Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What You Should Know About the Eric Garner Case
Explainer: What You Should Know About the Eric Garner Case
Mar 16, 2025 5:14 PM

A New York grand jury refused to indict a police officer in the death of a 43-year-old man that wascaught on video. Here are some details about the controversial case:

What was the incident that causedGarner’s death?

On July 17, 2014, two New York City police officers, Justin Damico and Daniel Pantaleo, attempted to arrest EricGarner. WhenGarnerresisted, Pantaleo grabbed him around the neck and tackled him to the ground. As Damico and three other officers assisted in pinning him to the sidewalk,Garnerrepeated nine times that he couldn’t breath.Garnerwas 6’3”, 350-pounds, and had a history of medical problems, including asthma.

AlthoughGarnerwas in obvious respiratory distress, none of the officers or the EMT personnel who arrived on the scene performed CPR. He died of cardiac arrest a few minutes later while on the way to the hospital.

Why wasGarnerbeing arrested?

Police say they observedGarnerselling untaxed cigarettes,though his family saidhe didn’t have any of the contraband on him or in his car at the time of his death.Garnerhad a criminal record thatincluded more than 30 arrestsfor charges such as assault, resisting arrest, and grand larceny. He was currently out on bail for several misdemeanor charges, including possession or sale of untaxed cigarettes.

What was the cause of death?

The city’s medical examiner’s office saidGarner’s death was caused by pression of neck pression of chest and prone positioning during physical restraint by police.” The report also said factors contributing to his death included asthma and heart disease. The report concluded the death was a homicide (i.e., the killing of one human being by another human being).

Who was the officer that was accused of killingGarner?

Daniel Pantaleois an eight-year NYPD veteran and plainclothes patrolman. Two years ago, he was accused of strip-searching two men in public following a traffic stop and having “slapped” and “tapped” their testicles. Civilian Complaint Review Board deemed the allegation to be unsubstantiated.

After the grand jury decision, Pantaleoissued a statementsaying it was “never my intention to harm anyone.”

“I feel very bad about the death of Mr.Garner,” he said. “My family and I include him and his family in our prayers and I hope that they will accept my personal condolences for their loss.”

Pantaleo is currently on modified duty performing crime analysis. He is still being investigated by the Internal Affairs Bureau, which is looking into his possible use of excessive force and maydecide to charge him departmentally.

What type of investigation was conducted?

Independent investigations spanning four months were conducted by the NYPD’s Internal Affairs Bureau, the NYC Medical Examiner, and the Richmond County District Attorney’s Office (which included eight assistant district attorneys and several detective investigators). More than38 interviews were conducted, and 22 civilian witnesses reportedto have seen some part of the interactionGarnerand the police.

Aspecial investigative grand prised of 23 members was impanelled specifically for this incident and was dedicated solely to hearing the evidence in this case. All members attended every session from September 20 to December 3. The grand jury heard from all witnesses, examined forensic evidence, and considered all video and photographic evidence. To charge Pantaleo with a crime and send the case to trial, 12 of the jury members would have had to vote that there is legally sufficient evidence and reasonable cause to believe the accused mitted a crime. (For more on how grand juries work, seehere.)

For what crime was OfficerPantaleo charged?

Because of the secrecy rules of the grand jury, the specific crime that Pantaleo was being charged with has not been revealed. However, law experts said the grand jury was likely considering charges that included manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide, and reckless endangerment.

Why were no other officers charged?

Other officers seen on the video restrainingGarneron the ground weregiven immunity in return for their testimony.

Will we get to learn specific details about what the grand jury considered, as in the Michael Brown case?

Maybe. Unlike in some other states, New York law does not allow a district attorney to disclose such information. However, the district attorney has filed a petition with the court to publicly release specific information in connection with the grand jury investigation.

What is a “chokehold”?

A “chokehold” is a general term for a type of grappling hold that critically reduces or prevents either air (choking) or blood (strangling) from passing through the neck of an opponent. Chokeholds are against NYPD policy but they arenot currently illegal under any criminal statute.

Adding to both the confusion and the controversy was the difficulty in determining whether Pantaleo used a chokehold or a “submission hold” (such as a headlock). Submission holds areneither illegal nor forbidden by police policy. News reports claim that police frequently use such grappling moves to subdue resistant suspects. The autopsy did not help clear up the confusion since it showed that neither the windpipe nor neck bones were damaged in the encounter. (An “airchoke” would have likely caused damage to the windpipe, while a “blood choke” could have triggered circulatory problems without causing visible damage to the neck.)

What happens now?

The U.S. justice department islaunching a civil rights investigationinto the death ofGarner. Attorney General Eric Holder announced “an independent, thorough, fair and expeditious” investigation into potential civil rights violations in the case. He also said the Department of Justice would conduct a plete review” of material gathered in the local investigation.

Garner’s family hasfiled a notice of claimto sue the city, its police department, and six of the officers involved for $75 million.

Other posts in this series:

Human Trafficking and Global Efforts to Abolish Slavery• Grand Juries•Who are the Recent Nobel Peace Prize Winners? •What’s Going on with Hong Kong’s ‘Umbrella Revolution’? •Ebola Crisis •Scottish Independence• Obamacare Subsidies Ruling • Border Crisis•What’s Going on in Iraq?•EPA’s Proposed New Climate Rule•VA Scandal•What is Going on in Vietnam?•Boko Haram and the Kidnapped Christian Girls•The Supreme Court’s Ruling on Government Prayer•Earth Day?•Holy Week?•What’s Going On in Crimea?•What Just Happened with Russia and Ukraine?•What’s Going on in Ukraine•Jobs Report•The Hobby Lobby Amicus Briefs•Common Core?•What’s Going on in Syria?•What’s Going on in Egypt?

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Noodles in Nigeria: When private business breeds economic development
In the West’s various efforts to alleviate global poverty, we continue to see the promotion of top-down solutions at the expense of bottom-up enterprises and institutions. Yet despite the setbacks and slowdowns caused by various governments and foreign aid, the entrepreneurs and workers on the ground aren’t sitting idly by. Across the developing world, people aren’t waiting for policies to change, conditions to improve, handouts to be given, or risks to evaporate. They are actively transforming their environments and creating...
The Federal Reserve as lender of last resort
Note: This is post #121 in a weekly video series on basic economics. If you heard a rumor that your bank was insolvent, asks economist Alex Tabarrok, what would you do? As Tabarrok says, a typical reaction is to panic. And if you can’t get your money out, your next step would likely be to try and get all of your cash in hand. The rumor could even be false, but if enough people responded as if it were true,...
Russia bans fake news: a lesson in unintended consequences
For months, French President Emmanuel Macron has asked European leaders to crack down on fake news. At last, someone has taken his advice. Last month, Vladimir Putin signed a law banning Russian websites from posting “fake news” stories. The government, of course, will be the arbiter of truth and falsehood. Coincidentally, the same day he signed a bill punishing websites that post stories insulting Vladimir Putin. The Moscow Times reported: The legislation will establish punishments for spreading information that “exhibits...
The dangers of Catholic anti-liberalism
Korey D. Maas, associate professor of history at Hillsdale College, has written a timely warning to American Catholics at Public Discourse titled, ‘The Coming Anti-Catholicism.’ Maas begins his essay with a recounting of the early history of American anti-Catholicism, its mitigation in the 1960s, and its troubling resurgence in recent years: bined effects of Camelot and the Council were to make political anti-Catholicism gauche almost overnight. Nobody, therefore, is surprised today when conservative Catholics and liberal non-Catholics alike respond to...
Religious toleration in a religious state
The concepts of toleration espoused by theologians in the officially religious states of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries deserve closer examination. So argue Tobias Dienst and Christoph Strohm in their introduction to Martinus Becanus’s 1607 treatise, On the Duty to Keep Faith with Heretics. Becanus (1563–1624), a Dutch Jesuit theologian who became court confessor to the Holy Roman Emperor, lived in and supported an officially Roman Catholic state, but this did not prevent him from developing a concept of religious...
Acton Line podcast: The moral hazard of student debt; Unraveling Islam
On this episode of Acton Line, Caroline Roberts speaks with Andrew Kloster, deputy director of the Center for the Study of the Administrative State at George Mason University, about the student debt crisis. Kloster claims that the student debt crisis is the greatest moral hazard of our Nation and explains how he sees the crisis panning out in the future. On the second segment, Acton’s director of research, Samuel Gregg, sits down with Mustafa Akyol, senior research fellow at the...
Rev. Ben Johnson: The socialist bizarro world of David Bentley Hart
When e across a think piece so catastrophically wrong as David Bentley Hart’s April 27 New York Times column, “Can We Please Relax About ‘Socialism’?” you marvel at the effort, intentional or not. Hart, an Eastern Orthodox theologian and, as the Times puts it a “cultural critic,” says he knows that, “in this country we employ terms like ‘socialism’ with wanton indifference to historical details and conceptual distinctions.” He’s right, but not in the way he thinks he’s right. After...
Presidential candidate Kamala Harris: We need to ban right-to-work laws
Speaking at a recent a Service Employees International Union (SEIU) event, Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris said there there is a need for “banning right-to-work laws.” It’s unclear how Harris plans to do this from the federal level, as Right to Work laws are state laws that guarantee a person cannot pelled to join or pay dues to a labor union as a condition of employment. “Kamala Harris wants to make absolutely sure that we know she’s an authoritarian,” says...
Half of millennials would prefer to live in a socialist or communist country
Yesterday was May Day, a date which some people—mostly socialists munists—consider to be an observance of International Workers’ Day. Others believe instead of celebrating labor the day should be considered an international observance of Victims of Communism Day. Law professor Ilya Somin explains why we should use the day memorate the victims munist totalitarian tyranny: While the influence munist ideology has declined since its mid-twentieth century peak, it is far from dead. Largely munist regimes remain in power in Cuba...
America doesn’t have a radically capitalist economy
Socialism, it seems, is back. But maybe the real question we should be asking is how far the United States has embraced various features of what might be called social democracy over the past 100 years. This is one of the points underscored in a well-written paper by the Heritage Foundation’s David Burton, entitled “Comparing Free Enterprise with Socialism” (April 30, 2019). Among other things, Burton also manages to: • bring clarity to the free markets versus socialism debate by...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved