Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about welfare reform
Explainer: What you should know about welfare reform
Apr 4, 2025 12:41 PM

This month marks the 20th anniversary of welfare reform, a bipartisan measure that made important changes to our country’s welfare system. Here is what you should know about this milestone legislation.

What was “welfare reform”?

Welfare reform is the nickname given to the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA). This 251-page federal law was introduced by Rep. E. Clay Shaw, Jr. (R-FL) in June 1996 as part of the Republican Contract with America and signed into law by President Bill Clinton on August 22, 1996.

Among other things, notes AEI’s Angela Rachidi, the law eliminated the cash welfare program Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) and replaced it with a block grant program that gave states flexibility to use federal funds to move people from welfare to work.

What does PRWORA require?

PRWORA contains requirements for both the states and welfare recipients.

Work requirements and time limits for individuals and families:

• Recipients must work after two years on assistance, with few exceptions.

• Since 2002, the law has required that 50 percent of all families in each state must be engaged in work activities or have left the welfare rolls.

• Since 2003, single parents are required to participate for at least 30 hours of work per week. Two-parent families must work 35 hours per week.

• Guarantees that women on welfare continue to receive health coverage for their families, including at least one year of transitional Medicaid when they leave welfare for work.

• Families who have received assistance for five cumulative years (or less at state option) are ineligible for cash aid.

Requirements of individual states:

• States are permitted to exempt up to 20 percent of their caseload from the time limit, and states have the option to provide non-cash assistance and vouchers to families that reach the time limit using Social Services Block Grant or state funds.

• States are required to make an initial assessment of recipients’ skills.

• States can develop personal responsibility plans for recipients identifying the education, training, and job placement services needed to move into the workforce.

• States must maintain their own spending on welfare at least 80 percent of FY 1994 levels.

• States must maintain spending at 100 percent of FY 1994 levels to access a $2 billion contingency fund designed to assist states affected by high population growth or economic downturn.

• States must maintain 100 percent of FY 1994 or FY 1995 spending on child care (whichever is greater) to access additional child care funds beyond their initial allotment.

The law also includes teen parent provisions and prehensive child support enforcement:

Teen parent provisions:

• Unmarried minor parents are required to live with a responsible adult or in an adult-supervised setting and participate in educational and training activities in order to receive assistance.

• States are responsible for locating or assisting in locating adult-supervised settings for teens.

• Requires block grant funding be used for abstinence education.

• Requires the Secretary of HHS to establish and implement a strategy to (1) prevent non-marital teen births, and (2) assure that at least 25 percent munities have teen pregnancy prevention programs.

• Requires the Attorney General to establish a program that studies the linkage between statutory rape and teen pregnancy, and that educates law enforcement officials on the prevention and prosecution of statutory rape. (The law includes the finding that, “Data indicates that at least half of the children born to teenage mothers are fathered by adult men. Available data suggests that almost 70 percent of births to teenage girls are fathered by men over age 20.)

Child support enforcement:

• Requires states to operate a child support enforcement program meeting federal requirements in order to be eligible for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) block grants.

• Established a Federal Case Registry and National Directory of New Hires to track delinquent parents across state lines.

• Requires that employers report all new hires to state agencies for transmittal of new hire information to the National Directory of New Hires.

• Expanded and streamlined procedures for direct withholding of child support from wages.

• Streamlined the legal process for paternity establishment, making it easier and faster to establish paternities.

• Expanded the voluntary in-hospital paternity establishment program and requires a state form for voluntary paternity acknowledgment.

• Mandates that states publicize the availability and encourage the use of voluntary paternity establishment processes. Individuals who fail to cooperate with paternity establishment will have their monthly cash assistance reduced by at least 25 percent.

• Provides for uniform rules, procedures, and forms for interstate cases.

• Requires states to establish central registries of child support orders and centralized collection and disbursement units. It also requires expedited state procedures for child support enforcement.

• Allows states to expand wage garnishment, seize assets, and munity service in some cases.

• Enables states to revoke drivers and professional licenses for parents who owe delinquent child support.

• Families no longer receiving assistance will have priority in the distribution of child support arrears.

• Includes grants to help states establish programs that support and facilitate noncustodial parents’ visitation with and access to their children.

What welfare policy did the reform change?

The main change of PRWORA was the replacement of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) with the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. While other programs (food stamps, Medicaid) provided assistance to the poor, AFDC was the program most often referred to as “welfare.”

AFDC, part of the Social Security Act passed by the Roosevelt administration in 1935, was a federally mandated program that guaranteed cash assistance to families with needy children. Needy children were defined as having been “deprived of parental support or care because their father or mother is absent from the home continuously, is incapacitated, is deceased, or is unemployed.”

Because of the e eligibility requirements, most AFDC recipients were single mothers (only 7 percent included two adults in the home). The program also paid more for the number of children, which favored having larger families. This disincentive to bined with an incentive to have numerous children was a primary criticism of the law and a key factor in driving welfare reform.

In addition to the cash grants of AFDC, many families prior to 1996 also received other benefits such as childcare assistance, food stamps, Medicaid, and subsidized housing.

Was the reform effective in helping families in poverty?

As with any major public policy change the effect of welfare reform has been subjective and controversial.

However, there is agreement among poverty scholars that the official poverty rate for children of single mothers—a key demographic who received AFDC—has decreased since the law’s passage in 1996. Poverty scholar Scott Winship notes that it’s impossible to isolate the effects of the PRWORA versus the state waivers that were already happening between 1993 and 1996.

Some advocates of welfare reform, however, say that the effect of the law is underestimated because the official poverty rate counts e rather than consumption, the use of goods and services. A household in poverty may have a low e but still have a modest consumption because of free housing, healthcare, etc. When consumption is taken into account Winship found that fewer than one in 1,500 children of single mothers in 2012 were living in what is called “extreme poverty.” He also found that, once the receipt of all government benefits are factored in, practically no children of single mothers were living on $2 a day in either 1996 or 2012 (the latest year for which we have reliable statistics).

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Journalism professor calls for Helter Skelter
In 1969 Charles Manson and his gang set out to ignite a race war that pitted the wealthy white establishment against underprivileged blacks. The apocalyptic battle would be called “Helter Skelter,” after the Beatles’ song written by Paul McCartney. The white Manson reasoned that America’s angry black population would eventually win this war; at which time he and his group would emerge from their Mojave Desert hideout to assume leadership over what he perceived to be an inferior race. es...
Fab labbing, Fu-Fu, and the ovine entrepreneur
The BBC reports today a great illustration of human creativity and the intersection of technology and subsidiarity. MIT has set up what they called Fab Labs (Fabrication Labs) in what many might consider the least likely places for technological invention. These Labs consist of basic tools and software than enable people in sometimes remote and rural locations to invent and fabricate the technology they need in their daily work. MIT professor Neil Gershenfeld: In a world of Fab Labs, you...
The nose of a camel: The federal government and education
Federal involvement in education has grown steadily throughout the nation’s history, encroaching on what is still viewed by American’s as mostly a state and local responsibility. Kevin Schmiesing looks at a new book that examines U.S. education policy, the red tape and bureaucracy that has resulted, and the opposition to federal control that arose from parochial school administrators. Read the full text here. ...
Hurricane relief – Small organizations to the rescue
In the wake of overwhelming need of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, thankfully a number of us are voicing irritation with the inquiry, “How important do you think that faith-based organizations are to helping people”? Before ANY organization — government agency of any kind or national nonprofit — made a move, faith organizations had already moved. In San Antonio, where several Russian students were among New Orleans evacuees, Victory Fellowship, a faith-based, privately funded substance abuse treatment program, simply did the...
The right pass at the right time
If you haven’t heard of this story yet, read about what Notre Dame head football coach Charlie Weis did this past weekend. His expression passion for a dying boy, 10-year-old Montana Mazurkiewicz, transcends sports. Weis honored a promise to Montana despite the fact that he is a first-year coach in the big business of college football, in what might be the most scrutinized and storied programs in the country. In a personal visit to the boy last week, in addition...
Breathing with one lung?
Bishop Hilarion (Alfeyev) of Vienna and Austria, the Russian Orthodox Church’s representative to the European Union, is once again urging a Roman Catholic-Orthodox alliance bat secularism, liberalism and relativism in Europe — and lands outside it. “The social and ethical teachings of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches are extremely close, in many cases practically identical,” Bishop Hilarion said. “Why, then, should we not be able to reveal our unity on all these major issues urbi et orbi?” Since the election...
Submerged subsidiarity
Because too much has already been said about the recent gulf hurricanes, I won’t put in my two cents. I will, however, direct the reader to the most insightful take on this situation that I have yet to stumble across. As you read it, think again about the importance of the definitions of the words we use, such as ‘responsibility’ and ‘authority’ as are discussed in the mentioned article. ...
Questions about the Red Cross
The Remedy, the Claremont Institute‘s blog, links to an article in the Los Angeles Times by Richard M. Walden, head of Operation USA, that raises concerns about how the Red Cross spends the money it receives for specific disasters. Walden levels some important and serious charges against the Red Cross, and may or may not be convincing depending on if you approve of the Red Cross’ fund-raising precedents and other activities. But Walden is undeniably right is when he raises...
CAFTA, prudence, and volleyball
After receiving some responses to a previous post (CAFTA/Culture of Life: Enemies?), I thought I would post the the exchange with my most recent dissatisfied critic. Here’s to volleying! (I have edited the emails for confidentiality.) Mr. Phelps, It was with great interest that I recently read your blog entry “CAFTA/Culture of Life: Enemies?” as for some strange reason it recently appeared on the Google Alerts. I found it amusing how you worked John Paul’s teachings in without actually quoting...
Spendthrift republicans
A wonderful piece by Deroy Murdock today on NRO. Though most fiscal conservatives understandably vote Republican, the record substantiates the theory that spending is less responsible when Congress is dominated by one party—either party—than when each party has enough votes to frustrate the other. Others have drawn attention to the problem of Republican pork, but Murdock does so in an especially devastating way. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved