Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Hats off to the British for Brexit referendum
Hats off to the British for Brexit referendum
Jan 13, 2026 3:05 AM

The United Kingdom shocked everyone and made the decision to leave the European Union. With 72.2 percent voter turnout, 51.9 percent chose to leave. England and Wales voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to remain. You can see a breakdown of the referendum numbers at the Telegraph.

Acton’s director of international outreach and author of The New Totalitarian Temptation, Todd Huizinga, issued the following statement congratulating the Brits on their decision:

Hats off to the British people and the courage they showed in the Brexit referendum. Despite the fear-mongering and scare tactics of the Remain campaigners and the European Union, the British reclaimed their right to self-government. They have set an example for people all around the world, and especially in the West. With the ongoing erosion of democratic sovereignty occurring in Europe and America, the politicization of the courts and the alarming growth of the administrative state throughout the West, we are called to emulate the strength of conviction of the British and reassert control over those we elect and the bureaucracies that are meant to be accountable to those who represent us.

This is not a time for gloating. The conservative, cautious temperament of the British electorate, as reflected in the Remain vote, is worthy of great respect. There were intelligent people of good will on both sides of the Brexit debate. With all of plex issues we face and the growing traditionalist-progressive divide, it is necessary to restore greater civility to the public square if we want better to exercise democratically accountable self-government.

What will now happen in the European Union is anyone’s guess. But those who voted for Brexit are not alone in Europe. For a long time, and accelerating since the May 2014 European elections, pro-EU establishment parties throughout the EU have been hemorrhaging support, and anti-EU protest parties have been gaining ground.

Unfortunately, the established elite has yet to draw the real conclusion from this state of affairs: after sixty-five years, the project of European integration has conclusively shown itself to be inherently undemocratic, unaccountable and unresponsive to voters. Europeans want political power transferred back to their national governments, the ones that they vote in and vote out and that are accountable to them, the people they claim to serve. The first “final straw,” that fueled this ongoing political upheaval was the eurozone crisis that resulted from the politically motivated decision to establish mon currency for hugely differing economies. The second final straw was and is the ongoing immigration crisis and all of the disruption it is causing. The third final straw is the terrifying vulnerability of a Europe of open borders to deadly terrorism, as we’ve seen in Brussels and Paris in recent months. And now we have Brexit. How many more final straws can the EU take?

But the EU is unparalleled in its ability to ignore reality and double down on European integration. The European Union and its supporters will do all they can to stay the course, perhaps after a period of retrenchment. Already, the pro-EU think tank German Marshall Fund has posted an article entitled, “With Britain Leaving, Europe Will Need to Quickly Carry On.” Believe it or not, European Council President Donald Tusk had the ment, “What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger.”

Well, not always, Mr. Tusk. Brexit changes everything. All bets are off.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Coercing charity
This section from Reinhold Niebuhr’s Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics strikes me as quite true: The coercive factors, in distinction to the more purely moral and rational factors, in political relations can never be sharply differentiated and defined. It is not possible to estimate exactly how much a party to a social conflict is influenced by a rational argument or by the threat of force. It is impossible, for instance, to know what proportion...
Faith-based funding politicizes religion
Rev. Robert A. Sirico looks at the Bush Faith-Based Initiative following the departure of Jim Towey, who headed the office. “I would far rather see a president rally people to give more to charity than rally voters to support government programs that go to religious organizations, and to create incentives and lessen penalties when they do give,” Rev. Sirico writes. Read Rev. mentary here. ...
Ecobits
Two quick bits for your Tuesday: – Federal judges on green junkets at your expense? CRC says so! – Is “steady state ecological economics” the answer to environmental and economic woes? [also, a quick thanks to Jordan for inviting me to join the PowerBlog team.] Federal judges on green junkets at your expense? But the three organizations CRC singles out have an agenda that goes beyond education and is the equivalent of lobbying, Kendall contends. FREE, for example, describes itself...
Economic turmoil in Zimbabwe
Where in the world would you pay $145,750 for a roll of toilet paper? According to an article in the New York Times, inflation in Zimbabwe is soaring higher than ever — about 900 percent since President Mugabe began seizing land from wealthy landowners in 2000. And inflation is climbing at unparalleled rates. What problems result from such rampant inflation? If inflation is climbing daily and you have $100 one day, it might be worth only $90 the next. People...
Clear thinking on immigration
Andrew Yuengert, the author of Inhabiting the Land – The Case for the Right to Migrate, the Acton study on immigration, looks at the current debate and debunks mon misconceptions. “The biggest burdens from immigration are not economic – they are the turmoil caused by the large numbers of illegal immigrants,” Yuengert writes. Read mentary here. ...
Religious liberty in Japan
For the past several decades in the United States many parents have gravitated toward one extreme or the other in terms of allowing religion in public schools. It is generally understood these days that our public school system is not a religious organization, and should not promote one religion as a state religion, over others. Of course, this does not mean that morality or other ideas that call on the revelation of religion cannot be taught, but we try to...
Religion, economics, and the zoo
Ota Benga Sometimes the spirit of an age prevails with such force that it moves the highest pinnacles of cultural influence to support the grossest indignities. Consider the early 1900s. During this time, the prevailing zeitgeist of Darwinism gave rise to the tragic dehumanization of a Pygmy named Ota Benga. What follows are a few salient points from Cynthia Crossen’s story as published in The Wall Street Journal’s Déjà vu column “How Pygmy Ota Benga Ended Up in Bronx Zoo...
Anthony Bradley discusses Duke lacrosse on Fox
Anthony Bradley, a research fellow at the Acton Institute, was interviewed on “Heartland with John Kasich” on Fox News last Saturday. He was talking about the need for a “hero to emerge” from the Duke lacrosse team in the wake of a sexual assault scandal. Bradley emphasizes the need for moral leadership in the United States as a whole and why we should discourage markets from promoting the dehumanization of women. Bradley earned quite a bit of attention after writing...
Spelling relief II
Jordan pretty well covered the territory in his earlier post on gas prices. But with the silliness from both Republicans and Democrats ongoing, it can’t hurt to suggest two additional sensible treatments of the subject: Thomas Nugent on National Review Online, and Jerry Taylor of the Cato Institute on Fox News. ...
Acton scholars on the immigration debate
Two Acton scholars, Andrew Yuengert and Fr. Paul Hartmann, were interviewed on “The World Over” (EWTN Studios) last Friday, April 28, about the Catholic response to immigration rights. Yuengert, author of the Acton monograph “Inhabiting the Land,” emphasizes the dignity of the human person as a foundation for looking at the issues surrounding immigration. Yuengert says that the “right to migrate” is not an absolute right, but to prevent people from assisting immigrants in need is immoral. e because they...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved