Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Halcyon: A Resurrection Without Salvation
Halcyon: A Resurrection Without Salvation
Mar 16, 2025 9:32 PM

The new novel offers an alternative future where the dead are raised and the past is forgotten, leaving us to answer the question, “What does life mean when time is our plaything?”

Read More…

Set in the opening decade of the current millennium, Elliot Ackerman’s Halcyon is a tale based on many alternative historical events—most notably, that Al Gore won the 2000 election, oversaw the capture of Osama bin Laden shortly after the 9/11 attacks, declined to launch into the Iraq conflict, and, most relevantly, funded advanced medical research that made possible the book’s central premise: the ability to revivify the dead.

Ackerman’s protagonist, Civil War historian Martin Neumann, wades into the conflicted lives of one family whose patriarch has chosen to avail himself of this medical resurrection and its supposed benefits. That man, Robert Ableson, a retired Virginia attorney and owner of the property for which the book is named, befriends Martin—who is taking a sabbatical at a cottage on the Halcyon grounds—drawing him unwittingly into the events that will unfold.

In a satisfying way, the story wholly avoids the obviously available sci-fi take on its subject matter—in fact, the characters, as they learn of what Ableson has done, take in the development with strangely little reaction. Rather, the novel explores the philosophical and personal implications of a world in which the dead can be brought back to life, resulting in a worthwhile meditation on what humans owe each other in life and in dying, and how the living account for death itself.

Given that the author steers his story this way, it is surprising how lightly he touches on religious themes and questions. There is a passing reference to Ableson’s general view on the subject, in that he allows for God’s existence based on the logic of Pascal’s famous wager: “If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing.” Of course, it is much more important to the story that he follows this same line of thinking when taking his chance with science. Neumann thinks of this parallel explicitly: “I now understood … [Ableson had] made not only religious arrangements for his death but also scientific ones. And it seemed the scientific arrangements had paid off.” Much of the plot, unsurprisingly, revolves around whether and how these arrangements did, in fact, “pay off”—and there are far more negative consequences than anticipated—for Ableson’s wife, three children, old friends and colleagues, and even his recent acquaintance Neumann.

Thus, while no other explicitly religious themes are discussed as the plot unfolds, the moral implications of a fictional world populated by people who could and would choose medical resurrection are constantly being weighed. Discussing a situation in which his daughter had narrowly avoided death, Ableson himself states: “Had she died, she believes she would’ve died for no reason. But having lived, she’s often felt she lived for no reason too. What does anything matter when it can all be arbitrarily swept away?” There’s added poignancy to that observation, given the arbitrariness lent to both life and death in a world in which scientific resurrection is possible.

In the real world, even without religion, death gives life meaning by suffusing it with the urgency presented by a looming finality. For the religious, there is a similar urgency lent by a finality of a different kind, for it is not an ultimate end that will be faced but rather a passage, a judgment, a joining with a destiny for which earthly life is lived. In this way, for them, it is not only true that death gives life meaning but also that—unlike for their non-believing counterparts—life gives death meaning. The novel (perhaps unintentionally) plays on this, as the key scientific advancement in the story is nothing short of resurrection itself, the very thing that Christians believe makes the passage through, or event of, death so specifically meaningful. Critically, though, Halcyon’s resurrection is one without salvation, meaning it inherently lacks ultimate rewards, and the story based upon it consequently must leave the implications of such rewards unexplored.

This being the case, the novel pays much more attention to other themes, and history is foremost among them. This is, after all, a story that features a world shaped by an alternative past, featuring a protagonist that is a historian. As if to set the stage for all that is e, our narrator, Neumann, ponders at the outset of the book “what … were the minor events of today that would forever change the trajectory of the future” while contemplating some of the very alternative historical developments built into the plot. This has the effect of calling the reader’s attention not only to the ripples extending out in time from the seemingly mundane events of contemporary life but also the precariousness of lives and their trajectories. Not coincidentally, the characters of the book, most especially the Ableson family, are impacted by the precariousness inherent in the natural order as much as they are by Robert Ableson’s attempt to defy that order.

Laced throughout this tale is Neumann’s own struggle with history as a professional endeavor. It’s a struggle brought into sharp relief by another plotline: a movement to remove a Confederate monument from the Gettysburg battlefield. The controversy over the subject animates many characters and creates divisions between them, but for Neumann, the Civil War historian, the issue is more than a mere social or political question of the day. A colleague who supports the statue’s removal believes that “history had to remain forward looking; only through the consistent, harsh gaze of the present could we properly judge the past,” but Martin feels differently. In the tradition of his idol, the southern historian Shelby Foote, Martin’s academic and intellectual focus is that of promise: how the failure to reach it resulted in the war, how the ability to embrace it helped the country heal afterward, and how the lessons of both could be applied to contemporary society. To Neumann, so much of the statue-removal movement smacks not only of an unwillingness promise but also of an attempt to erase the actual events and people of the past.

The controversy leaves Martin feeling isolated, conflicted, and ambivalent about the thrust of his academic career. It’s an ennui not helped by the questions raised by Ableson’s resurrection, which forces everyone to reconsider the straight line of history and the nature of promise with the limitations of a lifespan. “Never forget,” the fictional version of Foote had once inscribed in a book for the young Neumann, “history is what the living think of the dead.” But the arc of Robert Ableson’s life directly threatens that very formulation, because he simply refuses to die.

The fantastical nature of that man’s resurrection notwithstanding, then, the story leaves the readers with much to consider in terms of their own views on the meaning of history, the trajectory of life, and the implications of death. “This is about time and who owns it,” says one character, in summary of an unfolding plotline in the novel. So, who owns time? For those who hope for resurrection without salvation, that question is and always will be unanswerable. To those for whom the former is only made possible by the latter, the answer is obvious. While Ackerman’s narrator is enamored of Shelby Foote, it is perhaps most appropriate to give the last word to Foote’s friend of nearly 50 years, the novelist Walker Percy, whose formulation was far more thorough than Pascal’s:

This life is too much trouble, far too strange, to arrive at the end of it and then to be asked what you make of it and have to answer “scientific humanism.” That won’t do. A poor show. Life is a mystery, love is a delight. Therefore I take it as axiomatic that one should settle for nothing less than the infinite mystery and the infinite delight, i.e., God. In fact I demand it. I refuse to settle for anything less.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Denver City Council’s Despicable Disregard for the First Amendment
If you want to sell chicken sandwiches as the Denver Airport you need to check your First Amendment rights at the gate. That seems to be the message sent by the Denver City Council to Chick-fil-A, a fast-food chain that is seeking to open a store at the Denver International Airport. The Council is considering turning away the popular franchisebecause pany promotes a Christian ethic in their business dealings. This offends the Council who is worried about how it will...
Rev. Robert Sirico Takes On Trump’s Comments On Pope Francis
p Last week, the Washington Postfeatured an interview with Donald Trum, entrepreneur-turned-presidential candidate. Trump is clearly no fan of the ments on capitalism and free markets, and his approach to dealing with the pope on this topic is rather unique: Trump wants to scare Pope Francis. mon for someto criticize Pope Francis’s wariness about capitalism, but Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump just took that to a new level, saying he’d try to “scare” the pope by telling him: “ISIS wants...
Americans Don’t Know Pope’s Environmental Views (And What That Means For Us)
There has been no document by a world leader that has received more attention this year than Laudato Si. Three months have passed since Pope Francis released his encyclical on the environment, and yet the media coverage and mentary on it has hardly waned. Here on the Acton PowerBlog, Bruce Edward Walker has piling a daily list of links related to news mentary on the encyclical. To date he has 62 posts with hundreds of links. As the Associated Press...
What is the Moral Difference Between Taxation and Charity?
What is the difference between paying a tax and donating to a charity? Is it moral to force others to give to the cause of your choice? Is it moral for the government to force others to give to the cause of your choice? Rob Gressis, a professor of philosophy, went on campus at California State University – Northridge, to ask students those questions. You can see an extended version of the video here. ...
How Protestant Missionaries Spread Democracy
Over the past 500 years, some countries have proven to be more receptive to democracy than others. What accounts for the disparity? What causes some countries to be more likely to embrace democratic forms of governance? As empirical evidence shows, one strong predictor is the presence of Protestant missionaries. “Protestant missionaries played an integral role in spreading democracy throughout the world,” says Greg Scandlen. “We could preserve our own if we learn from their ways.” Today we may think of...
Video: Creation And The Heart Of Man
Pope Francis has started an important global discussion on the environment with the release of his encyclicalLaudeto Si’, which the Acton Institute has been engaging in with vigor since it’s release, and has been ably covered as well here on the PowerBlog by the likes of Bruce Edward Walker and Joe Carter. But this isn’t the first time that Acton has waded into the debate over protecting the environment; Acton Founder Rev. Robert A. Sirico was debating Matthew Fox, proponent...
Could Wealth Redistribution End Global Poverty?
Americans make up around four percent of the world population and yet they control over 25 percent of the world’s wealth. What if we were to simply redistribute our wealth to the most needy people on the planet—wouldn’t that end global poverty almost overnight? “The answer unfortunately is no,” says philosopher Matt Zwolinski. “Sharing one’s wealth with those who have less is admirable and it often helps to relieve immediate suffering. But just sharing existing wealth we’ll never be enough...
Children Press-Ganged into EcoService
Whether they’re old enough to believe in the EcoGospel, or Gaia, or man-made climate change or not, children are the latest weapon pressed into service by the eco-warriors. First, it was co-opting Pope Francis and Laudato Si, and now it’s kids. Will they stop at nothing? The Wisconsin Daily Independent reported this past Monday that a group calling itself Citizens Preserving the Penokee Hills Heritage Park is promoting its environmental agenda with a painting of a young Native American girl...
How Amazon is Like a Sweatshop (And What That Reveals About Flourishing and Justice)
Liberal and conservative, right and left, red state and blue state—there are dozens, if not hundreds of ways to divide political and economic lines. But one of the most helpful ways of understanding such differences is recognizing the divide between advocates of proximate justice and absolute justice. Several years ago Steven Garber wrote an essay in which he explained the concept of “proximate justice”: Proximate justice realizes that something is better than nothing. It allows us to make peace withsomejustice,somemercy,...
Overcoming ‘Anti-Foreign Bias’ in Trade and Immigration
Many conservatives exhibit a peculiar tendency to be pro-liberty when es to business, trade, and wages, but protectionist when es to the economic effectsof immigration. It’s an odd disconnect, and yet, as we’ve begun to see with figures like Donald Trump and Rick Santorum, one side is bound to eventually give way. They’ll gush aboutthe glories petition, but the second immigration gets brought up, they seem to defer tolabor-union talking points fromages past. When pressed on this in a recent...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved