Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about President Trump’s FY2018 budget
Explainer: What you should know about President Trump’s FY2018 budget
Jan 15, 2026 4:29 AM

What is the president’s budget?

Technically, it’s only a budgetrequest (and in this case, just a blueprint of a request). The budget request is aproposal telling Congress how much money the president believes should be spent on the various Cabinet-level federal functions, like agriculture, defense, education, etc. (The 62-page budget blueprintcan be found here.)

Why does the president submit a budget to Congress?

The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 requires that the President of the United States submit to Congress, on or before the first Monday in February of each year, a detailed budget request for ing federal fiscal year, which begins on October 1.

Is the outgoing or ing president required to submit the budget?

The Constitution requires each new Congress to convene on January 3 and the ing president to take office on January 20. Prior to 1990, that gap required that the outgoing president submit a budget, which his predecessor could change. In 1990, the deadline was moved to February. This allowed the outgoing president the option of skipping the process (an option taken by George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush).

If it’s due the first Monday in February, why are we just now hearing about it?

All recent presidentshave missed the statutory deadline for budget submissions in their first year in office.

Missing the deadline used to be a rare occurrence. According to the House Budget Committee, “All presidents from Harding to Reagan’s first term met the statutory budget submission deadline in every year.” Reagan and Clinton both missed their deadlines once in eight years. President Obama holds the record for missing the deadline six times in his eight years in office.

What is the function of the president’s budget request?

The president’s annual budget requestserves three functions:

• Tells Congress how much money the president thinks the Federal government should spend on public needs and programs;

• Tells Congress how much money the president thinks the government should take in through taxes and other sources of revenue; and

• Tells Congress how large a deficit or surplus would result from the president’s proposal.

What spending does the president have to request in his budget?

Thebudget requestincludes all optional or “discretionary” Federal programs and projects that must have their spending renewed or “reauthorized” by Congress every fiscal year. For example, most defense programs are discretionary, as are programs like NASA, Small Business Administration (SBA) loans, and housing assistance grants. The president’s budget request mends funding levels for each discretionary program, which totals only about one-third of federal expenditures.

What’s not included in the budget?

Mainly, “entitlement” programs established by Congress, like Social Security and Medicare. Since those programs include mandatory spending, the president does not have to request they be funded for ing year, though his budget request can mend new benefits or changes in the level of spending for specific entitlement programs. Entitlement prise about two-thirds of Federal spending.

What happens when Congress receives the president’s budget request?

The House and Senate Budget Committees will hold hearings on the president’s budget request. In the hearings, administration officials are called to testify about and justify their specific budget requests. From these hearings the Budget Committees will prepare a draft of the congressional budget resolution.

The Congressional Budget Act requires passage of an annual “Congressional Budget Resolution”, a concurrent resolution passed in identical form by both House and Senate, but not requiring the president’s signature. The Budget Resolution provides Congress an opportunity to propose its own spending, revenue, borrowing, and economic goals for ing fiscal year, as well as the next five fiscal years.

Did the president offer a “balanced budget?”

No. In a recent interview President Trump said, “I want a balanced budget eventually. But I want to have a strong military. To me, that’s much more important than anything.”

How much does the president propose to spend?

President Trumpproposes to spend $1.068 trillion in discretionary spending (about $4 trillion dollars overall once non-discretionary items are included).

What’s the bottom line on the changes in the recent budget request?

President Trump’s plan would increase:

• Defense spending – 10 percent

• Homeland Security spending – 7 percent

• Veteran’s Affairs spending by 6 percent.

It would reduce spending on the following programs:

• Environmental Protection Agency 31 percent

• State, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and Treasury International Programs – 29 percent

• Agriculture – 21 percent

• Labor – 21 percent

• Army Corps of Engineers – 16 percent

• Commerce – 16 percent

• Health and Human Services – 16 percent

• Education – 14 percent

• Housing and Urban Development – 13 percent

• Transportation – 13 percent

• Interior – 12 percent

• Energy – 6 percent

• Small Business Administration – 5 percent

• Justice – 4 percent

• Treasury – 4 percent

• NASA – 1 percent

• Other agencies – 10 percent

Will Congress pass the president’s budget request in its current form?

Definitely not. Congress has the ultimate say in how tax dollars are spent. Because the priorities of individual legislators differ from those of the president, they’ll shift the spending in various ways.

If Congress isn’t going to pass a budget, why does anyone care about the president’s budget request?

The actual process may be nothing more than legally mandated political theater but the details of the president’s budget request reveal thepriorities of his administration (e.g., strengthening the military).

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Do We Need Pro-Family Tax Policies?
Last month, in “Europe’s Choice: Populate or Perish,” Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg observed: At a deeper level … Europe’s declining birth-rate may also reflect a change in intellectual horizons. A cultural outlook focused upon the present and disinterested in the future is more likely to view children as a burden rather than a gift to be cared for in quite un-self-interested ways. Individuals and societies that have lost a sense of connection to their past and have no particular...
Audio: Rev. Sirico on ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Service to the Poor’
On the new Reclaiming the Culture radio show, host Dolores Meehan recently interviewed Acton President Rev. Robert A. Sirico on the subject of “The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Service to the Poor.” Here’s how Meehan describes the show’s mission: Bay Area Catholics are some of the strongest Catholics in the country. Reclaiming the Culture grew out of the desire to show that the Catholic Church in the Bay Area has the resources to confront the prevailing secular culture. Our...
Publicly Funded Films: A Cautionary Tale
The most basic lesson of all of the various efforts, by both state and federal governments, to provide incentives for films to be made is that with government es government oversight. Once you go down the road of filing for tax credits or government subsidy in various forms, and you depend on them to get your project made, you open yourself up to a host of regulatory, bureaucratic, and censorship issues. It shouldn’t be a surprise, for instance, that states...
Abela: Will Teaching Business Ethics Make Business More Ethical?
On the National Catholic Register, Andrew Abela confesses to a “nagging suspicion that teaching business ethics in a university is not delivering on what is expected of it.” The question is both concrete and academic: Abela is the chairman of the Department of Business and Economics at The Catholic University of America and an associate professor of marketing. He was awarded the Acton Institute’s Novak Award in 2009. Here, he explains the problem with “amoral” business attitudes: … we often...
The Economist, Catholicism, and Europe
When es to the sophistication of its coverage of religious affairs, the Economist is better than most other British publications (admittedly not a high standard) which generally insist on trying to read religion through an ideologically-secularist lens. Normally the Economist tries to present religion as a slightly plex matter than “stick-in-the-mud-conservatives”-versus-“open-minded-enlightened-progressivists”, though it usually slips in one of the usual secularist bromides, as if to reassure its audiences that it’s keeping a critical distance. A good example of this is...
The Ecumenical Movement and the Nuclear Question
It’s worth noting that the original context of engagement of the ecumenical movement by figures like Paul Ramsey and Ernest Lefever (two voices that figure prominently in my book, Ecumenical Babel) had much to do with foreign policy and the Cold War, and specifically the question of the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Last week marked the anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima and today is the anniversary of the Nagasaki detonation. As ENI reports (full story after the break), the...
Family vs. the State in Indian and Chinese Entrepreneurship
This August 3 Wall Street Journal article is based on a Legatum Institute paring Indian and Chinese entrepreneurship and raises important issues about the roles of the state and the family in promoting entrepreneurship. mon elements between Indian and Chinese wealth-creators are their optimistic view of the pared to Americans (“Why I’m Not Hiring”) and Europeans (“Everything’s Fine With Greece, Just Ignore Some Facts”) presumably, and their lack of concern about the impact of the global financial crises on their...
Re: Broken Windows – University Funding Edition
As Kishore Jayabalan noted yesterday, the fallacy of “broken windows” is, unfortunately, ubiquitous in discussions of public finance and macroeconomics. Though we are told that government spending and public works have a stimulating effect on economic activity, rarely are the costs of such projects discussed. Such is the case with several stimulus projects in my own hometown of Atlanta, GA. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reportson a list that Sen. John McCain and Sen. Tim Coburn drew up,criticizing wasteful stimulus projects throughout...
Acton on Tap – August 12: American Exceptionalism
Join us on Thursday, August 12, at Derby Station in Grand Rapids as we continue our Acton on Tap series, a casual and fun night out to discuss important and timely ideas with friends. The event is scheduled for 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm and discussion starts at 6:30. American Exceptionalism is a newsworthy topic as some on both the political left and right lament that America’s greatness is slipping away. But what does American Exceptionalism mean and how did...
Carbon Regulation: Ecological Utopia or Economic Nightmare?
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I discuss whether the Environmental Protection Agency’s planned regulation of carbon emissions can be justified from a Christian perspective. The EPA has found that carbon emissions endanger “public health and welfare,” and it is on track to begin regulating vehicle and power plant emissions. Environmentalists claim that policies targeting carbon emissions, such as EPA regulation or a cap-and-trade program, will stimulate the economy by creating green jobs. Unfortunately, this is not the case – the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved