Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about President Trump’s FY2018 budget
Explainer: What you should know about President Trump’s FY2018 budget
Jan 8, 2026 10:54 PM

What is the president’s budget?

Technically, it’s only a budgetrequest (and in this case, just a blueprint of a request). The budget request is aproposal telling Congress how much money the president believes should be spent on the various Cabinet-level federal functions, like agriculture, defense, education, etc. (The 62-page budget blueprintcan be found here.)

Why does the president submit a budget to Congress?

The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 requires that the President of the United States submit to Congress, on or before the first Monday in February of each year, a detailed budget request for ing federal fiscal year, which begins on October 1.

Is the outgoing or ing president required to submit the budget?

The Constitution requires each new Congress to convene on January 3 and the ing president to take office on January 20. Prior to 1990, that gap required that the outgoing president submit a budget, which his predecessor could change. In 1990, the deadline was moved to February. This allowed the outgoing president the option of skipping the process (an option taken by George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush).

If it’s due the first Monday in February, why are we just now hearing about it?

All recent presidentshave missed the statutory deadline for budget submissions in their first year in office.

Missing the deadline used to be a rare occurrence. According to the House Budget Committee, “All presidents from Harding to Reagan’s first term met the statutory budget submission deadline in every year.” Reagan and Clinton both missed their deadlines once in eight years. President Obama holds the record for missing the deadline six times in his eight years in office.

What is the function of the president’s budget request?

The president’s annual budget requestserves three functions:

• Tells Congress how much money the president thinks the Federal government should spend on public needs and programs;

• Tells Congress how much money the president thinks the government should take in through taxes and other sources of revenue; and

• Tells Congress how large a deficit or surplus would result from the president’s proposal.

What spending does the president have to request in his budget?

Thebudget requestincludes all optional or “discretionary” Federal programs and projects that must have their spending renewed or “reauthorized” by Congress every fiscal year. For example, most defense programs are discretionary, as are programs like NASA, Small Business Administration (SBA) loans, and housing assistance grants. The president’s budget request mends funding levels for each discretionary program, which totals only about one-third of federal expenditures.

What’s not included in the budget?

Mainly, “entitlement” programs established by Congress, like Social Security and Medicare. Since those programs include mandatory spending, the president does not have to request they be funded for ing year, though his budget request can mend new benefits or changes in the level of spending for specific entitlement programs. Entitlement prise about two-thirds of Federal spending.

What happens when Congress receives the president’s budget request?

The House and Senate Budget Committees will hold hearings on the president’s budget request. In the hearings, administration officials are called to testify about and justify their specific budget requests. From these hearings the Budget Committees will prepare a draft of the congressional budget resolution.

The Congressional Budget Act requires passage of an annual “Congressional Budget Resolution”, a concurrent resolution passed in identical form by both House and Senate, but not requiring the president’s signature. The Budget Resolution provides Congress an opportunity to propose its own spending, revenue, borrowing, and economic goals for ing fiscal year, as well as the next five fiscal years.

Did the president offer a “balanced budget?”

No. In a recent interview President Trump said, “I want a balanced budget eventually. But I want to have a strong military. To me, that’s much more important than anything.”

How much does the president propose to spend?

President Trumpproposes to spend $1.068 trillion in discretionary spending (about $4 trillion dollars overall once non-discretionary items are included).

What’s the bottom line on the changes in the recent budget request?

President Trump’s plan would increase:

• Defense spending – 10 percent

• Homeland Security spending – 7 percent

• Veteran’s Affairs spending by 6 percent.

It would reduce spending on the following programs:

• Environmental Protection Agency 31 percent

• State, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and Treasury International Programs – 29 percent

• Agriculture – 21 percent

• Labor – 21 percent

• Army Corps of Engineers – 16 percent

• Commerce – 16 percent

• Health and Human Services – 16 percent

• Education – 14 percent

• Housing and Urban Development – 13 percent

• Transportation – 13 percent

• Interior – 12 percent

• Energy – 6 percent

• Small Business Administration – 5 percent

• Justice – 4 percent

• Treasury – 4 percent

• NASA – 1 percent

• Other agencies – 10 percent

Will Congress pass the president’s budget request in its current form?

Definitely not. Congress has the ultimate say in how tax dollars are spent. Because the priorities of individual legislators differ from those of the president, they’ll shift the spending in various ways.

If Congress isn’t going to pass a budget, why does anyone care about the president’s budget request?

The actual process may be nothing more than legally mandated political theater but the details of the president’s budget request reveal thepriorities of his administration (e.g., strengthening the military).

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Concerns about consensus
George H. Taylor, the State Climatologist for Oregon, writes at TCS Daily, “A Consensus About Consensus.” The article is worth reading. It shows that scientific consensus is often overrated, both in terms of its existence and in terms of its relevance. With resepct to global warming, Taylor looks at some of the claims for scientific consensus, and states, “But even if there actually were a consensus on this issue, it may very well be wrong.” This simply means that the...
Bonhoeffer’s legacy
Earlier this month, we marked the 100th anniversary of Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s birth on February 4, in what is now Wroclaw, Poland. In a message before the International Bonhoeffer Conference on February 3, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams said, Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a man immersed in a specific cultural heritage, and untroubled by the fact; he was a person of profound and rigorous (and very traditional) personal spirituality; he was mitted to the ecumenical perspective from very early on in his...
Nonprofits beware!
A friend forwarded a Website link for The Nonprofit Congress recently that was downright scary. It appears to be the epitome of good intentions fraught with unintended consequences. Or perhaps the consequences are not unintended. The Congress is an apparent call to advocacy (i.e., political pressuring) within the National Council of Nonprofit Associations. To the group’s credit, the “why” is a forthright statement of their view and values: The time e for nonprofits of all sizes and scope e together....
‘Captialism’ according to the academy
For a quick overview of the current state of appreciation for economics and capitalism among various ‘academics,’ see the newly inaugurated e-journal Fast Capitalism. It might as well be subtitled: Marxism, Alive and Well. Most of the contributors to the first issue are in munications, or political science. Here’s a sampling: In “Beyond Beltway and Bible Belt: Re-imagining the Democratic Party and the American Left,” Ben Agger, who teaches sociology and humanities at the University of Texas at Arlington, writes,...
Stewardship and economics: two sides of the same coin
In yesterday’s Acton Commentary, I argued that the biblical foundation for the concepts of stewardship and economics should lead us to see them as united. In this sense I wrote, “Economics can be understood as the theoretical side of stewardship, and stewardship can be understood as the practical side of economics.” I also defined economics as “the thoughtful ordering of the material resources of a household or social unit toward the self-identified good end” and said that the discipline “helps...
Jack Hafer at the Acton Lecture Series
Jack Hafer, the producer of the award-winning film, To End All Wars, will be speaking at the 2006 Acton Lecture Series on Wednesday, February 15. This luncheon (which does include a lunch) will be held in the David Cassard room of the Waters Building in downtown Grand Rapids from 12:00pm – 1:30. Mr. Hafer will discuss the challenges of making movies with profound moral messages in today’s Hollywood culture. He will also talk about plans for future projects that break...
Moral posturing on Africa
Over the weekend, the Daily Telegraph’s Charles Moore asked, “Why should the Left win the scramble for Africa?” : [T]he trouble with this subject – perhaps this is why the Left dominates it – is that it attracts posturing. Africa is, among other things, a photo-opportunity. As our own educational system makes it harder and harder to get British pupils to smile at all, so the attraction for politicians of being snapped with rows of black children with happy grins...
The dignity of every human being
The February 11 issue of WORLD Magazine includes a culture feature, “Giving their names back.” Profiled in the article is Citizens for Community Values (CCV), a nonprofit in Memphis that does a victim assistance program called “A Way Out.” It’s a reclamation program of sorts, literally reclaiming women ensnarled in the sex trade industry, and giving them back their lives, reclamation evidenced by names. The very nature of the sex industry, be it topless dancing, stripping or prostitution, requires anonymity–no...
Addicted to influence
A brief but timely editorial appears in this month’s issue of Christianity Today, “We Are What We Behold.” Here’s a taste: “…evangelicals have wrestled with our relationship to power. When in a position of influence (and in our better moments), we leverage power to better the lives of our neighbors. Cultural savvy enables us to successfully translate the gospel for a changing world. But it’s a double-edged sword—influence and savvy can also dull the gospel’s transcendence. We achieve a royal...
Western Europe’s political homogeneity
Western Europeans often talk about the homogeneity of American politics and how the parties hardly differ from one another. One reason why Europeans believe this is because they often pay attention to US politics only during a presidential campaign, so they do have some justification. But while their opinion is understandable not only does it fail to reflect the real difference between the left and the right in America; it obscures the homogeneity of Western European political life. What is...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved