Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
From Babel to Babylon: God’s Problem With Centralized Power
From Babel to Babylon: God’s Problem With Centralized Power
Sep 21, 2024 5:47 AM

The Bible does not have a detailed plan for how the government of a modern nation of 300 million people should operate. If you’re looking for specifics on what the United States’ tariff policy with Finland ought to be, you’re plum out of luck. If you want canonical guidance as to the precise degree of control the filibuster should have over legislative proceedings in the U.S. Senate, you’re barking up the wrong tree.

With plenty of issues in the socio-political and economic realms left unaddressed, the earnest Believer is building upon the certain, clear-cut revelations in Scripture as he or she constructs a cohesive worldview. We must work to avoid the temptation to let emotional responses dictate what policies and practices we will adopt as individuals, families, and as a nation.

The story of the Tower of Babel in Genesis 11 is a very important piece of that “What does God have to say about politics/economics?” puzzle that Christians have wrestled with for thousands of years.

Verses 1 and 2:

1Now the whole earth had one language and the same words. 2And as people migrated from the east, they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there.

Up until this point in human history, God had been explicitly clear that humans were supposed to “fill the earth and subdue it.” His plan was for mankind to utilize all of creation for their benefit and His glory. They were to depend on Him and follow His lead. But as soon as sin entered the world, so did death, worry, and anxiety over life’s many trials and tribulations. Human beings naturally feel a sense fort and security when we’re in a group, and that isn’t a bad thing. Our Lord himself taught that where two or more Believers are gathered in His name, there He is also. However, there is a flip-side to that coin. When fallen people get together, there rampant sin can be found as well. The very fact that the people referred to in these opening verses were congregating in one central location was a collectively disobedient act. Things immediately went from “bad” to “blasphemous.”

3And they said to one another, “Come, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly.” And they had brick for stone, and bitumen for mortar. 4Then they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth.”

The problem here is that the intention was to flaunt their perceived independence and self-sufficiency apart from their Creator. They specifically challenged God’s “fill the earth” decree, and their challenge emanated from the notion that if they could just collectivize their resources, talents, and intellect, they would be able to cheat the realities of a fallen world. Their technological development and advancements in social engineering seduced them into believing that “the state” could replace The Maker.

5And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of man had built. 6And the LORD said, “Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language, and this is only the beginning of what they will do. And nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. 7Come, let us go down and there confuse their language, so that they may not understand one another’s speech.” 8So the LORD dispersed them from there over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city.

There is a lot to unpack there, so for the sake of time, let me simply point out that God thinks so lowly of mankind trying to form itself into one governing body that He is willing to confuse the world with different languages just to prove His point. The same pride pelled Satan to abandon the glories of heaven for the false and empty hope of “making a name” for himself fueled the hearts of the people who spearheaded the Babel initiative in this passage. God gave these people a chance to obey Him and when they didn’t there was punishment.

9Therefore its name was called Babel, because there the LORD confused the language of all the earth. And from there the LORD dispersed them over the face of all the earth.

God is going to have His way, in spite of our best intentions or worst behavior. The word “Babel” is the same used for the city of Babylon referenced in both the Old and New Testaments. In that context it is always used to depict and/or describe humankind’s longing to dethrone God and establish a heaven-on-earth here without Him. From Babel to Babylon, Genesis to Revelation, the unholy obsession with setting up global, governing entities to supplant God (and his ordained institutions like the family, the local church, etc.) and bring glory to ourselves is simply (and sadly) a reality of life.

Human-created governments and systems of economy have been, and will be, used by God as part of His unfolding plan of salvation, judgment, and renewal. If God is “leery” of centralized power and control in the hands of a handful of people who wish to re-make the world in their own image – an image that rejects God’s authority, undermines His sacred institutions, and corrodes human society – shouldn’t we be leery as well?

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Pandering: The politician’s pastime
What if someone told you “politicians sacrifice long-term economic performance for individual, political gain”? Many people would yawn (or sigh) and say this is obvious, or perhaps they would say it’s obvious with respect to the politicians in that otherpolitical party (the one that opposes their own). Nathan Jensen and Edmund Malesky, however, have not only made the claim quoted above, they’ve set out to prove it through hard data and careful argumentation in their book Incentives to Pander: How...
10 facts about homelessness in America
The homeless represent the most vulnerable portion of Americans living in poverty. The latest U.S. government report on homelessness shows that a culture ofsecularism and statism isdepriving Americans of church philanthropy, curbing the free market’s ability to provide,and leaving the most vulnerablereliant on the government – or the mercy of the streets. The Council of Economic Advisers detailed their conditions in itsreporton “The State of Homelessness in America,” released last week. It found that “rent controls” may have priced homeless...
Sohrab Ahmari’s biggest mistake
The debate between Sohrab Ahmari and David French has sparked a useful conversation about the means and ends of liberty. In that discussion, both men make valid criticisms and both sometimes fall short, but a recent column by Ahmari reveals perhaps the most glaring error in his perspective. Ahmari believes both economic interventionists (“progressive liberals”) and those who oppose state intervention (“conservative liberals”) share the same goal of maximizing freedom apart from state coercion. AtFirst Things, he writes: Progressiveliberals are...
Remember the trees
In this week’s Acton Commentary I argue that pathos and politics isn’t enough to address the contemporary challenges of environmental stewardship in general and climate change in particular. I point to the necessity to recognize the gifts and responsibilities that God has given to humanity. This includes natural resources like trees and human endowments like ingenuity and creativity. And in case you think remembering the trees is too basic of an idea, I will say that I once attended an...
Wilfred McClay on friendship new and old
What is friendship? What does it mean to be or to have a friend? And why does Aristotle consider friendship a virtue and an important for political life? Wilfred McClay has a nice essay on friendship at the Hedgehog Review, where he reflects on the title of the song “My New, Old Friend.” McClay writes that he initially did not like the idea of a“new old friend,” first because true friendship is rare and takes time to develop, and second...
The Saddleback story: When a ‘call to missions’ results in entrepreneurship
When David Munson was 19 years old, he went on a missions trip and was sure he had discovered his ultimate vocation. “I just knew I wanted to do ministry for the rest of my life,” he says. Soon thereafter, he moved to Mexico to teach English as a way to kickstart his life in foreign missions. Yet through a range of unexpected encounters, he found himself designing leather products and selling them out of his truck. The weirdest part:...
5 key points of Donald Trump’s UN religious freedom remarks
President Donald Trump addressed the Global Call to Protect Religious Freedom on Monday, ing the first U.S. president to host a United Nations meeting on religious liberty. The heads of state of more than 130 nations and UN Secretary-General António Guterres attended. Here are five key themes of his address: 1. Rights are unalienable, because e from God. “The United States is founded on the principle that our rights do e from government; e from God. This immortal truth is...
The UK Supreme Court’s dangerous ruling
This morning, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom ruled unanimously that Boris Johnson unlawfully suspended Parliament and annulled hisorder to prorogue. Today’s Supreme Court decision holds deep importance for Brexit, EU corruption, and the rule of law. The Supreme Court branded Prime Minister Johnson’s order to prorogue Parliament “unlawful” and declared it null and void. Members of Parliament were told to act as though it had never taken place. Speaker John Bercow announced Parliament will return to session tomorrow...
Fact check: Did ‘austerity’ kill 120,000 people?
Did stingy UK mit “economic murder” by slashing NHS funding? A clip of a self-described Communist accusing the government of killing 120,000 people has gone viral, but the facts do not bear out her contention. Ash Sarkar, who scored a glowing profile inTeen Vogueafter calling herself “literally a Communist,” made ment on the BBC programQuestion Time: Austerity was not just a bloodless balancing of the books it was paid for with people’s lives, 120,000 people. The reason why I’m so...
Bailouts, moral hazards, and the scapegoating of the taxpayer
If pandering is the politicians’pastime, then we owe a special debt of gratitude to those who resist this seemingly irresistible force. Today, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson confirmed that he refused to extenda £150 million government bailout to preventThomas Cook, the world’s oldest travel agency, from going bankrupt. Moreover, the prime minister explained his actions in both economic and moral terms. “It is perfectly true that a request was made to the government for a subvention of about £150 million​,”...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved