Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What You Should Know About Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s Senate Hearings
Explainer: What You Should Know About Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s Senate Hearings
Jan 9, 2026 5:29 PM

What just happened?

On Tuesday, Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg gave testimony (though not officially under oath) before a joint hearing of the Senate Judiciary and Senate Commerce, Science, and mittees. On Wednesday, Zuckerberg testified at a second hearing before the House Energy and Commerce Committee. He was asked to appear before Congress to discuss such issues as data privacy and Russian use of his social network to meddle in the 2016 election.

Why is Facebook and Zuckerberg now under scrutiny?

Facebook has been at the center of recent data privacy scandals and concerns. The Senate hearings were particularly interested in learning about the connection between Facebook and Cambridge Analytica.

Last month theNew York Timesreported that British data analysis firm Cambridge Analytica had “harvested private information from the Facebook profiles of more than 50 million users without their permission.” As law professor Andrew Keane Woodsexplains,

The data that Cambridge Analytica obtained seems to e from Aleksandr Kogan, a researcher at Cambridge University who convinced hundreds of thousands of Facebook users to take a Facebook-linked personality quiz—thereby granting Kogan access, through Facebook’s developer platform, to a treasure trove of user data. Kogan then shared this information with Cambridge Analytica. . . .

Kogan was able to collect such data because Facebook offers a popular feature called Facebook Login, which lets people simply log in to a website or app using their Facebook account instead of creating new credentials. In 2015, developers who created apps that used Facebook Login were allowed—with Facebook’s permission—tocollect some information on the users network of friends. According to theTimes, Kogan was able to use the data gleaned from the friends’ profiles to match users to other records and build psychographic profiles.

Facebook had also reportedly been collecting call records and text-messaging data from Android devices. pany deniesit was collecting the data without permission, that it was an “opt-in” feature, that it “helps you find and stay connected with the people you care about, and provides you with a better experience across Facebook.” Still, the concerns have led the Federal Trade Commission to launch a nonpublic investigation into the Facebook’s privacy practices.

How did Zuckerberg say Facebook would address the Cambridge Analytica data breach?

Zuckerberg identified three steps pany would be taking:

1) Learning exactly what Cambridge Analytica did, and telling everyone affected.

2) Making sure no other app developers are misusing data and investigating every app that had access to a large amount of information in the past. If a developer is improperly using data, Facebook will ban them from their platform and notifiy everyone affected.

3) To prevent similar data breaches, Facebook will be making sure developers can’t access as much information.

Zuckerberg says that—as explained in the first line of Facebook’s Terms of Service—the user controls and owns the information and content they put on the platform.

How does Facebook deal with screening content?

Zuckerberg punted on specific cases and controversies involving content being removed or censored on his platform. But hesays by the end of 2018, Facebook will have more than 20,000 people working on security and content review so that when content gets flagged, they can determine if it violates their policies and, if necessary, take it down.

The long-term goal, said Zuckerberg, is to have such content review conducted by artificial intelligence. He notes that “99 percent of the ISIS and Al Qaida content that we take down on Facebook” is done by artificial intelligence systems before any human sees it. But such review for “hate speech” is difficult, he says, “because determining if something is hate speech is very linguistically nuanced.” He believes it will take between 5 to 10-years to have artificial intelligence tools that can “get into some of the nuances” of hate speech.

What is Facebook doing to prevent foreign actors from interfering in U.S. elections?

Zuckerberg said they are disallowing fake accounts on Facebook and deploying new artificial intelligence tools that “do a better job of identifying fake accounts that may be trying to interfere in elections or spread misinformation.”

Is Zuckerberg opposed to new regulations to address the data privacy problems?

Not really. When asked, he said, “I think that there are a few categories of legislation that—that make sense to consider. Around privacy specifically, there are a few principles that I think it would be useful to—to discuss and potentially codified into law.” He gave three examples: explain what you are doing with data, give plete control, and enable innovation

When asked if Facebook would “as pany, e regulation” Zuckerberg also said that “I think, if it’s the right regulation, then yes.”

Is Facebook involved with Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation into Russian election interference?

Yes, Zuckerberg confirmed that Facebook has been interviewed by and is “working with” the Special Counsel’s Office.

What other key points did Zuckerberg reveal during the hearing?

Some other highlights from the hearings:

• Zuckerberg says Facebook is “responsible for the content” on its platform.

• He also says he is mitted to making sure that Facebook is a platform for all ideas” but when asked was unable to define what pany would prohibit under the rubric of “hate speech.”

• When asked if pany was a monopoly, he said, “It certainly doesn’t feel like that to me,”

What did we not learn from the hearing?

There are dozens of issues that Zuckerberg said he’s check with his team about and provide answers to the Senators. The Senate members can also submit follow-up written questions that will be entered into the record.

Senator Kamala Harris, for example, told Zuckerberg there are “several critical questions for which you don’t have answers,” adding, ““Those questions have included whether Facebook can track a user’s browsing activity even after the user has logged off of Facebook. Whether Facebook can track your activity across devices even when you are not logged into Facebook. Who is Facebook’s petition? Whether Facebook may store up to 96 categories of users’ information. Whether you knew [about Cambridge Analytica researcher Aleksandr] Kogan’s terms of service and whether you knew if Kogan could sell or transfer data.”

Image Source: (CC) Brian andbub.blicio.us

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Heritage Guide to the Constitution
Our friends at the Heritage Foundation have created an invaluable online tool for learning about the U.S. Constitution: The Heritage Guide to the Constitution is intended to provide a brief and accurate explanation of each clause of the Constitution as envisioned by the Framers and as applied in contemporary law. Its particular aim is to provide lawmakers with a means to defend their role and to fulfill their responsibilities in our constitutional order. Yet while the Guide will provide a...
The Next Civil Rights Movement
During last year’s Acton University—have you signed up for this year yet?—Nelson Kloosterman gave a lecture on the subject of school choice and private education. In the latest issue of Comment magazine, Kloosterman expands on his claim that parental choice is “the next civil rights movement“: Let me begin with some ments designed to set up the discussion that follows. First, and most importantly, I believe that the fundamental issue in this matter involves parental choice, even though the far...
Jacoby, D’Souza debate Religion in the Public Square
Susan Jacoby and Dinesh D’Souza met here in Grand Rapids at Fountain Street Church on Thursday, April 26, to debate the merits of religion in public discourse. The debate, co-sponsored by The Intercollegiate Studies Institute and the Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies, was titled, “Is Christianity Good for American Politics?” Susan Jacoby is program director at The Center for Inquiry and author of The Age of American Unreason and Alger Hiss and The Battle for History. She argued for the...
Why Religious Liberty Is Important for Institutions
Is religious liberty only for individuals or also for institutions? As Ryan Messmore explains, America’s founders thought that the Constitution’s “first freedom” is for both: True liberty must take account of the relational aspect of human nature. And truereligious liberty, in particular, must entail the freedom to exercise one’s faith in the various relationships and joint activities of day-to-day life. In other words, religious freedom applies to participation in institutions. Each one of those institutions—our particular school, church, workplace, etc.—takes...
Writing Tips for Your On Call in Culture Blog Entry
“Think, Think, Think” –Pooh It’s always hard to sit down and write. There are a million distractions that tempt us away from the keyboard or notepad and entangle us in the details of life. Not that these details are bad. In fact, as munity focused on being On Call in Culture, many of those details are the whole purpose. But before you get out there and answer the calling that God has put on your life as a dentist, professor,...
Are Young Millennials Less Religious or Simply Young?
Joe Carter recently posted a summary of a new studyconducted jointly by Public Religion Research Institute and Georgetown University’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs that shows that college-aged Millennials (18-24 year olds) “report significant levels of movement from the religious affiliation of their childhood, mostly toward identifying as religiously unaffiliated.” He also noted the tendency of college-aged Millennials to be more politically liberal. Just yesterday, the same study was highlighted by Robert Jones of the Washington Post,...
What Christian Education Is Not
“Each generation needs to re-own the rationale for Christian education,” says philosopher James K.A. Smith, “to ask ourselves ‘Why did we do this?’ and ‘Should we keep doing this?’” In answering such questions, Smith notes, “it might be helpful to point out what Christian education is not”: First, Christian education is not meant to be merely “safe” education. The impetus for Christian schooling is not a protectionist concern, driven by fear, to sequester children from the big, bad world. Christian...
Video: Chuck Colson speaks at the Abraham Kuyper & Leo XIII Conference
On October 31, 1998, Charles Colson came to Calvin College in Grand Rapids, Michigan to deliver the closing address at Acton’s “The Legacy of Abraham Kuyper & Leo XIII” conference, sponsored jointly with Calvin Seminary. “This is a momentous time for the Church as we reflect on two thousand years since the birth of Christ, and as we approach the millenium. And the question, I suspect, that all of us are asking and that the Church should be asking across...
Fair Trade or Free Trade?
Is ‘fair trade’ more fair or more just than free trade? While free trade has been increasingly maligned, The Fair Trade movement has e increasingly popular over the last several years. Many see this movement as a way to help people in the developing world and as a more just alternative to free trade. On the other hand, others argue that fair trade creates an unfair advantage that tends to harm the poor. Dr. Victor Claar addresses this question in...
Was Thomas More a proto-communist?
In Utopia, many modern intellectuals say Sir Thomas More advocates an ideal political and social order without private petition, citizens quarreling over worldly possessions, poverty and other “evils” supposedly brought on by a market-based society. At least that is the way social liberals, including left-leaning Christians, tend to interpret this great saint’s 1516 literary masterpiece, believing the English Catholic statesman’s work presents his vision of an ideal monwealth modeled on the early Church (even ifthose munist experiments failed). Recently, Istituto...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved