Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What’s the difference between a free trade union and a customs union?
Explainer: What’s the difference between a free trade union and a customs union?
Jan 4, 2026 9:27 AM

On Monday, Great Britain stood poised to enact Brexit with Her Majesty’s blessing. UK Prime Minister Theresa May announced that her government would send the letter officially triggering the UK’s exit from the European Union, in accordance with Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, on March 29 – more than nine months after the British people voted to extract themselves from the global governance institution.

The notification will touch off a two-year-long period of negotiations that will determine the UK’s futurerelationship with the EU – its largest single trading partner, responsible for £220 billion, or 44 percent, of its £510 billion in exports and an outright majority of its imports.

Free trade advocates, ranging from MP Daniel Hannan to the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), suggest the best e would be membership in a European free trade union, but not a customs union.

For non-Europeans, these terms can be confusing. What’s the difference?

Free trade union: A free trade union allows member nations to exchange goods across national boundaries without imposing tariffs or other trade barriers. Otherwise, it respectsmember states’ freedom to negotiate their own trade policies with outside nations.

Customs union: A customs union allows free trade among member nations but imposes a tariff between its collective membership and those outside. Members of the customs union cannot negotiate their own free trade agreements with nations that do not belong to the union.

The European Free Trade Association (EFTA) is a free trade union, while the European Union is a customs union, as well as a body of supranational governance. While EFTA members may export their goods to the EU’s 28 member states tariff-free, they retain the powerto enter into free trade agreements whose terms conflict with those negotiated by Brussels.

EU members must adopt all the regulations as passed in Brussels word-for-word, as well as all the rulings of the European Court of Justice, and are required to allowthe free movement of populations between EU nations. They must also enforce the Common Customs Tariff (CCT), which taxes imports from non-EU members at potentially steep rates. For instance, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) sets average tariffs on agricultural products produced outside Europe at 18 percent – a policy critics say distorts the economy and hurts consumers. “The CAP involves the government in contributing to EU farm subsidies, only a small part of which returns to UK farmers; this money forms part of our EU budget contribution,” writes Economists for Free Trade, whose members include former Margaret Thatcher adviser Patrick Minford. “However, the key damage to the UK economy from the es from the massive raising in farmers’ prices (by some 20 percent according to our and OECD estimates).”

Why it matters: UK officials must now negotiate their ongoing relationship with the EU. As such, they must navigate the narrow and contentious territory between preserving their national sovereignty – which assures that their policies reflect the will of their citizens, rather than that of EU bureaucrats – and maintaining their access to the European market and thus assuring their nations’ prosperity. Striking the right balance will preserve the deep-seated transatlantic values of representative government and economic opportunity and dynamism.

Home Office. This image has been cropped. CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Trade with China, or Blockade Their Ports?
Congress insults our intelligence when it tells us that Chinese currency games are to blame for our trade deficit with that country and unemployment in our own. Legislators might as well propose a fleet of men-o’-war to navigate the globe and collect all its gold: economics is not a zero-sum game. An exchange on yesterday’s Laura Ingraham Show frames the debate nicely. The host asked Ted Cruz, the conservative Texan running for U.S. Senate, what he thought about the Chinese...
Samuel Gregg: Imitate Sweden’s Economic Liberation, Not Her Failed Socialism
Acton’s director of research Samuel Gregg has a piece over at The American Spectator that may surprise big government liberals. (We know you read this blog.) In “Free Market Sweden, Social Democratic America,” he lays out the history of Sweden’s social democracy — its nature and its effects on the country’s economy — and then draws lessons for the United States. The Scandinavian country isn’t quite the pinko nanny state Americans like to look down upon, and we’ve missed their...
Roger Scruton: No escaping morality in economics
Roger Scruton has written an excellent piece on the moral basis of free markets;it’s up at MercatorNet. He begins with the Islamic proscriptions of interest charged, insurance, and other trade in unreal things: Of course, an economy without interest, insurance, limited liability or the trade in debts would be a very different thing from the world economy today. It would be slow-moving, restricted, paratively impoverished. But that’s not the point: the economy proposed by the Prophet was not justified on...
Why the Journal of Markets & Morality?
In the latest issue of Religion & Liberty, Acton Institute executive direct Kris Mauren answers the question, “Why does the Acton Institute publish the Journal of Markets & Morality?” For more, check out my interview with Micheal Hickerson of the Emerging Scholars Network. You can support the work of the journal by getting a subscription for yourself or mending a subscription to your library of choice. ...
Top 5 Lessons from the Solyndra Failure
The green tech firm Solyndra secured at $535 million federal loan guarantee in 2009 and was touted as an example of a promising green future. A month ago, pany went bankrupt. Here are the top five lessons we should learn from Solyndra’s collapse. 5. Both sides of the aisle are involved. Republican support of federal “investment” is routine — in fact, the DOE program that made Solyndra’s loan was approved by President Bush. It is true that Solyndra’s original application...
Religion & Liberty: An Interview with Metropolitan Jonah
Religion & Liberty’s summer issue featuring an interview with Metropolitan Jonah (Orthodox Church in America) is now available online. Metropolitan Jonah talks asceticism and consumerism and says about secularism, “Faith cannot be dismissed as partmentalized influence on either our lives or on society.” Mark Summers, a historian in Virginia, offers a superb analysis of religion during the American Civil War in his focus on the revival in the Confederate Army. 2011 marks the 150th anniversary of America’s bloodiest conflict. With...
VIDEO: Anthony Bradley on ‘Black and Tired’ at The Heritage Foundation
Acton Research Fellow Dr. Anthony Bradley spoke about his book Black and Tired: Essays on Race, Politics, Culture, and International Development at The Heritage Foundation earlier this month, and the video is now online. Dr. Bradley explained just why he called his book “Black and Tired:” The hopes and dreams, aspirations, virtues, institutions, values, principles that created the conditions that put me here today, are being sabotaged and eroded by those who have good intentions, but often do not think...
Arthur Koestler Here and Now
On The Freeman, PowerBlog contributor Bruce Edward Walker marks the 70th anniversary of the publication of Arthur Koestler’s Darkness at Noon and the essay “The Initiates” published a decade later in The God that Failed. As Walker notes, “it’s a convenient opportunity to revisit both works as a reminder of what awaits all democratic societies eager to abandon liberties for the sake of utopian ideologies.” Koestler’s Noon, he says, is where the author is at the height of his powers...
The invisible sources of entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurs take risks, they see opportunities that others do not, and they turn those opportunities into businesses. It’s perhaps counterintuitive, but this risk-taking actually requires stable social foundations. Entrepreneurs need to know that ground is solid before they risk a jump. Read More… There is great enthusiasm for entrepreneurship these days. There are social entrepreneurs, intellectual entrepreneurs, educational entrepreneurs and even intra-preneurs (entrepreneurs within their panies). Entrepreneurs like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are held up as model citizens. Magazines...
Charles Schwab and Ted Leonsis: ‘We aren’t the problem’
Billionaire Democrat Ted Leonsis wrote a posting titled “Class Warfare – Yuck!” on his blog yesterday, in which he implored the president, to whose campaign he donated the maximum amount: “Hit a reset button ASAP. Rethink how to talk to businesses and sell business leaders on your plan to make America great! Many of us want to be a part of the solution. We aren’t the problem.” Today, Charles Schwab published an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, and...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved