Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Hong Kong protester sentenced nine years in prison under National Security Law
Hong Kong protester sentenced nine years in prison under National Security Law
Jan 15, 2026 5:29 AM

The Chinese Communist Party will not and cannot tolerate any opposition, verbal or otherwise, in order to maintain control of their citizens. The latest protestor trial opens the door to a more broad application of NSL on any phrase or word that poses a threat to the CCP’s absolute control of China.

Read More…

Leon Tong Ying-Kit became the first person to be sentenced under Hong Kong’s National Security Law, or NSL, on July 30, when a Hong Kong court sentenced the protester to nine years in prison under charges of inciting secession and terrorism.

His sentence is portioned out between six-and-a-half years for inciting secession and eight years for terrorism. Two-and-a-half years will run consecutively, resulting in a total nine year sentence.

Tong was arrested on July 1 after crashing his motorcycle into a group of Hong Kong police officers while flying a flag reading “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of our Times.” He was the first to be charged under the NSL in Hong Kong on July 27.

Regarding the charge of terrorism, Tong’s defense lawyers acknowledged his recklessness in crashing into Hong Kong authorities, but they stressed that Tong had tried avoiding the group of police officers and that his actions did not constitute terrorism.

The charge of secession was the primary focus by most everyone involved in the trial. A key aspect was the slogan on the flag itself. Judges, prosecutors, and Tong’s lawyers spent most of their time determining the interpretation of the slogan, and if it suggested the promotion of Hong Kong’s secession from China, deemed illegal under the NSL.​

However, the slogan was ubiquitous back in Hong Kong’s 2019 protests.

Tong was not allowed a fair trial by jury and the judges of his case – who were handpicked by Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam – were Esther Toh, Anthea Pang, and Wilson Chan. The judges ruled that they were sure that the defendant “fully understood the slogan to bear the meaning of Hong Kong independence” which were the grounds of Tong’s sentencing.

Tong did not testify during the trial and plead not guilty to both convictions.

Leon Tong Ying-Kit, 24, was an advocate for freedom in Hong Kong and provided first aid to protesters involved in the pro-democracy marches in 2019. He was his family’s breadwinner, working as a cook in a Japanese restaurant to help provide financial assistance for his younger sister’s education.

NSL has changed Hong Kong’s judicial landscape. Experts say the new legislation, passed in June 2020, gives more room to courts to interpret any civilian’s action and apply any piece of the National Security legislation they deem fit.

Recently, the U.S. government has even warned businesses operating in Hong Kong that they too are at risk from the NSLs.

Since the NSL has been enacted, more than 60 pro-democracy advocates have been arrested. Among them is longtime Acton friend, Jimmy Lai.

“The objective of NSL is not merely to punish but to deter others” Surya Deva, an associate professor of law at City University of Hong Kong said. “Swift and serious penalties should be expected.”

The Chinese Communist Party, or CCP, will not and cannot tolerate any opposition, verbal or otherwise, in order to maintain control of their citizens. Especially in Tong’s case, his trial opens the door to a more broad application of NSL on any phrase or word that poses a threat to the CCP’s absolute control of China.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Ecumenical Movement and the Nuclear Question
It’s worth noting that the original context of engagement of the ecumenical movement by figures like Paul Ramsey and Ernest Lefever (two voices that figure prominently in my book, Ecumenical Babel) had much to do with foreign policy and the Cold War, and specifically the question of the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Last week marked the anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima and today is the anniversary of the Nagasaki detonation. As ENI reports (full story after the break), the...
Abela: Will Teaching Business Ethics Make Business More Ethical?
On the National Catholic Register, Andrew Abela confesses to a “nagging suspicion that teaching business ethics in a university is not delivering on what is expected of it.” The question is both concrete and academic: Abela is the chairman of the Department of Business and Economics at The Catholic University of America and an associate professor of marketing. He was awarded the Acton Institute’s Novak Award in 2009. Here, he explains the problem with “amoral” business attitudes: … we often...
Audio: Rev. Sirico on ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Service to the Poor’
On the new Reclaiming the Culture radio show, host Dolores Meehan recently interviewed Acton President Rev. Robert A. Sirico on the subject of “The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Service to the Poor.” Here’s how Meehan describes the show’s mission: Bay Area Catholics are some of the strongest Catholics in the country. Reclaiming the Culture grew out of the desire to show that the Catholic Church in the Bay Area has the resources to confront the prevailing secular culture. Our...
Do We Need Pro-Family Tax Policies?
Last month, in “Europe’s Choice: Populate or Perish,” Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg observed: At a deeper level … Europe’s declining birth-rate may also reflect a change in intellectual horizons. A cultural outlook focused upon the present and disinterested in the future is more likely to view children as a burden rather than a gift to be cared for in quite un-self-interested ways. Individuals and societies that have lost a sense of connection to their past and have no particular...
The Economist, Catholicism, and Europe
When es to the sophistication of its coverage of religious affairs, the Economist is better than most other British publications (admittedly not a high standard) which generally insist on trying to read religion through an ideologically-secularist lens. Normally the Economist tries to present religion as a slightly plex matter than “stick-in-the-mud-conservatives”-versus-“open-minded-enlightened-progressivists”, though it usually slips in one of the usual secularist bromides, as if to reassure its audiences that it’s keeping a critical distance. A good example of this is...
Publicly Funded Films: A Cautionary Tale
The most basic lesson of all of the various efforts, by both state and federal governments, to provide incentives for films to be made is that with government es government oversight. Once you go down the road of filing for tax credits or government subsidy in various forms, and you depend on them to get your project made, you open yourself up to a host of regulatory, bureaucratic, and censorship issues. It shouldn’t be a surprise, for instance, that states...
Acton on Tap – August 12: American Exceptionalism
Join us on Thursday, August 12, at Derby Station in Grand Rapids as we continue our Acton on Tap series, a casual and fun night out to discuss important and timely ideas with friends. The event is scheduled for 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm and discussion starts at 6:30. American Exceptionalism is a newsworthy topic as some on both the political left and right lament that America’s greatness is slipping away. But what does American Exceptionalism mean and how did...
Re: Broken Windows – University Funding Edition
As Kishore Jayabalan noted yesterday, the fallacy of “broken windows” is, unfortunately, ubiquitous in discussions of public finance and macroeconomics. Though we are told that government spending and public works have a stimulating effect on economic activity, rarely are the costs of such projects discussed. Such is the case with several stimulus projects in my own hometown of Atlanta, GA. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reportson a list that Sen. John McCain and Sen. Tim Coburn drew up,criticizing wasteful stimulus projects throughout...
Family vs. the State in Indian and Chinese Entrepreneurship
This August 3 Wall Street Journal article is based on a Legatum Institute paring Indian and Chinese entrepreneurship and raises important issues about the roles of the state and the family in promoting entrepreneurship. mon elements between Indian and Chinese wealth-creators are their optimistic view of the pared to Americans (“Why I’m Not Hiring”) and Europeans (“Everything’s Fine With Greece, Just Ignore Some Facts”) presumably, and their lack of concern about the impact of the global financial crises on their...
Carbon Regulation: Ecological Utopia or Economic Nightmare?
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I discuss whether the Environmental Protection Agency’s planned regulation of carbon emissions can be justified from a Christian perspective. The EPA has found that carbon emissions endanger “public health and welfare,” and it is on track to begin regulating vehicle and power plant emissions. Environmentalists claim that policies targeting carbon emissions, such as EPA regulation or a cap-and-trade program, will stimulate the economy by creating green jobs. Unfortunately, this is not the case – the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved