Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about single-payer healthcare
Explainer: What you should know about single-payer healthcare
Jan 21, 2026 11:26 PM

Today, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is unveiling his legislation for a single-payer healthcare system. Here is what you should know about single-payer systems and Sanders’s proposal:

What is single-payer healthcare?

In a single-payer healthcare system, the government pays for all medically necessary service for of all citizens, regardless of e or ability to pay.

Does the U.S. have a single-payer system?

In the U.S. most citizens over the age of 65 and people under 65 who have specific disabilities qualify for the single-payer system know as Medicare. The expansion of this single-payer system to all citizens is sometimes referred to as “Medicare for all.”

The state of Vermont also attempted to create a single-payer system but scrapped the idea in 2014. As Sarah Kliff explains, “budget analysts realized Vermont would need an additional $2.5 billion in tax revenue to pay for the system. That would have required raising the payroll tax by 11.5 percent and e tax by 9 percent.”

Isn’t the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) a single-payer system?

No. Obamacare is an expansion of government requirements to cover previously uninsured people. Obamacare does not collect money that is paid directly to medical providers but instead relies on currently existing private panies.

What is Sander’s single-payer proposal?

Sen. Sanders has introduced the “Expanded & Improved Medicare For All Act.” The purpose of the legislation is “To provide prehensive health insurance coverage for all United States residents, improved health care delivery, and for other purposes.”

Currently, Sanders has 15 Senate Democrats as co-sponsors for the bill.

What benefits would be covered under Sanders’s single-payer plan?

Everyone living in the U.S. would receive by mail a Medicare For All Program Cardafter filling out a 2-page registration form. All medically necessary services would be covered, including at least the following:

(1) Primary care and prevention.

(2) Approved dietary and nutritional therapies.

(3) Inpatient care.

(4) Outpatient care.

(5) Emergency care.

(6) Prescription drugs.

(7) Durable medical equipment.

(8) Long-term care.

(9) Palliative care.

(10) Mental health services.

(11) The full scope of dental services, services, including periodontics, oral surgery, and endodontics, but not including cosmetic dentistry.

(12) Substance abuse treatment services.

(13) Chiropractic services, not including electrical stimulation.

(14) Basic vision care and vision correction (other than laser vision correction for cosmetic purposes).

(15) Hearing services, including coverage of hearing aids.

(16) Podiatric care.

How would the law determine what medical practices qualified and what prices would be paid?

According the bill, the benefits would be available through any licensed health care clinician anywhere in the United States that is legally qualified to provide the benefits.

Additionally, no deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing would be imposed with respect to covered benefits.

No institution may be a participating provider unless it is a public or not-for-profit institution. Private physicians, private clinics, and private health care providers would be allowed to continue to operate as private entities, but would be prohibited from being investor owned.

It would be illegal for a private health insurer to sell health insurance coverage that duplicates the benefits provided under this Act. Health insurance coverage would still be legal for additional benefits not covered by this Act, such as for cosmetic surgery or other services and items that are not medically necessary.

Reimbursement fees and salaries would be determined by the government after “close consultation with the National Board of Universal Quality and Access and regional and State directors.” Initially, the current prevailing fees or reimbursement would be the basis for the fee negotiation for all professional services covered under this Act.

The prices to be paid each year under this Act for covered pharmaceuticals, medical supplies, and medically necessary assistive equipment would be negotiated annually by the Program.

How would this program be paid for?

Mostly by increased taxes, though the amounts have not been outlined. The proposed taxes include:

• Increasing personal e taxes on the top 5 percent e earners.

• Instituting a “modest and progressive” excise tax on payroll and self-employment e.

• Instituting a “modest tax” on unearned e.

• Instituting a “small tax” on stock and bond transactions.

How much would Sanders’s Medicare For All plan cost?

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) hasn’t yet scored the bill, but it is estimated to cost nearly $1.4 trillion a year.

To put that into perspective, that’s more money than bined annual budgets for the Dept. of Agriculture ($133 billion), Dept. of Commerce ($9.28 Billion), Dept. of Defense – military programs ($516 billion), Dept. of Education ($60.2 billion), Dept. of Energy ($26.7 billion), Dept. of Homeland Security ($42 billion), HUD (35.8 billion), Dept. of the Interior ($13.2 billion), Dept. of Justice ($31 billion), Dept. of Labor ($44.8 billion), Dept. of State ($25.4 billion), EPA ($7.65 billion), NASA ($16.9 billion), and all international assistance programs ($23.3 billion).

Also, the total revenue taken in federal taxes is $3.21 trillion a year. To add another $1 trillion—a 31 percent increase—would require raising taxes on nearly every American.

Is there a chance this single-payer bill could e law?

No, at least not while the Republicans control the House, Senate, and the White House. And even if the Democrats were to regain control of Congress in 2018 its unlikely they’d have the votes within their own party to pass the bill.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Politics of Crony Unionism
Last week’s Acton Commentary and blog post focused on my claims about “crony unionism” and how the intimate relationship between Big Labor and Big Government corrupt both. Here’s another instance of the kinds of gross conflicts of interest produced by this relationship: It’s hard to see this as anything but partisan pandering on the part of the largest public sector union, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). Meanwhile, the Washington Post asks, “Was politics behind the...
Explaining the New Democratic Logo
“The new Democratic logo is so bad that the intellectual rot in the official announcement went largely unnoticed.” The rest of my piece is here at The American Spectator. ...
Rev. Sirico: Respect others’ rights, but also their values
A new column by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, was published today in the Detroit News. This column will also be linked in tomorrow’s Acton News & Commentary. Sign up for the free weekly Acton newsletter here. +++++++++ Faith and policy: Respect others’ rights, but also their values FATHER ROBERT SIRICO If such an award were to be given for the Most Contentious Religious Story of 2010, the two main contenders would undoubtedly be...
Work as if It Mattered
The conversations over the last few weeks here on work have raised a couple of questions. In the context of criticisms on the perspectives on work articulated by Lester DeKoster and defended by menter John E. asks, “…what is it that you hope readers will change in their lives, and why?” I want to change people’s view of their work. I want them to see how it has value not simply as a means to some other end, but in...
The Daily Show Takes on a Union
The Daily Show exposes some union hypocrisy (HT). In the words of the union local head, es down to greed”: ...
A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I take a look at the prospects of “right-to-work” legislation in Michigan, “A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism.” One of the things that disturbs me the most about what I call “crony unionism” is the hand-in-glove relationship between the labor unions and big government. We have the same kind of special pleading and rent seeking in this system as we do in crony capitalism, but the labor unions enjoy such special protection...
Radio Free Acton: The Stewardship of Art, Part 2
Last week, we posted part 1 of our podcast on the proper Christian stewardship of art; for those who have been waiting for the conclusion, we’re happy to present part 2. David Michael Phelps continues to lead the discussion between Professors Nathan Jacobs and Calvin Seerveld, who previously debated this topic in the Controversy section of our Journal of Markets & Morality. The first portion of that exchange is available at the link for part 1; the remainder of the...
Mandating Monolithic Medicine
Among the warnings sounded as the Democratic health care reform bill was being debated was that the federal insurance mandate included in the bill—even though not national health care per se—would essentially give the federal government control of the insurance industry. The reason: If everyone is forced to buy insurance, then the government must deem what sort of insurance qualifies as adequate to meet the mandate. This piece of Obamacare promises to turn every medical procedure into a major political...
Envy: A Deadly (Economic) Sin
Victor Claar, Acton University lecturer and professor of economics at Henderson State University, will give a talk tonight in Washington, D.C., hosted by AEI, “Grieving the Good of Others: Envy and Economics.” If you are in the area, you are encouraged to attend and hear Dr. Claar as well as two respondents discuss the topic of envy and its moral and economic consequences. Here’s a description of the event: Critics of capitalism often argue that this economic system is irretrievably...
Journal of Religion and Business Ethics
The latest issue of the newly launched Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is now available (vol. 1, no. 2). Check out the contents at their website. From the journal’s about page: “The Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is a peer-reviewed journal that examines the ethical and religious issues that arise in the modern business setting. While much attention has been given to the philosophical treatment of business ethics, this is the first journal to address the more inclusive...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved