Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Great Britain is Poorer Than Every US State
Great Britain is Poorer Than Every US State
Mar 16, 2025 7:22 AM

At the height of power, circa 1922, the British Empire was the largest empire in history, covering one-fifth of the world’s population and almost a quarter of the earth’s total land area. Yet almost one hundred years later, Great Britain is not so great, having lost much of its previous economic and political dominance. In fact, if Great Britain were to join the United States, it’d be poorer than any of the other 50 states — including our poorest state, Mississippi.

Fraser Nelson discovered that fact by using a “fairly straightforward calculation” (see the end of this article for an explanation, and what Nelson missed). The result, as Nelson explains, is that all but one e group in America is better off than the same group in Britain:

It’s not surprising that America’s best-paid 10 per cent are wealthier than top 10 per cent. That fits our general idea of America: a country where the richest do best while the poorest are left to hang. The figures just don’t support this. As the below chart shows, middle-earning Americans are better-off than Brits. Even e Americans, those at the bottom 20 per cent, are better-off than their British counterparts. The only group actually worse-off are the bottom 5 per cent.

Tim Worstall notes that similar findings have shown that the bottom 10 percent in the US have the same es (PPP adjusted) as the bottom 10 percent in either Sweden or Finland. “While the top 10% have very much larger es than the top 10% in either country,” says Worstall. “All that redistribution hasn’t made the Nordic poor richer than the American poor but it has made the rich poorer.”

Unfortunately, I suspect “soaking the rich” might be the real reason many people still support redistributions schemes that go far beyond what is necessary to adequately support the social safety net for the poor. If the primary concern of redistributionists was to help the poor e wealthier, rather than making the rich poorer, they’d have long ago abandoned the idea that massive transfers of wealth is a long-term solution to poverty.

Addendum

To get Fraser’s calculation, take the US figures for GDP per state, divide it by population e up with a GDP per capita figure and then get the equivalent figure for Britain. Finally, paring the wealth of nations, you need to look at how far money goes, which means using a measure called Purchasing Power Parity (PPP). Tim Worstall explains why we need to add an additional step: make PPP adjustments for the price differences between the States as well.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Elites, markets and cronyism
It’s no great secret that France is facing social upheaval and has some longstanding deep-set economic problems. Nor is it revealing to say that France’s political class is despised across the spectrum as woefully out of touch. In a recent Wall Street Journal article, however, Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry underscores an important point about this situation that has escaped the attention of most people, including in France itself. It’s not just that the country’s meritocratic elite—personified by President Emmanuel Macron himself—are perceived...
Free marketers can learn from Keynes, says Samuel Gregg
John Maynard Keynes, 20th century British economist, is best known for his book, “The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money” (1936), but it was his pointed analysis of the Treaty of Versailles, “Economic Consequences of the Peace,” which first launched him into the public eye. Keynes’s “Economic Consequences” incinerated main political players of the time who had a hand in drawing up the Versailles treaty, especially Woodrow Wilson, Lloyd Wilson and Georges Clemenceau. “Deep down, he believed, there was...
Explainer: What you should know about the national debt
What just happened? Last month the U.S. Treasury Department reported that for the first time, the national debt has exceeded $22 trillion. What is the national debt? The national debt of the U.S. (also known as gross national debt) is the total amount of debt a federal government owes to creditors (public debt) and to itself (intragovernmental debt). What is public debt? Public debt is the portion of the national debt that the U.S. Treasury has borrowed from outside lenders...
Game of Theories: The Monetarists
Note: This is post #114 in a weekly video series on basic economics. A monetarist is an economist who holds the strong belief that the economy’s performance is determined almost entirely by changes in the money supply. The most well-known monetarist is Milton Friedman, who wrote about his beliefs in the book “A Monetary History of The United States, 1867 – 1960.” In the book he argued that a lack of money supply was a cause of the Great Depression....
Pete Buttigieg: the Bernie Sanders fan running for president
Pete Buttigieg (pronounced BOOT-edge-edge), mayor of South Bend, Indiana is running for president. His candidacy is a pared to democratic front-runners like former vice president Joe Biden or senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT). Nevertheless, he’s worth watching for the window he offers into his generation: millennials. Buttigieg is 37 years-old, and while twice-elected mayor of South Bend, his first splash into the political scene was with the winning essay he wrote in the year 2000 for the JFK Presidential Library and...
Faith and liberty in Guatemala
To say that the history of Latin America in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries is marked by sadness and disappointment is hardly a novel insight. Whether it’s the persistence of cronyism throughout the region, the constant presence of Marxist ideology among intellectuals and in popular culture, the challenge of poverty, the crime and political violence, or the rampant populism that rears its head at regular intervals, many Latin Americans will tell you that theirs is the continent in which many...
Class struggle and the end of identity politics
As the Democratic party in the United States gears up for the 2020 presidential campaign, and a host of candidates announce their entry into the fray, some have observed a (class?) struggle between what might be called the Old Left (the sort of democratic socialism associated with Bernie Sanders) and the New Left (the identity politics of a new generation of progressives). Is the identity politics of the New Left an extension of the old Marxistic dialectic of class struggle...
Brexit chaos: A view from the UK
The UK Parliament has taken two “meaningful votes” on Theresa May’s Brexit deal in less than six months. It has inflicted upon her the first and third largest defeats in modern history. At Acton’s Religion & Liberty Transatlanticwebsite, Rev. Richard Turnbull analyzes what the votes mean, for May and for the UK’s once-promising future as a nation leaving behind Brussels’ central planning for a future of free trade and innovation. Rev. Turnbull, who is the the director of theCentre for...
Alejandro Chafuen in Law & Liberty: Maduro versus the people of Venezuela
Today Alejandro Chafuen, Acton’s Managing Director, International, offered further thoughts on the current crisis in Venezuela in an article published by Law & Liberty. His piece paints a general picture of major figures and their roles in the situation, as well as international actions and efforts in response to it. Chafuen notes that this is not plete list—other issues such as drug trafficking revenues are also important—but his descriptions offer a good overview of the Venezuelan crisis seen from the...
Socialists cannot divorce good intentions from sound economics
Corey Robin has contributed an interesting essay to the Boston Review’s forum ‘Economics After Neoliberalism’. I am reluctant to enter into debates on, “Neoliberalism”, a term so nebulous and variegated in its usage as to render it useless as anything other than an all-purpose cudgel with which to browbeat others in middlebrow magazines (See Phil Magness on its pejorative origins). Robin’s contribution, ‘Uninstalling Hayek’, however, makes a bold case for removing economics from our moral and political discourse. Robin argues...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved