Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about federal deficits
Explainer: What you should know about federal deficits
Jan 8, 2026 10:53 PM

What just happened?

The White House Office of Management and Budget recently released a forecast that the federal deficit would exceed $1 trillion this year. As Fox News points out, this would be the first time since the four years following the Great Recession that the deficit reached that level.

What is the federal deficit?

The term federal deficit refers to the federal government’s fiscal year budget deficit. Such a deficit occurs when total outgoing expenditures (such as for buying military aircraft or paying government salaries) exceeds the revenues collected in the form of taxes and fees. Deficits are measured over the course of the fiscal year, which runs from October 1 through September 30. Net interest payments, which measure inflows and outflows on interest from the federal debt, are included in deficit and surplus es.

What is a federal surplus?

If the government collects more in taxes than it spends, then it has incurred a surplus. In the past fifty years, the government has only recorded budgetsurpluses in five years: 1969, 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001.

What is the difference between the federal debt and the national deficit?

The federal deficit is the difference between what the federal government brings in each year in revenues (i.e., taxes and fees) and what it spends during that same fiscal year. The national debt is the accumulation of all federal government borrowing activity from private citizens, institutions, and domestic and foreign governments. Deficits have historically been the largest contributor to the federal debt.

What is a structural deficit?

In theory, deficits should shrink or disappear when the economy is growing since the government does not have as many expenses (e.g., unemployment payments) and increase only during economic slowdowns or recessions. Structural deficits, though, are budget conditions that produce deficits in all economic conditions because the government is structured in a way to continuously outspend its revenues.

How do current deficits affect future deficits?

Deficits increase the debt, which increase the interest payments on the debt, which can increase deficits, etc.—a vicious cycle of spiraling debt.

What was the peak for federal deficits?

To make parisons between deficits we need to look at them as a percentage of GDP, which allows us to see the size of the deficit in relation to the entire U.S. economy. Based on this we find that the federal deficits peaked during World War I (17% of GDP in 1919) and World War II (24% in 1945).

Over the next decade, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that annual deficits will average 4.4 percent of GDP. Over the past fifty years including the Great Recession and its immediate aftermath, deficits have averaged only 2.9 percent of GDP.

What was President Trump’s position on deficits during his 2016 campaign?

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump promised not only to eliminate deficits but that he would eliminate the nation’s debt in eight years. Instead, his budgets would add $9.1 trillion during his tenure (assuming he is reelected). Based on the estimate of his own administration, his deficits would increase the U.S. debt to $29 trillion.

Why do deficits matter?

Deficits matter because they increase the total debt. According to the CBO, the budget deficits over the next 30 years are projected to drive federal debt held by the public to unprecedented levels—from 78 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2019 to 144 percent by 2049.This matters because the national debt is almost always an unjust form of an intergenerational wealth transfer.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The dignity of every human being
The February 11 issue of WORLD Magazine includes a culture feature, “Giving their names back.” Profiled in the article is Citizens for Community Values (CCV), a nonprofit in Memphis that does a victim assistance program called “A Way Out.” It’s a reclamation program of sorts, literally reclaiming women ensnarled in the sex trade industry, and giving them back their lives, reclamation evidenced by names. The very nature of the sex industry, be it topless dancing, stripping or prostitution, requires anonymity–no...
Stewardship and economics: two sides of the same coin
In yesterday’s Acton Commentary, I argued that the biblical foundation for the concepts of stewardship and economics should lead us to see them as united. In this sense I wrote, “Economics can be understood as the theoretical side of stewardship, and stewardship can be understood as the practical side of economics.” I also defined economics as “the thoughtful ordering of the material resources of a household or social unit toward the self-identified good end” and said that the discipline “helps...
Concerns about consensus
George H. Taylor, the State Climatologist for Oregon, writes at TCS Daily, “A Consensus About Consensus.” The article is worth reading. It shows that scientific consensus is often overrated, both in terms of its existence and in terms of its relevance. With resepct to global warming, Taylor looks at some of the claims for scientific consensus, and states, “But even if there actually were a consensus on this issue, it may very well be wrong.” This simply means that the...
Moral posturing on Africa
Over the weekend, the Daily Telegraph’s Charles Moore asked, “Why should the Left win the scramble for Africa?” : [T]he trouble with this subject – perhaps this is why the Left dominates it – is that it attracts posturing. Africa is, among other things, a photo-opportunity. As our own educational system makes it harder and harder to get British pupils to smile at all, so the attraction for politicians of being snapped with rows of black children with happy grins...
Jack Hafer at the Acton Lecture Series
Jack Hafer, the producer of the award-winning film, To End All Wars, will be speaking at the 2006 Acton Lecture Series on Wednesday, February 15. This luncheon (which does include a lunch) will be held in the David Cassard room of the Waters Building in downtown Grand Rapids from 12:00pm – 1:30. Mr. Hafer will discuss the challenges of making movies with profound moral messages in today’s Hollywood culture. He will also talk about plans for future projects that break...
Nonprofits beware!
A friend forwarded a Website link for The Nonprofit Congress recently that was downright scary. It appears to be the epitome of good intentions fraught with unintended consequences. Or perhaps the consequences are not unintended. The Congress is an apparent call to advocacy (i.e., political pressuring) within the National Council of Nonprofit Associations. To the group’s credit, the “why” is a forthright statement of their view and values: The time e for nonprofits of all sizes and scope e together....
Western Europe’s political homogeneity
Western Europeans often talk about the homogeneity of American politics and how the parties hardly differ from one another. One reason why Europeans believe this is because they often pay attention to US politics only during a presidential campaign, so they do have some justification. But while their opinion is understandable not only does it fail to reflect the real difference between the left and the right in America; it obscures the homogeneity of Western European political life. What is...
Bonhoeffer’s legacy
Earlier this month, we marked the 100th anniversary of Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s birth on February 4, in what is now Wroclaw, Poland. In a message before the International Bonhoeffer Conference on February 3, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams said, Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a man immersed in a specific cultural heritage, and untroubled by the fact; he was a person of profound and rigorous (and very traditional) personal spirituality; he was mitted to the ecumenical perspective from very early on in his...
‘Captialism’ according to the academy
For a quick overview of the current state of appreciation for economics and capitalism among various ‘academics,’ see the newly inaugurated e-journal Fast Capitalism. It might as well be subtitled: Marxism, Alive and Well. Most of the contributors to the first issue are in munications, or political science. Here’s a sampling: In “Beyond Beltway and Bible Belt: Re-imagining the Democratic Party and the American Left,” Ben Agger, who teaches sociology and humanities at the University of Texas at Arlington, writes,...
Addicted to influence
A brief but timely editorial appears in this month’s issue of Christianity Today, “We Are What We Behold.” Here’s a taste: “…evangelicals have wrestled with our relationship to power. When in a position of influence (and in our better moments), we leverage power to better the lives of our neighbors. Cultural savvy enables us to successfully translate the gospel for a changing world. But it’s a double-edged sword—influence and savvy can also dull the gospel’s transcendence. We achieve a royal...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved