Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY
/
From Judges to Justices: Keeping Executive Power in Check Is an Ancient Problem
From Judges to Justices: Keeping Executive Power in Check Is an Ancient Problem
Jul 18, 2025 7:45 PM

  In the Bible, ancient Israel wrestled with how to restrain corrupt rulers. A modern-day version of that political question went before the US Supreme Court, which ruled Monday on when a president can be prosecuted for criminal behavior.

  The case revolved around former president Donald Trumps attempts to interfere with the 2020 election results. Ultimately, the Court decided that presidents have absolute immunity for official acts related to core constitutional duties while in office and presumptive immunity for official acts that dont fall under core powers, but cannot be granted immunity for private acts.

  Some evangelicals have expressed disappointment in Trumps actions and support for the resulting criminal charges, saying they are eager to hold their executives to higher ethical standards, especially if they claim Christ. Trump supporters, though, have seen the efforts to prosecute him as unjust and politically motivated.

  While Trump and his backers viewed the Court as siding with the former president, reactions were mixed among his opponents. Some were concerned about putting leaders above the law, while others saw the lack of immunity for unofficial acts as a significant check on executive power.

  Daniel Darling, who is director of the Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminarys Land Center for Cultural Engagement and has been critical of Trump, said reactions to the decision were perhaps overblown.

  Despite the screaming, the Court has strengthened democracy, he wrote on X. Trump has to prove his election-meddling was part of official acts. The government has to prove they werent. The court seems to lean in the direction that they werent.

  Some evangelical critics of Trump have relied on biblical appeals that Trumps actions undermined the rule of law, making him unable to govern. Foremost among them is David French, a New York Times columnist, who wrote in response to the decision that the court might say that presidents arent above the law, but in reality, it established an extraordinarily broad zone of absolute immunity for presidents.

  He added that this immunity, combined with the presidents ability to deploy troops, even on American soil under the Insurrection Act, would have dangerous potential implications.

  The historic ruling in Donald J. Trump v. United States returned the case back to the trial court for more analysis on which of Trumps actions were official before making a judgment about moving forward with a trial.

  While the case on the surface deals with weighty legal matters of contemporary politics, one legal expert said the questions around the rule of law at the heart of the case are the same controversies that biblical figures wrestled with in the Old Testament.

  Much of the Old Testament are stories of kings abusing their power, Robert Cochran, professor emeritus at Pepperdines Caruso School of Law and coeditor of a 2013 InterVarsity Press book, Law and the Bible, told CT.

  He pointed to the story of King Ahab, who coveted a vineyard owned by a man named Naboth. Naboth refused to sell. So Queen Jezebel had him killed, and Ahab took the vineyard.

  Prior to Israel installing a king, the nation suffered from the opposite problem of general lawlessness. The Book of Judges explored the need for someone to be in charge, due to chaos caused by human sin, and the concern that human-held power is liable to corruption.

  Cochran pointed to the last five chapters of Judges, where people unrestrained by the rule of law committed rapes, mass murders, kidnappings, and forced marriages (Judges 1721).

  At the end of each story appears the refrain In those days Israel had no king; all the people did whatever seemed right in their own eyes, Cochran said, citing Judges 21:25 (NLT). The implication is clear: Israel needs a strong executive to enforce the law.

  But establishing a king did not fix ancient Israels problems either.

  Donald Trumps case puts this same tension on display, Cochran said. Both sides are arguing that the other side will abuse power if not restrained. . We need a rule that will enable presidents to govern effectively, but one under which they will not abuse their power.

  Special counsel Jack Smith, who secured an indictment from a grand jury on four felony charges against Trump in the case, has made the argument throughout the proceedings that blanket immunity would make presidents unanswerable to the rule of law.

  Smith accused Trump of conspiring to subvert the will of millions of American citizens and attempting to violate the peaceful transfer of power through election interference.

  Meanwhile, Trumps legal team argued that unless presidents have far-reaching immunity, they are vulnerable to prosecutions by politically motivated bad actors once they leave office.

  The decision means the lower court will determine whether Trumps actions that are at the heart of the trial were official or unofficial and whether Smith can move forward in prosecuting Trump for the latter. It likely means some allegations Smith had made against Trump, which involved communications between Trump and Justice Department officials, wont be grounds for prosecution.

  The Supreme Court majority said the decision was not a power grab for the executive branch: The President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and not everything the President does is official. The President is not above the law.

  The minority saw things differently. The President is now a king above the law, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a strongly worded dissent.

  Trump celebrated the outcome on his social media network, Truth Social, writing in all capital letters: BIG WIN FOR OUR CONSTITUTION AND DEMOCRACY. PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!

  His supporters also applauded the ruling.

  Today the Supreme Court decided on what a majority of Americans already knewthat the DOJ was weaponized against Trump, Sen. James Lankford, an Oklahoma Republican and former Southern Baptist pastor, wrote on social media. No candidate or party should be attacked by their political opponents.

  Critics remained skeptical. Napp Nazworth, director of the American Values Coalition and former politics editor for The Christian Postsaid the decision couldve been worse. But he questioned the ruling overall.

  Is a coup attempt an official act? This seems to be an open question for a majority of the court, he wrote on Threads. A Never Trumper, Nazworth has long held that Trump would have a corrosive impact on the public witness of the church.

  The decision today makes it extremely unlikely that Trump will face a trial before voters head to the polls in November.

  Legal scholars predicted that, should Trump win the presidency a second time, its unlikely the case will proceed further.

  If Trump were to be reelected and this case is still out there, it is highly likely that he would take one of several paths to getting the Justice Department to dismiss the case, George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin told CT. He also noted a standing Justice Department policy against prosecuting sitting presidents. In addition, theres the open question of whether Trump would pardon himself.

  Theres other ways that you could do it, Somin added. But I think the bottom line is that he would find some way to put an end to the case.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY
The return of nature worship
We live in decadent times. Universal human rights have not been fully attained, yet radical environmentalists insist that flora, fauna and even geological features and structures should be deemed legal persons, a meme known as “nature rights.” The drive to grant rights to the entirety of the natural world has already achieved stunning victories. In 2008, Ecuador granted human-type rights to “nature” in its constitution back, while Bolivia recently passed a law to the same effect. More than 30...
Labor unions, yesterday and today
Along-cherished predisposition on the part of the Roman Catholic Church is that labor unions act as a protection against the exploitation of workers. From Pope Leo XIII’s 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum forward, the Church has been an outspoken proponent of organized labor, worker safety and human dignity. Thus, es as little surprise that the U.S. Catholic Conference of Bishops weighed-in when the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in February regarding the Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and...
Editor's Note: Summer 2018
In early July, an Indian court issued a ruling that accorded the status of “legal person or entity” to animals in the state, saying “they have a distinct persona with corresponding rights, duties and liabilities of a living person.” With this measure, designed to prevent cruelty to animals, justices of the Uttarakhand High Court in northern India declared that “the entire animal kingdom, including avian and aquatic ones, are declared as legal entities having a distinct persona with corresponding...
Power, people and things in 'Westworld'
Since I was a child I’ve always loved a good story. I believed that stories helped us to ennoble ourselves, to fix what was broken in us, and to help us e the people we dreamed of being.” So begins Anthony Hopkin’s character, Robert Ford, in his speech marking the finale of the first season of HBO’s mind-bending, techno-philosophical series “Westworld.” Ford is the brilliant co-creator of Westworld, a theme park set several decades in the future in which...
Editor's Note: Fall 2018
When I accepted the new position as managing editor of Religion & Liberty, only one thing had been set in stone: Caroline Roberts’ article on Walker Percy would be the cover story. Everything else remained to be determined. Her essay is one of the first e from Acton’s new longform journalism platform, bines extensive reporting with beautiful photography to give readers an immersive understanding of the subject. This project continues to grow and improve. Curt Biren analyzes economic and...
Arvo Pärt and the universal soul of music
Sacred music is not only a devotional posed and performed to honor our Creator but also a bulwark against human sinfulness and frailties. Composer Arvo Pärt has been creating music of faith that inspires while at the same time subverts several of the most oppressive systems of government of the past century. poser’s lifelong development as a poser also led him to a deeper faith. He converted to Orthodox Christianity in 1972. Theologian Peter Bouteneff observed that Pärt is...
Nature, technology, and Pompeii
The primary mission of the Acton Institute since its inception has been identifying and revealing both traditional and innovative tonics to ward off Lord Acton’s dictum: “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” In fact, the manner in which we wield our power over one another, our environment and God’s other creatures defines our humanity, or, in other words, who we are as individuals and social creatures. bined tradition teaches us that humanity was not created by...
Acton Briefs: Summer 2018
A collection of short essays by Acton writers, click a link to jump to that article: AU and building the free society by Jenna Suchyta Westminster Abbey praises God for the NHS by Noah Gould President Trump nominates Judge Brett Kavanaugh by Joe Carter AU and building the free society Jenna Suchyta, Acton Institute Intern Over 1,000 people flocked to Grand Rapids June 18-21 to listen to more than 80 inspiring faculty members lecture on a wide variety of...
Sister Mary Kenneth Keller
For the first time, we can now mechanically simulate the cognitive process. –Sister Mary Kenneth Keller Sister Mary Kenneth Keller established herself as a strong influence in the world puter science at a time when women in the field were unheard of. At the same time, her work paved the way for what we now understand as the information economy – a key driver of wealth creation. She was the first woman in the United States to earn a...
The politics of apocalypse
Disarmageddon” is what The Economist earlier this year called placent, reckless leaders” who “have forgotten how valuable it is to restrain nuclear weapons.” The politics of nuclear weapons – deterrence doctrines, mutually assured destruction and so on – have been the obsessive stuff of international politics since the Manhattan Project. There is, as Alissa Wilkinson and I argue in our 2015 book How to Survive the Apocalypse, something unique about the nuclear age, in which it es terrifyingly clear...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved