Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about Trump’s tax reform framework
Explainer: What you should know about Trump’s tax reform framework
Jan 10, 2025 3:04 PM

Later today in a speech in Indiana, President Trump will outline his tax reform framework. Here’s what you should know about the president’s plan:

What are the goals of the tax reform framework?

Trump’s tax plan has four stated goals:

1. Make the tax code simple, fair and easy to understand.

2. Give American workers a pay raise by allowing them to keep more of their hard-earned paychecks.

3. Make America the jobs magnet of the world by leveling the playing field for American businesses and workers.

4. Bring back trillions of dollars that are currently kept offshore to reinvest in the American economy.

How does the plan affect individual taxpayers?

The framework proposes the following changes:

• The standard deduction would increase from $6,300 to $12,000 for single filers and from $12,600 to $24,000 for married couples.The additional standard deduction and personal exemptions for the taxpayer and spouse are consolidated into this larger standard deduction.

• Creates a larger “zero tax bracket” by eliminating taxes on the first $24,000 of e earned by a married couple and $12,000 earned by a single individual.

• Reduces the 7 tax brackets (10, 15, 25, 28, 33, 35, and 39.6 percent) to 3 tax brackets of 12 percent, 25 percent, and 35 percent. (An additional top rate may apply to the e taxpayers to ensure that the reformed tax code is at least as progressive as the existing tax code.)

• Increases the Child Tax Credit and make the first $1,000 of the credit refundable.

• Provides a non-refundable credit of $500 for non-child dependents to help defray the cost of caring for other dependents.

• Repeals the existing individual Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT).

• Eliminates most itemized deductions (such as deductions for state and local taxes), but retains tax incentives for home mortgage interest and charitable contributions.

• Promises to retain “tax benefits that encourage work, higher education and retirement security.”

• Promises to repeal many exemptions, deductions and credits to “make the system simpler and fairer for all families and individuals, and allow for lower tax rates.”

• Repeals the “death tax”, the federal estate tax applies to the transfer of property at death, that applies to estates worth $5,490,000 or more.

How does the plan affect individual businesses?

The framework proposes the following changes:

• Limits the maximum tax rate applied to the business e of small and family-owned businesses conducted as sole proprietorships, partnerships and S corporations to 25 percent.

• Reduces the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 20 percent.

• Eliminates the existing corporate Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT).

• Allows businesses to immediately write off (or “expense”) the cost of new investments in depreciable assets other than structures made after September 27, 2017, for at least five years.

• The deduction for net interest expense incurred by C corporations will be partially limited.

• Preserves business credits for research and development (R&D) and e housing.

• Promises to “modernize” the rules for the special tax regimes the currently exist to govern the tax treatment of certain industries and sectors.

• In an effort to bring overseas corporate profits back into the U.S., all overseas assets from panies will be considered repatriated and taxed at a one-time lower rate. (The rate will be specified at a later date.)

How does this plan differ from the proposal outlined by President Trump during the campaign?

The new plan includes five items that Trumppromised on the campaign trail: reducing the tax brackets, increasing the standard deduction, reducing business tax (though he promised a reduction to 15 percent), and eliminating the AMT and estate tax.

However, Trump’s campaign plan promised to be “revenue neutral” (i.e., would not increase the deficit), a claim which few economists outside of the White House believes is possible.

What happens next?

The president’s framework will now go to the mittees with jurisdiction over tax legislation (the Senate Finance Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee) to be turned into workable bill. Then Congressional Republicans will attempt to pass the tax reform bill via the budget reconciliation process.

By using budget reconciliation, the GOP can limit the number of debates and amendments on the bill and it can be passed with a simple majority of 51 votes.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Acton on Tap: A Christian Economist Clarifies Fair Trade
The Acton Institute will be hosting another thought provoking and discussion orientated Acton on Tap on Tuesday, May 17. The event will begin at 6:30pm at the Derby Station (2237 Wealthy St. SE, East Grand Rapids 49506). Leading the discussion will be Victor Claar, who is a professor of Economics at Henderson State University. The Acton on Tap with Professor Claar is titled “Clarifying the Question of Fair Trade: A Christian Economist’s Perspective.” Claar will bring a unique perspective of...
Stories from the Gulag
A new online exhibit: European Memories of the Gulag. (HT: Instapundit/Claire Berlinski) From 1939 to 1953, nearly one million people were deported to the Gulag from the European territories annexed by the USSR at the start of the Second World War and those that came under Soviet influence after the War: some to work camps but most as forced settlers in villages in Siberia and Central Asia. An international team of researchers has collected 160 statements from former deportees, photographs...
Film Spanks U.N. Treaty on the Rights of the Child
There’s a free screening of a documentary critiquing the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child this Friday evening at 7 p.m. at Grandville Church of Christ–3725 44th St. SW. The film makes the case that parental rights have already been dangerously eroded in the United States and would be further eroded if Congress ratified the U.N. treaty. The screening is sponsored by the area chapter of Generation Joshua and is open to the public. More against the treaty...
An End to Ethanol Subsidies?
With rising gas and food prices, ethanol subsidies are getting strict scrutiny. Many have called for the end of ethanol subsidies, and now the Senate is acting. Senators Tom Coburn and Dianne Feinstein introduced legislation that would end ethanol subsidies and repeal the tariff that is placed on foreign ethanol. The problems with ethanol subsidies have been vast as I’ve pointed out in previous posts including a tax credit for panies that blends ethanol with gasoline—even though they are mandated...
Rev. Sirico responds to Speaker Boehner’s Catholic Critics
On ...
Survivors Not Victims
This video was captured by Toomer’s for Tuscaloosa at Five Points Baptist Church in Northport, Alabama. Northport is just outside Tuscaloosa. Toomer’s for Tuscaloosa has been leading from the front during the tornadoes that decimated parts of Alabama. Their Facebook page is mand center for leading and directing volunteers to areas of greatest need. ESPN highlighted some of the work of Toomer’s on their network. In a letter to Alabama Governor Robert Bentley, Toomer’s for Tuscaloosa wrote: In one way...
Catholic Social Teaching and Capitalism
That’s the subject of my most recent article at . The new Crisis web site is a reinvigoration of the old Crisis magazine. Editor Brian Saint-Paul summarizes the history in his inaugural editorial. His statement of the vision of the new Crisis includes this: In the name of Catholic Social Thought, many in the Church continue to promote ideas of political economy that would hurt the very people they intend to help, and often do so with the suggestion that...
Subsidiarity, Funding, and the Arts
In today’s edition of Capital Commentary, HBU assistant professor of literature Micah Mattix explores the question, “How Might the Arts Be Funded?” He ably and briefly surveys the recent history of politics surrounding the NEA. And he concludes by noting that art is inherently “relational” and that “the problem with large, centralized organizations like the Endowment is that they are often unable to take such relational elements into account.” He muses: However the arts are to be funded, this relational...
The Welfare State and the Moral High Ground
Writing in the Sacramento Bee, Margaret A. Bengs cites Rev. Robert A. Sirico’s Heritage Foundation essay “The Moral Basis for Economic Liberty” in her column on munities and government budget battles. As a priest, Sirico has met many entrepreneurs “who are disenfranchised and alienated from their churches,” with often little understanding by church leaders of the “vocation called entrepreneurship, of what it requires in the way of personal sacrifice, and of what it contributes to society.” This lack of understanding,...
Rising Food Prices and Regulation
In an article appearing on EWTN News, Acton Director of Research, Samuel Gregg, is interviewed on rising food prices and the effect on the developing world. In this article, Dr. Gregg contributed to a broad discussion on the many factors contributing to the rising food prices. He advocates for a free market economy in agriculture by discussing the effects agricultural subsides in Europe and the United State, and how these market distortions contribute to stifling the growth of agriculture in...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved