Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about welfare reform
Explainer: What you should know about welfare reform
Apr 2, 2025 8:37 AM

This month marks the 20th anniversary of welfare reform, a bipartisan measure that made important changes to our country’s welfare system. Here is what you should know about this milestone legislation.

What was “welfare reform”?

Welfare reform is the nickname given to the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA). This 251-page federal law was introduced by Rep. E. Clay Shaw, Jr. (R-FL) in June 1996 as part of the Republican Contract with America and signed into law by President Bill Clinton on August 22, 1996.

Among other things, notes AEI’s Angela Rachidi, the law eliminated the cash welfare program Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) and replaced it with a block grant program that gave states flexibility to use federal funds to move people from welfare to work.

What does PRWORA require?

PRWORA contains requirements for both the states and welfare recipients.

Work requirements and time limits for individuals and families:

• Recipients must work after two years on assistance, with few exceptions.

• Since 2002, the law has required that 50 percent of all families in each state must be engaged in work activities or have left the welfare rolls.

• Since 2003, single parents are required to participate for at least 30 hours of work per week. Two-parent families must work 35 hours per week.

• Guarantees that women on welfare continue to receive health coverage for their families, including at least one year of transitional Medicaid when they leave welfare for work.

• Families who have received assistance for five cumulative years (or less at state option) are ineligible for cash aid.

Requirements of individual states:

• States are permitted to exempt up to 20 percent of their caseload from the time limit, and states have the option to provide non-cash assistance and vouchers to families that reach the time limit using Social Services Block Grant or state funds.

• States are required to make an initial assessment of recipients’ skills.

• States can develop personal responsibility plans for recipients identifying the education, training, and job placement services needed to move into the workforce.

• States must maintain their own spending on welfare at least 80 percent of FY 1994 levels.

• States must maintain spending at 100 percent of FY 1994 levels to access a $2 billion contingency fund designed to assist states affected by high population growth or economic downturn.

• States must maintain 100 percent of FY 1994 or FY 1995 spending on child care (whichever is greater) to access additional child care funds beyond their initial allotment.

The law also includes teen parent provisions and prehensive child support enforcement:

Teen parent provisions:

• Unmarried minor parents are required to live with a responsible adult or in an adult-supervised setting and participate in educational and training activities in order to receive assistance.

• States are responsible for locating or assisting in locating adult-supervised settings for teens.

• Requires block grant funding be used for abstinence education.

• Requires the Secretary of HHS to establish and implement a strategy to (1) prevent non-marital teen births, and (2) assure that at least 25 percent munities have teen pregnancy prevention programs.

• Requires the Attorney General to establish a program that studies the linkage between statutory rape and teen pregnancy, and that educates law enforcement officials on the prevention and prosecution of statutory rape. (The law includes the finding that, “Data indicates that at least half of the children born to teenage mothers are fathered by adult men. Available data suggests that almost 70 percent of births to teenage girls are fathered by men over age 20.)

Child support enforcement:

• Requires states to operate a child support enforcement program meeting federal requirements in order to be eligible for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) block grants.

• Established a Federal Case Registry and National Directory of New Hires to track delinquent parents across state lines.

• Requires that employers report all new hires to state agencies for transmittal of new hire information to the National Directory of New Hires.

• Expanded and streamlined procedures for direct withholding of child support from wages.

• Streamlined the legal process for paternity establishment, making it easier and faster to establish paternities.

• Expanded the voluntary in-hospital paternity establishment program and requires a state form for voluntary paternity acknowledgment.

• Mandates that states publicize the availability and encourage the use of voluntary paternity establishment processes. Individuals who fail to cooperate with paternity establishment will have their monthly cash assistance reduced by at least 25 percent.

• Provides for uniform rules, procedures, and forms for interstate cases.

• Requires states to establish central registries of child support orders and centralized collection and disbursement units. It also requires expedited state procedures for child support enforcement.

• Allows states to expand wage garnishment, seize assets, and munity service in some cases.

• Enables states to revoke drivers and professional licenses for parents who owe delinquent child support.

• Families no longer receiving assistance will have priority in the distribution of child support arrears.

• Includes grants to help states establish programs that support and facilitate noncustodial parents’ visitation with and access to their children.

What welfare policy did the reform change?

The main change of PRWORA was the replacement of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) with the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. While other programs (food stamps, Medicaid) provided assistance to the poor, AFDC was the program most often referred to as “welfare.”

AFDC, part of the Social Security Act passed by the Roosevelt administration in 1935, was a federally mandated program that guaranteed cash assistance to families with needy children. Needy children were defined as having been “deprived of parental support or care because their father or mother is absent from the home continuously, is incapacitated, is deceased, or is unemployed.”

Because of the e eligibility requirements, most AFDC recipients were single mothers (only 7 percent included two adults in the home). The program also paid more for the number of children, which favored having larger families. This disincentive to bined with an incentive to have numerous children was a primary criticism of the law and a key factor in driving welfare reform.

In addition to the cash grants of AFDC, many families prior to 1996 also received other benefits such as childcare assistance, food stamps, Medicaid, and subsidized housing.

Was the reform effective in helping families in poverty?

As with any major public policy change the effect of welfare reform has been subjective and controversial.

However, there is agreement among poverty scholars that the official poverty rate for children of single mothers—a key demographic who received AFDC—has decreased since the law’s passage in 1996. Poverty scholar Scott Winship notes that it’s impossible to isolate the effects of the PRWORA versus the state waivers that were already happening between 1993 and 1996.

Some advocates of welfare reform, however, say that the effect of the law is underestimated because the official poverty rate counts e rather than consumption, the use of goods and services. A household in poverty may have a low e but still have a modest consumption because of free housing, healthcare, etc. When consumption is taken into account Winship found that fewer than one in 1,500 children of single mothers in 2012 were living in what is called “extreme poverty.” He also found that, once the receipt of all government benefits are factored in, practically no children of single mothers were living on $2 a day in either 1996 or 2012 (the latest year for which we have reliable statistics).

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Election Preaching
The election day sermon was an important institution in colonial New England. It was one delivered by Samuel Danforth in 1670 that furnished the venerable Puritan concept of America as an “errand into the wilderness.” (For more, see Nathan Hatch, The Democratization of American Christianity.) One need not share the Massachusetts colony’s view of church-state relations (one of the chief tasks of government was the suppression of heresy) to recognize that the election day sermon served a useful purpose. The...
Baby Stepping Toward the Nanny State
Is Senator Obama a closet socialist waiting for inauguration day, at which time he and a Democratic Congress will immediately pursue a massive increase in the size and power of government in our lives, panied by massive tax increases and massive redistribution of wealth? Or is he really a moderate pragmatist, a canny politician who when he was getting started in politics used his radical contacts from his ultra-leftwing Hyde munity, but now is in a position to use more...
Birth of Freedom Shorts Series: Is it appropriate to consider the religious views of political candidates?
Acton Media’s latest Birth of Freedom short video is a timely message in the face of tomorrow’s election. In this video, William B. Allen, Professor of Political Science at Michigan State University, discusses how faith, “the pelling part of one’s existence”, ought to fit in when evaluating a political candidate. Check out more Birth of Freedom shorts, learn about premieres in your area, and discover more background information at . ...
Why Not Learn Some Economics First?
According to a report from the Zenit News Service, Cardinal Renato Martino, president of the Pontifical Council of Justice and Peace, recently insisted that the “logic” of the market be changed. He said that the logic “was till (sic) now that of maximum gain, and therefore the most investments possible directed toward obtaining maximum benefit. And this, according to the social doctrine of the Church, is immoral.” This is because, according to the Cardinal, the market “should be able to...
Doctoral Work on Religion and Philanthropy
I received this notice via H-Net last week: THE LAKE INSTITUTE ON FAITH & GIVING THE CENTER ON PHILANTHROPY INDIANA UNIVERSITY DOCTORAL DISSERTATION FELLOWSHIP The Lake Institute on Faith and Giving at the Center on Philanthropy, Indiana University will offer a one year doctoral dissertation fellowship of $22,000 for the academic year 2009-2010. This doctoral dissertation fellowship will be given to a scholar whose primary research focus is in the area of religion and philanthropy or faith and giving. The...
Birth of Freedom Shorts Series: How did Plato and Aristotle justify slavery?
In this week’s Birth of Freedom short video Sam Gregg, author of On Ordered Liberty, discusses the views that two influential ancient philosophers held regarding human equality and the practice of slavery. If you haven’t seen the other 7 video shorts, you can check out the rest of the series, learn about premieres in your area, and discover more background information at . ...
Busted
The lyrics to “Busted,” written by Harlan Howard, and made famous as performed by Johnny Cash: My bills are all due and the babies need shoes, But I’m Busted Cotton’s gone down to a quarter a pound And I’m Busted I got a cow that’s gone dry And a hen that won’t lay A big stack of bills Getting bigger each day The county’s gonna haul my belongings away, But I’m Busted So I called on my brother to ask...
Careful what you wish for….
Via Drudge, Australia is joining none other than China in censoring the internet. Here’s a surprising endorsement/justification the writer uses to bottom line the article: The Australian Christian Lobby, however, has ed the proposals. Managing director Jim Wallace said the measures were needed. "The need to prevent access to illegal hard-core material and child pornography must be placed above the industry’s desire for unfettered access," Mr Wallace said. I’m not endorsing porn. But earth to Mr. Wallace: Scan up a...
Federalism and the EPA
There’s a lingering issue that continues to bother me about the so-called “global warming” Supreme Court case from 2007, Massachusetts v. EPA (05-1120), and that is a nagging concern about federalism and environmental standards. As it stands currently, individual states are often prevented from enacting tougher legislation or regulation regarding some forms of pollution than the federal EPA standards. In order for a state EPA to partner with the federal EPA, be “authorized,” and thus receive funds, “a state must...
“A lot of people are hungry for this…”
A Boston-area Church of Christ is using environmental stewardship to boost membership. The United Church of Christ, to which the Newbury congregation belongs, has called upon its members to e more deeply engaged in stewardship initiatives. Gary Gardner, a senior researcher at the Worldwatch Institute, an environmental research organization in Washington, wrote in 2002 that the union of environmentalists and religious institutions is "a bination that until recently remained virtually unexplored. . . . Each looks at the world from...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved