Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Global poverty reduction slows – but there’s a fix
Global poverty reduction slows – but there’s a fix
Dec 13, 2025 5:00 PM

For the past many years, the news about extreme poverty around the globe has been extremely encouraging. The number of people living on $1.90 a day (2011 PPP), which the World Bank defines as extreme poverty, has been falling for decades. In 1990, approximately 1.85 billion people lived in extreme poverty. In 2015, that dropped to 736 million. In other words, extreme poverty was reduced by over fifty percent globally in just 30 years. That’s an astonishing plishment.

Given this rapid progress, the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) pletely eliminating extreme poverty by 2030 seemed within reach. Unfortunately, new findings by the University of Oxford’s Our World In Data indicates that the rate of poverty reduction around the world has slowed and projects that it may even stagnate. While the number of extremely poor people will continue to decline, researchers believe the rate of decline will level off, leaving approximately 500 million people in extreme poverty in 2030.

The report emphasizes that this is only a projection based on economic growth trends of the last decade (2005-2015). Presumably, this catastrophe can be avoided if economic growth within the poorest nations exceeds that of the last decade.

This will be a challenge. Many of the poorest countries have seen extremely slow growth in their GDP per capita over the last 30 years. Some countries, primarily in Sub-Saharan Africa, have actually seen a reduction in their GDP per capita. The Gates Foundation is predicting that 87% of people living in extreme poverty will be concentrated in Sub-Saharan Africa by 2050 and that just two of these countries, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Nigeria, will be the home to 40 percent of all extremely poor people living on the planet.

Despite this challenge, Our World In Data is right to zero in on robust economic growth as the key to reducing extreme poverty. As the report states, “Poverty declined during the last generation because the majority of the poorest people on the planet lived in countries with strong economic growth.” The big questions are these: How do we get strong economic growth? What are the ingredients necessary for widespread, economic flourishing?

The ingredients for robust economic growth involve what we call the institutions of justice. These include: rule of law, property rights, and the ability to register a business and engage freely in trade. The problem with the aforementioned Sub-Saharan African countries is not their people; they have capabilities, talents, and potential. The problem lies elsewhere. As Nobel Laureate Muhammad Yunus says, “Poor people are Bonsai people.” Watch the clip:

In other words, people are in extreme poverty because they do not have the institutional base necessary to create wealth for themselves and munities. They lack the institutions of justice. Robust economic growth es when countries truly establish the rule of law, enforce property rights, and provide people with the ability to register a business and engage in global trade. Check out the 2019 Economic Freedom Index and you will quickly recognize a link between material poverty and poor institutions.

What can be done to help spur economic growth in the poorest countries? Counterintuitively, we need to radically rethink international aid. It’s clear that aid has unintentionally harmed countries in a variety of ways (read Dead Aid or The Great Escape). This includes creating a destructive “external orientation” within leaders, who are incentivized to secure aid rather than build the institutions of justice within their domains. Growth will occur only when leaders establish the institutions of justice.

Probably the single most effective way of lifting people out of extreme poverty is to allow them to freely trade the fruit of their labor in global markets. Many western countries actively discourage the importation of goods from developing countries through tariffs and unfairly subsidize their own producers, eliminating market opportunities for the people who need them the most. This should stop immediately.

To ensure 500 million people are not trapped in extreme poverty a decade from now, we need to focus on economic growth. Let’s hope that policy makers, transnational organizations, and aid agencies emphasize the formation of the institutions of justice within the poorest nations. Otherwise, 500 million men, women, and children remaining poverty in 2030 will cease to be a prediction. It will be reality.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Was Gordon Gekko Catholic?
Is greed really good? Does self-interest equal sin? Samuel Gregg takes on these questions at Aleteia.org, in an excerpt from his new book, Tea Party Catholic: the Catholic Case for Limited Government, a Free Economy and Human Flourishing. In many ways, the free economy does rely upon people pursuing their self-interest rather than being immediately focused upon promoting the wellbeing of others. One response to this challenge is to recognize that fallen humanity cannot realize perfect justice in this world....
Lord Acton and America’s Moral Absolutes Concerning Liberty
Lord Acton once said of the American revolution: “No people was so free as the insurgents, no government less oppressive than the government which they overthrew.” It was America’s high view of liberty and its ideas that cultivated this unprecedented freedom ripe for flourishing. Colonists railed over 1 and 2 percent tax rates and were willing to take up arms in a protracted and bloody conflict to secure independence and self-government. In a chapter on Lord Acton in The Moral...
Bradley Cited in News Roundup on Millenials Leaving Church
Last week, Rachel Held Evans wrote an article discussing millennials leaving the church. This piece quickly went viral prompting responses from mentators, debating “why those belonging to the millennial generation are leaving the church and what should be done about it.” Research fellow at Acton, Anthony Bradley, discusses Evans’ piece in “United Methodists Wearing A Millennial Evangelical Face.” Jeff Schapiro, at the Christian Post, discusses this debate and summarizes mentators’ opinions, including Bradley’s: Anthony Bradley, associate professor of Theology and...
For America’s Elites, Religious Freedom is a Non-Issue
America’s Founding Fathers considered religious liberty to be our “first freedom.” But as Ken Blackwell notes, that view is no longer shared by our media and foreign policy elites: All such understandings of the religious freedom foundation of American civil liberty and foreign policy seem long forgotten by the elites of today. The media cares little about religious freedom. The famous Rothman-Lichter study of 1981 surveyed 240 journalists from the prestige press. Of course, 80 percent of them voted one...
Dispersing Poor People And Crime
Emily Badger at The Atlantic Wire posts mon sense story regarding the debate about whether or not the dispersing of poor people out of inner-city housing projects into suburban neighborhoods, through government housing voucher programs, increases crime rates. The article reflects recent research by Michael Lens, an assistant professor of urban planning at UCLA. A growing stack of research now supports [the] hypothesis that housing vouchers do not in fact lead to crime. Lens has just added another study to...
Spirit-and-Body Economics
Over at the Kern Pastors Network, Greg Forster points to Rev. Robert Sirico’s speech from this year’s Acton University, drawing particularly on Sirico’s emphasis on Christian anthropology.“One may not say that we are spirits inside of flesh,” Sirico said, “but that we are spirits and flesh.” Forster summarizes: Christianity teaches that the human person is, in Sirico’s words, both corporeal and transcendent. We cannot make sense of ourselves if we are only bodies. How could a strictly material body think...
Disability and Discipleship: God Don’t Make No Junk
In this week’s Acton Commentary, “Disability, Service, and Stewardship,” I write, “Our service of others may or may not be recognized by the marketplace as something valuable or worth paying for. But each one of us has something to offer someone else. All of us have ministries of one kind or another. Our very existence itself must be seen as a blessing from God.” During a sermon a couple weeks ago at my church, the preacher made an important point...
The Rise of Free-Market Alternatives to Obamacare
Referring to the Affordable Care Act, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Max Baucus (D-Mont.) stated earlier this year, “Unless we implement this properly, it’s going to be a train wreck.” And indeed, from looking at the Obamacare implementation timeline alone, the law seems to have gotten off to a shaky start. The implementation of the so-called employer mandate, which would require businesses with more than 50 workers to offer insurance to all full-time employees, or else pay a fine...
What Distributists Get Wrong
Last week, we took a look at what distributists get right in terms of economics, through the eyes of David Deavel at Intercollegiate Review. Now, Deavel discusses where distributism goes off the rails in that same series. It is a rather long list, but here are the highlights. First, Deavel says that simple economics escapes distributists. Despite the fact that economics teaches that actions in the real world have real world consequences, distributists tend to ignore this fact. They scoff...
Do the Poor Vote for More Welfare?
A popular saying (often misattributed to Alexis de Tocqueville) states that a democracy can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. If this is always the case then we should expect the poor to vote themselves even more welfare payments. However, as Dwight R. Lee explains, the desire for transfers that others will pay for has almost no effect on people’s voting behavior: This argument that a significant financial gain from...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved