Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
For St. John Paul II’s 100th birthday, Italy gets gift of religious freedom
For St. John Paul II’s 100th birthday, Italy gets gift of religious freedom
Nov 22, 2025 7:44 PM

Today, May 18, is a very good day, indeed. It is a heroic day for the Italian Catholic Church on the 100th anniversary of Pope St. John Paul II’s birth. There could not be a better birthday gift from a saint who, fluent in 13 languages, was a veritable Paraclete-on-earth. He spoke courageously and often, raising his voice against persecution of religious freedom. He did so not just in his munist Poland, but throughout the entire secularized world.

By the beginning of the 1990s, John Paul II and his allies had won the war on religious freedom when atheistic, Marxist regimes fell across Eastern Europe. But fast-forward 30 years, and the same battle has sprung right back up unexpectedly in the name of preserving public health during a pandemic.

John Paul II’s spirit dwells among us

After over two and half months of ardent appeals, fines, police raids, and civil disobedience by the faithful and pastors alike during the COVID-19 lockdown, public Masses have finally resumed–at least in Italy. In these days of personal trial, the spirit of St. John Paul II has dwelt among us. His words echoed in our troubled hearts, as we remember him exhorting leaders at the height of the Cold War in his 1988 World Day of Peace Message:

Religious freedom, an essential requirement of the dignity of every person, is a cornerstone of the structure of human rights, and for this reason an irreplaceable factor in the good of individuals and of the whole of society, as well as of the personal fulfillment of each individual. It follows that the freedom of individuals munities to profess and practice their religion is an essential element for peaceful human coexistence. … The civil and social right to religious freedom, inasmuch as it touches the most intimate sphere of the spirit, is a point of reference for the other fundamental rights and in some way es a measure of them.

Moreover, every violation of religious freedom, whether open or hidden, does fundamental damage to the cause of peace, like violations of the other fundamental rights of the human person. Forty years after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to memorated next December, we have to admit that millions of people in various parts of the world are still suffering for their religious convictions: They are victims of repressive and oppressive legislation, victims sometimes of open persecution, but more often of subtle forms of discrimination aimed at believers munities. This state of affairs, in itself intolerable, is also a bad omen for peace.

Boiling point

The tension between the Italian government and the nation’s Catholic bishops has reached that same boiling point as they did in 1988, if not higher. As proof, hear this video tirade by outspoken Bishop Giovanni D’Ercole of Ascoli Piceno. In his very strong language of a few weeks ago, D’Ercole slammed the Italian government for not reopening churches sooner. He insisted houses of worship were “places of hope” and that the Church wanted “no more favors” from the state but only their natural rights back.

Last May 4, Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte announced a gradual reopening of Italy with no mention of resuming church services in his government’s Fase Due (Phase 2) objectives, thus reneging on his promises. The Italian bishops fumed in unison. They now all stood together with righteous indignity. They no longer wanted to be known to the world as submissive “good and faithful servants” of a secular state administration that no longer viewed the sacraments as “essential” to health, even if suicides in Italy had begun to spike due to ongoing spiritual despair.

Three days later, on May 7, an historic agreement was reached. As Associated Press vaticanista Philip Pullella reported:

Tensions ran high again late last month when the government announced a gradual staged easing of the lockdown but did not include a return to Masses in a phase that began on May 4. The bishops told the government they could “not accept seeing the exercise of freedom of religion promised.” … With Thursday’s [May 7] agreement, Masses for the public can resume on May 18 but under strict conditions outlined in a protocol signed by Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte and Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti, president of the Italian Bishops Conference.

Any further delays in reopening Italian churches for public worship would surely have led to the revolt of both clerics and laity against the state. Creative solutions to avoid spreading the contagion between the faithful, as with parking lot celebrations in the United States, were not practical in Italy nor in line with Italy’s cultural mores. Religious processions, from Naples to Milan, had been halted immediately or interrupted by police for reasons of “illegal assembly.” Streamed worship services were a popular substitute at first, but parents had quickly grown weary of their children misbehaving and generally being distracted in the non-consecrated space of their living rooms, prompting some websites to give tips for keeping children attentive during online Masses.

First Mass: Witness from the JP II Generation

This morning, an 8 a.m. service was the first Mass I attended in 71 days–70 days too many for a man born and raised in the “JP II Generation.” I had fought for this long-awaited day. I voiced my opinions clearly and without fear, just like the Great Communicator from Poland had asked, in order to return and assemble in worship.

At Mass, I was one of roughly 50 people present, triple the usual attendance for a Monday service. I was panied by pangs of “guilty privilege,” knowing millions of Catholics, and billions believers of other religious backgrounds, remained shut out of their churches. Constitutions that normally enshrine and protect a citizen’s God-given religious liberty have been largely ignored by politicians.

Today, I witnessed how the Italian state and Roman Catholic Church could work together. It wasn’t a perfect union, nor was I in agreement with all the health directives, but I was respectful and overjoyed to be in the house of Christ again.

Passing through the main entrance, I was motioned with a finger-wag that I had done something wrong. I was unaware I had to enter now through a side door. The reason? At this secondary entrance was my parish’s hand sanitizing station. There must have been signs redirecting me, but I was too eager and my faith-filled mind had e numb reading the fine details of so many avvisi pubblici over the last three months.

The parish monitor insisted again about something else. She kept gesturing to me but couldn’t vocalize her concern through a tightly fitted face mask. Then she mimed lathering her hands, which I immediately understood to mean I needed to wash my own hands. However, I had already done so three times that morning. A fellow parishioner turned around and mercifully squeezed some gel onto my digits, which I rubbed to the count of 20.

I was given the nod (presumably with a smile behind the lady’s mask) and was pointed to my seat.

Another public health misstep I made was sitting in the middle of an empty pew. Again, my focus was so intense on the tabernacle and opening prayers that I hadn’t noticed the white squares scotch-taped on the top armrests of each pew, exactly three meters apart and two per bench. I was motioned to move to the end of the pew. I plied, scooting over another meter to social distance from my brothers and sisters in Christ.

We kept our face masks on for the duration of the service. That much I conformed to intuitively after three months of restrained human contact. With masks on, the responses and hymns were “muffled” to say the least.

There was no exchange of peace, nor did the priest even pronounce the sacred words “now let us offer a sign” but moved on speedily to the Agnus Dei following the Our Father. Faithful turned around anyway to wave a little ciaoand nod at one other. No one tried to shake hands, kiss, or hug. This is still a social distancing “no-no” in the land of baci e abbracci.

The big change was Communion. The priest, before distributing, washed his hands thoroughly with sanitizer and put on his white surgical mask. Then something happened that I have never seen in Italy: Each pew emptied out one row at a time, from the top to the bottom of the church’s nave. It was a perfect imitation of the military order of Communion lines conducted in my native United States. Usually, it is an experience like the streets of Mumbai, where traffic is squeezed onto an avenue from every odd direction simultaneously to create one huge bottleneck. Not so, today!

At the conclusion of Mass, many, like me, stayed for some private prayer and contemplation in our own house of worship. After 10 minutes, an announcement was made that the church would have to be closed for re-sanitizing. Faithful would have to go out the main doors (the same I had mistakenly entered). Some stayed a few more minutes in quiet disobedience to authorities, yet in peaceful obedience to the One Almighty Authority.

As we exited, no one spoke to another, and we went out about our solitary domestic routines. It was a good, new beginning. Above all, it was a rarest of gifts on a great saint’s 100th birthday. John Paul II was certainly smiling in Heaven above. pleanno, San Giovanni Paolo!

Severance)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Explainer: What you need to know about Catalonia’s independence 1-0 referendum
Voters who took part in yesterday’s national 1-0 referendum overwhelmingly supported Catalonia’s independence from Spain, and images of the Spanish National Police brutally suppressing the election have flooded the international media. But any honest accounting of the 1-0 referendum requires a deeper nuance that leaves no party looking heroic. The 1-0 referendum On October 1, Catalonia held an election asking voters,“Do youwantCatalonia to e an independent state in theform of a republic?” Catalonia, which has seen its autonomy wax and...
Radio Free Acton: Tom Lindsay on the future of higher education in America; Upstream on The Devil and Father Amorth
On this week’s episode of Radio Free Acton, Paul Bonicelli, director of programs and education at the Acton Institute talks about Acton’s ing Education & Freedom conference and the future of education in America with Tom Lindsay, director of the Texas Public Policy Foundation’s Center for Higher Education. Then, on the Upstream segment, Bruce Edward Walker talks with Sam Buntz, writer at The Federalist, about “The Devil and Father Amorth,” a new documentary by William Friedkin, director of the classic...
Sec. DeVos defends school choice in speech at Harvard
In a speech last Thursday at the Harvard Kennedy School, U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos made a powerful defense of school choice: One of the many pernicious effects of the growth of government is that its people worry less and less about each other, thinking their worries are now in the hands of so-called “experts” in Washington. There is perhaps no better example than our current education system. Many inside — and outside — government insist a government system...
5 Facts about federal regulations
Vice President Pence will be giving a speech today emphasizing the importance the Trump administration places on reviewing regulatory policy. Today’s date of October 2 was selected to mark the start of the next fiscal year, when federal agencies will be expected to generate below zero dollars in net new regulatory costs. Here are five facts you should know about federal regulations: 1.Regulations are rules that have the force of law and that are issued by various federal government departments...
Audio: Rev. Sirico on the air
Acton President Rev. Robert A. Sirico has been busy on the airwaves of late; here’s a roundup of his latest radio interviews: On September 19th, Rev. Sirico joined hostThaddeus Romansky on RED-C Catholic Radio in Waco and College Station, Texas to discuss patibility of social solidarity and free markets, and the interface of religion and economics more generally. On September 22nd, Rev. Sirico joinedhost Justin Barclay and Samaritas CEO Sam Beals on WOOD Radio’s West Michigan Liveto talk about the...
6 ways economic freedom benefits the global poor
Even most critics admit the free market is the greatest wealth-generating system in history, but they say the poor benefit more from interventionist economic systems. In fact, economic liberty elevates the least well-off in more laissez-faire nations to a better position than those living in unfree economies based on such factors as average e, life expectancy, literacy, and other forms of personal liberty. The data bearing out each point are contained in theFraser Institute’s most recent“Economic Freedom of the World”...
The social welfare of price discrimination
Note: This is post #51 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Is price discrimination bad for society? How does it affect output, and what is its effect on social welfare? If price discrimination increases output, it is likely beneficial for society. If output isn’t increased, social welfare is reduced. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, economist Tyler Cowen consider the effect of price discrimination. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching...
No, it’s not absurd for conservatives to worry about socialism
The Library of Law and Liberty has published a pilation of essays that address the recent claims made by First Things editor, Rusty Reno, about Michael Novak and his understanding of capitalism. In pilation, Michael Matheson Miller, research fellow at the Acton Institute, writes that Reno’s view of Novak is an inaccurate “caricature” and “misses the point.” Reno was incorrect on several points he made about Novak and the present state of the economy, including his characterizing Novak as a...
What is ‘economic man’?
“Intellectuals are often vocal critics of capitalism. Most of them lean left politically, so it is easy to identify anti-capitalism with progressivism,” says Kishore Jayabalan in this week’s Acton Commentary. “It is therefore no coincidence that the modern welfare state has been administered by elites eager to correct supposed market failures on the way to a more egalitarian society. Leftist elites tend to be university professors rather than captains of industry, but elites they remain.” How, then, are we to...
How Christians can bridge the gap between work and wage
As Target races against Walmart to voluntarily raise its minimum wage to $15 per hour, we’re reminded that upward fluctuations in the price of low-skilled labor are more than possible without the blunt interference of government control (and its deleterious side effects). Even still, critics will predictably proclaim that such changes are far too little, too late, arguing that the government plays a valuable role in accelerating these developments when employers fall short. Or, as one of economist Don Boudreaux’s...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved