Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about the Republicans’ bill to replace Obamacare
Explainer: What you should know about the Republicans’ bill to replace Obamacare
Jan 14, 2026 6:44 AM

Embed from Getty Images

Last night Congressional Republicans released two bills (here and here) which together constitute the current plan to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare). Here’s what you should know about the legislation known as the “American Health Care Act” (AHCA).

Does this legislation “repeal and replace” Obamacare?

Yes and no (but overall, not really).

No, the AHCA does pletely repeal Obamacare in toto and it merely replaces some aspects of the current law. But yes, it does repeal certain aspects of Obamacare and in some cases replaces them with new mandates and requirements.

Why doesn’t the GOP put forward a bill that simply repeals and replaces all of Obamacare?

The short answer is that Republicans in Congress don’t think they could pass such a bill. They would need 60 votes in the Senate to break a filibuster by the Democrats, and they only have 52. Instead, the GOP plans to use a process called “budget reconciliation” that allows them to make changes to federal revenue and spending with only 51 votes (which they may not be able to get since some Republicans in the Senate oppose the bill). The problem with this approach, as Avik Roy notes, is that “reconciliation can only repeal Obamacare’s taxes and spending; it can’t replace most of the law’s premium-hiking insurance regulations.”

What’s actually in the bill?

Here are some key changes that are included in the bill:

• Removes the “individual mandate,” the tax under Obamacare that people had to pay if they chose not to buy health insurance. However, the bill includes a “Continuous Health Insurance Coverage Incentive,” that provides a disincentive to dropping coverage and then picking it back up when a person gets ill. Those who reenroll would have to pay an “amount that is equal to 30 percent of the monthly premium rate.” (For example, if someone bought a policy that cost $6,000 a year ($500), they’d have to pay an additional $150 a month for one year before returning to the standard rate.)

• Rather than immediately repealing Obamacare’s Medicaid expansions, the bill allows them to remain in place until January 1, 2020. After that time, states will no longer be able to add new people to that program.

• Repeals almost all Obamacare-related taxes (e.g., tanning tax).

• Removes the regulation that prevented insurers from charging older enrollees more than three times as much as younger ones.

• Adds a per capita cap on states, which caps the federal funding per enrollee in the programs.

• Changes the structure of the Obamacare tax credits from being based solely on e to a means-based credit based mostly on age and partially on e.

• Prohibits almost all groups that provide abortions (e.g., Planned Parenthood) from receiving federal funds or Medicaid reimbursements. Also prohibits insurance policies that pay for abortions from being eligible for tax credits.

• Almost 10 percent of the bill (seven pages) is dedicated to a provision that prevents lottery winners who win over $80,000 from getting Medicaid. (This seems to be a cause championed by Rep. Joe Pitts, R-Penn.)

What major parts of Obamacare does it leave unchanged?

The two major provisions left unchanged are that parents will still be able to keep their kids on their insurance plans until the children reach age 26 and panies will still be required to ensure everyone, regardless of preexisting conditions.

How much will it cost and how many people will be affected?

No one knows just yet. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), a non-partisan independent group that provides analyses of budgetary and economic issues as it pertains to legislation, has not yet had a chance to “score” the bill. The CBO will consider the legislation and make a estimate about how much it will cost taxpayers and how many citizens will be affected by the changes.

Who opposes this bill?

Generally speaking, both liberals and conservatives. Liberals are concerned that the changes will reduce access to health insurance for the poor while cutting taxes for the wealthy. They are also concerned that it dismantles Obamacare, the most significant liberal policy victory this century. Conservatives are concerned that it will explode the deficit and leave Obamacare largely intact. “It’s Obamacare in a different format,” said Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.

Because of opposition from both sides of the political aisle, the AHCA is unlikely to pass the Senate in its current form.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The road to London Bridge is paved with self-loathing
The day after Thanksgiving, the world saw a murderous terrorist prevented from maximizing his death toll by desperate people armed with nothing more than personal courage, a narwhal tusk, and a fire extinguisher. As I write at The Stream, unless the West jettisons its paralyzing doubt of itself and its historic faith, that scene threatens to e an “epoch-defining event.” Naively believing that all religions are alike, and that Western capitalism is uniquely exploitative, renders European culture incapable of understanding...
Samuel Gregg: Charles de Gaulle could have prevented the Brexit debate
The integration of Europe in the postwar era continues to roil politics continent-wide, most notably taking center stage in this week’s UK general election. Yet Acton Institute Director of Research Samuel Gregg writes that Charles de Gaulle could have spared Europe this future. Gregg traces the history of European supranationalism from Immanuel Kant to Jacques Maritain’s Christian Democratic ideas in a new essay posted today at Law & Liberty. De Gaulle, although far from an isolationist, understood the reality of...
Wilhelm Röpke on liberalism and Catholic social teaching
This week’s Acton Commentary, adapted from my preface to the newest Acton Institute publication The Humane Economist: A Wilhelm Röpke Reader, illustrates what makes Röpke such an interesting and vital economist: Röpke saw his project in holistic terms involving intersecting and interdependent spheres or orden that to be fully appreciated and understood scientifically must be examined in their economic, social, and moral dimensions. mitments to mainline economic analysis, the importance of social institutions, and the moral and religious framework of...
Trade war hits home: How tariffs disrupt American businesses
Despite the “America-first” claims of trade protectionists and economic nationalists, we continue to see the ill effects of the Trump administration’s recent wave of tariffs—particularly among American businesses, workers, and consumers. Alas, while such controls may serve to temporarily benefit a select number of businesses or industries, they are just as likely to distort and contort any number of other fruitful relationships and creative partnerships across the economic order—at home, abroad, and everywhere in between. In a recent article for...
How reason and faith complement each other
Faith and reason are mutually reinforcing. When faith and reason bined, faith is kept from metastasizing into irrationality and reason is kept from ing overly materialistic. bination of faith and reason is the foundation of Western Civilization. In a new review of Samuel Gregg’s book, Reason, Faith, and the Struggle for Western Civilization, Gene Veith of Patrick Henry College notes that “[t]he scholastic theology of Roman Catholicism, grounded as it is in Aristotelian philosophy, does indeed integrate faith and reason,...
Hugo Chavez and Jack London on why socialism kills
In an emotional story in the January 2020 issue of Reason, Jose Cordiero relays how “socialism killed my father” – through economic scarcity. His article highlights the life-and-death stakes of wealth creation. Cordiero writes that he was working in Silicon Valley when he got a call that his father had experienced kidney failure in Caracas. Yet even traveling to Bolivarian Venezuela became virtually impossible. The economic collapse ushered in by Hugo Chavez’s socialist policies dried up demand: Indeed, the number...
An encyclical on China and the US?
Sen. Marco Rubio’s recent speech on capitalism and mon good, taking its point of departure in Rerum Novarum, has gotten a good bit of coverage. Yesterday he delivered remarks at the National Defense University and opened with these words: This morning I am honored to speak here at the National Defense University to discuss the defining geopolitical relationship of this century: the one between the United States and China. Unfortunately, I was unable to find a papal encyclical on this...
Video: David Hebert on how ice got to India
The 2019 Acton Lecture Series wrapped up last week Thursday with a lecture by David Hebert,assistant professor of economics and director of the Center for Markets, Ethics, and Entrepreneurship at Aquinas College. Hebert told the story of Frederick Tudor, a Boston entrepreneur who in the early 1800s set about finding a way to transport ice to Cuba, believing that given the opportunity, Cubans would pay handsomely for the resource. It wasn’t easy, but in the end he was right, and...
The Virtue of Liberalism
Today, Law & Liberty published the text of my lecture for the Philadelphia Society in October: “Why Economic Nationalism Fails.” The topic for the panel was “Conservatism and the Coming Economy.” Since I’m not a determinist and doubt my own powers of prediction, I focused on what political economy conservatives ought to support in the future, despite worrying trends in the present: Conservatives ought to reaffirm the good of economic liberty, both domestically and internationally. Free markets and free trade,...
Brian Tierney, rest in peace
The world of medieval history suffered a great loss on November 30 with the death of Professor Brian Tierney. Widely recognized as a leading scholar of medieval Western Christianity and how church law and institutions affected the broader culture of Europe, Tierney wrote widely but also deeply on topics ranging from the origins of papal infallibility to how religion shaped the development of constitutionalism. Born in 1922, the formative experience for Tierney was, like for most of his generation, the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved