Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
‘He needs us’: The missing ingredient in Western missions
‘He needs us’: The missing ingredient in Western missions
Apr 26, 2025 12:28 AM

More and more, Western churches are opening their eyesto the risks and temptations inherent in so-called “short-term missions,” whether manifested inour basic vocabulary, paternalistic attitudes, or reactionary service.

As films like Poverty, Inc. and the PovertyCure seriesdemonstrate, ourcultural priorities and preferred solutions often distract us from the true identities and creative capacities of our neighbors. Paired with apassion to “do good,” and standing atop an abundance of resources, it’s easy toforget and neglect the importance of real relationship, holistic service, and long-term discipleship.

For missionary Nik Ripken, those missing pieces were made clear through a range of interviews with persecuted Christians in over 45 countries, whose opinionsabout what makes a “good” Westernmissionarychallenged his own approach and priorities.

In a stirring set of reflections, Ripken describes thisshift in his thinking. Serving in an unnamed Islamic country, Ripken was interviewing a group of persecuted Christians about their trials and struggles with their munities, and government. Theywere remarkably open and vulnerable in their answers until he changed the topic to Western missionaries.

“What do we do well?” he asked. “What things do we not do well? What should we start doing? What should we stop doing? What should we pick up? What should we lay down? What makes a good missionary?”

The group fell silent.“Finally, with great hesitation,” Ripken explains, “one of the believers looked at me and said, ‘I don’t know what makes a good missionary, but I can tell you the name of the man we love.’” Ripken proceeded to try again, askingwhy they loved this particular missionary. “We don’t know,” they said. “We just love him.”

Ripken traveled for ten more days across the country, stopping in five additional places, each time asking that same question: “What makes a good missionary from the West?” Each time, he was met with the same response about the samelocal missionary, with no additional details. “We don’t know what makes a good missionary,” they would say, “but we can tell you the man we love.”

Ripken eventually found a hint to identity theroot of this widespread admiration. “We love him because he borrows money from us,” one man said.

Initially shocked, Ripken soon learned the answer had little to do withmere financial exchange. The man explained that the localmissionary not only invested his own time and energy in their country and its people, but he himself passionately embedded alongside them, vulnerable and open about his own need for them. There was a give-and-take of generosity and charity and grace; it was not one-sided or transactional, either in attitude or example.This missionaryyearned for their investment, their participation and creativity, and munities delighted in the opportunity to engage and exchange.

“Do you want to know why we love him?” the man concluded. “He needs us. The rest of you have never needed us.”

Ripken was shaken, and concludes witha lesson we’d all do well to absorb:

I was tearfully overwhelmed. And I confessed the arrogance of Western missionaries — and my own arrogance. So much of what we do is about us and about what we can provide. We travel around the world to meet needs, not to be honest about our own, nor to e part of their body of Christ. We are the “haves,” and they are the “have-nots.”

Though our motives are not always suspect, we e and tell other people to “sit down and listen” while we stand and speak. We are aggressive, and we expect local people to remain passive. We bring the gospel, Bibles, and hymnbooks. We provide baptisms, discipleship, and places to meet. We choose the leaders. We care for orphans, build orphanages, rescue the broken, and care for the crippled.

And those are all wonderful things.

But here’s the challenge: What’s left for local people to do? What’s left for the Holy Spirit to provide? Where do we model how to trust God and his provision through the local body of believers? Where do local believers find their worth, their sanctified sense of significance? What gifts and sacrifice can they bring to this enterprise of taking the gospel to the ends of the earth?

Rarely did the apostle Paul create dependency upon himself. Often in his letters, Paul expressed how desperately he needed his brothers and sisters in Christ. He called those friends by name years later. He never forgot them. When possible, he returned to be with them. When he could not go, he sent them someone else. And he faithfully wrote to them, expressing his love, encouragement, and correction. In a word, he needed them.

There are countless missionaries engaging in this sort of collaborative creativity and exchange, connecting charity with evangelism anddiscipleship to empower rather than simply filling the gaps or meetshort-term needs, material, spiritual, or otherwise.

But it’s a stirring reminder for all of us. Not just forWesterners seeking to assist the developing world and spread the Gospel to foreign nations, but also for those seeking justice and reconciliation in their own backyards. We are not called to be mere piggy banks for short-term poverty alleviation or tract-dispensers for short-term evangelism, striving to satisfy, convert, and tally without room for relationship and struggle and grace.

The missing ingredient of Western missions has to do with the relational and munal natureof whole-life discipleship. We are not called to pour out and turn away, to be mere transactors of grace. We are called to participate in God’s divine generosity,relishing in the give-and-take of spiritual empowerment, not only leaning into butdrawing out of the gifts we see in our neighbors.

We are called to intimate partnership and real relationship with our fellow image bearers, and that means exposing our own individual needs and vulnerabilities to the light of Jesus in others.Inour efforts toserve the world, let usnever forgetit.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Obamacare’s Religious Rubes
The White House has a plan to mobilize prayer vigils in front of the Supreme Court in defense of Obamacare. It was reported that the administration met with leaders at non-profit organizations and religious officials who support the new health care law. The court takes up the constitutional test of the health care mandate in a couple of weeks. The mandate has now been challenged in 26 states. Cue the same stale big government religious prophets who confuse statism and...
Is Work a Curse?
Is work a curse, a result of mankind’s fall from grace? Not according to the Book of Genesis. As Hugh Whelchel, Executive Director of the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, explains, what Adam was called to do in the garden is what we are still called to do in our work today: Humanity was created by God to cultivate and keep God’s creation, which included developing it and protecting it. You see, we were created to be stewards of...
Constitutional Cases and the Four Cardinal Virtues
Should virtue be a consideration in judicial decisionmaking? Indiana Law Professor R. George Wright makes an intriguing argument for why the four cardinal virtues could be useful in interpreting constitutional cases: Judges typically decide constitutional cases by referring to one or more legal precedents, rules, tests, principles, doctrines, or policies. This Article mends supplementing this standard approach with fully legitimate and appropriate attention to what many cultures have long recognized as the four basic cardinal virtues of practical wisdom or...
How to Love Liberty More Than a Libertarian Economist
I have a deep and abiding love for liberty—which is why I find myself so often in disagreement with libertarians. Libertarians love liberty too, of course, but they tend to love liberty a bit differently. I love liberty in an earthy, elemental way. I love liberty because I need it—like I need air and food—for human flourishing. In contrast, the libertarians I’ve encountered tend to love liberty primarily as an abstraction. Indeed, the most ideologically consistent libertarians I know seem...
How to Steal a Bike in New York City
Edmund Burke didn’t really say it, but it still rings true: All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. In a test of this maxim, filmmaker Casey Neistat tries to steal his own bike in several locations around New York City and finds that most people do nothing about it—even when it’s done right in front of a police station. I recently spent a couple of days conducting a bike theft experiment, which...
Lord Acton and the Power of the Historian
Looking through my back stacks of periodicals the other day I ran across a review in Books & Culture by David Bebbington, “Macaulay in the Dock,” of a recent biography of Thomas Babington Macaulay. The essay takes its point of departure in Lord Acton’s characterization of Macaulay as “one of the greatest of all writers and masters, although I think him utterly base, contemptible and odious.” As Bebbington writes, “Acton, a towering intellectual of the later 19th century, was at...
Italy’s Tax Man Takes Aim at the Vatican
Kishore Jayabalan, the Acton Institute’s Rome office director, was interviewed by the Zenit news agency in an article titled, “Is Taxing the Church a Real Solution for Italy?” In the article, Jayabalan discusses the history of the Italian state and its imposition of property taxes on the Roman Catholic Church’s land holdings, residences and non-profit businesses. Sometimes in the past, particularly under Napoleonic rule and before the Lateran Pacts, the institution of property tax was often a subject of state...
Integral Human Development
The Journal of Markets & Morality is planning a theme issue for the Spring of 2013: “Integral Human Development,” i.e. the synthesis of human freedom and responsibility necessary for the material and spiritual enrichment of human life. According to Pope Benedict XVI, Integral human development presupposes the responsible freedom of the individual and of peoples: no structure can guarantee this development over and above human responsibility. (Caritas in Veritate 17) There is a delicate balance between the material and the...
Let’s Change Hearts and Minds (and Laws, Too)
Few clichés are so widespread within the evangelical subculture, says Matthew Lee Anderson, as the notion that our witness must be one of “changing hearts and minds.” In careful hands, the idea is at best ambiguous. At worst it reinforces the sort of interior-oriented individualism that allows for and perpetuates a blissful naivete about how institutions and structures shape our dispositions and thoughts. In less than careful hands, the phrase drives a wedge between law and culture by attempting to...
Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Threat to Freedom
Over at the Liberty Law Blog, there is an excellent post titled “Ronald Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Dialogue of Liberty” by Alan Snyder. Snyder delves into the influence Chambers had on Reagan and how their worldviews differed as well. Many conservatives and scholars felt Chambers’ prediction that the West was on the losing side of history in the battle against Marxism collapsed after the fall of the Iron Curtain and the Soviet Union. For many, the ideas of Chambers...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved