Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about federal deficits
Explainer: What you should know about federal deficits
Apr 26, 2025 12:28 AM

What just happened?

The White House Office of Management and Budget recently released a forecast that the federal deficit would exceed $1 trillion this year. As Fox News points out, this would be the first time since the four years following the Great Recession that the deficit reached that level.

What is the federal deficit?

The term federal deficit refers to the federal government’s fiscal year budget deficit. Such a deficit occurs when total outgoing expenditures (such as for buying military aircraft or paying government salaries) exceeds the revenues collected in the form of taxes and fees. Deficits are measured over the course of the fiscal year, which runs from October 1 through September 30. Net interest payments, which measure inflows and outflows on interest from the federal debt, are included in deficit and surplus es.

What is a federal surplus?

If the government collects more in taxes than it spends, then it has incurred a surplus. In the past fifty years, the government has only recorded budgetsurpluses in five years: 1969, 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001.

What is the difference between the federal debt and the national deficit?

The federal deficit is the difference between what the federal government brings in each year in revenues (i.e., taxes and fees) and what it spends during that same fiscal year. The national debt is the accumulation of all federal government borrowing activity from private citizens, institutions, and domestic and foreign governments. Deficits have historically been the largest contributor to the federal debt.

What is a structural deficit?

In theory, deficits should shrink or disappear when the economy is growing since the government does not have as many expenses (e.g., unemployment payments) and increase only during economic slowdowns or recessions. Structural deficits, though, are budget conditions that produce deficits in all economic conditions because the government is structured in a way to continuously outspend its revenues.

How do current deficits affect future deficits?

Deficits increase the debt, which increase the interest payments on the debt, which can increase deficits, etc.—a vicious cycle of spiraling debt.

What was the peak for federal deficits?

To make parisons between deficits we need to look at them as a percentage of GDP, which allows us to see the size of the deficit in relation to the entire U.S. economy. Based on this we find that the federal deficits peaked during World War I (17% of GDP in 1919) and World War II (24% in 1945).

Over the next decade, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that annual deficits will average 4.4 percent of GDP. Over the past fifty years including the Great Recession and its immediate aftermath, deficits have averaged only 2.9 percent of GDP.

What was President Trump’s position on deficits during his 2016 campaign?

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump promised not only to eliminate deficits but that he would eliminate the nation’s debt in eight years. Instead, his budgets would add $9.1 trillion during his tenure (assuming he is reelected). Based on the estimate of his own administration, his deficits would increase the U.S. debt to $29 trillion.

Why do deficits matter?

Deficits matter because they increase the total debt. According to the CBO, the budget deficits over the next 30 years are projected to drive federal debt held by the public to unprecedented levels—from 78 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2019 to 144 percent by 2049.This matters because the national debt is almost always an unjust form of an intergenerational wealth transfer.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Constitutional Cases and the Four Cardinal Virtues
Should virtue be a consideration in judicial decisionmaking? Indiana Law Professor R. George Wright makes an intriguing argument for why the four cardinal virtues could be useful in interpreting constitutional cases: Judges typically decide constitutional cases by referring to one or more legal precedents, rules, tests, principles, doctrines, or policies. This Article mends supplementing this standard approach with fully legitimate and appropriate attention to what many cultures have long recognized as the four basic cardinal virtues of practical wisdom or...
Integral Human Development
The Journal of Markets & Morality is planning a theme issue for the Spring of 2013: “Integral Human Development,” i.e. the synthesis of human freedom and responsibility necessary for the material and spiritual enrichment of human life. According to Pope Benedict XVI, Integral human development presupposes the responsible freedom of the individual and of peoples: no structure can guarantee this development over and above human responsibility. (Caritas in Veritate 17) There is a delicate balance between the material and the...
Lord Acton and the Power of the Historian
Looking through my back stacks of periodicals the other day I ran across a review in Books & Culture by David Bebbington, “Macaulay in the Dock,” of a recent biography of Thomas Babington Macaulay. The essay takes its point of departure in Lord Acton’s characterization of Macaulay as “one of the greatest of all writers and masters, although I think him utterly base, contemptible and odious.” As Bebbington writes, “Acton, a towering intellectual of the later 19th century, was at...
Is Work a Curse?
Is work a curse, a result of mankind’s fall from grace? Not according to the Book of Genesis. As Hugh Whelchel, Executive Director of the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, explains, what Adam was called to do in the garden is what we are still called to do in our work today: Humanity was created by God to cultivate and keep God’s creation, which included developing it and protecting it. You see, we were created to be stewards of...
Let’s Change Hearts and Minds (and Laws, Too)
Few clichés are so widespread within the evangelical subculture, says Matthew Lee Anderson, as the notion that our witness must be one of “changing hearts and minds.” In careful hands, the idea is at best ambiguous. At worst it reinforces the sort of interior-oriented individualism that allows for and perpetuates a blissful naivete about how institutions and structures shape our dispositions and thoughts. In less than careful hands, the phrase drives a wedge between law and culture by attempting to...
Obamacare’s Religious Rubes
The White House has a plan to mobilize prayer vigils in front of the Supreme Court in defense of Obamacare. It was reported that the administration met with leaders at non-profit organizations and religious officials who support the new health care law. The court takes up the constitutional test of the health care mandate in a couple of weeks. The mandate has now been challenged in 26 states. Cue the same stale big government religious prophets who confuse statism and...
How to Love Liberty More Than a Libertarian Economist
I have a deep and abiding love for liberty—which is why I find myself so often in disagreement with libertarians. Libertarians love liberty too, of course, but they tend to love liberty a bit differently. I love liberty in an earthy, elemental way. I love liberty because I need it—like I need air and food—for human flourishing. In contrast, the libertarians I’ve encountered tend to love liberty primarily as an abstraction. Indeed, the most ideologically consistent libertarians I know seem...
How to Steal a Bike in New York City
Edmund Burke didn’t really say it, but it still rings true: All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. In a test of this maxim, filmmaker Casey Neistat tries to steal his own bike in several locations around New York City and finds that most people do nothing about it—even when it’s done right in front of a police station. I recently spent a couple of days conducting a bike theft experiment, which...
Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Threat to Freedom
Over at the Liberty Law Blog, there is an excellent post titled “Ronald Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Dialogue of Liberty” by Alan Snyder. Snyder delves into the influence Chambers had on Reagan and how their worldviews differed as well. Many conservatives and scholars felt Chambers’ prediction that the West was on the losing side of history in the battle against Marxism collapsed after the fall of the Iron Curtain and the Soviet Union. For many, the ideas of Chambers...
Italy’s Tax Man Takes Aim at the Vatican
Kishore Jayabalan, the Acton Institute’s Rome office director, was interviewed by the Zenit news agency in an article titled, “Is Taxing the Church a Real Solution for Italy?” In the article, Jayabalan discusses the history of the Italian state and its imposition of property taxes on the Roman Catholic Church’s land holdings, residences and non-profit businesses. Sometimes in the past, particularly under Napoleonic rule and before the Lateran Pacts, the institution of property tax was often a subject of state...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved