Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about the Republicans’ bill to replace Obamacare
Explainer: What you should know about the Republicans’ bill to replace Obamacare
Jan 27, 2026 2:28 AM

Embed from Getty Images

Last night Congressional Republicans released two bills (here and here) which together constitute the current plan to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare). Here’s what you should know about the legislation known as the “American Health Care Act” (AHCA).

Does this legislation “repeal and replace” Obamacare?

Yes and no (but overall, not really).

No, the AHCA does pletely repeal Obamacare in toto and it merely replaces some aspects of the current law. But yes, it does repeal certain aspects of Obamacare and in some cases replaces them with new mandates and requirements.

Why doesn’t the GOP put forward a bill that simply repeals and replaces all of Obamacare?

The short answer is that Republicans in Congress don’t think they could pass such a bill. They would need 60 votes in the Senate to break a filibuster by the Democrats, and they only have 52. Instead, the GOP plans to use a process called “budget reconciliation” that allows them to make changes to federal revenue and spending with only 51 votes (which they may not be able to get since some Republicans in the Senate oppose the bill). The problem with this approach, as Avik Roy notes, is that “reconciliation can only repeal Obamacare’s taxes and spending; it can’t replace most of the law’s premium-hiking insurance regulations.”

What’s actually in the bill?

Here are some key changes that are included in the bill:

• Removes the “individual mandate,” the tax under Obamacare that people had to pay if they chose not to buy health insurance. However, the bill includes a “Continuous Health Insurance Coverage Incentive,” that provides a disincentive to dropping coverage and then picking it back up when a person gets ill. Those who reenroll would have to pay an “amount that is equal to 30 percent of the monthly premium rate.” (For example, if someone bought a policy that cost $6,000 a year ($500), they’d have to pay an additional $150 a month for one year before returning to the standard rate.)

• Rather than immediately repealing Obamacare’s Medicaid expansions, the bill allows them to remain in place until January 1, 2020. After that time, states will no longer be able to add new people to that program.

• Repeals almost all Obamacare-related taxes (e.g., tanning tax).

• Removes the regulation that prevented insurers from charging older enrollees more than three times as much as younger ones.

• Adds a per capita cap on states, which caps the federal funding per enrollee in the programs.

• Changes the structure of the Obamacare tax credits from being based solely on e to a means-based credit based mostly on age and partially on e.

• Prohibits almost all groups that provide abortions (e.g., Planned Parenthood) from receiving federal funds or Medicaid reimbursements. Also prohibits insurance policies that pay for abortions from being eligible for tax credits.

• Almost 10 percent of the bill (seven pages) is dedicated to a provision that prevents lottery winners who win over $80,000 from getting Medicaid. (This seems to be a cause championed by Rep. Joe Pitts, R-Penn.)

What major parts of Obamacare does it leave unchanged?

The two major provisions left unchanged are that parents will still be able to keep their kids on their insurance plans until the children reach age 26 and panies will still be required to ensure everyone, regardless of preexisting conditions.

How much will it cost and how many people will be affected?

No one knows just yet. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), a non-partisan independent group that provides analyses of budgetary and economic issues as it pertains to legislation, has not yet had a chance to “score” the bill. The CBO will consider the legislation and make a estimate about how much it will cost taxpayers and how many citizens will be affected by the changes.

Who opposes this bill?

Generally speaking, both liberals and conservatives. Liberals are concerned that the changes will reduce access to health insurance for the poor while cutting taxes for the wealthy. They are also concerned that it dismantles Obamacare, the most significant liberal policy victory this century. Conservatives are concerned that it will explode the deficit and leave Obamacare largely intact. “It’s Obamacare in a different format,” said Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.

Because of opposition from both sides of the political aisle, the AHCA is unlikely to pass the Senate in its current form.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Occupational licensing harms the economically vulnerable
Note:This article is part of the ‘Principles Project,’ a list of principles, axioms, and beliefs that undergirda Christian view of economics, liberty, and virtue. Clickhereto read the introduction and other posts in this series. The Principle: #10B — Because it interferes with economic liberty, occupational licensing is almost always unjust and unnecessary. The Definitions:This principle has two key terms that need to be clearly defined: Economic liberty — The freedom to secure and protect one’s labor, resources, and private property...
The intellectual maverick behind Brazil’s conservative wave
The recent victory of the conservative populist Jair Bolsonaro in the Brazilian presidential elections brought the name of the philosopher Olavo de Carvalho to the center of Brazilian political debate. Many have since stated that Carvalho is an intellectual precursor to the populist candidate – as someone who was able to reshape the Brazilian political discussion in ways that cleared an intellectual path for Bolsonaro’s electoral victory. It is not a coincidence that when Bolsonaro gave his victory speech, Carvalho’s...
Trade, nations, and war in an enlightened age
Between 1776 and 1815, Britain was at peace for just 10 years, notes Samuel Gregg, Acton’s Director of Research. Reading the Scottish defense of free trade without this in mind is a mistake: It’s easy to forget that the tremendous intellectual creativity flowing from the Scottish Enlightenment occurred against a background of war. These included Britain’s participation in the War of the Spanish Succession (1701–1714), the War of Austrian Succession (1740-1748), the Seven Years War (1756-1763), the American War of...
From Babel to Babylon: How God is redeeming our work
In our Sunday-school retellings of the Tower of Babel, we are often fixated on themes of human pride and failure, shrugging off the aspirations of the builders as frivolous or far-fetched. In a recent series at The Green Room, Greg Forster frames things a bit differently, highlighting the story’s hidden lessons about human destiny and redemptive purpose in a fallen world. Far from being a story about the limitations of human power, Forster argues, Babel is a story about humanity’s...
What is the ‘Norway Option’ for Brexit?
Theresa May has unveiled the withdrawal agreement she negotiated with the EU and, as of this writing, may survive opposition within her own party to see the deal voted on in Parliament. The 585-page agreement satisfied no party: Leavers find it too uncertain and stultifying, Remainers say it strains ties with the nearest proximate trade bloc. All parties agree: There must be other options. Some have inquired about the “Norway Option” – but what is it? Mark R. Royce...
Conflict and resolution: Charles de Gaulle’s understanding of ‘nation’
In an article written for Public Discourse, Samuel Gregg. Acton’s director of research, reviews Julian Jackson’s recent book about General Charles de Gaulle. The book municates the idea that “de Gaulle’s conception of France as a nation had a very specific character.” “De Gaulle” is a historical biography, not mentary on present-day debates concerning globalization or nationalism. “It’s difficult, however, not to reflect on these matters when reading this book,” writes Gregg, “given the central place accorded by de Gaulle...
Russell Kirk: Where does virtue come from?
“How can human society form and raise up virtuous people?” asks Barton Gingerich in this week’s Acton Commentary. As Gingerich notes, Russell Kirk explored this perennial question in a 1982 essay titled, “Virtue: Can It Be Taught?” Kirk defined virtues as “the qualities of full humanity: strength, courage, capacity, worth, manliness, moral excellence,” particularly qualities of “moral goodness: the practice of moral duties and the conformity of life to the moral law; uprightness; rectitude.” Despite modern attempts to supplant vigorous,...
Shenandoah and ‘every good gift’ for which we give thanks
“Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, eth down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning. Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.” I’ll be reading this passage (James 1:17-18) to my congregation on Thanksgiving morning. It’s one of the assigned Propers for Thanksgiving Day according to the 1928 Book of Common Prayer, and...
How gratitude transforms our perspective on global trade
The Thanksgiving holiday gives us a unique opportunity to reflect on God’s overwhelming grace, abundance, and provision—spiritually, materially, and otherwise. But amid and throughout those reflections, how often do we pause and consider the relationships, channels, and institutions that God uses in the process? Do we acknowledge that the very foods on our Thanksgiving e from an in-depth exchange of human creativity, investment, and daily sacrifice? Are we thankful for the labor it took to grow and harvest, package and...
Debunking the durable Malthusian myths
On his show yesterday, Rush Limbaugh discussed the famous bet between Julian Simon and Paul Ehrlich in 1980 over the question of whether or not the Earth had sufficient natural resources to sustain the growing global population. Erlich — a biologist from Stanford University — had gained some notoriety through his issuance of dire public warnings about the potential catastrophic consequences of continued human population growth, and had authored a book on the subject that was gaining a good deal...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved