Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about President Trump’s FY2018 budget
Explainer: What you should know about President Trump’s FY2018 budget
Jan 21, 2026 11:08 PM

What is the president’s budget?

Technically, it’s only a budgetrequest (and in this case, just a blueprint of a request). The budget request is aproposal telling Congress how much money the president believes should be spent on the various Cabinet-level federal functions, like agriculture, defense, education, etc. (The 62-page budget blueprintcan be found here.)

Why does the president submit a budget to Congress?

The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 requires that the President of the United States submit to Congress, on or before the first Monday in February of each year, a detailed budget request for ing federal fiscal year, which begins on October 1.

Is the outgoing or ing president required to submit the budget?

The Constitution requires each new Congress to convene on January 3 and the ing president to take office on January 20. Prior to 1990, that gap required that the outgoing president submit a budget, which his predecessor could change. In 1990, the deadline was moved to February. This allowed the outgoing president the option of skipping the process (an option taken by George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush).

If it’s due the first Monday in February, why are we just now hearing about it?

All recent presidentshave missed the statutory deadline for budget submissions in their first year in office.

Missing the deadline used to be a rare occurrence. According to the House Budget Committee, “All presidents from Harding to Reagan’s first term met the statutory budget submission deadline in every year.” Reagan and Clinton both missed their deadlines once in eight years. President Obama holds the record for missing the deadline six times in his eight years in office.

What is the function of the president’s budget request?

The president’s annual budget requestserves three functions:

• Tells Congress how much money the president thinks the Federal government should spend on public needs and programs;

• Tells Congress how much money the president thinks the government should take in through taxes and other sources of revenue; and

• Tells Congress how large a deficit or surplus would result from the president’s proposal.

What spending does the president have to request in his budget?

Thebudget requestincludes all optional or “discretionary” Federal programs and projects that must have their spending renewed or “reauthorized” by Congress every fiscal year. For example, most defense programs are discretionary, as are programs like NASA, Small Business Administration (SBA) loans, and housing assistance grants. The president’s budget request mends funding levels for each discretionary program, which totals only about one-third of federal expenditures.

What’s not included in the budget?

Mainly, “entitlement” programs established by Congress, like Social Security and Medicare. Since those programs include mandatory spending, the president does not have to request they be funded for ing year, though his budget request can mend new benefits or changes in the level of spending for specific entitlement programs. Entitlement prise about two-thirds of Federal spending.

What happens when Congress receives the president’s budget request?

The House and Senate Budget Committees will hold hearings on the president’s budget request. In the hearings, administration officials are called to testify about and justify their specific budget requests. From these hearings the Budget Committees will prepare a draft of the congressional budget resolution.

The Congressional Budget Act requires passage of an annual “Congressional Budget Resolution”, a concurrent resolution passed in identical form by both House and Senate, but not requiring the president’s signature. The Budget Resolution provides Congress an opportunity to propose its own spending, revenue, borrowing, and economic goals for ing fiscal year, as well as the next five fiscal years.

Did the president offer a “balanced budget?”

No. In a recent interview President Trump said, “I want a balanced budget eventually. But I want to have a strong military. To me, that’s much more important than anything.”

How much does the president propose to spend?

President Trumpproposes to spend $1.068 trillion in discretionary spending (about $4 trillion dollars overall once non-discretionary items are included).

What’s the bottom line on the changes in the recent budget request?

President Trump’s plan would increase:

• Defense spending – 10 percent

• Homeland Security spending – 7 percent

• Veteran’s Affairs spending by 6 percent.

It would reduce spending on the following programs:

• Environmental Protection Agency 31 percent

• State, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and Treasury International Programs – 29 percent

• Agriculture – 21 percent

• Labor – 21 percent

• Army Corps of Engineers – 16 percent

• Commerce – 16 percent

• Health and Human Services – 16 percent

• Education – 14 percent

• Housing and Urban Development – 13 percent

• Transportation – 13 percent

• Interior – 12 percent

• Energy – 6 percent

• Small Business Administration – 5 percent

• Justice – 4 percent

• Treasury – 4 percent

• NASA – 1 percent

• Other agencies – 10 percent

Will Congress pass the president’s budget request in its current form?

Definitely not. Congress has the ultimate say in how tax dollars are spent. Because the priorities of individual legislators differ from those of the president, they’ll shift the spending in various ways.

If Congress isn’t going to pass a budget, why does anyone care about the president’s budget request?

The actual process may be nothing more than legally mandated political theater but the details of the president’s budget request reveal thepriorities of his administration (e.g., strengthening the military).

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Envy: A Deadly (Economic) Sin
Victor Claar, Acton University lecturer and professor of economics at Henderson State University, will give a talk tonight in Washington, D.C., hosted by AEI, “Grieving the Good of Others: Envy and Economics.” If you are in the area, you are encouraged to attend and hear Dr. Claar as well as two respondents discuss the topic of envy and its moral and economic consequences. Here’s a description of the event: Critics of capitalism often argue that this economic system is irretrievably...
The Daily Show Takes on a Union
The Daily Show exposes some union hypocrisy (HT). In the words of the union local head, es down to greed”: ...
Journal of Religion and Business Ethics
The latest issue of the newly launched Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is now available (vol. 1, no. 2). Check out the contents at their website. From the journal’s about page: “The Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is a peer-reviewed journal that examines the ethical and religious issues that arise in the modern business setting. While much attention has been given to the philosophical treatment of business ethics, this is the first journal to address the more inclusive...
Explaining the New Democratic Logo
“The new Democratic logo is so bad that the intellectual rot in the official announcement went largely unnoticed.” The rest of my piece is here at The American Spectator. ...
Mandating Monolithic Medicine
Among the warnings sounded as the Democratic health care reform bill was being debated was that the federal insurance mandate included in the bill—even though not national health care per se—would essentially give the federal government control of the insurance industry. The reason: If everyone is forced to buy insurance, then the government must deem what sort of insurance qualifies as adequate to meet the mandate. This piece of Obamacare promises to turn every medical procedure into a major political...
Work as if It Mattered
The conversations over the last few weeks here on work have raised a couple of questions. In the context of criticisms on the perspectives on work articulated by Lester DeKoster and defended by menter John E. asks, “…what is it that you hope readers will change in their lives, and why?” I want to change people’s view of their work. I want them to see how it has value not simply as a means to some other end, but in...
A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I take a look at the prospects of “right-to-work” legislation in Michigan, “A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism.” One of the things that disturbs me the most about what I call “crony unionism” is the hand-in-glove relationship between the labor unions and big government. We have the same kind of special pleading and rent seeking in this system as we do in crony capitalism, but the labor unions enjoy such special protection...
Rev. Sirico: Respect others’ rights, but also their values
A new column by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, was published today in the Detroit News. This column will also be linked in tomorrow’s Acton News & Commentary. Sign up for the free weekly Acton newsletter here. +++++++++ Faith and policy: Respect others’ rights, but also their values FATHER ROBERT SIRICO If such an award were to be given for the Most Contentious Religious Story of 2010, the two main contenders would undoubtedly be...
The Politics of Crony Unionism
Last week’s Acton Commentary and blog post focused on my claims about “crony unionism” and how the intimate relationship between Big Labor and Big Government corrupt both. Here’s another instance of the kinds of gross conflicts of interest produced by this relationship: It’s hard to see this as anything but partisan pandering on the part of the largest public sector union, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). Meanwhile, the Washington Post asks, “Was politics behind the...
Radio Free Acton: The Stewardship of Art, Part 2
Last week, we posted part 1 of our podcast on the proper Christian stewardship of art; for those who have been waiting for the conclusion, we’re happy to present part 2. David Michael Phelps continues to lead the discussion between Professors Nathan Jacobs and Calvin Seerveld, who previously debated this topic in the Controversy section of our Journal of Markets & Morality. The first portion of that exchange is available at the link for part 1; the remainder of the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved