Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about the U.S. president’s emergency powers
Explainer: What you should know about the U.S. president’s emergency powers
Jan 20, 2026 6:02 AM

What just happened?

Last Friday President Trump said he was considering using his national emergency powers to secure funding for the construction of a border wall between U.S.-Mexico border. “We can call a national emergency and build it very quickly,” said the president.

What are national emergency powers?

The President of the United States has certain powers that may be exercised in the event that the nation is threatened by crisis, exigency, or emergency circumstances (other than natural disasters, war, or near-war situations). Some of these powers are either implied or explicitly stated by the U.S. Constitution. Others are delegations of authority through legislation, such as the National Emergencies Act.

How does a U.S. President declare a national emergency?

The president can declare a national emergency through an executive order. Per the National Emergencies Act, the president must specifically declare a national emergency and act in accordance with the rest of the Act.

What is the National Emergencies Act?

The National Emergencies Act (NEA) is a law passed by Congress in 1976 that authorizes the president to declare a national emergency. A declaration under NEA triggers emergency authorities contained in other federal statutes.

The NEA does not provide any specific emergency authority on its own, but relies on emergency authorities provided in other statutes. A national emergency declaration allows for the activation of these other statutory authorities, though they must be specifically identified in the president’s declaration before taking effect.

How are national emergencies ended?

After a president declares a national emergency, it can be terminated only by a proclamation of the president or by a concurrent resolution of Congress.

What are the accountability requirements during a national emergency?

There are three main requirement outlined in the National Emergencies Act:

• The President must maintain a file and index of all significant orders, rules, and regulations, issued during such emergency pursuant to such declarations.

• All such significant orders of the president must be promptly transmitted to Congress.

• The president shall transmit to Congress, within ninety days after the end of each six-month period after such declaration, a report on the total expenditures incurred by the U.S. Government during such six-month period which are directly attributable to the exercise of powers and authorities conferred by such declaration. Not later than ninety days after the termination of each such emergency or war, the President shall transmit a final report on all such expenditures.

How many national emergency declarations have been issued?

Since the NEA took effect in 1976 there have been over fifty declarations of national emergency by U.S. presidents. Currently, 28 are still in effect (the date is the year the emergency was declared):

1979 — Blocking Iranian Government Property

1994 — Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction

1995 — Prohibiting Transactions with Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process

1995 — Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to the Development of Iranian Petroleum

1995 — Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Significant Narcotics Traffickers

1997 — Blocking Sudanese Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Sudan

1998 — Blocking Property of the Governments of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), the Republic of Serbia, and the Republic of Montenegro, and Prohibiting New Investment in the Republic of Serbia in Response to the Situation in Kosovo

2001 — Continuation of Export Control Regulations

2001— Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks

2001— Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism

2003 — Blocking Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe

2003— Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and Certain Other Property in Which Iraq has an Interest

2004— Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain Goods to Syria

2004— Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Importation of Certain Goods from Liberia

2006— Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Côte d’Ivoire

2006— Blocking Property of Certain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus

2006— Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

2007— Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or Its Democratic Processes and Institutions

2008— Continuing Certain Restrictions with Respect to North Korea and North Korean Nationals

2010— Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Somalia

2011— Blocking Property and Prohibiting Certain Transactions Related to Libya

2011— Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal Organizations

2012— Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Yemen

2014— Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine

2014— Blocking Property of Certain Persons With Respect to South Sudan

2014— Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Central African Republic

2015— Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela

2015— Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities

2015— Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Burundi

Can President Trump declare a national emergency on border security?

Under the NEA, President Trump has broad latitude to issue an emergency proclamation. However, if he issues such an executive order he will almost assuredly by immediately sued by members of Congress. Even before the passage of the NEA the Courts put limits on the president’s ability to use the emergency powers to enact policy.

For example, during the Korean War President Truman issued an executive order directing Secretary of Commerce Charles Sawyer to seize and operate most of the nation’s steel mills. This was done in order to avert the expected effects of a strike by the United Steelworkers of America. In a 6-to-3 decision, the Court held that the President did not have the authority to issue such an order, and said that “the President’s power to see that the laws are faithfully executed refutes the idea that he is to be a lawmaker.”

Based on the president’s ments and actions, the Supreme Court would likely rule such action as an unconstitutional attempt to get around Congress’s refusal to fund the border wall.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
North Koreans face new challenges after they defect
They faced potential starvation, imprisonment, torture, and made a dangerous journey to freedom only to discover new struggles that they never could prehended in their former lives. Stories and reports of North Koreans fleeing their country aren’t particularly unusual. There are dozens of books written by or about North Korean defectors. Last week, thirteen North Koreans who worked for a restaurant fled to South Korea. It’s also been recently reported that a high-ranking colonel from North Korean military’s General Reconnaissance...
Audio: Samuel Gregg Revisits Regensburg
Samuel GreggOn Monday evening, Acton Institute Director of Research Samuel Gregg joined host Sheila Liaugminas on Relevant Radio’s A Closer Look to examine Pope Benedict XVI’s Regensburg address as we approach the tenth anniversary of its delivery. Greggemphasizes the fact that our understanding of who God is and what his nature is has important implications for how we understand human liberty and rationality, and argues that as western nations have gradually abandoned the Christian religious principles that formerly undergirded their...
A Papal Revolution
This year marks the 125th anniversary of Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical Rerum Novarum and the beginning of the modern Catholic social encyclical tradition. In this landmark text, Leo courageously set out to examine the “new things” of his time, especially the changes associated with the Industrial Revolution. These included the emergence of an urbanized working class, the breakdown of old social hierarchies, and the rise of capitalism as well as ideologies such as socialism, munism, and corporatism. On April 20,...
Money and Moral Absolutes
In medieval Europe merchants would often writeDeus enim et proficuum (“For God and Profit”) in the upper corners of their accounting ledgersorA nome di Dio e guadangnio (“In the Name of God and Profit”) on partnership contracts. These words reflected their authors’ conviction that banking and finance were economically useful endeavors,saysSamuel Greggin this week’s Acton Commentary. Luis Molina and the many other Christians who explored these areas throughout history were not searching for greater marketplace effi­ciencies. Their concern was moral....
Roundup: Samuel Gregg on Pope Francis and Overpopulation, Pope Leo XIII and Modernity, and Constitutional Conservatism
New articles from the indefatigable Samuel Gregg, research director of the Acton Insitute: Amoris Laetitia: Another Nail in the “Overpopulation” Coffin, The Catholic World Report Here the pope signals his awareness of the efforts of various organizations—the UN, the World Bank, the IMF, the EU, particular US administrations—to push anti-natalist policies upon developing nations. A Revolutionary Pope for Revolutionary Times, Crisis Magazine Between 1878 and 1903, Leo issued an astonishing 85 encyclicals. Many dealt squarely with the political, social, and...
Lex Luthor, Capitalist Villain
In an earlier post pared the political economy of superheroes in the DC and Marvel universes. And today I have a piece up at The Stream examining the figure of Lex Luthor, the crony capitalist villain featured in Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice. As I write in that piece, Luthor is certainly more than a crony capitalist, but he is not less than one, and it is this corruption of democratic capitalism that serves as a backdrop for his...
Tesla Motors Releases a Car for the Masses That Runs on Coal
Electric cars are not a new invention, nor are they as popular as they once were. (They debuted in 1890 and by 1900 electric cars accounted for around a third of all vehicles on the road.) But over the past decade, thanks to Elon Musk and Tesla Motors, electric cars have e much more interesting. Tesla rolled out the first fully electric sports car in 2008 and a fully electric luxury sedan in 2012. And earlier this month they unveiled...
Leftist Shareholders Attack Corporate Free Speech
On its website, Trinity Health trumpets its shareholder activism. Based in Livonia, Mich., the Catholic health care provider boasts operations in 21 states, which includes 90 hospitals and 120 long-term care facilities. For this last, Trinity should be lauded. For the first, however, your writer is left shaking his head. Among Trinity’s list of five shareholder advocacy priorities, two stand out: • uphold the dignity of the human person. • enable access to health care. In other words, issues any...
Rev. Sirico: Pope Francis’s Love Letter to the Family
“What the pope has brought forth is honest, timely and sensitive,” writes Rev. Robert A. Sirico, co-founder and president of the Acton Institute. “Amoris Laetitia explores plicated pastoral situations that any confessor will know all too well: challenges of how weak and fallen people can authentically live the faith.” In the Detroit News, Rev. Sirico discusses Pope Francis’s love letter to the family: The pope’s reflections are aimed at how to make a solid moral discernment in the midst of...
4 Reasons to Support School Choice from Pope Francis’s ‘Amoris Laetitia’
Pope Francis’s recently released apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitiahas received considerable attention because of the issue of divorce munion. But the 60,000+ word document has much more to say about family life than the dissolution of marriage. For example, it provides pelling reasons for all Christians (not just Catholics) to support school choice. The term “school choice” refers to programs that give parents the power and opportunity to choose the schools their children attend, whether public, private, parochial, or homeschool. While...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved