Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about the Republicans’ bill to replace Obamacare
Explainer: What you should know about the Republicans’ bill to replace Obamacare
Jan 14, 2026 2:31 PM

Embed from Getty Images

Last night Congressional Republicans released two bills (here and here) which together constitute the current plan to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare). Here’s what you should know about the legislation known as the “American Health Care Act” (AHCA).

Does this legislation “repeal and replace” Obamacare?

Yes and no (but overall, not really).

No, the AHCA does pletely repeal Obamacare in toto and it merely replaces some aspects of the current law. But yes, it does repeal certain aspects of Obamacare and in some cases replaces them with new mandates and requirements.

Why doesn’t the GOP put forward a bill that simply repeals and replaces all of Obamacare?

The short answer is that Republicans in Congress don’t think they could pass such a bill. They would need 60 votes in the Senate to break a filibuster by the Democrats, and they only have 52. Instead, the GOP plans to use a process called “budget reconciliation” that allows them to make changes to federal revenue and spending with only 51 votes (which they may not be able to get since some Republicans in the Senate oppose the bill). The problem with this approach, as Avik Roy notes, is that “reconciliation can only repeal Obamacare’s taxes and spending; it can’t replace most of the law’s premium-hiking insurance regulations.”

What’s actually in the bill?

Here are some key changes that are included in the bill:

• Removes the “individual mandate,” the tax under Obamacare that people had to pay if they chose not to buy health insurance. However, the bill includes a “Continuous Health Insurance Coverage Incentive,” that provides a disincentive to dropping coverage and then picking it back up when a person gets ill. Those who reenroll would have to pay an “amount that is equal to 30 percent of the monthly premium rate.” (For example, if someone bought a policy that cost $6,000 a year ($500), they’d have to pay an additional $150 a month for one year before returning to the standard rate.)

• Rather than immediately repealing Obamacare’s Medicaid expansions, the bill allows them to remain in place until January 1, 2020. After that time, states will no longer be able to add new people to that program.

• Repeals almost all Obamacare-related taxes (e.g., tanning tax).

• Removes the regulation that prevented insurers from charging older enrollees more than three times as much as younger ones.

• Adds a per capita cap on states, which caps the federal funding per enrollee in the programs.

• Changes the structure of the Obamacare tax credits from being based solely on e to a means-based credit based mostly on age and partially on e.

• Prohibits almost all groups that provide abortions (e.g., Planned Parenthood) from receiving federal funds or Medicaid reimbursements. Also prohibits insurance policies that pay for abortions from being eligible for tax credits.

• Almost 10 percent of the bill (seven pages) is dedicated to a provision that prevents lottery winners who win over $80,000 from getting Medicaid. (This seems to be a cause championed by Rep. Joe Pitts, R-Penn.)

What major parts of Obamacare does it leave unchanged?

The two major provisions left unchanged are that parents will still be able to keep their kids on their insurance plans until the children reach age 26 and panies will still be required to ensure everyone, regardless of preexisting conditions.

How much will it cost and how many people will be affected?

No one knows just yet. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), a non-partisan independent group that provides analyses of budgetary and economic issues as it pertains to legislation, has not yet had a chance to “score” the bill. The CBO will consider the legislation and make a estimate about how much it will cost taxpayers and how many citizens will be affected by the changes.

Who opposes this bill?

Generally speaking, both liberals and conservatives. Liberals are concerned that the changes will reduce access to health insurance for the poor while cutting taxes for the wealthy. They are also concerned that it dismantles Obamacare, the most significant liberal policy victory this century. Conservatives are concerned that it will explode the deficit and leave Obamacare largely intact. “It’s Obamacare in a different format,” said Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.

Because of opposition from both sides of the political aisle, the AHCA is unlikely to pass the Senate in its current form.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Faulty Moral Arithmetic of the GOP
Arthur Brooks, president of the American Enterprise Institute, has an op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal that every conservative should read—and heed: Conservatives are fighting a losing battle of moral arithmetic. They hand an argument with virtually 100% public support—care for the vulnerable—to progressives, and focus instead on materialistic concerns and minority moral viewpoints. The irony is maddening. America’s poor people have been saddled with generations of disastrous progressive policy results, from welfare-induced dependency to failing schools that continue to...
When Free Speech Died in Canada
When future historians attempt to narrow down the exact point at which the concept of free speech died in Canada, they’ll likely point to Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v. Whatcott, specifically this sentence: Truthful statements can be presented in a manner that would meet the definition of hate speech, and not all truthful statements must be free from restriction. Jesus might have claimed that “the truth will set you free” but in Canada speaking the same truths proclaimed in God’s...
Samuel Gregg on Catholics, Welfare, and the Sequester
Should Catholics be concerned about the looming budget cuts? The National Catholic Register asked several Catholic leaders and thinkers, including Acton’s Samuel Gregg, for their response to the sequester: Re-establishing fiscal discipline and welfare reform are ponents to securing mon good, a key principle in Catholic social teaching, said Samuel Gregg, author of the new book ing Europe: Economic Decline, Culture and How America Can Avoid a European Future. Gregg, director of research for the Acton Institute for the Study...
Sirico: Conclave Process Will Move Quickly
There is one thing certain about picking a new pope: there is nothing certain about picking a pope. While there are predictions that the conclave could begin as soon as tomorrow, it likely will take longer for the cardinals to start the sealed process. The Rev. Robert Sirico, President of the Acton Institute, believes the process will moved quickly once it begins. Sirico, who is traveling to Rome this week, said he expects the process to move swiftly. “I will...
Lawmakers Push for Conscience Rights to be Included in Budget Bill
Fourteen members of Congress—including 13 women—sent a letter to the House leadership today asking that conscience rights be included in the ing budget bill. They mentioned specific violations of conscience rights, including the HHS Mandate: “This attack on religious freedom demands immediate congressional action,” the 14 lawmakers wrote. “Nothing short of a full exemption for both nonprofit and for-profit entities will satisfy the demands of the Constitution mon sense.” The continuing resolution that House appropriators released Monday would not cut...
Kevin Schmiesing: Catholic Social Teaching and the Sequester
In a story about looming budget cuts associated with the federal sequestration, Acton Research Fellow Kevin Schmiesing was called on by Aleteia to suggest “ways Catholic social teaching might be used to guide the cuts.” Schmiesing pointed out that the “cuts” are really “only a slow-down in the rate of growth in federal spending.” More: “Much more dramatic cuts and/or revenue increases are needed to reach a position of fiscal responsibility,” he said in an interview. But the principle of...
Lecrae Urges Christians to Move Beyond a ‘Sacred-Secular Divide’
At last fall’s evangelical-oriented Resurgence Conference, Grammy award-winning hip-hop artist Lecrae Moore encouraged the American church to rethink how it engages culture, urging Christians to move beyond what has e a narrow, overly introverted “sacred-secular divide” (HT): We are great at talking about salvation and sanctification. We are clueless when es to art, ethics, science, and culture. Christianity is the whole truth about everything. It’s how we deal with politics. It’s how we deal with science. It’s how we deal...
PovertyCure: From ‘Paternalism to Partnerships’
Alex Chafuen’s Forbes article on “champions of innovation,” which Michael Miller blogged here recently, is now one of the top features on the contributors page at The Blaze. Here’s an excerpt: When Adam Smith wrote his famous “Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,” he helped shift the terms of the discussion. Centuries earlier, work focused on different aspects of poverty. Jurists and city authorities analyzed whether the poor should be allowed to beg freely and...
Corporate Welfare: Why?
I have yet to read a moral argument for why the taxes collected from working men and women should be redistributed to businesses. It’s called “corporate welfare.” This is the odd state of affairs where, business pete for government funding rather than peting for customers in the marketplace. In fact, many of the biggest recipients of corporate welfare are the same businesses that hire high-priced lobbyists to help write laws in Congress that protect them petition. Why, then, do voters...
Avoiding the Fate of Europe
At The American Spectator, Jackson Adams reviews Samuel Gregg’s new book, ing Europe: Economic Decline, Culture, and How America Can Avoid a European Future: “Europe” is a concept Europeans are still getting used to. It should not, therefore, be surprising that it took a book written primarily for Americans to determine the sort of morass into which Western European social democracies have stepped. In his new ing Europe, Samuel Gregg provides a detailed dissection of Europe’s economic climate and the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved