Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What is Common Core?
Explainer: What is Common Core?
Jan 13, 2026 3:02 AM

What is Common Core?

The Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led effort that established a single set of educational standards for kindergarten through 12th grade in English language arts and mathematics.

What do the educational standards entail?

Common Core is intended to cover fewer topics in greater depth at each grade level. In English language arts, the Common Core State Standards require certain content for all students, including: Classic myths and stories from around the world; America’s Founding Documents; Foundational American literature: and Shakespeare. The remaining decisions about what content should be taught are left to state and local determination. In addition to content coverage, the Common Core State Standards require that students systematically acquire knowledge in literature and other disciplines through reading, writing, speaking, and listening.

In Mathematics, the Common Core State Standards lay a solid foundation in: whole numbers; addition; subtraction; multiplication; division; fractions; and decimals. The middle school and high school standards call on students to practice applying mathematical ways of thinking to real world issues and challenges in an attempt to prepare students to think and reason mathematically.

Did the federal government implement Common Core?

No, the program is not being implemented by the federal government — though the Obama administration has had some influence over the program. Common Core is an initiative driven by state governors and missioners, through their representative organizations, the National Governors Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). However, President Obama is a strong supporter and the federal government poured $438 million of economic stimulus funding into developing standardized tests aligned to the Common Core. Additionally, the federal government strongly encouraged states to adopt “college- and career-ready standards” in petitive grant program Race to the Top and through No Child Left Behind, which outlines consequences for schools that do not meet goals.

Have all the states adopted Common Core?

The English and math standards were voluntarily adopted by 45 states and the District of Columbia. Minnesota adopted only the English standards. Alaska, Nebraska, Texas, and Virginia have chosen not to adopt the standards.

If the states chose to adopt the Common Core, why are so many people shocked that it is being implemented?

In most of the states in which it was adopted, the approval by the state legislators was not required to adopt Common Core. (Idaho, Kentucky, Maine, and Washington were the only states where the Common Core required direct approval from legislators.) In most states, boards of education parable state agencies or the chief education officer for the state approved the Common Core. Because this process was not public, many parents and teachers are only now learning it has been adopted in their state.

Do private and parochial schools have to adopt Common Core?

Private and parochial schools do not have to adopt the standards, though many schools are voluntarily doing so. For example, approximately 100 out of 195 Catholic dioceses throughout the U.S. have embraced the new Common Core State Standards.

What are the reasons people support Common Core?

Four primary claims are frequently cited in support of Common Core:

1. Improves standards for learning – Supporters claim, “Common Core offers American students the opportunity for a far more rigorous, content-rich, cohesive K–12 education than most of them have had.”

2. Promotes consistent standards – Supporters claim the standards provide “clarity and consistency in what is expected of student learning across the country.”

3. The standards internationally benchmarked – Supporters claim the standards are informed by other top performing countries, so that all students are prepared to succeed in our global economy and society.

4. The standards ensure students develop the skills and knowledge needed to graduate college- and career-ready – Supporters claim the standards will force teachers to “design lessons that address the particular academic needs of their students rather than relying on textbooks or scripted, pre-packaged, lessons.”

What are the main objections to Common Core?

Four primary objections are frequently cited in opposition to Common Core:

1. The standards are academically deficient – As Anthony Esolen says, “[Common Core] is a bag of rotten old ideas doused with disinfectant; its assumptions are hostile to classical and Christian approaches to education; it is starkly utilitarian; its self-promotion is sludged up with edu-lingo, thick with verbiage and thin in thought; its drafters have forgotten, if they ever knew, what it is to be a child.”

2. The standards will not fix the broken education system — Brookings Institute policy analyst Grover Whitehurst observes that high academic standards and high student achievement are not connected and that statistics show states with high academic standards score about the same on standardized assessments as states with low standards.

3. The method of implementing the standards is flawed and expensive — Randi Weingarten, president of the second-largest teachers’ union in America, opposes the Common Core because of the “high stakes attached” to its implementation. She argues that the Common Core will only be destructive since the government has done nothing to prepare teachers to successfully utilize the standards. Diane Ravitch, an education historian who has pushed for national standards for years, criticizes the government’s use of Race to the Top funding to coerce states into adopting the Common Core.

4. The federal government has overstepped its bounds — The Republican National Committee passed a resolution stating that “even though Federal Law prohibits the federalizing of curriculum, the Obama Administration accepted the [Common Core State Standards] plan and used 2009 Stimulus Bill money to reward the states that were mitted to the president’s CCSS agenda.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Coercing charity
This section from Reinhold Niebuhr’s Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics strikes me as quite true: The coercive factors, in distinction to the more purely moral and rational factors, in political relations can never be sharply differentiated and defined. It is not possible to estimate exactly how much a party to a social conflict is influenced by a rational argument or by the threat of force. It is impossible, for instance, to know what proportion...
Anthony Bradley discusses Duke lacrosse on Fox
Anthony Bradley, a research fellow at the Acton Institute, was interviewed on “Heartland with John Kasich” on Fox News last Saturday. He was talking about the need for a “hero to emerge” from the Duke lacrosse team in the wake of a sexual assault scandal. Bradley emphasizes the need for moral leadership in the United States as a whole and why we should discourage markets from promoting the dehumanization of women. Bradley earned quite a bit of attention after writing...
Economic turmoil in Zimbabwe
Where in the world would you pay $145,750 for a roll of toilet paper? According to an article in the New York Times, inflation in Zimbabwe is soaring higher than ever — about 900 percent since President Mugabe began seizing land from wealthy landowners in 2000. And inflation is climbing at unparalleled rates. What problems result from such rampant inflation? If inflation is climbing daily and you have $100 one day, it might be worth only $90 the next. People...
Spelling relief II
Jordan pretty well covered the territory in his earlier post on gas prices. But with the silliness from both Republicans and Democrats ongoing, it can’t hurt to suggest two additional sensible treatments of the subject: Thomas Nugent on National Review Online, and Jerry Taylor of the Cato Institute on Fox News. ...
Acton scholars on the immigration debate
Two Acton scholars, Andrew Yuengert and Fr. Paul Hartmann, were interviewed on “The World Over” (EWTN Studios) last Friday, April 28, about the Catholic response to immigration rights. Yuengert, author of the Acton monograph “Inhabiting the Land,” emphasizes the dignity of the human person as a foundation for looking at the issues surrounding immigration. Yuengert says that the “right to migrate” is not an absolute right, but to prevent people from assisting immigrants in need is immoral. e because they...
Religious liberty in Japan
For the past several decades in the United States many parents have gravitated toward one extreme or the other in terms of allowing religion in public schools. It is generally understood these days that our public school system is not a religious organization, and should not promote one religion as a state religion, over others. Of course, this does not mean that morality or other ideas that call on the revelation of religion cannot be taught, but we try to...
Ecobits
Two quick bits for your Tuesday: – Federal judges on green junkets at your expense? CRC says so! – Is “steady state ecological economics” the answer to environmental and economic woes? [also, a quick thanks to Jordan for inviting me to join the PowerBlog team.] Federal judges on green junkets at your expense? But the three organizations CRC singles out have an agenda that goes beyond education and is the equivalent of lobbying, Kendall contends. FREE, for example, describes itself...
Clear thinking on immigration
Andrew Yuengert, the author of Inhabiting the Land – The Case for the Right to Migrate, the Acton study on immigration, looks at the current debate and debunks mon misconceptions. “The biggest burdens from immigration are not economic – they are the turmoil caused by the large numbers of illegal immigrants,” Yuengert writes. Read mentary here. ...
Faith-based funding politicizes religion
Rev. Robert A. Sirico looks at the Bush Faith-Based Initiative following the departure of Jim Towey, who headed the office. “I would far rather see a president rally people to give more to charity than rally voters to support government programs that go to religious organizations, and to create incentives and lessen penalties when they do give,” Rev. Sirico writes. Read Rev. mentary here. ...
Religion, economics, and the zoo
Ota Benga Sometimes the spirit of an age prevails with such force that it moves the highest pinnacles of cultural influence to support the grossest indignities. Consider the early 1900s. During this time, the prevailing zeitgeist of Darwinism gave rise to the tragic dehumanization of a Pygmy named Ota Benga. What follows are a few salient points from Cynthia Crossen’s story as published in The Wall Street Journal’s Déjà vu column “How Pygmy Ota Benga Ended Up in Bronx Zoo...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved