Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Families pay more in taxes than for food, clothing, and housing combined: Study
Families pay more in taxes than for food, clothing, and housing combined: Study
Jan 7, 2026 10:23 AM

The necessities of life include food, water, clothing, and shelter … but should the government cost more than all of them put together? A new study has found that politicians extract more in taxes than working families pay for their basic human needs.

Canadian families paid more to the tax collectorthan they did to the farmer, the grocer, the landlord, and the seamstress to sustain life itself, according to a new study from the Fraser Institute, a free market think tank.

The tax burden in Canada has risen 158 percent in inflation-adjusted dollars since 1961, the report states.

The situation is a reversal from just a few years ago. “In 1961, the average family spent 56.5 percent of its cash e to pay for shelter, food, and clothing. In the same year, 33.5 percent of the family’s e went to governments as tax,” the study says. The point of parity came in 1981, when Canadians paid an even 40.5 percent of their e on necessities and government.

After 1992, the costs began to trade places. “The situation in 2016 is reversed from 1961: the average family spent 37.4 percent of its e on the necessities of life while 42.5 percent of its e went to taxes.”

The good news is that the cost of necessities has fallen through the transformative power of the free market. The bad news is that government has grown, both overall as well as a percentage of e expenditure.

Significantly, the tax burden rose faster than household e during the same period.

The institute calculates the annual Canadian Consumer Tax Index by adding the amount families pay in an array of federal, provincial, and local taxes – including taxes on e, healthcare, sales taxes, property taxes, fuel and carbon taxes, vehicles, alcohol and tobacco “sin” taxes, tariffs, and many other government levies.

“Although businesses pay [many of] these taxes directly, the cost of business taxation is ultimately passed onto ordinary Canadians,” the institute rightly notes.

A similar situation holds across the transatlantic sphere. The Tax Foundation, which calculates the annual date of Tax Freedom Day in the U.S., states that Americans collectively spend more on taxes than necessities (although the burden does not fall evenly).

Tax Freedom Day in the es (sometimes much) later yet, although food prices are also (somewhat) higher.

Government undoubtedly provides stability and order necessary for a civilized life. But given that earners on both sides of the Atlantic are paying more to politicians than for food, the Fraser Institute asks a simple question: “Are you getting good value for your tax dollars?”

The answer for Canadian families is open to debate. Take, as but one example, the crown of Canadian government: its national healthcare system, known as Medicare.

Quebec had the worst emergency room waiting times in the Western world, according to a report from the province’s health and missioner, Robert Salois, which was released last June. More than a third (35 percent) of patients spend five hours in the ER waiting for care, and as many as another third (30 percent) leave without ever seeing a doctor.In fact, the Canadian Institute for Health Information found that 10 percent of Canadian ER visitors in 2014 had to wait 28 hours to get a bed. The UK’s NHS waiting times have e notorious. The U.S. wait time is a fraction of those in either nation.

The ER wait is illustrative of other mandatory waits that arise from the rationing that inevitably follows the socialization of any good or service.

Rather than risk their health,an estimated 1.4 percent of patients (63,459 Canadians) left the country to obtain healthcare last year, according to another report released by the Fraser Institute in June. That’s an increase from 2015.

This is but one government program, albeit a large (and growing) one.

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation reports that politicians approved other, less worthy taxpayer-funded ventures in 2017, such as:

Provincial – The Government of Quebecpaid a political appointee $180,000 per year for nearly four years even though she almost never went to work;Federal – Canada Revenue Agency for employee’s $538,000 moving expenses; andFederal – The Department of Canadian missioned a $14,000 survey on Parliament Hill’s Christmas light show.

Forcing working families to divert their hard-earned money to such projects is wasteful and raises moral issues. Market distortions caused by unnecessary government intervention reduce the efficiency of the market – and es at a real price to families. An intrusive public sector bureaucratizes the care of the poor and robs subsidiary institutions of their role and, in the case of churches, their divinely appointed vocation. Government leaders similarly may violate their duties to be wise and just stewards of their citizens’ resources by multiplying projects, boondoggles that too often favor their crony contributors, and wealth transfer programs.

“Public authority therefore would act unjustly and inhumanly, if in the name of taxes it should appropriate from the property of private individuals more than is equitable,” Pope Leo XIII wrote in Rerum Novarum. He further instructed rulers to assure that “private wealth is not drained away by crushing taxes of every kind.”

He did not specify a precise level of taxation. However, when thegovernment requires more of its families than they spend to feed, clothe, and house themselves, that threshold has likely been met.

Keightley. CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Anthony Bradley vs. John Edwards’ Poverty Tour
I wrote a ments explaining why John Edwards’ recent poverty tour may serve as good rhetoric but, in the end, demonstrates very poor economic thinking. His ideas essentially represent the failed “war on poverty” initiatives that came out of LBJ’s “Great Society” foolishness. It’s a 2007 remix of a few old, tired, played out ideologies. The programs didn’t work in the 70s and 80s and they won’t work if Edwards es president. Edwards wants to raise the minimum wage to...
Retribution and Forgiveness
Richard John Neuhaus, over at the First Things blog On The Square, posts an excerpt from the ing print edition that excoriates the NAB translation (also noted at Mere Comments). Neuhaus writes of Jesus’ answer in Matt. 18:22 to Peter’s question, “Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother when he sins against me? Up to seven times?” that “Jesus obviously intended hyperbole, indicating that forgiveness is open-ended. Keep on forgiving as you are forgiven by God, for God’s...
From Trash to Treasure
Last week I linked to this R&L item, “The Leaky Bucket: Why Conservatives Need to Learn the Art of Story.” And two weeks ago, I discussed the relationship between environmental stewardship and economics. You may recall that the first story featured in Acton’s Call of the Entrepreneur documentary is that of Brad Morgan, a Michigan dairy farmer. Faced with huge costs to dispose of cow refuse, Morgan’s entrepreneurial vision took hold: “His innovative solution to manure disposal, turning it into...
Nothstine in CSM on the ‘ethanol quick fix’
Ray Nothstine’s mentary on the the ethanol boom and its impact on the poor was published today in the Christian Science Monitor as, “The unintended consequences of the ethanol quick fix.” His timely article was also picked up by a slew of other newspapers and Web sites, including the Bakersfield Californian, the Fresno Bee and the Atlantic City Press. ...
Tony Snow in CT
In the July issue of Christianity Today, White House spokesman Tony Snow offers a moving account of his struggle with colon cancer in “Cancer’s Unexpected Blessings.” Snow, who delivered the keynote speech at the 2001 Acton Annual Dinner, wrote this in response to CT’s question about “the spiritual lessons he has been learning through the ordeal.”: The moment you enter the Valley of the Shadow of Death, things change. You discover that Christianity is not something doughy, passive, pious, and...
Pro-Life Socialism?
For some reason, I had never thought about what pro-life socialist policies might look like. But today, Jim Wallis’s Sojourner’s blog covered a Los Angeles Times story about a strategy shift in the Democratic party to support a House bill “designed not only to prevent unwanted pregnancies, but also to encourage women who do conceive to carry to term.” Passed last week in the House with strong bi-partisan support, the bill provides millions of federal dollars to: • Counsel more...
Bucer, “Care for the Needy”
Readings in Social Ethics: Martin Bucer, De Regno Christi (selections), in Melanchthon and Bucer, Book I, Chapter XIV, “Care for the Needy,” pp. 256-59. References below are to page number. Bucer praises the deacon as an office of the institutional church and an artifact of the early mending it to reestablishment in the evangelical churches: “it was their principal duty to keep a list of all of Christ’s needy in the churches, to be acquainted with the life and character...
Classical Music = Gang Repellant
My local library is apparently having a problem with youth gangs who are using the puters to access social networking sites, such as MySpace and Facebook. The hooligans are defacing each others sites, sending threatening messages, and causing other kinds of trouble. From the Wyoming Advance, “A place that should be safe for children has seen graffiti, assaults, loud and vulgar language, patron intimidation, public sexual encounters, carving gang symbols in furniture, and more.” What is the library to do?...
Affirmation Blankets
Just when you thought America’s Rogerian culture of prostrated self-worship couldn’t get anymore nauseating…. ‘I boldly ask for what I want!’ ….Enter, the Affirmation Blanket. I am almost reluctant to give these people more publicity, but this is way too funny to pass up. Some of my favorite lines are, “I am perfect just the way I am,” (found on the “Serenity” blanket), “Success and prosperity follow me everywhere I go” (from the “Joy” blanket — because we all know...
Who is favored?
My brothers, as believers in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ, don’t show favoritism. Suppose a es into your meeting wearing a gold ring and fine clothes, and a poor man in shabby clothes es in. If you show special attention to the man wearing fine clothes and say, “Here’s a good seat for you,” but say to the poor man, “You stand there” or “Sit on the floor by my feet,” have you not discriminated among yourselves and e judges...