Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about President Trump’s FY2018 budget
Explainer: What you should know about President Trump’s FY2018 budget
Dec 18, 2025 11:31 AM

What is the president’s budget?

Technically, it’s only a budgetrequest (and in this case, just a blueprint of a request). The budget request is aproposal telling Congress how much money the president believes should be spent on the various Cabinet-level federal functions, like agriculture, defense, education, etc. (The 62-page budget blueprintcan be found here.)

Why does the president submit a budget to Congress?

The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 requires that the President of the United States submit to Congress, on or before the first Monday in February of each year, a detailed budget request for ing federal fiscal year, which begins on October 1.

Is the outgoing or ing president required to submit the budget?

The Constitution requires each new Congress to convene on January 3 and the ing president to take office on January 20. Prior to 1990, that gap required that the outgoing president submit a budget, which his predecessor could change. In 1990, the deadline was moved to February. This allowed the outgoing president the option of skipping the process (an option taken by George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush).

If it’s due the first Monday in February, why are we just now hearing about it?

All recent presidentshave missed the statutory deadline for budget submissions in their first year in office.

Missing the deadline used to be a rare occurrence. According to the House Budget Committee, “All presidents from Harding to Reagan’s first term met the statutory budget submission deadline in every year.” Reagan and Clinton both missed their deadlines once in eight years. President Obama holds the record for missing the deadline six times in his eight years in office.

What is the function of the president’s budget request?

The president’s annual budget requestserves three functions:

• Tells Congress how much money the president thinks the Federal government should spend on public needs and programs;

• Tells Congress how much money the president thinks the government should take in through taxes and other sources of revenue; and

• Tells Congress how large a deficit or surplus would result from the president’s proposal.

What spending does the president have to request in his budget?

Thebudget requestincludes all optional or “discretionary” Federal programs and projects that must have their spending renewed or “reauthorized” by Congress every fiscal year. For example, most defense programs are discretionary, as are programs like NASA, Small Business Administration (SBA) loans, and housing assistance grants. The president’s budget request mends funding levels for each discretionary program, which totals only about one-third of federal expenditures.

What’s not included in the budget?

Mainly, “entitlement” programs established by Congress, like Social Security and Medicare. Since those programs include mandatory spending, the president does not have to request they be funded for ing year, though his budget request can mend new benefits or changes in the level of spending for specific entitlement programs. Entitlement prise about two-thirds of Federal spending.

What happens when Congress receives the president’s budget request?

The House and Senate Budget Committees will hold hearings on the president’s budget request. In the hearings, administration officials are called to testify about and justify their specific budget requests. From these hearings the Budget Committees will prepare a draft of the congressional budget resolution.

The Congressional Budget Act requires passage of an annual “Congressional Budget Resolution”, a concurrent resolution passed in identical form by both House and Senate, but not requiring the president’s signature. The Budget Resolution provides Congress an opportunity to propose its own spending, revenue, borrowing, and economic goals for ing fiscal year, as well as the next five fiscal years.

Did the president offer a “balanced budget?”

No. In a recent interview President Trump said, “I want a balanced budget eventually. But I want to have a strong military. To me, that’s much more important than anything.”

How much does the president propose to spend?

President Trumpproposes to spend $1.068 trillion in discretionary spending (about $4 trillion dollars overall once non-discretionary items are included).

What’s the bottom line on the changes in the recent budget request?

President Trump’s plan would increase:

• Defense spending – 10 percent

• Homeland Security spending – 7 percent

• Veteran’s Affairs spending by 6 percent.

It would reduce spending on the following programs:

• Environmental Protection Agency 31 percent

• State, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and Treasury International Programs – 29 percent

• Agriculture – 21 percent

• Labor – 21 percent

• Army Corps of Engineers – 16 percent

• Commerce – 16 percent

• Health and Human Services – 16 percent

• Education – 14 percent

• Housing and Urban Development – 13 percent

• Transportation – 13 percent

• Interior – 12 percent

• Energy – 6 percent

• Small Business Administration – 5 percent

• Justice – 4 percent

• Treasury – 4 percent

• NASA – 1 percent

• Other agencies – 10 percent

Will Congress pass the president’s budget request in its current form?

Definitely not. Congress has the ultimate say in how tax dollars are spent. Because the priorities of individual legislators differ from those of the president, they’ll shift the spending in various ways.

If Congress isn’t going to pass a budget, why does anyone care about the president’s budget request?

The actual process may be nothing more than legally mandated political theater but the details of the president’s budget request reveal thepriorities of his administration (e.g., strengthening the military).

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Ex Ante vs. Ex Post Government Action
I haven’t started Marvin Olasky’s new book yet, but here’s a bit from the abstract of a new NBER paper, “Rules Rather Than Discretion: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina,” by Howard Kunreuther and Mark Pauly. Speaking of property owners who suffer severe damage and don’t have the resources to rebuild: To avoid these large and often uneven ex post expenditures, we consider the option of prehensive private disaster insurance with risk based rates. It may be more efficient to have an...
The Marketer’s Morality
Seth Godin issued a call recently for marketers to take stock of their trade and embrace the moral aspects of their industry: “You’re responsible for what you sell. When you choose to sell it, more of it gets sold.” I particularly like how Godin emphasizes personal responsibility. This is something that is not unique to a particular profession, of course, and is therefore a reality that constantly needs to be reiterated. “As marketers, we have the power to change things,...
The Perfect, the Enemy of the Good
Voltaire had a saying: “The perfect is the enemy of the good,” or, “Le mieux est l’ennemi du bien.” It’s often repeated, especially in public policy circles, that the perfect the enemy of the good, implying that you should favor the realistic good that can be done rather than the unattainable perfect ideal. And now you know why. Because “good” beats “perfect” in a Google Fight, and by a rather handy margin. HT: Seth’s Blog, pares “unique”, “best”, and “finest”....
How a Missional Perspective Changes Culture
The only way that culture can be truly changed, in terms of the gospel, is by movements of the Spirit that are birthed in congregational life. The Christian Right thinks that it can alter culture by direct partisan political pressure led by media personalities and tried-and-true techniques. They could not be more sadly mistaken. The failure of this approach is self-evident over the course of the past six years. The late missional theologian Lesslie Newbigin understood this well when he...
From the ‘Well, Duh!’ Department
“A human brain trapped inside a mouse’s body — not a good idea,” says Anjana Ahuja in the UK Times. Not convinced? Check out this piece of mine over at BreakPoint, “A Monster Created in Man’s Image.” ...
Subsidiarity Inverted
Jeff Mirus of CatholicCulture.org flogs an address by Capuchin friar and dean of theology at St. Mary’s Seminary and University in Baltimore, Father David Couturier. I share Mirus’s assessment that “one is at times unsure exactly what Fr. Couturier means,” but some of his points do seem at odds with the vision of charity articulated by, for example, Benedict XVI in Deus Caritas Est, as Mirus points out. Especially perplexing is Couturier’s statement concerning the role of Capuchin Franciscans in...
Francis Collins – A Believer Looks at the Human Genome
Christian geneticist and author (The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief, Simon & Schuster Trade Sales) Dr. Francis Collins is the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Human Genome Research Institute and head of the Human Genome Project. Recently he was the keynote speaker at the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Scientific Affiliation, a group of Christian geneticists, chemists and other scientists. Over the past week I transcribed his lecture from the audio...
Rendering to Caesar, God, and MasterCard
A press release from the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, linked over at WorldMagBlog, claims that the bankruptcy reform legislation passed last year is being “reluctantly” interpreted by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of New York to mean that “those going through bankruptcy may not tithe to their church or make other charitable donations … until after they have paid off credit panies and other creditors. Before the new law went into effect, bankruptcy court...
Abolish the FDA?
An interesting debate is going on over at Mere Comments. The main thread has to do with the morality of the Bush Administration’s approval of over-the-counter sales of the morning-after pill and the implications for Pennsylvania’s U.S. Senate race. Leaving those issues aside, I was struck by ment from “Daniel C.”, claiming that the problem really presents an “excellent case for dismantling the Food & Drug Administration.” It’s a question worth raising. I don’t know enough about the history or...
Evangelicals and the Brave New World: Why Natural Law Can No Longer Be Ignored
In the Introduction to an important new book by J. Budziszewski that engages four distinct traditions of evangelical political thought, Michael Cromartie observes: “While appreciative of the contributions of each of these thinkers [Carl Henry, Abraham Kuyper, Francis Schaeffer, and John Howard Yoder], Budziszewski finds fault with each, to a greater or lesser degree, for failing to develop a systematic political theory pelling as those offered by the secularist establishment. He suggests that evangelical political thought would be improved if...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved