Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Give In To Evil Or Give Up: What Should The Catholic Bishops Do?
Give In To Evil Or Give Up: What Should The Catholic Bishops Do?
Oct 5, 2024 3:00 PM

National Catholic Reporter writer Michael Sean Winters has a message for the United States Catholic Bishops: plicit with evil or toll the death knell for the Church in the U.S. Unlike the Amish, who choose to live in a manner outside of modern culture, Winters exhorts the bishops to not only engage the world, but realize that being part of evil is simply part and parcel of that engagement:

I bring up the Amish for a reason. They are lovely people and mitment to living a Christ-like life challenges us all. But their model is not our Catholic tradition. We do not shut out the world; we engage it. And it seems to me that the approach of many bishops in recent years has been to mimic the Amish, to construct walls around a ‘faithful remnant’ of Catholics, close the doors in the face of those who evidence ambivalence, and denounce the culture for its moral turpitude. Setting aside the fact that those denunciations tend to be ideologically one-sided, this dour, pessimistic, denunciatory stance toward the culture is a death sentence for the church…

Winters is specifically addressing the bishops’ decision to fight the HHS mandate, forcing employers to include abortificients and abortions with insurance coverage. Winters adds, “…no one is being tied down and force-fed contraception: We are talking about insurance coverage.”

Contrast this with what an actual Catholic bishop has to say. Archbishop Charles Chaput of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia notes that the bishops of the U.S. have long held that all Americans deserve adequate health care, regardless of their employment situation. It is not the bishops, he says, but the White House, that has politicized this issue.

[H]ealth care has now morphed into a religious liberty issue provoked entirely – and needlessly — by the current White House. Despite a few small concessions under pressure, the administration refuses to withdraw or reasonably modify a Health and Human Services (HHS) contraceptive mandate that violates the moral and religious convictions of many individuals, private employers and religiously affiliated and inspired organizations.

Coupled with the White House’s refusal to uphold the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, and its astonishing disregard for the unique nature of religious freedom displayed by its arguments in a 9-0 defeat in the 2012 Hosanna-Tabor Supreme Court decision, the HHS mandate can only be understood as a form of coercion. Access to inexpensive contraception is a problem nowhere in the United States. The mandate is thus an ideological statement; the imposition of a preferential option for infertility. And if millions of Americans disagree with it on principle – too bad.

If Winters’ rallying cry to American Catholics is “Just give in to evil”, Chaput’s is “Wake up!” Winters believes that American Catholics simply have to accept the fact that they cannot live in the world without occasionally – wittingly or unwittingly – sinning, and they should simply accept that: “There is simply no way to engage a sinful world without somehow participating, even cooperating, in the evil in the world.”

Chaput, on the other hand, says that the days of religious freedom as a “given” are over, and that conscious cooperation with evil is simply not a choice. He notes the current IRS scandal as evidence:

As Mollie Hemingway, Stephen Krason and Wayne Laugesen have all pointed out, the current IRS scandal – involving IRS targeting of “conservative” organizations – also has a religious dimension. Selective IRS pressure on religious individuals and organizations has drawn very little media attention. Nor should we expect any, any time soon, for reasons Hemingway outlines for the Intercollegiate Review. But the latest IRS ugliness is a hint of the treatment disfavored religious groups may face in the future, if we sleep through the national discussion of religious liberty now.

American Catholics – and others who believe that religious freedom is precious and well-worth safe-guarding – cannot simply shrug their shoulders and say, “What are ya gonna do?” when es to plicit with evil. While it may be true that we all find ourselves in sticky and even sinful situations, it doesn’t give one the excuse to do nothing to correct the situation, whether it is an issue in our own conscience or one outside of ourselves. Martin Niemöller gave us this quote to help us remember exactly where plicit with evil will lead us:

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out–

Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out–

Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out–

Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me–and there was no one left to speak for me.

Archbishop Chaput is calling on the bishops and American Catholics not to plicit with evil, but to speak out.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Moral Business
Profit is a valid motivation for business and, generally speaking, pany that pursues profits within the bounds of law and morality will be fulfilling its purpose admirably. But profit is an instrumental good rather than a final good, and so there are sometimes extraordinary circumstances that place additional moral obligations on business. For an edifying story about pany that responded well to such circumstances, see ...
Subsidiarity Inverted
Jeff Mirus of CatholicCulture.org flogs an address by Capuchin friar and dean of theology at St. Mary’s Seminary and University in Baltimore, Father David Couturier. I share Mirus’s assessment that “one is at times unsure exactly what Fr. Couturier means,” but some of his points do seem at odds with the vision of charity articulated by, for example, Benedict XVI in Deus Caritas Est, as Mirus points out. Especially perplexing is Couturier’s statement concerning the role of Capuchin Franciscans in...
Rendering to Caesar, God, and MasterCard
A press release from the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, linked over at WorldMagBlog, claims that the bankruptcy reform legislation passed last year is being “reluctantly” interpreted by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of New York to mean that “those going through bankruptcy may not tithe to their church or make other charitable donations … until after they have paid off credit panies and other creditors. Before the new law went into effect, bankruptcy court...
Death and Despair, Life and Hope
Two pieces on Christianity Today’s website this week are worthy ment. The first, “Despair Not,” reminds us that “there is something worse than misery and death.” The author Stephen L. Carter interacts with C.S. Lewis’ famous book, The Screwtape Letters, to show that “the terrible tragedies that befall the world work to Satan’s benefit only if we despair. Suffering, as Screwtape reminds his nephew, often strengthens faith. Better to keep people alive, he says, long enough for faith to be...
‘X’ Marks the Spot
In a recent issue of Business 2.0 magazine, we are told that X Prize founder Peter Diamandis is expanding his X Prize Foundation to address new areas of innovation. The first Ansari X Prize included a $10 million purse for the first private spaceflight. The X Prize Foundation website notes that the group is “actively researching the feasibility of new prizes in space, energy, genomics, education, nanotechnology, and prizes in the social arena,” but Business 2.0 gives us some more...
How a Missional Perspective Changes Culture
The only way that culture can be truly changed, in terms of the gospel, is by movements of the Spirit that are birthed in congregational life. The Christian Right thinks that it can alter culture by direct partisan political pressure led by media personalities and tried-and-true techniques. They could not be more sadly mistaken. The failure of this approach is self-evident over the course of the past six years. The late missional theologian Lesslie Newbigin understood this well when he...
Social Issues, B16, and our Fundamental Task
Last week, Pope Benedict XVI addressed the Canadian Bishops who were making their ad limina visit. A worthwhile read, especially concerning the strong language His Holiness uses to condemn the symptoms of crumbling Western culture. …the fundamental task of the evangelization of culture is the challenge to make God visible in the human face of Jesus. In helping individuals to recognize and experience the love of Christ, you will awaken in them the desire to dwell in the house of...
‘Green’ Offices are Economical
From the same issue of Business 2.0 magazine I cited yesterday, check out this article on Adobe Systems, which is touted as having “The greenest office in America.” It just goes to show you that economic efficiency and environmental concerns go hand in hand. Click on the first link in the piece to get a slideshow of the various improvements which save energy and money at Adobe’s offices. My favorite is the timed outages of garage exhaust fans and outdoor...
Francis Collins – A Believer Looks at the Human Genome
Christian geneticist and author (The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief, Simon & Schuster Trade Sales) Dr. Francis Collins is the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Human Genome Research Institute and head of the Human Genome Project. Recently he was the keynote speaker at the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Scientific Affiliation, a group of Christian geneticists, chemists and other scientists. Over the past week I transcribed his lecture from the audio...
The Perfect, the Enemy of the Good
Voltaire had a saying: “The perfect is the enemy of the good,” or, “Le mieux est l’ennemi du bien.” It’s often repeated, especially in public policy circles, that the perfect the enemy of the good, implying that you should favor the realistic good that can be done rather than the unattainable perfect ideal. And now you know why. Because “good” beats “perfect” in a Google Fight, and by a rather handy margin. HT: Seth’s Blog, pares “unique”, “best”, and “finest”....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved