Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Has the purpose of corporations changed?
Has the purpose of corporations changed?
Jan 1, 2026 3:06 PM

In his influential 1962 book Capitalism and Freedom economist Milton Friedman promoted the position of shareholder primacy by declaring that a corporation has no real “social responsibility” to the public, since its only concern is to increase profits for the shareholders. Social responsibility would be the responsibility (or not) of the shareholders. Since then this “shareholder theory” has became the dominant view of the purpose of the corporation.

But in 1984 the philosopher and business professor R. Edward Freeman wrote Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach in which he proposed the “stakeholder theory.” Under this view shareholders are merely one of many stakeholders in pany who must be considered when making decisions. pany’s stakeholders include just about anyone affected by pany and its workings, so pany’s success depends on satisfying most, if not all, of its stakeholders.

The stakeholder theory received a huge boost today as the Business Roundtable, one of the most powerful pro-business lobbying groups in the United States, issued a statement that moves away from shareholder primacy and redefines the purpose of a corporation to promote “an economy that serves all Americans.”

As the statement notes, Business Roundtable has periodically issued Principles of Corporate Governance since 1978 and each version since 1997 has endorsed principles of shareholder primacy–that corporations exist principally to serve shareholders. This new statement supersedes previous statements and outlines a modern standard for corporate responsibility.

The statement on the purpose of the corporation says:

Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation

Americans deserve an economy that allows each person to succeed through hard work and creativity and to lead a life of meaning and dignity. We believe the free-market system is the best means of generating good jobs, a strong and sustainable economy, innovation, a healthy environment and economic opportunity for all.

Businesses play a vital role in the economy by creating jobs, fostering innovation and providing essential goods and services. Businesses make and sell consumer products; manufacture equipment and vehicles; support the national defense; grow and produce food; provide health care; generate and deliver energy; and offer munications and other services that underpin economic growth.

While each of our panies serves its own corporate purpose, we share a mitment to all of our stakeholders. mit to:

Delivering value to our customers. We will further the tradition of panies leading the way in meeting or exceeding customer expectations.Investing in our employees. This starts pensating them fairly and providing important benefits. It also includes supporting them through training and education that help develop new skills for a rapidly changing world. We foster diversity and inclusion, dignity and respect.Dealing fairly and ethically with our suppliers. We are dedicated to serving as good partners to the panies, large and small, that help us meet our missions.Supporting munities in which we work. We respect the people in munities and protect the environment by embracing sustainable practices across our businesses.Generating long-term value for shareholders, who provide the capital that panies to invest, grow and innovate. We mitted to transparency and effective engagement with shareholders.

Each of our stakeholders is essential. mit to deliver value to all of them, for the future success of panies, munities and our country.

While the devil is in the details, this view of the stakeholder theory appears to be more consistent with Christian social ethics than the morally neutral shareholder theory. Should we encourage this perspective to e the dominant purpose of corporations?

Image source: Pixabay

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Work, Leisure, and the Search for Daily Meaning
Over at AEIdeas, James Pethokoukis challenges our attitudes about work and leisure by drawing a helpful contrast between economists John Maynard Keynes and Deirdre McCloskey. First, he points to “Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren,” in which Keynes frames our economic pursuits as a means to a leisurely end: Thus for the first time since his creation man will be faced with his real, his permanent problem-how to use his freedom from pressing economic cares, how to occupy the leisure, which...
The ‘Ghost of Fiscal Future’
Matt Mitchell at Neighborhood Effects offers an interesting perspective regarding the fiscal cliff. As we hurriedly approach the edge, Mitchell’s insights ought not to be ignored, whatever the e of today’s last minute meeting at the White House. Evoking the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come from Charles Dickens’s A Christmas Carol, he writes, At the risk of mixing metaphors, we should think of the fiscal cliff as the Ghost of the Fiscal Future. It is a bleak lesson in...
The Year in Commentary: Various
Every Wednesday we publish the Acton Commentary, a weekly article that covers topics related to Acton’s mission. As es to a close I thought it would be worth highlighting the mentaries that have been produced by Acton Institute staffers over the past year. The following list includes articles published in 2012 by various Acton Institute staffers: Kishore Jayabalan, director of Istituto Acton February 08, 2012 Obamacare vs the Catholic Bishops May 02, 2012 Vatican Affirms ‘Supernatural’ Purpose to Work Life...
The Year in Commentary: Anthony B. Bradley
Every Wednesday we publish the Acton Commentary,a weekly article that covers topics related to Acton’s mission. As es to a close I thought it would be worth highlighting the mentaries that have been produced by Acton Institute staffers over the past year. The following list includes articles published in 2012 by Dr. Anthony B. Bradley, a research fellow at the Acton Institute.: January 25, 2012 Despite Economic and Social Ills, Blacks Give Obama a Pass February 29, 2012 Corn Subsidies...
Was 2012 the Best Year Ever?
An article in the Christmas issue of The Spectator make a surprising and bold claim: It may not feel like it, but 2012 has been the greatest year in the history of the world. That sounds like an extravagant claim, but it is borne out by evidence. Never has there been less hunger, less disease or more prosperity. The West remains in the economic doldrums, but most developing countries are charging ahead, and people are being lifted out of poverty...
Hobby Lobby Denied Request For HHS Mandate Relief
The National Catholic Register and Associated Press are reporting that Justice Sonia Sotomayor has denied Hobby Lobby (and a pany, Mardel, Inc.) its request to opt out of the HHS mandate to provide abortifacients as health care to employees. Justice Sotomayor’s decision stated that Hobby Lobby did not meet the legal standard for preventing them plying with the government mandate. However, David Green, CEO and owner of Hobby Lobby disagrees, saying the lawsuit violates his family’s faith. The Becket Fund...
The Year in Commentary: Jordan J. Ballor
Every Wednesday we publish the Acton Commentary,a weekly article that covers topics related to Acton’s mission. As es to a close I thought it would be worth highlighting the mentaries that have been produced by Acton Institute staffers over the past year. The following list includes articles published in 2012 by Dr. Jordan J. Ballor, Acton research fellow and executive editor of the Journal of Markets & Morality: January 11, 2012 Ministers of Common Grace February 15, 2012 Corrupted Capitalism...
Children and a Culture of Choice
The Choice of Hercules between Virtue and PleasureEli Horowitz over at Rust Belt Philosophy takes up my post from earlier this week, “The Christ Child and a Culture of Birth.” For the moment we can leave aside the accusations of racism latent in my view, as my demographic concerns are related to replacement levels and not to the question of majority/minority demographic shifts. I do want to address one claim from Horowitz about the nature of cultural privilege, though. His...
The Year in Commentary: Ray Nothstine
Every Wednesday we publish the Acton Commentary,a weekly article that covers topics related to Acton’s mission. As es to a close I thought it would be worth highlighting the mentaries that have been produced by Acton Institute staffers over the past year. The following list includes articles published in 2012 by Ray Nothstine, an associate editor at Acton and managing editor of Religion & Liberty: February 01, 2012 Playing Politics with Unemployed Veterans June 06, 2012 Calvin Coolidge and the...
Dear President Obama: Don’t Live in the Zero-Sum Universe
Zero-sum: It’s thinking that if you have more, I have less. One more baby in a family is one more mouth to feed, and less food for everyone else. One new business opens up on the block, and all the rest of the businesses suffer. The guy in the cubicle next to you gets a raise, and you get nothing, because there’s nothing left. Except that it’s wrong. Lots of people know it, too. P.J. O’Rourke knows it, and he...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved