Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What You Should Know About Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s Senate Hearings
Explainer: What You Should Know About Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s Senate Hearings
Jan 14, 2026 11:56 PM

What just happened?

On Tuesday, Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg gave testimony (though not officially under oath) before a joint hearing of the Senate Judiciary and Senate Commerce, Science, and mittees. On Wednesday, Zuckerberg testified at a second hearing before the House Energy and Commerce Committee. He was asked to appear before Congress to discuss such issues as data privacy and Russian use of his social network to meddle in the 2016 election.

Why is Facebook and Zuckerberg now under scrutiny?

Facebook has been at the center of recent data privacy scandals and concerns. The Senate hearings were particularly interested in learning about the connection between Facebook and Cambridge Analytica.

Last month theNew York Timesreported that British data analysis firm Cambridge Analytica had “harvested private information from the Facebook profiles of more than 50 million users without their permission.” As law professor Andrew Keane Woodsexplains,

The data that Cambridge Analytica obtained seems to e from Aleksandr Kogan, a researcher at Cambridge University who convinced hundreds of thousands of Facebook users to take a Facebook-linked personality quiz—thereby granting Kogan access, through Facebook’s developer platform, to a treasure trove of user data. Kogan then shared this information with Cambridge Analytica. . . .

Kogan was able to collect such data because Facebook offers a popular feature called Facebook Login, which lets people simply log in to a website or app using their Facebook account instead of creating new credentials. In 2015, developers who created apps that used Facebook Login were allowed—with Facebook’s permission—tocollect some information on the users network of friends. According to theTimes, Kogan was able to use the data gleaned from the friends’ profiles to match users to other records and build psychographic profiles.

Facebook had also reportedly been collecting call records and text-messaging data from Android devices. pany deniesit was collecting the data without permission, that it was an “opt-in” feature, that it “helps you find and stay connected with the people you care about, and provides you with a better experience across Facebook.” Still, the concerns have led the Federal Trade Commission to launch a nonpublic investigation into the Facebook’s privacy practices.

How did Zuckerberg say Facebook would address the Cambridge Analytica data breach?

Zuckerberg identified three steps pany would be taking:

1) Learning exactly what Cambridge Analytica did, and telling everyone affected.

2) Making sure no other app developers are misusing data and investigating every app that had access to a large amount of information in the past. If a developer is improperly using data, Facebook will ban them from their platform and notifiy everyone affected.

3) To prevent similar data breaches, Facebook will be making sure developers can’t access as much information.

Zuckerberg says that—as explained in the first line of Facebook’s Terms of Service—the user controls and owns the information and content they put on the platform.

How does Facebook deal with screening content?

Zuckerberg punted on specific cases and controversies involving content being removed or censored on his platform. But hesays by the end of 2018, Facebook will have more than 20,000 people working on security and content review so that when content gets flagged, they can determine if it violates their policies and, if necessary, take it down.

The long-term goal, said Zuckerberg, is to have such content review conducted by artificial intelligence. He notes that “99 percent of the ISIS and Al Qaida content that we take down on Facebook” is done by artificial intelligence systems before any human sees it. But such review for “hate speech” is difficult, he says, “because determining if something is hate speech is very linguistically nuanced.” He believes it will take between 5 to 10-years to have artificial intelligence tools that can “get into some of the nuances” of hate speech.

What is Facebook doing to prevent foreign actors from interfering in U.S. elections?

Zuckerberg said they are disallowing fake accounts on Facebook and deploying new artificial intelligence tools that “do a better job of identifying fake accounts that may be trying to interfere in elections or spread misinformation.”

Is Zuckerberg opposed to new regulations to address the data privacy problems?

Not really. When asked, he said, “I think that there are a few categories of legislation that—that make sense to consider. Around privacy specifically, there are a few principles that I think it would be useful to—to discuss and potentially codified into law.” He gave three examples: explain what you are doing with data, give plete control, and enable innovation

When asked if Facebook would “as pany, e regulation” Zuckerberg also said that “I think, if it’s the right regulation, then yes.”

Is Facebook involved with Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation into Russian election interference?

Yes, Zuckerberg confirmed that Facebook has been interviewed by and is “working with” the Special Counsel’s Office.

What other key points did Zuckerberg reveal during the hearing?

Some other highlights from the hearings:

• Zuckerberg says Facebook is “responsible for the content” on its platform.

• He also says he is mitted to making sure that Facebook is a platform for all ideas” but when asked was unable to define what pany would prohibit under the rubric of “hate speech.”

• When asked if pany was a monopoly, he said, “It certainly doesn’t feel like that to me,”

What did we not learn from the hearing?

There are dozens of issues that Zuckerberg said he’s check with his team about and provide answers to the Senators. The Senate members can also submit follow-up written questions that will be entered into the record.

Senator Kamala Harris, for example, told Zuckerberg there are “several critical questions for which you don’t have answers,” adding, ““Those questions have included whether Facebook can track a user’s browsing activity even after the user has logged off of Facebook. Whether Facebook can track your activity across devices even when you are not logged into Facebook. Who is Facebook’s petition? Whether Facebook may store up to 96 categories of users’ information. Whether you knew [about Cambridge Analytica researcher Aleksandr] Kogan’s terms of service and whether you knew if Kogan could sell or transfer data.”

Image Source: (CC) Brian andbub.blicio.us

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Sew Efficient
US News and World Report has a little feature on a pany that has expanded into more distant markets and thereby grown. The article identifies trade agreements and technology as paving the way for such expansion by many small, local businesses. Decreasing tariffs and regulation and improving technology—these are examples of what economists call “lowering transaction costs,” which improves efficiency and benefits producers and consumers alike. The US News article highlights an American business, but, even more crucially, opening international...
‘Beyond Petroleum’ or ‘Big Problem’? UPDATED
NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams is asking, “Was the BP pipeline problem preventable?” It seems that BP has allegedly been giving required maintenance to the pipeline short shrift: “Allegations about BP’s maintenance practices have been so persistent that a criminal investigation now is under way into whether BP has for years deliberately shortchanged maintenance and falsified records to cover it up.” BP shut down the Prudhoe Bay oil field earlier this week, after a “spill” resulting from “unexpected corrosion.”...
Scarcity and Innovation
“Throughout history, shortages of vital resources have driven innovation, and energy has often starred in these technological dramas. The desperate search for new sources of energy and new materials has frequently produced remarkable advances that no one could have imagined when the shortage first became evident.” So says Stephen L. Sass, a professor of materials science and engineering at Cornell, in today’s NYT op-ed, “Scarcity, Mother of Invention.” He concludes, “If there is anything to be learned from history, it’s...
Local Help on the Street
We’re working through the meaning of the tenth anniversary of welfare reform, debating important ‘next phase’ issues like marriage and fatherhood and what those mean to helping people leave poverty…permanently. That debate about government’s appropriate role in addressing social need is important. At least equally important is the work or private citizens at the local level, ‘on the street’–figuratively and literally. In February, a blog post featured A Way Out Victim Assistance program in Memphis, one of Acton’s Samaritan Award...
Protestants and Natural Law: A Forgotten Legacy
In this mentary, “Protestants and Natural Law: A Forgotten Legacy,” I ask the question: “So, why don’t Protestants like Natural Law?” The short answer is: There isn’t a short answer. Tracing out the reasons that twentieth-century Protestants have given for why natural law is off limits plicated and can take a person in many different directions. In my judgment, the great tragedy in the Protestant rejection of natural law is not merely that Protestants (and particularly evangelicals) have had tremendous...
Corporate America and the Campus
More news on the campus that may disturb those who are already hyperventilating about corporate involvement in higher education: university newspapers are receiving increasing corporate attention. In an article in today’s WSJ, Emily Steel writes, “Hip, local, relevant and generated by students themselves, college newspapers have held steady readership in recent years while newspapers in general have seen theirs shrink. Big advertisers are going on campus to reach these young readers. Ford Motor Co., Microsoft Corp., Samsung Electronics Co., and...
The Effects of Federal Unionism
According to figures recently released by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, federal workers receive on average about double what private sector workers make: $106,579 vs. $53,289. These numbers are based on pensation. A study done by the Cato Institute (PDF here of 2004 figures), under the direction of Chris Edwards, shows that for 2005, “If you consider wages without benefits, the average federal civilian worker earned $71,114, 62 percent more than the average private-sector worker, who made $43,917.” In...
GM Bacteria and Malaria
“Scientists have discovered a way to help stop the spread of malaria by genetically altering a bacterium that infects about 80 percent of the world’s insects. Malaria is primarily transmitted through mosquito bites and kills more than a million people every year.” Source: “Genetically Altered Bacteria Could Block Malaria Transmission,” by Lisa Pickoff-White, The National Academies, Science in the Headlines, August 2, 2006. HT: Zondervan “To the Point” For more on the fight against malaria, visit Acton’s Impact campaign page....
Our Changing Environmental Perspective
Seth Godin, a marketing guru, passes along this nugget: One mistake marketers make is a little like the goldfish that never notices the water in his tank. Our environment is changing. Always. Incrementally. Too slowly to notice, sometimes. But it changes. What we care about and talk about and react to changes every day. Starbucks couldn’t have launched in 1970. We weren’t ready. Of course, sometimes the reason that our perspective on an issue changes is because the thing itself...
The Cash Cow
CRC has made two good articles available recently (these are Adobe .pdf linked documents) that dispell the myth that large corporations are conservative monoliths supporting anti-environment causes. The first is Funding Liberalism with Blue-Chip Profits; Fortune 100 Foundations Back Leftists Causes. The other is called The Price of Doing Business: Environmentalist Groups Toe Funders’ Lines. Both have page after page of data on the amounts that organizations like Earth Justice, Nature Conservancyਊnd Sierra Club are getting from big business and billion dollar...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved