Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What’s the difference between a free trade union and a customs union?
Explainer: What’s the difference between a free trade union and a customs union?
Jan 21, 2026 10:47 PM

On Monday, Great Britain stood poised to enact Brexit with Her Majesty’s blessing. UK Prime Minister Theresa May announced that her government would send the letter officially triggering the UK’s exit from the European Union, in accordance with Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, on March 29 – more than nine months after the British people voted to extract themselves from the global governance institution.

The notification will touch off a two-year-long period of negotiations that will determine the UK’s futurerelationship with the EU – its largest single trading partner, responsible for £220 billion, or 44 percent, of its £510 billion in exports and an outright majority of its imports.

Free trade advocates, ranging from MP Daniel Hannan to the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), suggest the best e would be membership in a European free trade union, but not a customs union.

For non-Europeans, these terms can be confusing. What’s the difference?

Free trade union: A free trade union allows member nations to exchange goods across national boundaries without imposing tariffs or other trade barriers. Otherwise, it respectsmember states’ freedom to negotiate their own trade policies with outside nations.

Customs union: A customs union allows free trade among member nations but imposes a tariff between its collective membership and those outside. Members of the customs union cannot negotiate their own free trade agreements with nations that do not belong to the union.

The European Free Trade Association (EFTA) is a free trade union, while the European Union is a customs union, as well as a body of supranational governance. While EFTA members may export their goods to the EU’s 28 member states tariff-free, they retain the powerto enter into free trade agreements whose terms conflict with those negotiated by Brussels.

EU members must adopt all the regulations as passed in Brussels word-for-word, as well as all the rulings of the European Court of Justice, and are required to allowthe free movement of populations between EU nations. They must also enforce the Common Customs Tariff (CCT), which taxes imports from non-EU members at potentially steep rates. For instance, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) sets average tariffs on agricultural products produced outside Europe at 18 percent – a policy critics say distorts the economy and hurts consumers. “The CAP involves the government in contributing to EU farm subsidies, only a small part of which returns to UK farmers; this money forms part of our EU budget contribution,” writes Economists for Free Trade, whose members include former Margaret Thatcher adviser Patrick Minford. “However, the key damage to the UK economy from the es from the massive raising in farmers’ prices (by some 20 percent according to our and OECD estimates).”

Why it matters: UK officials must now negotiate their ongoing relationship with the EU. As such, they must navigate the narrow and contentious territory between preserving their national sovereignty – which assures that their policies reflect the will of their citizens, rather than that of EU bureaucrats – and maintaining their access to the European market and thus assuring their nations’ prosperity. Striking the right balance will preserve the deep-seated transatlantic values of representative government and economic opportunity and dynamism.

Home Office. This image has been cropped. CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Envy: A Deadly (Economic) Sin
Victor Claar, Acton University lecturer and professor of economics at Henderson State University, will give a talk tonight in Washington, D.C., hosted by AEI, “Grieving the Good of Others: Envy and Economics.” If you are in the area, you are encouraged to attend and hear Dr. Claar as well as two respondents discuss the topic of envy and its moral and economic consequences. Here’s a description of the event: Critics of capitalism often argue that this economic system is irretrievably...
Work as if It Mattered
The conversations over the last few weeks here on work have raised a couple of questions. In the context of criticisms on the perspectives on work articulated by Lester DeKoster and defended by menter John E. asks, “…what is it that you hope readers will change in their lives, and why?” I want to change people’s view of their work. I want them to see how it has value not simply as a means to some other end, but in...
Mandating Monolithic Medicine
Among the warnings sounded as the Democratic health care reform bill was being debated was that the federal insurance mandate included in the bill—even though not national health care per se—would essentially give the federal government control of the insurance industry. The reason: If everyone is forced to buy insurance, then the government must deem what sort of insurance qualifies as adequate to meet the mandate. This piece of Obamacare promises to turn every medical procedure into a major political...
Radio Free Acton: The Stewardship of Art, Part 2
Last week, we posted part 1 of our podcast on the proper Christian stewardship of art; for those who have been waiting for the conclusion, we’re happy to present part 2. David Michael Phelps continues to lead the discussion between Professors Nathan Jacobs and Calvin Seerveld, who previously debated this topic in the Controversy section of our Journal of Markets & Morality. The first portion of that exchange is available at the link for part 1; the remainder of the...
A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I take a look at the prospects of “right-to-work” legislation in Michigan, “A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism.” One of the things that disturbs me the most about what I call “crony unionism” is the hand-in-glove relationship between the labor unions and big government. We have the same kind of special pleading and rent seeking in this system as we do in crony capitalism, but the labor unions enjoy such special protection...
The Daily Show Takes on a Union
The Daily Show exposes some union hypocrisy (HT). In the words of the union local head, es down to greed”: ...
The Politics of Crony Unionism
Last week’s Acton Commentary and blog post focused on my claims about “crony unionism” and how the intimate relationship between Big Labor and Big Government corrupt both. Here’s another instance of the kinds of gross conflicts of interest produced by this relationship: It’s hard to see this as anything but partisan pandering on the part of the largest public sector union, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). Meanwhile, the Washington Post asks, “Was politics behind the...
Rev. Sirico: Respect others’ rights, but also their values
A new column by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, was published today in the Detroit News. This column will also be linked in tomorrow’s Acton News & Commentary. Sign up for the free weekly Acton newsletter here. +++++++++ Faith and policy: Respect others’ rights, but also their values FATHER ROBERT SIRICO If such an award were to be given for the Most Contentious Religious Story of 2010, the two main contenders would undoubtedly be...
Journal of Religion and Business Ethics
The latest issue of the newly launched Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is now available (vol. 1, no. 2). Check out the contents at their website. From the journal’s about page: “The Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is a peer-reviewed journal that examines the ethical and religious issues that arise in the modern business setting. While much attention has been given to the philosophical treatment of business ethics, this is the first journal to address the more inclusive...
Explaining the New Democratic Logo
“The new Democratic logo is so bad that the intellectual rot in the official announcement went largely unnoticed.” The rest of my piece is here at The American Spectator. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved