideas in a new essay posted today at Law & Liberty. De Gaulle, although far from an isolationist, understood the reality of...
The road to London Bridge is paved with self-loathing
The day after Thanksgiving, the world saw a murderous terrorist prevented from maximizing his death toll by desperate people armed with nothing more than personal courage, a narwhal tusk, and a fire extinguisher. As I write at The Stream, unless the West jettisons its paralyzing doubt of itself and its historic faith, that scene threatens to e an “epoch-defining event.” Naively believing that all religions are alike, and that Western capitalism is uniquely exploitative, renders European culture incapable of understanding...
Trade war hits home: How tariffs disrupt American businesses
Despite the “America-first” claims of trade protectionists and economic nationalists, we continue to see the ill effects of the Trump administration’s recent wave of tariffs—particularly among American businesses, workers, and consumers. Alas, while such controls may serve to temporarily benefit a select number of businesses or industries, they are just as likely to distort and contort any number of other fruitful relationships and creative partnerships across the economic order—at home, abroad, and everywhere in between. In a recent article for...
The Virtue of Liberalism
Today, Law & Liberty published the text of my lecture for the Philadelphia Society in October: “Why Economic Nationalism Fails.” The topic for the panel was “Conservatism and the Coming Economy.” Since I’m not a determinist and doubt my own powers of prediction, I focused on what political economy conservatives ought to support in the future, despite worrying trends in the present: Conservatives ought to reaffirm the good of economic liberty, both domestically and internationally. Free markets and free trade,...
Wilhelm Röpke on liberalism and Catholic social teaching
This week’s Acton Commentary, adapted from my preface to the newest Acton Institute publication The Humane Economist: A Wilhelm Röpke Reader, illustrates what makes Röpke such an interesting and vital economist: Röpke saw his project in holistic terms involving intersecting and interdependent spheres or orden that to be fully appreciated and understood scientifically must be examined in their economic, social, and moral dimensions. mitments to mainline economic analysis, the importance of social institutions, and the moral and religious framework of...
An encyclical on China and the US?
Sen. Marco Rubio’s recent speech on capitalism and mon good, taking its point of departure in Rerum Novarum, has gotten a good bit of coverage. Yesterday he delivered remarks at the National Defense University and opened with these words: This morning I am honored to speak here at the National Defense University to discuss the defining geopolitical relationship of this century: the one between the United States and China. Unfortunately, I was unable to find a papal encyclical on this...
How reason and faith complement each other
Faith and reason are mutually reinforcing. When faith and reason bined, faith is kept from metastasizing into irrationality and reason is kept from ing overly materialistic. bination of faith and reason is the foundation of Western Civilization. In a new review of Samuel Gregg’s book, Reason, Faith, and the Struggle for Western Civilization, Gene Veith of Patrick Henry College notes that “[t]he scholastic theology of Roman Catholicism, grounded as it is in Aristotelian philosophy, does indeed integrate faith and reason,...
Video: David Hebert on how ice got to India
The 2019 Acton Lecture Series wrapped up last week Thursday with a lecture by David Hebert,assistant professor of economics and director of the Center for Markets, Ethics, and Entrepreneurship at Aquinas College. Hebert told the story of Frederick Tudor, a Boston entrepreneur who in the early 1800s set about finding a way to transport ice to Cuba, believing that given the opportunity, Cubans would pay handsomely for the resource. It wasn’t easy, but in the end he was right, and...
Hugo Chavez and Jack London on why socialism kills
In an emotional story in the January 2020 issue of Reason, Jose Cordiero relays how “socialism killed my father” – through economic scarcity. His article highlights the life-and-death stakes of wealth creation. Cordiero writes that he was working in Silicon Valley when he got a call that his father had experienced kidney failure in Caracas. Yet even traveling to Bolivarian Venezuela became virtually impossible. The economic collapse ushered in by Hugo Chavez’s socialist policies dried up demand: Indeed, the number...
Brian Tierney, rest in peace
The world of medieval history suffered a great loss on November 30 with the death of Professor Brian Tierney. Widely recognized as a leading scholar of medieval Western Christianity and how church law and institutions affected the broader culture of Europe, Tierney wrote widely but also deeply on topics ranging from the origins of papal infallibility to how religion shaped the development of constitutionalism. Born in 1922, the formative experience for Tierney was, like for most of his generation, the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved