Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about the Meals on Wheels controversy
Explainer: What you should know about the Meals on Wheels controversy
Dec 3, 2025 10:58 AM

Embed from Getty Images

What’s the story?

Last week, numerous media outlets falselyreported that the Trump administration proposed 2018 budget would eliminate charities like Meals on Wheels. The reports also claimedthat White House budget director Mick Mulvaney had said during a press conference that Meals on Wheels “doesn’t work.” (Representative headlines included Time’s “Trump’s Budget Would Kill a Program That Feeds 2.4 Million Senior Citizens” and Slate’s article: “Trump’s budget director says Meals on Wheels doesn’t work.”

What is “Meals on Wheels”?

Meals on Wheels is a name that refers to two different entities: (1) The approximately 5,000 independently-run munity programs called Meals on Wheels whose function is to provide nutritious meals to homebound seniors as well as safety checks and human connection, and (2) Meals on Wheels America, a national membership organization that does not provide direct services (i.e., meals).

Did the White House budget director say Meals on Wheels “doesn’t work”?

No. Mulvaney said that Community Development Block Grants (CDBGs), a program administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), were identified as “just not showing any results” and that the $3 billion should be spent on other budget items.

Some states use CDBG money for Meals on Wheels. However, HUD doesn’t know how much of that money ultimately goes to that program. As USA Today notes, “It’s certainly a small fraction: Social services are capped by law at 15% of the block grants, and the most recent HUD figures show all senior services receive about $33 million.”

Even the liberal activist magazine Mother Jonescontends that Mulvaney’s words were taken out of context:

Mulvaney, obviously, wasn’t saying that Meals on Wheels doesn’t work. He was saying that CDBGs don’t work. Meals on Wheels might be great, munity grants aren’t, and he wants to eliminate them. But by smushing together three quotes delivered at three different points, it sounds like Mulvaney was gleefully killing off food for the elderly. . . . Someone managed to plant this idea with reporters, and more power to them. Good job! But reporters ought to be smart enough not to fall for it.

Is it true that Meals on Wheels only receives 3 percent of its funding from the federal government?

Yes and no. Meals on Wheels America (MOWA), the national membership organization, says it receives only 3 percent of its $7.9 million dollar budget from the federal government (approximately $239,347). parison, MOWA paid its top six employees a pensation of $1,065,344, including $304,758 to the nonprofit’s CEO.

MOWA says that “in the aggregate” local Meals on Wheels programs receive 35 percent of their funding directly from the federal government.

Will direct federal funding for local Meals on Wheels programs be cut?

Unclear, though unlikely.

The direct funding for Meals on Wheels es from the Nutrition Service Programs, administered by the Administration on Aging within the Administration for Community Living of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the Older Americans Act. In 2015, the program gave U.S. states, territories, and tribal groups a total of $224,673,820 for home meals.

President Trump’s budget proposal proposes to cut the Department of Health and Human Services by 16 percent. It is unknown whether any part of this reduction will include the Nutrition Service Programs, which helps to fund Meals on Wheels. Additionally, Congress could direct the funding for this program not be reduced or eliminated.

Some local organizations also gain additional funding Community Services Block Grant (CSBG), Social Services Block Grant (SSBG), Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS), and Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP). There is currently no evidence that any of these programs are being cut or that their budget reductions would affect Meals on Wheels programs.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
First Amendment Is For Conservatives, Too
The First Amendment (“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”) is for all Americans. I know that seems obvious, but the folks at Salon seem to need a reminder. Jenny Kutner has taken offense to a group of Catholic women expressing their...
The Economics of Liberation Theology
None of the prominent liberation theologians influential in Latin America had significant training in or exposure to the discipline of economics, says Carroll Ríos de Rodríguez in this week’s Acton Commentary. This was odd given that their concern for the material well-being demanded at least some attempt to provide an economic explanation of underdevelopment and mass poverty. Instead of engaging in such economic reflection, many liberation theologians effectively married their theology to various renderings of what was then the fashionable...
Who Pays for Detroit’s Water?
As I was poring over the morning news the other day, it seemed to me that every few days there is another water crisis somewhere; whether it’s California’s drought, or more recently the controversial decision in which the Detroit panies shut off the water supply to over 15,000 customers. But are we really looking at water regulation, appropriation, and the morality of shutting water off in the correct light? Let’s start with some of the basics: Water is essential for...
Distinguishing Capitalism
Last month the New York Times hosted a discussion on the question, “Has Capitalism e patible With Christianity?” There’s lots to be said about the “Room for Debate” feature, including a note on the caption for the lead image in the introduction. The image is a rendering of the classic scene from the Gospels, Jesus’ cleansing of the temple. The NYT caption reads thus: es down hard on the bankers of his day.” Perhaps that’s a bit of ideological balance...
Our Foster Care System Is Becoming A ‘Pipeline’ For Human Trafficking
At any given time in the U.S., there are about half a million children in foster care. Many of these children are in crisis situations, and will be in foster care for only a short time, returning home or to live with a family member when the crisis has been resolved. Other children, however, remain in the system. The lucky ones will remain in one home, loved and nurtured, possibly even adopted (although for most that can take up to...
In Memoriam: John Blundell (1952-2014)
The Acton Institute lost a dear friend this week. Historian John Blundell passed away on Tuesday. According to the Atlas Network (where Blundell had served as past president and board member), he will be remembered for his writing. [Blundell] followed his own Margaret Thatcher: A Portrait of the Iron Lady(2008) with an edited collection, Remembering Margaret Thatcher: Commemorations, Tributes and Assessments(2013). He wrote Ladies For Liberty: Women Who Made a Difference in American History(2nd expanded edition 2013) to also showcase...
Why Liberals Should Support the Hobby Lobby Decision
When the Supreme Court ruled on the Hobby Lobby case, the near universal reaction by liberals was that it was a travesty of epic proportion. But as self-professed liberal law professor Brett McDonnell argues, the left should embrace the Hobby Lobby decision since it supports liberal values: The first question was: Can for-profit corporations invoke religious liberty rights under RFRA? The court answered yes. HBO’s John Oliver nicely expressed the automatic liberal riposte, parodying the idea that corporations are people....
Heritage Foundation Releases Index of Culture and Opportunity
The Heritage Foundation has released their 2014 Index of Culture and Opportunity, the first annual report that tells how social and economic factors relate to the success of individuals, families, opportunity, and freedom. Through charts that track changes, mentary that explains the trends, the Index shows the current state of some key features of American society and tells whether specific indicators are improving or getting off track. Here are a few highlights from the report: On Culture From 2001 to...
What You Should Know About Paul Ryan’s Anti-Poverty Plan
Social mobility is a “key tenet of the American Dream” yet relative upward mobility has been stagnant, says Rep. Paul Ryan in his new 73-page proposal for reforming federal anti-poverty programs. Ryan acknowledges that there are many individual and social factors that affect upward mobility (e.g., family structure) but adds that “public policy is still a factor, and government has a role to play in providing a safety net and expanding opportunity for all.” Expanding Opportunity in Americaincludes mendations for...
In Welfare Systems, Two Plus Two May No Longer Equal Four
“You are a slow learner, Winston.” “How can I help it? How can I help but see what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four.” “Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to e sane.” – George Orwell, 1984 In a calculation that surely qualifies as “new math,” the government has created an equation in which $29,000...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved