Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What is the Queen’s Speech and the opening of Parliament?
Explainer: What is the Queen’s Speech and the opening of Parliament?
Jan 20, 2026 11:40 PM

This morning, Queen Elizabeth II opened a new session of the UK Parliament by delivering her 64th “Queen’s Speech.” This event, which contains ceremonial elements dating back centuries, lays out the government’s vision for the ing legislative session. The 2017 Queen’s Speech focused primarily on Brexit and enhancing trade with the rest of the world, as well as terrorism, the Paris climate agreement, and NHS funding. This year’s speech differed from previous years in a number of ways, notably its delayed scheduling, its reduced ceremonial pomp, and the fact that it will usher in a two-year-long session of Parliament.

What is the Queen’s Speech?

The Queen’s Speech is the formal beginning of Parliament. This event involves all three constituent elements of Parliament: The Sovereign (King or Queen), the House of Lords, and the House of Commons; members of the judiciary and the Church of England, as well as invited guests, are also traditionally present. From a throne in the House of Lords, the queen reads a speech written by the government that details its legislative agenda for Parliament in the ing year or session.

What are the ceremonial elements associated with a typical Queen’s Speech?

The Sovereign usually rides in a horse-drawn carriage, escorted by the Household Cavalry, approximately one mile from Buckingham Palace to Parliament in Westminster. Wearing the crown and the Robe of State, with its long, dark red velvet train, she leads a procession to take her place at a throne in the House of Lords. At that time a senior official in the House of Lords, known as the Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod (usually shortened to “Black Rod”), walks to the House of Commons to summon the lower chamber to the speech. Lieutenant General David Leakey has served as Black Rod since 2010; the office was instituted in 1350.

When he arrives, the door is slammed in his face – a tradition dating back to the English Civil War, symbolizing Parliament’s independence from the monarchy. Black Rod then raps upon the door three times, the doors are opened and MPs, led by the prime minister and the shadow cabinet, process to the House of Lords.

The Lord Chancellor keeps possession of the speech until he hands it to the Sovereign. Until recently, the text was inscribed on vellum, an exquisite parchment made from calf’s skin, but is now written on goatskin parchment (which contains no actual goatskin). The queen returns it to him after it has been read. Following the speech, both houses of Parliament meet and draft an “Address in Reply to Her Majesty’s Gracious Speech.”

Queen Elizabeth II has only failed to deliver the speech in person twice, in 1959 and 1963, due to pregnancy. In each case, the Lord Chancellor read it in her place.

How was the 2017 Queen’s Speech different from previous years?

The 2017 Queen’s Speech stood out parison with prior years in three ways:

The prime minister delayed the speech by two days. PM Theresa May moved the Queen’s Speech, originally scheduled for Monday, to this morning reflecting uncertainty that her Conservative Party would be able to strike a governing arrangement with Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). The Conservative Party lost its slim majority following the June 8 snap elections, and negotiations to hammer out a confidence and supply arrangement with the DUP haven dragged on longer than anticipated. Failure to secure a vote on the Queen’s Speech could have triggered a no confidence vote and another national election.The 2017 Queen’s Speech omitted traditional ceremonial elements. A number of accoutrements of royal pomp and circumstance were missing from this year’s speech. The queen arrived by car rather than by carriage. She made no royal procession to the House of Lords, and she wore a hat and “day dress” rather than her crown and Robe of State. Prince Philip, 96, was absent this year after being admitted to King Edward VIII Hospital due to an infection caused by a preexisting condition. The queen was instead panied by her son, Prince Charles.There will be no Queen’s Speech in 2018, as this year begins a rare two-year-long session of Parliament. The prime minister’s office announced last week that “Parliament will sit for two years, instead of the usual one, to give MPs enough time to fully consider the laws required to make Britain ready for Brexit.”This is only the third biennual Parliament since 1949. The last took place in 2010, as David Cameron’s Conservative Party struck an unsteady coalition government with the Liberal Democratic Party led by Nick Clegg. Critics say the term is designed to help May cling to power; Tory officials say the two-year Parliament was planned before the snap election was called.

What policies did Queen Elizabeth II announce in the 2017 Queen’s Speech?

The speech, which began at 11:30 a.m. London time, focused largely on Brexit. It featured Theresa May’s characteristic phrases, such as providing “stability” and securing “the best possible deal” from the European Union. Among the most significant policies contained in the 27 bills referenced were:

Brexit and EU regulation. Eight of the 27 bills mentioned this morning related to the UK’s exit from the European Union. Parliament will vote to repeal the 1972 European Communities Act, which cemented the UK’s membership in what became the EU. The queen also referred to the Great Repeal Bill, which will transpose the full body, or “acquis,” of EU regulations into UK law.

Future free trade deals, global development, and low taxes. The queen said, “My government will seek to maintain a deep and special partnership with European allies and to forge new trading relationships across the globe.” This echoes May’s vision of expanding free trade, especially with the developing world, since the UK will no longer have to impose high tariffs on imported agricultural goods. This may well merce and reduce poverty in underdeveloped nations. The speech promised to spend 0.7 percent of national e on international development to “project British values around the world,” while “keeping taxes low.”

Paris climate agreement. The queen vowed to “support international action against climate change, including the implementation of the Paris Agreement.” Critics say the agreement, which President Trump has opposed, will hamper Western economic growth while doing little to improve the environment.

Additional spending and minimum wage increases. The speech signaled May’s goal of generating “tax revenues needed to invest in the National Health Service.” The British Red Cross has accused the perpetually imperiled NHS of creating a “humanitarian crisis” through bination of long waits, overcrowding, and understaffed facilities. Increasing NHS funding is a top DUP demand. The Queen’s Speech also vowed to increase the UK’s national living wage, which the Institute of Economic Affairs warns will cost “thousands of jobs.” The queen promised action to “tackle the gender pay gap”; to fight discrimination based on “race, faith, gender, disability or sexual orientation”; and to eliminate “unfair” tenant fees.

Security and privacy reforms. In the wake of a wave of terrorist “incidents” sweeping the UK, the government has indicated it will crack down on online extremism. It also backs a Data Protection bill that secures greater online privacy, and provisions to allow greater flexibility in serving in the armed forces.

Does this speech put other issues off the table?

The Queen’s speech added, “Other measures will be laid before you.” The phrase is a hallmark of such orations, allowing the government to introduce additional policies not delineated in the speech. Among the issues most notably missing from the speech were:

Social care reform. The queen did not mention the more controversial aspects of the Conservative Party’s manifesto, such as the so-called “dementia tax,” ending universal “free” school lunches for the youngest school children, and means-testing home heating assistance. Tories blame May’s rollout of such policies for their electoral setback.

Immigration. The queen pledged to “establish new national policies on immigration”; however, the Tories’ pledge to reduce immigration to “tens of thousands” a year was conspicuously absent.

President Donald Trump’s visit and the U.S-UK special relationship. The Queen’s Speech made no mention of President Donald Trump making a state visit to the UK. There is a silver lining for the president, though: The queen promised to meet the mitment to spend at least two percent of GDP on defense, a measure he forcefully and publicly advocated during the G-7 and NATO summits last month.

Was there a religious element to her speech?

Queen Elizabeth II concluded her speech by saying, “I pray that the blessing of Almighty God may rest upon your counsels.”

You can read the full text of her speech here.

(Photo: Screenshot of the 2017 Queen’s Speech.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
How the ‘sheepskin effect’ signals education and affects wages
Note: This is post #56 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Why do wages in America differ greatly among workers? One reason, says economist Alex Tabarrok, includes differences in human capital—tools of the mind. Education is one of the biggest investments people make to increase their human capital. Which college majors offer the greatest returns? And are all returns on education due to human capital? In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Tabarrok explains how a college degree...
‘Communism is the increase of the search for the Kingdom of God and His righteousness!’
Following its 100th anniversary, Communism is experiencing a public relations boon, and it has just recruited its most significant Spokesman: Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Jesus (Who, one must assume, was not consulted on the sponsorship) is said to have been the first and most vociferous Scourge of free enterprise and Advocate of socialist economics. This is precisely the argument made in France by Falk Van Gaver in his new bookChristianity vs. Capitalism: The Economy According to Jesus Christ.Perhaps Van Gaver’s...
3 reasons to study the Russian Revolution today, according to Dutch lovers of liberty
The Bolshevik Revolution was one of the epochal events of modern history, continuing to affect the world in which we live 28 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Modern governments and systems of economics were created in imitation, or opposition, of its fundamental tenets. Too much of the memoration of its centenary last week consisted of celebration by its intellectual heirs. However, lovers of liberty across the transatlantic sphere also paused to reflect upon the occasion. On October...
What does the Bible say about wealth creation?
What does the Bible say about wealth creation? Can wealth creation lead to Biblical human flourishing? Earlier this year two evangelical groups, theLausanne MovementandBAM Global, released apaper exploringbiblical perspectives on the theme of ‘wealth creation for holistic transformation’ to address these questions and more. The paper begins by considering the meaning of the terms ‘wealth’ and ‘holistic transformation.’ First, they discuss the concept of wealth: Biblically speaking, wealth is a concept embodying strength, power, riches, and substance. Sometimes ‘riches’ and...
5 Facts about veterans
Today is Veterans Day, a U.S. public holiday set aside to thank and honor all those who served honorably in the armed forces both in wartime or peacetime. Here are five facts you should know about veterans in the United States: 1. The Veteran’s Administration estimates there are currently 19,998,799 living veterans (18,115,951 men and 1,882,848 women). Out of that number, 8,876,728 served in the Army, 4,264,809 served in the Navy, 3,476,021 served in the Air Force, 2,213,601 served in...
Today: Debate between R. R. Reno and Rev. Sirico on free markets
Conservative Christians are ing increasingly enticed by the idea of socialism. As many people with good intentions are beginning to consider socialism as a beneficial alternative to capitalism, supporters of the free market would beg to differ. Recently the editor of “First Things”, Rusty Reno, voiced his concerns with capitalism in his essay on Michael Novak’s The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism. Reno criticizes Novak’s view of capitalism and proposes a reexamination of socialism. President and co-founder of the Acton Institute,...
Do occupational licensing laws respect human rights?
“Occupational licensing laws harm workers, as well as consumers who purchase services from professionals that require licensure,” says Tyler Bonin in this week’s Acton Commentary. “This harm is disproportionately placed on economically disadvantaged populations. Thus, when examining the effects of excessive occupational licensing in the U.S., it es apparent that these laws present an undue burden on one’s right to livelihood.” In the U.S., the number of occupations requiring licensure from state governments rose by nearly 25 percent between the...
The Paradise Papers: A moral assessment of tax havens from Richard Teather
To hear politicians across the Atlantic tell it, the dark specter of Paradise is haunting the world. The Paradise Papers reveal precisely how wealthy individuals and corporations – including the Queen of England, U2’ssainted front man Bono, the less-than-saintly Madonna, and scores of others – have used offshore tax havens to limit their tax liability. The papers, which were illegally obtained from Appleby law firm and released by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, include 13.4 million files dating from...
The Russian Revolution’s rebellion against spirit and man
As we reflect on the impact of the Russian Revolution on its 100th anniversary, we’re bound to hear routine admiration of its goals and ideals, even among those who duly recognize the violence and oppression that followed. It’s mon refrain, whether made by college professors or garden-variety Bernie Sanders activists: Socialism has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and not tried. Indeed, even those who oppose such a system are plicit in this sort of...
Rev. Sirico and R.R. Reno debate the merits of free markets
Should Christians rethink the merits of free markets? Last night The King’s College hosted a debate on that question between First Things editor R.R. Reno and Acton Institute president and co-founder Rev. Robert Sirico. In his opening statement, Reno admits that free markets have done a great deal to promote human flourishing, but says that “markets are human, and like all things human in our fallen world, markets can also impede human flourishing.” Reno claims this is especially true today...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved