Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Government shouldn’t be the one leading our communities – we should
Government shouldn’t be the one leading our communities – we should
Oct 1, 2024 10:31 PM

After a year of lockdowns, Americans have a unique opportunity to reclaim their freedom and promote a conservative ideal munity life and leadership.

Read More…

As our lives begin to crank back up after over a year of turmoil, we have to ask the question: es next for society?

As usual, politicians have their own answer, eager to wade into new spheres during times of crisis. True to form, the federal government has already gleefully claimed the job of reorganizing the economy post-pandemic.

Pay attention to the language used by the White House in President Biden’s “Build Back Better” statement: It is the president who will be jumpstarting the economy, the president who will be “mobilizing American talent and heart,” and the president who will be rewriting the “social contract” between the nation and her government.

Freeing the economy from government interference might be a lost cause, but there is another area that politicians are attempting to creep into: munities.

Why does this matter? Community life is just as important as economic life, if not more so. The relationships and activities found in munities are not just a facet but a fundamental expression of humanity itself. As sociologist Robert Nisbet put it:

The family, religious association, and munity – these, the conservatives insisted, cannot be regarded as the external products of man’s thought and behavior; they are essentially prior to the individual and are the indispensable supports of belief and conduct. Release man from the contexts munity and you get not freedom and rights but intolerable aloneness and subjection to demonic fears and passions.

Over this past year, a tragic number of Americans experienced this “intolerable aloneness,” whether due to government-mandated lockdowns or self-enforced isolation. By government order, our churches were closed, choirs cancelled, sports leagues postponed, and schooling swapped puter screens.

As these spaces and places reopen across the country, it’s a chance for Americans to reclaim the mantle munity leadership. If we don’t, our leaders in Washington, D.C., will be more than happy to step in.

So what should a munity look like? First of all, it must be physical. Computers are no substitute. Roger Scruton, the conservative English philosopher, defines munity as “animated by oikophilia: the love of the oikos, which means not only the home but the people contained in it, and the surrounding settlements that endow the home with lasting contours and an enduring smile. The oikos is the place that is not just mine and yours but ours.”

The Kentucky farmer Wendell Berry echoes this theme: munity is “a group of people who belong to another and to their place.” This sense of belonging occurs in the family, the business world, and social groups of every kind.

As Scruton puts it: “Conservatism is the philosophy of attachment. We are attached to the things we love, and wish to protect them against decay.” Conservatism is inherently skeptical of bold, sweeping ideas. We risk losing that which we love if we let others manage it for us, even if those others provide the stamp of authority or good intentions.

Centralized government, no matter how optimistic or progressive, can never understand the special friendship you have with your neighbors, the traditions of your faith, or the rich social fabric of your town. Jane Jacobs wrote about this in 1961, describing misguided city planning that destroyed the historic vibrancy of neighborhoods to create parks that no one used, all in the remote bureaucratic ideal of urban cleanliness.

Furthermore, the munity ideal is grounded in a truth and morality that is rarely seen in politics. Communities built on morality simply run better. Studies show that a culture of virtue at work quantifiably improves performance and religious affiliation is linked to higher levels of civic engagement across the board.

With this in mind, how can we really build munities back better?

Follow the conservative model munities: focused on real human interaction, centered on a physical place, grounded in tradition, anchored in truth and morality, and led locally.Refute the isolationist mentality that many have adopted over the past year. By demonstrating love and fulfillment through active membership in munity, we can draw others from the fringes of “intolerable loneliness.”Create munities whenever you see a gap. There is no one-size-fits-all template. If we don’t use our creativity and leadership to restore places for human interaction and fulfillment of mon goal, we risk the void being filled by cold bureaucracy or selfish hedonism. Worse still, the void will continue to grow.

It is in the restoration of this munity, guarded by freedom but bounded by love, that the restoration of America lies. We as conservatives must lead the effort.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
World Day Against Trafficking In Persons: Suhana’s Story
Today is the first World Day Against Trafficking in Persons, as declared by the United Nations. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said in a statement: To stop the traffickers, we must sever funding pipelines and seize assets. I urge all countries to ratify and fully implement the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime and its Protocol on Trafficking in Persons.” International Justice Mission is one of many organizations that fight human trafficking on a daily basis. They track down both...
Phantom Needs: Projecting Poverty Where It Doesn’t Exist
As we continue to encounter the adverse effects of certain forms of foreign aid and othermisalignedefforts to alleviate poverty, it es increasingly clear that those in need require a level of care, concern, and discipleship not well suited to detached top-down “solutions.” But just as we ought to be careful about the types of solutions we create, we ought to give the same level of attentiveness to the needs themselves, which are no plex and difficult to discern. Steve Saint,...
Audio: The Crucible of Poverty
Stuart Ray, Donn Weinberg, and Anielka Munkel discuss solutions to poverty – July 17, 2014 On July 17th, the Acton Institute hosted a panel discussion titled “The Crucible of Poverty: Perspectives from the Trenches.” The discussion examined the issue of poverty, with a focus on what strategies for poverty alleviation have worked, what strategies have failed, and how we can better help the most vulnerable among us. The panelists for the discussion were Mr. Stuart Ray, Executive Director of Guiding...
State Department Releases Report on International Religious Freedom
Yesterday the State Department released its International Religious Freedom Report for 2013. A wide range of U.S. government agencies and offices use the reports for such efforts as shaping policy and conducting diplomacy. The Secretary of State also uses the reports to help determine which countries have engaged in or tolerated “particularly severe violations” of religious freedom in order to designate “countries of particular concern.” “In 2013, the world witnessed the largest displacement of munities in recent memory,” is the...
Teachers Unions vs. Students
Labor unions can be a force for good, especially in protecting the interest of workers against exploitation. But as with any human institution, unions can e harmful to mon good. That is particularly true with teachers unions, which often promote the self-interests of their members even when they are antithetical to the interests of students. In this 5 minute video, Terry Moe, Professor of Political Science at Stanford University, outlines the problem of teachers unions and offers solutions to how...
Download Acton University 2014 Lectures
We’ve just posted the final bundle of 107 audio files from Acton University 2014 available for $14.95 at our digital download store. Our lunch and evening lectures are also free, including talks from: Rev. Robert Sirico, co-founder of the Acton Institute and author of Defending the Free Market Makoto Fujimura, Artist and Public Intellectual Andy Crouch, Executive Editor, Christianity Today Ross Douthat, Op-Ed Columnist, New York Times Here’s the full list of lectures: Opening Lecture – Rev. Robert A. SiricoCulture...
Archbishop Chaput: Pope Francis Reminds Us To Live In Solidarity With The Poor
Archbishop Charles Chaput of Philadelphia spoke recently at the Napa Institute on Pope Francis’ view of economics. Archbishop Chaput reminded the audience that the pope was not an economist, but spoke rather as a pastor and theologian. He went on to say that some of what the pope has to say about economics is “hard for some of us to hear” but told his listeners to read the pope’s writings for themselves, without the filter of the media. Archbishop Chaput...
Christianity, Socialism, and Wealth Creation
Christian churches in the West have been focused on redistribution of e rather than the creation of wealth, says Brian Griffiths in this week’s Acton Commentary. Through much of the post-war period in the West, the formation of economic policy was dominated by Keynesian activism on the part of governments seeking an increasing role in providing public services, reducing material poverty, and reshaping e redistribution. In the United States, President John F. Kennedy launched the New Frontier program and his...
Consumerism, Service, and Religion
Today at The Imaginative Conservative, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, in an excerpt from his recent book, bemoans what he sees as “The Spoiling of America.” While sympathetic to his support for self-discipline, I find his analysis of our consumer culture to be myopic. He writes, Without even thinking about it we have gotten used to having it our way. Because excellent customer service is ubiquitous we believe it must be part of the natural order. The service in the restaurant is...
Religious Conservatives, EPA Rules, and the Church of the New York Times
The New York Times has a new articled titled “Religious Conservatives Embrace Proposed E.P.A. Rules” that raises the question: are the Times’ editors irredeemably biased or are they just not all that bright? Presumably, you have to be smart to work for the Times, right? So it must be another example of what my friend and former Get Religion boss Terry Mattingly calls “Kellerism.” Mattingly coined the term Kellerism in homage to former Times editor Bill Keller, who said that...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved