Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Families pay more in taxes than for food, clothing, and housing combined: Study
Families pay more in taxes than for food, clothing, and housing combined: Study
Jan 9, 2026 10:14 PM

The necessities of life include food, water, clothing, and shelter … but should the government cost more than all of them put together? A new study has found that politicians extract more in taxes than working families pay for their basic human needs.

Canadian families paid more to the tax collectorthan they did to the farmer, the grocer, the landlord, and the seamstress to sustain life itself, according to a new study from the Fraser Institute, a free market think tank.

The tax burden in Canada has risen 158 percent in inflation-adjusted dollars since 1961, the report states.

The situation is a reversal from just a few years ago. “In 1961, the average family spent 56.5 percent of its cash e to pay for shelter, food, and clothing. In the same year, 33.5 percent of the family’s e went to governments as tax,” the study says. The point of parity came in 1981, when Canadians paid an even 40.5 percent of their e on necessities and government.

After 1992, the costs began to trade places. “The situation in 2016 is reversed from 1961: the average family spent 37.4 percent of its e on the necessities of life while 42.5 percent of its e went to taxes.”

The good news is that the cost of necessities has fallen through the transformative power of the free market. The bad news is that government has grown, both overall as well as a percentage of e expenditure.

Significantly, the tax burden rose faster than household e during the same period.

The institute calculates the annual Canadian Consumer Tax Index by adding the amount families pay in an array of federal, provincial, and local taxes – including taxes on e, healthcare, sales taxes, property taxes, fuel and carbon taxes, vehicles, alcohol and tobacco “sin” taxes, tariffs, and many other government levies.

“Although businesses pay [many of] these taxes directly, the cost of business taxation is ultimately passed onto ordinary Canadians,” the institute rightly notes.

A similar situation holds across the transatlantic sphere. The Tax Foundation, which calculates the annual date of Tax Freedom Day in the U.S., states that Americans collectively spend more on taxes than necessities (although the burden does not fall evenly).

Tax Freedom Day in the es (sometimes much) later yet, although food prices are also (somewhat) higher.

Government undoubtedly provides stability and order necessary for a civilized life. But given that earners on both sides of the Atlantic are paying more to politicians than for food, the Fraser Institute asks a simple question: “Are you getting good value for your tax dollars?”

The answer for Canadian families is open to debate. Take, as but one example, the crown of Canadian government: its national healthcare system, known as Medicare.

Quebec had the worst emergency room waiting times in the Western world, according to a report from the province’s health and missioner, Robert Salois, which was released last June. More than a third (35 percent) of patients spend five hours in the ER waiting for care, and as many as another third (30 percent) leave without ever seeing a doctor.In fact, the Canadian Institute for Health Information found that 10 percent of Canadian ER visitors in 2014 had to wait 28 hours to get a bed. The UK’s NHS waiting times have e notorious. The U.S. wait time is a fraction of those in either nation.

The ER wait is illustrative of other mandatory waits that arise from the rationing that inevitably follows the socialization of any good or service.

Rather than risk their health,an estimated 1.4 percent of patients (63,459 Canadians) left the country to obtain healthcare last year, according to another report released by the Fraser Institute in June. That’s an increase from 2015.

This is but one government program, albeit a large (and growing) one.

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation reports that politicians approved other, less worthy taxpayer-funded ventures in 2017, such as:

Provincial – The Government of Quebecpaid a political appointee $180,000 per year for nearly four years even though she almost never went to work;Federal – Canada Revenue Agency for employee’s $538,000 moving expenses; andFederal – The Department of Canadian missioned a $14,000 survey on Parliament Hill’s Christmas light show.

Forcing working families to divert their hard-earned money to such projects is wasteful and raises moral issues. Market distortions caused by unnecessary government intervention reduce the efficiency of the market – and es at a real price to families. An intrusive public sector bureaucratizes the care of the poor and robs subsidiary institutions of their role and, in the case of churches, their divinely appointed vocation. Government leaders similarly may violate their duties to be wise and just stewards of their citizens’ resources by multiplying projects, boondoggles that too often favor their crony contributors, and wealth transfer programs.

“Public authority therefore would act unjustly and inhumanly, if in the name of taxes it should appropriate from the property of private individuals more than is equitable,” Pope Leo XIII wrote in Rerum Novarum. He further instructed rulers to assure that “private wealth is not drained away by crushing taxes of every kind.”

He did not specify a precise level of taxation. However, when thegovernment requires more of its families than they spend to feed, clothe, and house themselves, that threshold has likely been met.

Keightley. CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
5 facts about Russian President Vladimir Putin
President Donald Trump met today with Vladimir Putin for a summit in Helsinki, Finland. Here are five facts you should know aboutthe powerful and controversialRussian president. 1.Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin was born in Cold War era Russia in 1952. His mother worked in a factory during World War II, and his father was drafted into the army,where he served on a submarine fleet. During his younger years, Putinwas an atheist. He says he turned to the church after two major accidents...
How politics becomes religion
In his new article for the Catholic World Report, Samuel Gregg, Research Director for the Acton Institute, argues that many in the world today have replaced politics with religion. One result of this is disproportionate outrage and scandal over political events, such as Brett Kavanaugh’s recent nomination to the United States Supreme Court. On the other hand, replacing religion with politics can also lead to a watered-down, “prudentialized” theology that ignores moral absolutes and weakens the bonds of faith. Gregg...
Tim Keller on the ‘saltiness’ of self-denial in the modern age
What does it look like for Christians to be “salt and light” in the modern age? In the recent keynote address at the National Parliamentary Prayer Breakfast, Tim Keller spoke to Prime Minister Theresa May and over 140 MPs about the cultural influence of Christianity, past and future. “What can Christianity offer our society in the 21st century?” asks Keller, who will be the guest speaker at the Acton Institute’s 28th Annual Dinnerthis October. “And I’d like to answer that...
We can separate church and state, but not religion and politics
All our politics is religious, says Jonathan Leeman. “Neutrality is a bluff, he adds, “We are all sectarians (and conversations in the public square will e more honest when everyone names their ‘sect’). . . . Whoever gets to define which issues are ‘religious’ gets to rigs the game.” Should we therefore conclude that the the U. S. Constitution’s “no religious test for public office” clause is nothing more than an ideological power play? “Not at all,” says Leeman: In...
How the UN Report on extreme poverty in America goes astray
During the 38th Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), on June 18 – July 6, 2018, the UN Special Rapporteur, an Englishman by the name of Philip Alston, presented a report on poverty in the United States, the full text of which may be read here. This report, based on a two-week fact-finding mission to various locations in the United States and interviews with local, state, and federal politicians and civil servants, represents the official UN view...
How a Colorado business is welcoming refugees
Debates continue to rage about immigration policy and the best way to manage our range of migrant and refugee crises. Yet much of our solution-seeking seems intently focused on the levers of government. Whatever side of the political divide,we continue to hear Biblical justifications for a range of policy solutions. But however important those political considerations may be, we should remember that our basic ethic of Christian hospitality doesn’t rely or depend on decisions or decrees from the halls of...
Vladimir Putin is winning over (anti-capitalist) Catholics
“Tomorrow I leave this land of hope and return to our Western countries – the countries of despair,” wrote George Bernard Shaw as he prepared to depart Stalin’s Soviet Union in 1931. Many Western intellectuals idolized the USSR as a viable economic alternative to the free market – and a certain variety of Western Catholic now sees Vladimir Putin as the leader of an analogous movement. At the Acton Institute’s Religion & Liberty Transatlantic website, Stefano Magni writes: [I]t is...
How patents, prizes and subsidies affect idea creation
Note: This is post #85 in a weekly video series on basic economics. The last entry in this series considered how institutions can incentivize the creation of new ideas. Because of this connection, the Founding Fatherswrote a protection mechanism for new ideas into the U.S. Constitution in the form of patents. But arepatents the only (or even best) way to reward good ideas? In this video by Marginal Revolution University,Alex Tabarrok examinestwo more incentive options: prizes, and subsidies. (If you...
Can Bitcoin solve the classic problems of money?
The digital currency Bitcoin has not only attracted a lot of interest from investors, but it has raised some intriguing economic and financial questions. Economists and other theorists have long grappled with problems such as inflation, counterfeiting or money laundering. When we are talking about money in a digital world, however, we may have specific problems like scarcity and trust issues. Inflation Bitcoin is based on the underlying block chain technology (see this explainer). Each time a user discovers a...
The Left’s populist pushback
Simply defined, populism is the rebellion of mon man against the outsiders. This vague definition reflects the reality that there are populists of numerous different political persuasions; at its heart, populism is a strategy, not an ideology. Populism is dangerous because its antagonistic framework prevents proper dialogue between different groups; promise allows a morally inferior group to force its views on the people. Populism frequently panies US political movements. The Tea Party, Andrew Jackson’s war on the bank, Occupy Wall...