Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Finding wisdom in Barack Obama fanfiction
Finding wisdom in Barack Obama fanfiction
Apr 26, 2025 12:39 AM

We need to stop daydreaming about Egypt and face the wilderness.

Read More…

This diatribe was inspired by the most amusing book I’ve ever encountered. While perusing the wares of a D.C. bookstore, I came across a tome entitled Hope Never Dies by New York Times bestselling author Andrew Shaffer, released in 2018. It isn’t an inspirational feel-good-about-your-life how-to or workout guide that makes weird forays into the philosophical. It is, and you are reading this correctly, a work of presidential fanfiction.

For those of you unfamiliar, here is a brief summary paraphrased from the book’s back cover:

It’s been several months since the 2016 presidential election, and “Uncle Joe” Biden is puttering around his house, feeling lost and adrift in an America that doesn’t make sense anymore. But when his favorite Amtrak conductor dies in a suspicious accident, Joe leaps into the role of amateur sleuth, with a little help from his old friend President Barack Obama (code name: Renegade). Together they’ll plumb the darkest depths of Delaware as they uncover the sinister forces advancing America’s opioid epidemic.

The book is definitely as weird as it sounds. After Finn Donnelly, Joe Biden’s favorite train conductor, is found dead on the train tracks with a bag of heroin in his pocket, the former vice president jumps into action to solve what he believes to be a murder. Partnering with Barack Obama in an attempt to rekindle their best friendship from years in the White House, and joined by trusty Secret Service agent “Steve,” the crew encounters outlaw biker gangs, breaks into cheap motels, and uncovers a sinister drug-related plot involving corrupt cops. The plot includes such antics as Barack Obama clocking bikers on the side of the head with a shotgun, Joe Biden interrogating a subway shoeshiner for information about overdosed Amtrak colleagues, and men being thrown out of hundred-mile-an-hour trains and surviving to attempt murder on the esrtwhile vice president.

One dream sequence involves Barack Obama in a white toga astride a rainbow unicorn. I am not making this up. Page 244, should you care to check. This is what my journalistic career e to.

The book ends with the case solved and Biden realizing that his success—despite bungling most of it and being rebuked by the gruff law-and-order Lt. Selena Esposito (the only openly Republican character in the book, who of course ends up being in the wrong)—may have inspired him to get back into the rat race of American politics. Was this not fiction, I know I’d have some questions for Shaffer.

I’ll leave it there, as this isn’t a conventional book review (nor a conventional book, as you can see). You’ll have to go to a Barnes & Noble and thumb through it for yourself for more (I doubt you’ll end up buying it). In the end, Shaffer makes clear that the book is nothing more than lighthearted writing intended to bring amusement to the reader. The existence of such books, dubbed “escapist fantasy” by one reviewer, does seem to raise naturally such questions as, What lies beneath the surface of our desires for political escapism? Is it beneficial to spend time pining for days past, for the leaders of bygone eras who may have tickled our fancy or warmed our hearts by their perceived greatness? Those are the issues I prefer to explore a little more deeply, instead of just knocking down a Barack Obama—Joe Biden mystery novel. That would be taking-candy-from-a-baby levels of easy.

The desire to return to past political ages is always one that takes on extra significance during election season. Much has been made of the extent to which Donald Trump holds sway over the Republican Party for the election cycles of 2022 and 2024, and it’s not much of a stretch to venture that the popularity of Barack Obama paved at least part of the way for his vice president to return to the White House in 2020. To an extent, it’s understandable: For diehard political supporters on either side, it’s very easy to conclude that simply placing one’s preferred candidate into the current political milieu will result in some noticeable uptick in quality of life.

It’s pelling notion of the good old days. If you were an ardent Obama supporter bemoaning ing years of the Trump administration (Hope Never Dies was released in 2018), it’s very easy to think that if Trump were miraculously replaced by Obama, all the perceived Trump negatives—racially insensitive rhetoric, Charlottesville, James Comey, Russia—would instantaneously disappear and America would enter a racially harmonious, forward-thinking phase of history, which for many Obama symbolized.

If you’re a diehard Trump supporter, however, bemoaning the Biden administration, it’s easy to imagine that if Biden suddenly disappeared and was replaced by Trump, all the issues that the current administration struggles with (inflation, high gas prices, mass migration at the border) would slowly but surely dissipate as MAGA power took effect.

Astute readers will shake their heads at the examples given, and for good reason—they’re all absurdly imaginary. Sheer nostalgia and fairy dust memories of the “good old days” are soon head-butted by reality. Gas would not immediately drop to $2 a gallon tomorrow if Trump came back into control of the Oval Office today. America would not return to an optimistic, racially reconciled utopia if Obama returned as leader of the free world. (It wasn’t even a utopia when he wasin office, but that’s another argument.)

These are obvious premises to Americans who aren’t particularly devoted to a party line or politician, but events even within the past two years have demonstrated that devotion to a politician or party can easily spill over from mere fanfiction reading and pixie dust into real violence that reminds the country of how truly polarized we’ve e. The type of people who launch insurrections at the Capitol or perpetrate vandalism and arson against pro-life pregnancy centers didn’t simply wake up one day and decide to do it. They’re urged on, by social media, groupthink, negative polarization, and our own natural human tendency to be dysfunctional. Political violence is political escapism applied—if the good old days are truly better, it’s a very short logical jump to doing whatever it takes to bring those good old days back, even if they’re not nearly as good as we remembered.

In his magnificent essay in The Atlantic, Jonathan Haidt writes about how America e to resemble the earth after the events of the Tower of Babel, as described in the Old Testament. “What would it be like to live in Babel in the days after its destruction?” Haidt asks. “We know. It is a time of confusion and loss. But it is also a time to reflect, listen, and build. … We must change ourselves and munities.”

That’s what lies at the heart of our political escapism: fort with our current situation and a fleeting hope that maybe the past was a better deal. But yet we cannot escape to that past. Like the Israelites of that same Old Testament, we are no longer in the land of Egypt eating the cucumbers and leeks of Pharaoh. We are in fact wandering far from that supposedly golden past, in a social landscape that often feels like a wilderness. But even as the Israelites conveniently forgot that the cucumbers and leeks of Pharaoh came with the stinging whips of slavery, our past isn’t so rosy and free from trial either. Perhaps, like them, it’s for us to shoulder the reality we’ve been given, unite munities around the values that we share, and face the wilderness.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Constitutional Cases and the Four Cardinal Virtues
Should virtue be a consideration in judicial decisionmaking? Indiana Law Professor R. George Wright makes an intriguing argument for why the four cardinal virtues could be useful in interpreting constitutional cases: Judges typically decide constitutional cases by referring to one or more legal precedents, rules, tests, principles, doctrines, or policies. This Article mends supplementing this standard approach with fully legitimate and appropriate attention to what many cultures have long recognized as the four basic cardinal virtues of practical wisdom or...
Let’s Change Hearts and Minds (and Laws, Too)
Few clichés are so widespread within the evangelical subculture, says Matthew Lee Anderson, as the notion that our witness must be one of “changing hearts and minds.” In careful hands, the idea is at best ambiguous. At worst it reinforces the sort of interior-oriented individualism that allows for and perpetuates a blissful naivete about how institutions and structures shape our dispositions and thoughts. In less than careful hands, the phrase drives a wedge between law and culture by attempting to...
Integral Human Development
The Journal of Markets & Morality is planning a theme issue for the Spring of 2013: “Integral Human Development,” i.e. the synthesis of human freedom and responsibility necessary for the material and spiritual enrichment of human life. According to Pope Benedict XVI, Integral human development presupposes the responsible freedom of the individual and of peoples: no structure can guarantee this development over and above human responsibility. (Caritas in Veritate 17) There is a delicate balance between the material and the...
Is Work a Curse?
Is work a curse, a result of mankind’s fall from grace? Not according to the Book of Genesis. As Hugh Whelchel, Executive Director of the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, explains, what Adam was called to do in the garden is what we are still called to do in our work today: Humanity was created by God to cultivate and keep God’s creation, which included developing it and protecting it. You see, we were created to be stewards of...
Obamacare’s Religious Rubes
The White House has a plan to mobilize prayer vigils in front of the Supreme Court in defense of Obamacare. It was reported that the administration met with leaders at non-profit organizations and religious officials who support the new health care law. The court takes up the constitutional test of the health care mandate in a couple of weeks. The mandate has now been challenged in 26 states. Cue the same stale big government religious prophets who confuse statism and...
Italy’s Tax Man Takes Aim at the Vatican
Kishore Jayabalan, the Acton Institute’s Rome office director, was interviewed by the Zenit news agency in an article titled, “Is Taxing the Church a Real Solution for Italy?” In the article, Jayabalan discusses the history of the Italian state and its imposition of property taxes on the Roman Catholic Church’s land holdings, residences and non-profit businesses. Sometimes in the past, particularly under Napoleonic rule and before the Lateran Pacts, the institution of property tax was often a subject of state...
How to Steal a Bike in New York City
Edmund Burke didn’t really say it, but it still rings true: All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. In a test of this maxim, filmmaker Casey Neistat tries to steal his own bike in several locations around New York City and finds that most people do nothing about it—even when it’s done right in front of a police station. I recently spent a couple of days conducting a bike theft experiment, which...
Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Threat to Freedom
Over at the Liberty Law Blog, there is an excellent post titled “Ronald Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Dialogue of Liberty” by Alan Snyder. Snyder delves into the influence Chambers had on Reagan and how their worldviews differed as well. Many conservatives and scholars felt Chambers’ prediction that the West was on the losing side of history in the battle against Marxism collapsed after the fall of the Iron Curtain and the Soviet Union. For many, the ideas of Chambers...
Lord Acton and the Power of the Historian
Looking through my back stacks of periodicals the other day I ran across a review in Books & Culture by David Bebbington, “Macaulay in the Dock,” of a recent biography of Thomas Babington Macaulay. The essay takes its point of departure in Lord Acton’s characterization of Macaulay as “one of the greatest of all writers and masters, although I think him utterly base, contemptible and odious.” As Bebbington writes, “Acton, a towering intellectual of the later 19th century, was at...
How to Love Liberty More Than a Libertarian Economist
I have a deep and abiding love for liberty—which is why I find myself so often in disagreement with libertarians. Libertarians love liberty too, of course, but they tend to love liberty a bit differently. I love liberty in an earthy, elemental way. I love liberty because I need it—like I need air and food—for human flourishing. In contrast, the libertarians I’ve encountered tend to love liberty primarily as an abstraction. Indeed, the most ideologically consistent libertarians I know seem...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved