Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Global poverty reduction slows – but there’s a fix
Global poverty reduction slows – but there’s a fix
Dec 2, 2025 12:45 PM

For the past many years, the news about extreme poverty around the globe has been extremely encouraging. The number of people living on $1.90 a day (2011 PPP), which the World Bank defines as extreme poverty, has been falling for decades. In 1990, approximately 1.85 billion people lived in extreme poverty. In 2015, that dropped to 736 million. In other words, extreme poverty was reduced by over fifty percent globally in just 30 years. That’s an astonishing plishment.

Given this rapid progress, the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) pletely eliminating extreme poverty by 2030 seemed within reach. Unfortunately, new findings by the University of Oxford’s Our World In Data indicates that the rate of poverty reduction around the world has slowed and projects that it may even stagnate. While the number of extremely poor people will continue to decline, researchers believe the rate of decline will level off, leaving approximately 500 million people in extreme poverty in 2030.

The report emphasizes that this is only a projection based on economic growth trends of the last decade (2005-2015). Presumably, this catastrophe can be avoided if economic growth within the poorest nations exceeds that of the last decade.

This will be a challenge. Many of the poorest countries have seen extremely slow growth in their GDP per capita over the last 30 years. Some countries, primarily in Sub-Saharan Africa, have actually seen a reduction in their GDP per capita. The Gates Foundation is predicting that 87% of people living in extreme poverty will be concentrated in Sub-Saharan Africa by 2050 and that just two of these countries, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Nigeria, will be the home to 40 percent of all extremely poor people living on the planet.

Despite this challenge, Our World In Data is right to zero in on robust economic growth as the key to reducing extreme poverty. As the report states, “Poverty declined during the last generation because the majority of the poorest people on the planet lived in countries with strong economic growth.” The big questions are these: How do we get strong economic growth? What are the ingredients necessary for widespread, economic flourishing?

The ingredients for robust economic growth involve what we call the institutions of justice. These include: rule of law, property rights, and the ability to register a business and engage freely in trade. The problem with the aforementioned Sub-Saharan African countries is not their people; they have capabilities, talents, and potential. The problem lies elsewhere. As Nobel Laureate Muhammad Yunus says, “Poor people are Bonsai people.” Watch the clip:

In other words, people are in extreme poverty because they do not have the institutional base necessary to create wealth for themselves and munities. They lack the institutions of justice. Robust economic growth es when countries truly establish the rule of law, enforce property rights, and provide people with the ability to register a business and engage in global trade. Check out the 2019 Economic Freedom Index and you will quickly recognize a link between material poverty and poor institutions.

What can be done to help spur economic growth in the poorest countries? Counterintuitively, we need to radically rethink international aid. It’s clear that aid has unintentionally harmed countries in a variety of ways (read Dead Aid or The Great Escape). This includes creating a destructive “external orientation” within leaders, who are incentivized to secure aid rather than build the institutions of justice within their domains. Growth will occur only when leaders establish the institutions of justice.

Probably the single most effective way of lifting people out of extreme poverty is to allow them to freely trade the fruit of their labor in global markets. Many western countries actively discourage the importation of goods from developing countries through tariffs and unfairly subsidize their own producers, eliminating market opportunities for the people who need them the most. This should stop immediately.

To ensure 500 million people are not trapped in extreme poverty a decade from now, we need to focus on economic growth. Let’s hope that policy makers, transnational organizations, and aid agencies emphasize the formation of the institutions of justice within the poorest nations. Otherwise, 500 million men, women, and children remaining poverty in 2030 will cease to be a prediction. It will be reality.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Madison on Religious Conscience
The HHS Mandate is troubling to so many simply because it’s a clear Constitutional violation. Any basic understanding of Constitutional rights and our religious freedom sees that this is primarily about religious liberty, and not solely an issue concerning contraceptives or Roman Catholics. Last week we heard from James Madison on religious liberty in my post “Religious Liberty or Government Tolerance?” In 1792, Madison wrote an essay titled “Property” in the National Gazette. This is a brilliant piece by Madison...
Samuel Gregg: Inequality Anyone?
Over at National Review Online, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg takes a look at a recent Charles Blow op-ed in the New York Times in which the writer hyperventilates about statements made by Rick Santorum on the subject of e inequality. Economically speaking, e inequality reflects the workings of several factors, many of which are essential if we want a dynamic, growing economy. Even your average neo-Keynesian economist will acknowledge that, without incentives (such as the prospect of a higher...
What does it mean to be On Call In Culture?
Most of us know what it feels like… this pull toward something. Whether it is art or science or writing or business—there is something inside you that says, “Yes, this is where I belong. This is what I was meant to do!” As Christians this realization e with a bit of disappointment mixed with the excitement of finding our place. We somehow wish that our calling were something of a more spiritual nature…something that mattered more. But here’s a question:...
Libertarians, Religious Conservatives, and the Myth of Social Neutrality
When es to our view of individual liberty, one of the most unexplored areas of distinction between libertarians and religious conservatives* is how we view neutrality and bias. Because the differences are uncharted, I have no way of describing the variance without resorting to a grossly simplistic caricature—so with a grossly simplistic caricature we shall proceed: Libertarians believe that neutrality between the various spheres of society—and especially betweenthe government and the individual—are both possible and desirable, and so the need...
Happiness is Subjective
One of the conclusions from last mentary was that the government shouldn’t be in the business of promoting a particular vision of the good life in America. That’s not to say that the government doesn’t have some role in promoting mon good or making some normative judgments about the good life. But it shouldn’t get anywhere near the level of specificity of promising a family, home, college education, and retirement for all. In part this is because while moral good...
Since Christ Died for Us
Yesterday my son asked me why today is called “Ash Wednesday.” In that question I could hear the echoes of another question, “Since Christ has died for us, why do we still have to die?” The latter question is found in the Heidelberg Catechism, and the brief but poignant answer has stuck with me since I first encountered it. First, the catechism clarifies that our death does not have redemptive power: “Our death does not pay the debt of our...
No Olympic Dream: Monti’s wake up call to Italy
On Valentine’s Day, just one day before having to tender its application to the International Olympic Committee in Lausanne, Switzerland, Italy’s pragmatic Prime Minister Mario Monti showed no romantic spirit by canceling his nation’s dream to host the 2020 Summer Olympics. In a last-minute decision made Feb. 14, Prime Minister Monti explained at a press conference that the already overburdened Italian taxpayers simply cannot afford to finance the estimated $12.5 billion to bring the 2020 Olympic Games to Rome. “I...
Biased in Favor of the Entrepreneur State
Yesterday I argued that since bias is inherent in institutions and neutrality between individual and social spheres is illusory we should harness and direct the bias of institutions towards a free and virtuous society characterized by individual liberty and sustained by religious principles. One of the ways we can do that in the economic realm, I believe, is to encourage a bias toward entrepreneurship and away from corporatism. As Derek Thompson, a senior editor at The Atlantic, says, “It would...
Gleaner Tech #2: The Global Village Construction Set
[Note: This is the second in an occasional series ongleaner technology.] The Global Village Construction Setis a collection of 40 machines needed to “create a small civilization with forts…like a life-size Lego set.” ...
Government and Gambling
Over at Mere Comments I note the recent invective against gambling leveled by Al Mohler and Russell Moore. I contend that as opposed to casinos, lotteries are in fact the most troubling example of state-sponsored gambling. And I also worry a bit about the use of legal means to prohibit gambling, as it isn’t so clear to me that gambling is always and in every case a moral evil. Thus, I write, that cultural rather than primarily political attempts to...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved