Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Health Care Sharing Ministries: ‘Faith, Liberty, and Charity’ in Health Care
Health Care Sharing Ministries: ‘Faith, Liberty, and Charity’ in Health Care
Mar 23, 2026 8:22 PM

While many Americans are struggling to navigate healthcare.gov and some are fighting against the Affordable Care Act’s threat to religious liberty, an estimated 100,000 people are exempt from the legislation as members of a health care sharing ministry (HCSM); these organizations offer the opportunity for individuals with similar beliefs to share their health care costs.

HCSMs are not panies, but nonprofit religious organizations that receive no government funding. Andrea Miller, the medical director for Medi-Share, one HCSM in the U.S., explained in a recent interview with NPR how the ministry works:

[I]t’s a group of people, in this case Christians, who band together and agree that they want to share one another’s burdens. And the way they do that is that they each put a certain amount of money aside every month and then they actually send that money to another Christian who is in need of it that month in order to help them pay their medical bills.

The Alliance of Health Care Sharing Ministries explains, in more details, what HCSMs are and offers some interesting facts about them, including parison of current ministries. More than 99% of all applicants are accepted into a sharing ministry. Medi-Share, has shared more than $600 million among members. HCSMs have stricter guidelines than traditional panies on which procedures are eligible. For example, members will not receive sharing to pay for abortions, suicides, and other procedures that are prohibited in ministry guidelines. Members must live Christian lifestyles, abstaining from illegal drug consumption, sex outside of marriage, tobacco use, and may not abuse alcohol or prescription drugs. Because HCSMs are not panies they don’t have to guarantee that they will pay any and all medical bills. Members pay a one-time participation fee, pay a monthly share option, and receive a newsletter or publication that lists the needs of other members. Members must be Christians, affirming their faith through a personal testimony or with a letter from their pastor.

HCSMs have been providing this service in the United States for several decades, but the two largest organizations—Medi-Share: Christian Care Ministry and Samaritan Ministries International—have been working since the early nineties. HCSMs take their mission directly from scripture. Galatians 6:2 calls Christians to “bear one another’s burdens, and thus fulfill the law of Christ.” They also cite Acts 2:44-45, which is often mistakenly attributed to munism: “all the believers were together and had everything mon. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need.” Participants of HCSM see paying for each other’s medical bills as bearing one another’s burdens.

The two main HCSMs distribute the funds among members differently. America’s Christian Credit Union manages all funds in a “Member Share Exchange” for Medi-Share and money from there can be transferred from one member to another. Members of Samaritan Ministries International give their monthly share amount directly to other members in need based on their monthly newsletter. When members have needs that do not meet the guidelines or are not paid in full, they can be listed in the monthly newsletters and other members may choose to donate extra funds.

Members not only support each other financially, but also spiritually through prayer and sending words of encouragement. Fred Bennet, from Chattanooga, Tenn; had been a member of an HCSM for several years when he and his wife Beth suffered major health problems. Beth had E.Coli in her kidneys and ended up with a $70,000 bill while Fred suffered a heart attack and had to have several surgeries, other members of their sharing ministry picked up the bill and the Bennetts ended up paying only the deductable for each procedure. While the financial aid is important, the spiritual support offered by HCSMs is also vital. Fred says: “The night before my surgery, the lady who’d helped me locate the right providers and everything called me back and said, ‘Would it be OK if I prayed with you for your surgery tomorrow?’” Two members from Idaho, Michael and Mary Suitter, say that they “found [themselves] in tears as we read the meaningful notes of agape love and encouragement” from other participants.

Although individual participants of HCSMs are exempt from Obamacare for now, it could still cause long term problems for individual members as well as the ministries as a whole. A recent article by Jim Epstein at Reason outlines the risks that Obamacare poses to HCSMs. Epstein says:

It would hardly be the first time that a new government entitlement destroyed a voluntary organization built monly held beliefs.Samaritan is one of the last “mutual aid societies,” organizations that up to the early twentieth century played an integral role in American life.In 1910, an estimated one-third of American men belonged to a fraternal organization, which provided temporary help to those unlucky enough to fall ill or lose a job. The mutual aid societies began disappearing with the rise of government programs such as welfare, Medicaid, food stamps, and unemployment insurance.

The demise of Samaritan and other outfits like it would be cause for concern. Subsidized health insurance plans through the exchanges provide richer benefits than a membership in Samaritan, but they do away with incentives that over time are the key to driving down prices and driving up quality. With the “silver plan” on the health care exchanges, when patients get a routine physical they’re responsible for no more than $45 out of pocket and insurance pays the rest. Samaritan members pay the entire cost of a routine visit out of pocket and they can only submit their bills for reimbursement that exceed $300.

President of Samaritan Ministries, James Lansberry, is not concerned that members will leave Samaritan and other HCSMs for Obamacare, he says: “We look at our exemption from the individual mandate as a miracle from God…members will stick with us even if it doesn’t make financial sense, because by belonging they’re expressing their religious beliefs.”

Acton has plenty of resources to help you understand what’s going on with health care in America. Check out Powerblog posts about Obamacare, Nick Pandelidis’ mentary “Obamacare Reset: A Free Market Vision for Health Care Reform,” and Acton’s “Christians and Health Care” Resource page.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Beyond the party: Catholics and government’s moral purpose
In the Acton Commentary this week, Dr. Samuel Gregg examines the “Historic Catholic Statement of Principles” released by House Democrats last week. Following is a brief statement of purpose from the official press release: …Signed by 55 House Democrats, the statement documents how their faith influences them as lawmakers, making clear mitment to the basic principles at the heart of Catholic social teaching and their bearing on policy – whether it is increasing access to education for all or pressing...
Texas justice
If you think the justice system lacks a sense of humor, you better reappraise that thinking. Exhibit A: the 2-page opinion in a recent bankruptcy court motion in San Antonio (PDF). Be sure to read the footnote on page 2. “Deciphering motions like the one presented here wastes valuable chamber staff time, and invites this sort of footnote.” Classic. ...
Dueling mommies
In her column this week, Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse, Acton senior fellow in economics, takes Linda Hirshman, a retired professor at Brandeis University, to task. Hirshman has been making the news circuit touting her claims about negative trends among working women. She says that educated women who e stay at home moms will create the future result that “expensively educated, upper-class moms will be leading lesser lives.” According to an ABC News article, Hirshman views this as “a tragedy not...
Government can’t do it alone
The news from across the pond today is that the UK government is announcing that it will miss its target set in 1999 to reduce the number of children in poverty by 1 million. According to the BBC, “Department for Work and Pension figures show the number of children in poverty has fallen by 700,000 since 1999, missing the target by 300,000.” This has resulted in the typical responses when government programs fail: calls to “redouble” efforts and to increase...
‘It’s capitalism or a habitable planet—you can’t have both’
. . . Or so claims Robert Newman in this article in The Guardian from February 2. It makes a great subject for a game of “Find-the-Fallacy.” Newman’s breezy inferences are reminiscent of The Communist Manifesto, edited to conform to trendy deep ecology. Here’s my favorite line: “Capitalism is not sustainable by its very nature. It is predicated on infinitely expanding markets, faster consumption and bigger production in a finite planet.” Well, I guess somebody has to shoot fish in...
The crunchiness of factory farming
The CrunchyCon blog at NRO is currently discussing the issue of factory farming, which is apparently covered and described in some detail in Dreher’s book (my copy currently is on order, having not been privy to the “crunchy con”versation previously). A reader accuses Dreher of being in favor of big-government, because “he thinks we ought to ‘ban or at least seriously reform’ factory farming.” Caleb Stegall responds that he, at least, is not a big-government crunchy con, and that this...
Today’s “blast from the past”
“It is the highest impertinence and presumption, therefore, in kings and ministers, to pretend to watch over the economy of private people, and to restrain their expense, either by sumptuary laws, or by prohibiting the importation of foreign luxuries. They are themselves always, and without any exception, the greatest spendthrifts in society. Let them look well after their own expense, and they may safely trust private people with theirs.” –Adam Smith It’s nice to know our leaders are no longer...
Opposing viewpoints on democracy
A mentary of mine was featured in a recent book, Democracy: Opposing Viewpoints, published earlier this year by Greenhaven Press, an imprint of Thomson Gale. My contribution appears as part of Chapter 2: What Should Be the Relationship Between Religion and Democracy? Following a pair of items by Clark Moeller and Bill O’Reilly arguing that democracy is based on secular and religious foundations respectively, I take the affirmative side of my issue in a section titled, “Politicians Should Voice Their...
Spurning the ‘supernatural’
In a recent post on the evangelical outpost, Joe Carter makes the case for discarding, or at least severely restricting, the use of the descriptive term supernatural by Christians. He notes that in using the term to refer, for example, to angels and demons, “we are implying that they belong on the same plane or realm of existence as God.” One source of this implication is due to the fact that “we buy into the modernist notion that all of...
Aid and the mystery of capital
Bono and the One Campaign want us to sign a petition encouraging the government to spend 1 percent of the U.S. budget for aid to developing countries. The One Campaign states that this would “transform the futures and hopes of an entire generation of the poorest countries.” Now I admire the intentions of Bono to fight against poverty and he puts his money where is mouth is. But how do we know that increased aid will make a difference? How...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved