Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What You Should Know About the Rubio-Lee Tax Plan
Explainer: What You Should Know About the Rubio-Lee Tax Plan
Jan 28, 2026 6:58 PM

What is the Rubio-Lee Plan?

The plan—officially titled the “Economic Growth and Family Fairness Tax Plan”—is a white paper in which Senators Marco Rubio (R-Florida) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) lay out a tax reform proposal they believes will “resolve these major problems in the tax code.”

What’s in the plan?

The plan has two main sections, one “pro-growth” and one “pro-family.” The pro-growth side of the plan includes seven mended changes:

Full expensing for all businessesCreating parity on the taxation of business eElimination of extraneous business tax provisionsElimination of interest from tax baseTransition to an international dividend exemption systemCarryover of losses and transitionsReforming the treatment of health care in the tax code

The pro-family side has four proposed changes to the tax code:

Tax bracket and filing status consolidationChild tax credit consolidation and enhancementConsolidation of filing systemEnding high effective marginal tax rates for the poor

What are some specifics of the plan?

The plan would simply tax code structure and lower rates by consolidating the numerous existing e tax brackets into two simple brackets—15 percent and 35 percent. Individuals earning up to $75,000 or married couples making up to $150,000 would pay 15 percent, and the 35 percent top rate would apply for everyone above that line. (The current top rate is 39.6 percent.)

The plan would also eliminate or reform deductions (sparing only mortgage interest and charitable contribution deductions), including an elimination of the marriage penalty, which imposes higher taxes on married couples than if they had filed individually. A new $2,500 child tax credit, applicable to payroll tax liabilities as well as for the e tax, would be included.

On the business side, the proposal eliminates double taxation on all business e. The Senators also would mend that businesses only be taxed in the country where e is actually earned, rather than double-taxed when the money is brought back home.

How much would the plan cost?

Estimates are that implementing the plan would mean a reduction in federal tax revenues of $4 trillion over ten years. However, if the intended effects of economic growth are taken into account the cost could be about $2 trillion. So unless the plan is coupled with spending reductions, the result would be an additional $2-4 trillion added to the deficit over a decade.

What is the likelihood the plan will be adopted?

Slim to none. Neither senator is a member of the tax-writing Senate Finance Committee, which is currently involved in a tax reform effort with working groups focusing on specific parts of the tax code. They can mend the plan to their colleagues, but there is no chance that it will be adopted wholesale. And if it were to get through Congress, President Obama would surely veto the plan.

Still, the white paper shows what tax reform (at least fromGOP) will look like when it e. As Ryan Ellis of Americans for Tax Reform says, the Rubio-Lee plan is “what pro-growth looks like in the 21st century.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
PBR: Monsma and Carlton-Thies Speak Out
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” As part of Christianity Today’s Speaking Out (web-only) feature, Stephen V. Monsma and Stanley Carlson-Thies, of Calvin College’s Henry Institute and the Center for Public Justice respectively, address the future of the faith-based initiative under President Obama. Monsma and Carlton-Thies outline five “encouraging signs” and one “major concern.” The encouraging signs include the naming of the office executive director (Joshua DuBois) and advisory council (including “recognized evangelicals”...
Dr. Andrew Abela Receives 2009 Novak Award
Maltese-American marketing professor, Dr. Andrew Abela, is the winner of the Acton Institute’s 2009 Novak Award. Dr. Abela’s main research areas include consumerism, marketing ethics, Catholic Social Teaching, and internal munication. Believing that anti-free market perspectives seem to dominate discussion about the social impact of business, Dr. Abela is working to explore Christian ethics further to show how these issues can be resolved more humanely and effectively through market-oriented approaches. To aid this work, Dr. Abela is currently preparing a...
Acton Commentary: Choosing a Prosperous Future
“Focusing on education is not a distraction from the pressing business of economic recovery,” Kevin Schmiesing writes. “It is vital to ensuring it.” This focus should advance school choice and a reduction of administrative red tape. Read mentary at the Acton website, and share ments below. ...
Debunking the New Deal
It’s long been my contention that the mythology surrounding the New Deal in large swaths of the popular imagination plays an ongoing, important, and harmful role in politics and policy debate. For that reason, I e periodic attempts to debunk the myth. Jonah Goldberg offers a perceptive and enlightening perspective on New Deal historiography and its current uses and abuses. Unlike Daniel Gross (cited by Goldberg), I don’t care whether the analyst is an historian, economist, policy wonk, or journalist,...
PBR: Public Good and the Faith-Based Initiative
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” I have little confidence in the future of the faith-based initiative because conservatives who gain office are unwilling to take any fire at all in order to advance the cause beyond concept. At the same time, liberals will be unable to make productive use of the idea because of giant fissures regarding public religion in their movement. In theory, President Obama would make an ideal person to...
Acton Commentary: Race Alarmists Hijack Black History Month
Ignore those racial disparity studies that point to the “resegregation” of America’s educational system. They advance the lie that minorities cannot survive without whites. “What is best for e black and Latino students is what is best for all students: stable and supportive families, parental options, and high achieving schools with stellar teachers,” Bradley writes. Read mentary at the Acton website, and then discuss it here. ...
Kaarlgard Declares ‘Failure of Morality, Not Capitalism’
In a Forbes blog post titled “Failure of Morality, Not Capitalism,” Rich Kaarlgard counters the critics of supply-side capitalism by pointing to an absence of morality. Kaarlgard declares: Many people do blame capitalism for bringing us to this low moment in the economy. Do they have a point? They do if capitalism, as they define it, is devoid of any underlying morality. True enough, it is hard to see any underlying morality when one surveys the present carnage caused by...
PBR: A Genuine Challenge to Religious Liberty
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” Jordan Ballor kindly asked me to offer a few words in response to this question, as I made it an area of expertise during the previous Administration. I’ve been working up to writing something more formal, but I’ll begin by thinking aloud here, as well as at my my home blog. Without further ado, here’s what I posted over there: By now, you’ve probably heard about the...
America’s Secular Challenge
I’ve been reading America’s Secular Challenge by NYU professor and president of the Hudson Institute Herb London. The book is essentially an extended essay about how elite, left-wing secularism undercuts America’s traditional strengths of patriotism and religious faith during a time when the nation can ill afford it. The assault on public religion and love of es in a period when America faces enemies who have no such crisis of identity and lack the degree of doubt that leaves us...
PBR: On Faith
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” Perhaps taking a cue from this week’s PBR question (or perhaps not), the On Faith roster of bloggers have been asked to weigh in on the following question this week: “Should the Obama Administration let faith-based programs that receive government grants discriminate against those they hire or serve?” Notable responses include those from Chuck Colson, Al Mohler, and Susan Brooks Thistlewaite, the latter of whom has these...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved